No child left behind: estimating the impact on choices and student outcomes
Several recent education reform measures, including the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), couple school choice with accountability measures to allow parents of children in under-performing schools the opportunity to choose higher-performing schools. We use the introduction of NCLB in the Char...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge, Mass.
National Bureau of Economic Research
2007
|
Schriftenreihe: | Working paper series / National Bureau of Economic Research
13009 |
Online-Zugang: | kostenfrei |
Zusammenfassung: | Several recent education reform measures, including the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), couple school choice with accountability measures to allow parents of children in under-performing schools the opportunity to choose higher-performing schools. We use the introduction of NCLB in the Charlotte-Mecklenburg School District to determine if the choice component had an impact on the schools parents chose and if those changed choices led to academic gains. We find that 16% of parents responded to NCLB notification by choosing schools that had on average 1 standard deviation higher average test scores than their current NCLB school. We then use the lottery assignment of students to chosen schools to test if changed choices led to improved academic outcomes. On average, lottery winners experience a significant decline in suspension rates relative to lottery losers. We also find that students winning lotteries to attend substantially better (above-median) schools experience significant gains in test scores. Because proximity to high-scoring schools drives both the probability of choosing an alternative school and the average test score at the school chosen, our results suggest that the availability of proximate and high-scoring schools is an important factor in determining the degree to which school choice and accountability programs can succeed at increasing choice and immediate academic outcomes for students at under-performing schools. |
Beschreibung: | 39 S. graph. Darst. 22 cm |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zcb4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV023592922 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20080327000000.0 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 070607s2007 xxud||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)255601978 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)GBV527897663 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
044 | |a xxu |c XD-US | ||
049 | |a DE-521 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Hastings, Justine S. |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)131528653 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a No child left behind |b estimating the impact on choices and student outcomes |c Justine S. Hastings ; Jeffrey M. Weinstein |
264 | 1 | |a Cambridge, Mass. |b National Bureau of Economic Research |c 2007 | |
300 | |a 39 S. |b graph. Darst. |c 22 cm | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a Working paper series / National Bureau of Economic Research |v 13009 | |
520 | 8 | |a Several recent education reform measures, including the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), couple school choice with accountability measures to allow parents of children in under-performing schools the opportunity to choose higher-performing schools. We use the introduction of NCLB in the Charlotte-Mecklenburg School District to determine if the choice component had an impact on the schools parents chose and if those changed choices led to academic gains. We find that 16% of parents responded to NCLB notification by choosing schools that had on average 1 standard deviation higher average test scores than their current NCLB school. We then use the lottery assignment of students to chosen schools to test if changed choices led to improved academic outcomes. On average, lottery winners experience a significant decline in suspension rates relative to lottery losers. We also find that students winning lotteries to attend substantially better (above-median) schools experience significant gains in test scores. Because proximity to high-scoring schools drives both the probability of choosing an alternative school and the average test score at the school chosen, our results suggest that the availability of proximate and high-scoring schools is an important factor in determining the degree to which school choice and accountability programs can succeed at increasing choice and immediate academic outcomes for students at under-performing schools. | |
700 | 1 | |a Weinstein, Jeffrey |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)131528661 |4 aut | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |
810 | 2 | |a National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.> |t NBER working paper series |v 13009 |w (DE-604)BV002801238 |9 13009 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://papers.nber.org/papers/w13009.pdf |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016908252 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804138251905138688 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Hastings, Justine S. Weinstein, Jeffrey |
author_GND | (DE-588)131528653 (DE-588)131528661 |
author_facet | Hastings, Justine S. Weinstein, Jeffrey |
author_role | aut aut |
author_sort | Hastings, Justine S. |
author_variant | j s h js jsh j w jw |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV023592922 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)255601978 (DE-599)GBV527897663 |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02704nam a2200325zcb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV023592922</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20080327000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070607s2007 xxud||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)255601978</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBV527897663</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">XD-US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hastings, Justine S.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)131528653</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">No child left behind</subfield><subfield code="b">estimating the impact on choices and student outcomes</subfield><subfield code="c">Justine S. Hastings ; Jeffrey M. Weinstein</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge, Mass.</subfield><subfield code="b">National Bureau of Economic Research</subfield><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">39 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">graph. Darst.</subfield><subfield code="c">22 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Working paper series / National Bureau of Economic Research</subfield><subfield code="v">13009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Several recent education reform measures, including the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), couple school choice with accountability measures to allow parents of children in under-performing schools the opportunity to choose higher-performing schools. We use the introduction of NCLB in the Charlotte-Mecklenburg School District to determine if the choice component had an impact on the schools parents chose and if those changed choices led to academic gains. We find that 16% of parents responded to NCLB notification by choosing schools that had on average 1 standard deviation higher average test scores than their current NCLB school. We then use the lottery assignment of students to chosen schools to test if changed choices led to improved academic outcomes. On average, lottery winners experience a significant decline in suspension rates relative to lottery losers. We also find that students winning lotteries to attend substantially better (above-median) schools experience significant gains in test scores. Because proximity to high-scoring schools drives both the probability of choosing an alternative school and the average test score at the school chosen, our results suggest that the availability of proximate and high-scoring schools is an important factor in determining the degree to which school choice and accountability programs can succeed at increasing choice and immediate academic outcomes for students at under-performing schools.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Weinstein, Jeffrey</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)131528661</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="810" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.></subfield><subfield code="t">NBER working paper series</subfield><subfield code="v">13009</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV002801238</subfield><subfield code="9">13009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://papers.nber.org/papers/w13009.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016908252</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV023592922 |
illustrated | Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-02T22:41:31Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T21:25:14Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016908252 |
oclc_num | 255601978 |
open_access_boolean | 1 |
owner | DE-521 |
owner_facet | DE-521 |
physical | 39 S. graph. Darst. 22 cm |
publishDate | 2007 |
publishDateSearch | 2007 |
publishDateSort | 2007 |
publisher | National Bureau of Economic Research |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Working paper series / National Bureau of Economic Research |
spelling | Hastings, Justine S. Verfasser (DE-588)131528653 aut No child left behind estimating the impact on choices and student outcomes Justine S. Hastings ; Jeffrey M. Weinstein Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2007 39 S. graph. Darst. 22 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Working paper series / National Bureau of Economic Research 13009 Several recent education reform measures, including the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), couple school choice with accountability measures to allow parents of children in under-performing schools the opportunity to choose higher-performing schools. We use the introduction of NCLB in the Charlotte-Mecklenburg School District to determine if the choice component had an impact on the schools parents chose and if those changed choices led to academic gains. We find that 16% of parents responded to NCLB notification by choosing schools that had on average 1 standard deviation higher average test scores than their current NCLB school. We then use the lottery assignment of students to chosen schools to test if changed choices led to improved academic outcomes. On average, lottery winners experience a significant decline in suspension rates relative to lottery losers. We also find that students winning lotteries to attend substantially better (above-median) schools experience significant gains in test scores. Because proximity to high-scoring schools drives both the probability of choosing an alternative school and the average test score at the school chosen, our results suggest that the availability of proximate and high-scoring schools is an important factor in determining the degree to which school choice and accountability programs can succeed at increasing choice and immediate academic outcomes for students at under-performing schools. Weinstein, Jeffrey Verfasser (DE-588)131528661 aut Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.> NBER working paper series 13009 (DE-604)BV002801238 13009 http://papers.nber.org/papers/w13009.pdf kostenfrei Volltext |
spellingShingle | Hastings, Justine S. Weinstein, Jeffrey No child left behind estimating the impact on choices and student outcomes |
title | No child left behind estimating the impact on choices and student outcomes |
title_auth | No child left behind estimating the impact on choices and student outcomes |
title_exact_search | No child left behind estimating the impact on choices and student outcomes |
title_exact_search_txtP | No child left behind estimating the impact on choices and student outcomes |
title_full | No child left behind estimating the impact on choices and student outcomes Justine S. Hastings ; Jeffrey M. Weinstein |
title_fullStr | No child left behind estimating the impact on choices and student outcomes Justine S. Hastings ; Jeffrey M. Weinstein |
title_full_unstemmed | No child left behind estimating the impact on choices and student outcomes Justine S. Hastings ; Jeffrey M. Weinstein |
title_short | No child left behind |
title_sort | no child left behind estimating the impact on choices and student outcomes |
title_sub | estimating the impact on choices and student outcomes |
url | http://papers.nber.org/papers/w13009.pdf |
volume_link | (DE-604)BV002801238 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hastingsjustines nochildleftbehindestimatingtheimpactonchoicesandstudentoutcomes AT weinsteinjeffrey nochildleftbehindestimatingtheimpactonchoicesandstudentoutcomes |