The 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements: commentary and documents
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge [u.a.]
Cambridge Univ. Press
2008
|
| Ausgabe: | 1. publ. |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | XV, 319 S. |
| ISBN: | 9780521878661 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a22000008c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV023326113 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20091217 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 080603s2008 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780521878661 |9 978-0-521-87866-1 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)173749300 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ277461545 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 045 | |a 011495968 | ||
| 049 | |a DE-19 |a DE-M382 |a DE-355 |a DE-703 |a DE-739 |a DE-12 |a DE-11 |a DE-188 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a K7625 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 341.5/22 |2 22 | |
| 084 | |a PT 317 |0 (DE-625)139854: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a PT 340 |0 (DE-625)139872: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Brand, Ronald A. |d 1952- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)139805303 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements |b commentary and documents |c Ronald A. Brand ; Paul Herrup |
| 246 | 1 | 3 | |a The two thousand and five Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements |
| 250 | |a 1. publ. | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge [u.a.] |b Cambridge Univ. Press |c 2008 | |
| 300 | |a XV, 319 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 630 | 0 | 4 | |a Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements |d (2005) |
| 630 | 0 | 7 | |a Haager Übereinkommen über Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen |f 2005 Juni 30 |0 (DE-588)7541149-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 7 | |a Arbitrage (droit international privé) |2 ram | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Droit international privé |2 ram | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Juridiction |2 ram | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Arbitration agreements, Commercial | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Arbitration and award, International | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Conflict of laws |x Jurisdiction | |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4136710-8 |a Kommentar |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Haager Übereinkommen über Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen |f 2005 Juni 30 |0 (DE-588)7541149-0 |D u |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Herrup, Paul |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)139805311 |4 aut | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m SWB Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016510125&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016510125 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804137667266347008 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | CONTENTS PREFACE PAGE XV PART I: A BASIC INTRODUCTION TO THE 2005 HAGUE
CHOICE OF COURT CONVENTION 1 THE CONTEXT AND HISTORY OF THE HAGUE
NEGOTIATIONS 3 I. INTRODUCTION 3 II. THE CONTEXT OF THE HAGUE
NEGOTIATIONS 3 III. THE HISTORY OF THE HAGUE NEGOTIATIONS 5 A. THE
PRE-EXISTING INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR A NEW CONVENTION 5 B. THE
NEGOTIATIONS 6 2 THE CONVENTION STRUCTURE AND CONTENT 11 I. INTRODUCTION
11 II. THE THREE BASIC RULES 11 A. ARTICLE 5: THE CHOSEN COURT SHALL
HAVE JURISDICTION 11 B. ARTICLE 6: COURTS NOT CHOSEN SHALL SUSPEND OR
DISMISS THE CASE 12 C. ARTICLE 8: A JUDGMENT GIVEN ON JURISDICTION BASED
ON AN EXCLUSIVE CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENT SHALL BE RECOGNIZED AND
ENFORCED 13 D. THE OPTIONAL FOURTH RULE: RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF
JUDGMENTS BASED ON NON-EXCLUSIVE CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENTS 15 III.
CONVENTION SCOPE 15 A. THE THREE BASIC LIMITATIONS 15 1. THE
INTERNATIONAL CASE LIMITATION 15 2. THE EXCLUSIVE CHOICE OF COURT
AGREEMENT LIMITATION 16 3. THE CIVIL OR COMMERCIAL MATTERS LIMITATION 17
B. ARTICLE 2 EXCLUSIONS FROM SCOPE 18 C. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE ARTICLE 2
EXCLUSIONS 18 IV. SPECIFIC ADDITIONAL ISSUES 19 A. CONSENT AND VALIDITY
19 B. DAMAGES 21 C. SPECIAL MENTION FOR INSURANCE CONTRACTS 22 V.
CREATING A SENSE OF BALANCE: THE PROCESS OF NEGOTIATION AND THE FINAL
RESULT 22 A. ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF A CONSENSUS PROCESS 22 B.
TENSIONS, CHOICES, AND COMPROMISES 23 1. PARTY AUTONOMY AND STATE
INTEREST 23 2. SPECIFICITY AND FLEXIBILITY 24 3 INTERPRETATION AND USE
OF THE CONVENTION 26 I. INTERPRETATION OF THE CONVENTION 26 A.
INTRODUCTION 26 B. SOURCES ESTABLISHING CONSENSUS 27 1. THE TEXT 27 2.
THE PREAMBLE 27 3. EXTRA-TEXTUAL SOURCES OF CONSENSUS 29 A. THE
INTERPRETIVE REPORT 29 B. STATEMENTS IN THE PLENARY OF THE DIPLOMATIC
CONFERENCE 30 C. CONSENSUS FROM SOURCES OTHER THAN THE PLENARY SESSION
OF THE CONFERENCE 31 II. USE OF THE CONVENTION 32 A. TRANSACTIONAL
LAWYERS 33 B. LITIGATORS 34 C. JUDGES 35 D. AVOIDING THE HOMEWARD TREND
35 PART II: ARTICLE-BY-ARTICLE COMMENTARY ON THE CONVENTION 4 SCOPE AND
DEFINITIONS (ARTICLES 1-4) 39 I. GENERAL MATTERS 39 II. ARTICLE 1: THE
THREE BASIC ELEMENTS OF SCOPE 39 A. AN EXCLUSIVE CHOICE OF COURT
AGREEMENT 40 1. ARTICLE 3(A) AND (B): DEFINING EXCLUSIVE CHOICE OF COURT
AGREEMENTS 40 A. AN AGREEMENT 40 B. DESIGNATING A COURT OR COURTS 41 C.
TO THE EXCLUSION OF ANY OTHER COURTS 42 1) AGREEMENTS DEEMED TO BE
EXCLUSIVE 42 2) EXAMPLES 43 D. FOR THE PURPOSE OF DECIDING PARTICULAR
CLASSES OF DISPUTES 44 2. ARTICLE 3(C): OTHER ASPECTS OF EXCLUSIVE
CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENTS 45 A. REQUIREMENTS OF FORM 45 B. PARTIES TO
THE AGREEMENT 46 C. THE SEVERABILITY RULE 46 B. CONCLUDED IN CIVIL OR
COMMERCIAL MATTERS 47 C. IN INTERNATIONAL CASES 49 1. CASE 49 2.
INTERNATIONAL 50 A. INTERNATIONAL FOR PURPOSES OF JURISDICTION
(ARTICLE 1(2)) 50 1) THE NOT INTERNATIONAL TEST 50 2) THE IMPORTANCE
OF NATIONAL LAW 50 3) THE TIME AT WHICH INTERNATIONAL STATUS IS
DETERMINED 51 4) APPLICATION IN NON-UNIFIED LEGAL SYSTEMS 52 5)
CONSEQUENCES OF A CASE THAT IS NOT INTERNATIONAL 52 B. INTERNATIONAL
FOR PURPOSES OF RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT (ARTICLE 1(3)) 53 1) GENERAL
ISSUES 53 2) DEFINING JUDGMENT (ARTICLE 4(1)) 54 D. A GENERAL
OBSERVATION 54 III. ARTICLE 2: EXCLUSIONS FROM SCOPE 54 A. ARTICLE 2(1):
EXCLUSIONS FOR PROTECTIVE PURPOSES BASED ON THE TYPE OF AGREEMENT 55 B.
ARTICLE 2(2): EXCLUSIONS BASED ON SUBJECT MATTER 56 1. GENERAL ISSUES 56
2. FAMILY AND DOMESTIC LAW MATTERS 58 A. STATUS AND LEGAL CAPACITY OF
NATURAL PERSONS 58 B. MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS 58 C. OTHER FAMILY LAW
MATTERS 59 D. WILLS AND SUCCESSION 59 3. BANKRUPTCY MATTERS 60 4.
TRANSPORTATION EXCLUSIONS 61 5. ANTITRUST MATTERS 62 6. LIABILITY FOR
NUCLEAR DAMAGE 63 7. CERTAIN TORT CLAIMS 63 8. RIGHTS IN RAN AND
TENANCIES OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY 65 9. CERTAIN INTERNAL MATTERS OF LEGAL
PERSONS 67 10. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MATTERS 67 A. GENERALLY 67 B.
VALIDITY OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS 68 C. INFRINGEMENT OF
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS 69 11. ENTRIES IN PUBLIC REGISTERS 70 IV.
CLARIFICATIONS TO, AMPLIFICATIONS OF, AND EXCEPTIONS TO EXCLUSIONS FROM
SCOPE IN CHAPTER I 71 A. PRELIMINARY MATTERS (ARTICLE 2(3)) 71 B.
ARBITRATION AND RELATED PROCEEDINGS (ARTICLE 2(4)) 73 C. STATES AS
PARTIES 74 1. STATES AS PARTIES TO CIVIL OR COMMERCIAL MATTERS (ARTICLE
2(5)) 74 2. STATES AS DEFENDANTS (ARTICLE 2(6)) 75 D. OTHER MATTERS 76
1. PROVISIONS IN OTHER CHAPTERS WHICH MAY AFFECT SCOPE 76 2. OTHER
LIMITATIONS ON THE EFFECT AND OPERATION OF THE CONVENTION 76 3. THE
MANDATORY NATURE OF THE CONVENTION 76 5 JURISDICTION (ARTICLES 5-7) 78
I. INTRODUCTION 78 II. EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURT 78 A.
ARTICLE 5(1): THE COURT CHOSEN SHALL HAVE JURISDICTION 78 1. THE BASIC
RULE 78 2. THE VALIDITY EXCEPTION 79 A. EXISTENCE OF AN AGREEMENT 79 B.
DETERMINING WHETHER THE AGREEMENT IS NULL AND VOID 79 C. THE
AUTONOMOUS CONVENTION CHOICE OF LAW RULE 80 3, THE RULE AGAINST
DECLINING JURISDICTION 82 4. INTERNAL RULES OF SUBJECT MATTER
JURISDICTION AND TRANSFER 84 B. ARTICLE 6: A COURT NOT CHOSEN SHALL NOT
EXERCISE JURISDICTION 87 1. THE BASIC RULE 87 2. THE EXCEPTIONS 89 A.
THE VALIDITY EXCEPTION 90 B. LACK OF CAPACITY 90 C. PUBLIC POLICY 91 D.
THE AGREEMENT CANNOT REASONABLY BE PERFORMED 94 E. THE CHOSEN COURT HAS
DECIDED NOT TO HEAR THE CASE 95 III. ARTICLE 7: AVOIDING INTERFERENCE
WITH INTERIM MEASURES OF PROTECTION 95 IV. FINAL COMMENTS ON THE
JURISDICTIONAL RULES AND INTERIM MEASURES 96 6 RECOGNITION AND
ENFORCEMENT (ARTICLES 8-15) 98 I. INTRODUCTION 98 II. ARTICLE 8(1): A
JUDGMENT SHALL BE RECOGNIZED AND ENFORCED 98 A. DEFINING RECOGNITION
AND ENFORCEMENT 98 B. THE THREE CONDITIONS OF ARTICLE 8(1) 99 C. THE
CONSEQUENCES OF MEETING THE THREE CONDITIONS 101 D. BASES FOR REFUSAL OF
RECOGNITION OR ENFORCEMENT 101 III. ARTICLE 8(2): PROHIBITIONS ON REVIEW
OF DECISIONS OF THE COURT OF ORIGIN 102 A. NO REVIEW ON IHE MERITS 102
B. BOUND BY THE FINDINGS OF FACT 103 1. THE GENERAL RULE 103 A. FINDINGS
OF FACT AND JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATIONS 103 B. FINDINGS OF FACT AND
SCOPE OF THE CONVENTION 104 C. SUMMARIZING THE EFFECT OF THE GENERAL
RULE 104 2. THE QUALIFICATION TO THE GENERAL RULE 105 3. THE CONVENTION
AND THE TRADITIONAL APPROACH TO REVIEW BY THE COURT ADDRESSED 105 IV.
ARTICLE 8(3): EFFECT AND ENFORCEABILITY IN THE ORIGINATING COURT 106 V.
ARTICLE 8(4): POSTPONEMENT OR REFUSAL OF RECOGNITION OR ENFORCEMENT 107
VI. ARTICLE 8(5): THE EFFECT OF INTERNAL TRANSFER RULES ON RECOGNITION
AND ENFORCEMENT 109 VII. ARTICLE 9: GROUNDS FOR DENIAL OF RECOGNITION OR
ENFORCEMENT 110 A. REVISITING THE QUESTION OF VALIDITY 111 B. PARTY
CAPACITY 111 C. LACK OF NOTICE TO THE DEFENDANT 112 1. DOCUMENTS COVERED
113 2. NOTICE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE DEFENDANT TO ARRANGE FOR HIS
DEFENSE 113 3. EFFECT IF DEFENDANT FAILS TO CHALLENGE NOTICE IN THE
COURT OF ORIGIN 114 4. PROTECTION OF STATE INTERESTS 115 5. IMPACT ON
ARTICLE 2(6) 116 D. EXTRINSIC FRAUD 116 E. PUBLIC POLICY AND FUNDAMENTAL
PRINCIPLES OF PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS 117 1. MANIFESTLY INCOMPATIBLE WITH
THE PUBLIC POLICY OF THE REQUESTED STATE 117 2. INCOMPATIBLE WITH
FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS 118 3. SUBSTANTIVE PUBLIC
POLICY 118 4. RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 9 119 5.
APPLICATION IN NON-UNIFIED LEGAL SYSTEMS 119 F. INCONSISTENT JUDGMENTS
FROM COURTS IN THE REQUESTED STATE 119 1. TIMING ISSUES 120 2.
INCONSISTENT JUDGMENTS BETWEEN THE SAME PARTIES 120 3. THE RELATIONSHIP
BETWEEN ARTICLE 9(F) AND ARTICLE 6 120 4. THE DISCRETIONARY NATURE OF
ARTICLE 9(F) 121 G. INCONSISTENT JUDGMENTS FROM OTHER COURTS 121 VIII.
ARTICLE 10: PRELIMINARY QUESTIONS 122 A. ARTICLE 10(1): NON-RECOGNITION
OF RULINGS ON PRELIMINARY QUESTIONS 123 B. ARTICLE 10(2):
NON-RECOGNITION OF JUDGMENTS BASED ON RULINGS ON PRELIMINARY QUESTIONS
123 C. ARTICLE 10(3): SPECIAL RULE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
RULINGS 124 D. ARTICLE 10(4): PRELIMINARY QUESTIONS IMPLICATING ARTICLE
21 DECLARATIONS 126 IX. ARTICLE 11: DISCRETIONARY NON-RECOGNITION OF
NON-COMPENSATORY DAMAGES 126 X. ARTICLE 12: JUDICIAL SETTLEMENTS IN
CIVIL LAW SYSTEMS 130 XI. ARTICLE 13: DOCUMENTS TO BE PRODUCED 132 A.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 133 B. ARTICLE 13(1): DOCUMENTS TO BE PRODUCED 133
C. ARTICLE 13(2): ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS THAT MIGHT BE REQUIRED 135 D.
ARTICLE 13(3): STANDARD FORM TO ACCOMPANY DOCUMENTS 135 E. ARTICLE
13(4): TRANSLATION REQUIREMENTS 135 XII. ARTICLE 14: PROCEDURE FOR
RECOGNITION 136 XIII. ARTICLE 15: SEVERABILITY 137 7 GENERAL CLAUSES
(ARTICLES 16-26) 139 I. INTRODUCTION 139 II. ARTICLE 16: TRANSITIONAL
PROVISIONS 139 A. ARTICLE 16(1): THE DATE OF CONCLUSION OF AN EXCLUSIVE
CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENT AND THE APPLICATION OF CHAPTER II RULES ON
JURISDICTION 140 1. GENERAL APPLICATION OF THE RULE 140 2. APPLICATION
OF THE RULE TO CASES INVOLVING CONVENTION DECLARATIONS 140 B. ARTICLE
16(2): THE DATE PROCEEDINGS ARE BROUGHT 141 C. TIMING AND THE SCOPE OF
REVIEW 142 III. ARTICLE 17: INSURANCE AND REINSURANCE CONTRACTS 142 IV.
ARTICLE 18: NO LEGALIZATION REQUIREMENTS 144 V. THE DECLARATION SYSTEM
145 A. DECLARATIONS IN GENERAL 145 B. ARTICLE 19: DECLARATIONS LIMITING
JURISDICTION 146 1. THE SUBSTANCE OF ARTICLE 19 146 2. THE POTENTIAL
ARTICLE 19 INTERPRETATION PROBLEM 148 C. ARTICLE 20: DECLARATIONS
LIMITING RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT 149 D. ARTICLE 21: DECLARATIONS TO
EXCLUDE SPECIFIC MATTERS FROM SCOPE ON A STATE-BY-STATE BASIS 150 1.
ARTICLE 21(1): MAKING THE DECLARATION 151 2. ARTICLE 21(2): RECIPROCAL
TREATMENT 152 E. ARTICLE 22: RECIPROCAL DECLARATIONS TO RECOGNIZE AND
ENFORCE JUDGMENTS BASED UPON NON-EXCLUSIVE CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENTS
153 1. THE GENERAL CONTOURS OF ARTICLE 22 DECLARATIONS 154 2. CONDITIONS
REQUIRED BY ARTICLE 22(2) 155 3. SPECIAL ISSUES 158 4. PLANNING FOR
ARTICLE 22 PRIOR TO ENTRY INTO FORCE 158 VI. ARTICLE 23: UNIFORM
INTERPRETATION 159 VII. ARTICLE 24: REVIEW OF OPERATION OF THE
CONVENTION 161 VIII. ARTICLE 25: NON-UNIFIED LEGAL SYSTEMS 161 A.
REFERENCES TO THE LAW OR PROCEDURE OF A STATE 162 B. REFERENCES TO
RESIDENCE IN A STATE 163 C. REFERENCES TO THE COURT OR COURTS OF A STATE
164 D. REFERENCES TO A CONNECTION WITH A STATE 164 E. THE INSULATION OF
INTERNAL LEGAL ORDERS FROM CONVENTION RULES 164 IX. ARTICLE 26:
RELATIONSHIP OF THE CONVENTION TO OTHER SETS OF RULES 165 A. GENERAL
CONCERNS 167 B. THE CONVENTION AND OTHER TREATIES 167 1. ARTICLE 26(1):
THE RULE OF COMPATIBLE INTERPRETATION 167 2. ARTICLE 26(2)-(5): PRIORITY
RULES IN THE EVENT OF AN INCONSISTENCY WITH ANOTHER TREATY 168 A.
ARTICLE 26(2): PRIORITY WHEN ALL PARTIES ARE RESIDENT IN STATES THAT ARE
PARTY TO THE OTHER TREATY 168 B. ARTICLE 26(3): PRIORITY TO AN EARLIER
TREATY WITH A NON-CONTRACTING STATE 169 C. ARTICLE 26(4): PRIORITY TO
RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT PROVISIONS IN OTHER TREATIES 170 D. ARTICLE
26(5): PRIORITY TO TREATIES DEALING WITH SPECIFIC SUBJECT MATTERS WHEN A
DECLARATION HAS BEEN MADE 170 3. ARTICLE 26(6): PRIORITY RULES IN THE
EVENT OF AN INCONSISTENCY WITH THE RULES OF A REGIONAL ECONOMIC
INTEGRATION ORGANIZATION 172 FINAL CLAUSES (ARTICLES 27-34) 174 I.
INTRODUCTION 174 II. ARTICLE 27: SIGNATURE, RATIFICATION, ACCEPTANCE,
APPROVAL OR ACCESSION 174 III. ARTICLE 28: DECLARATIONS WITH RESPECT TO
NON-UNIFIED LEGAL SYSTEMS 175 IV. ARTICLE 29: REGIONAL ECONOMIC
INTEGRATION ORGANIZATIONS 176 V. ARTICLE 30: REIO ACCESSION WITHOUT ITS
MEMBER STATES 177 VI. ARTICLE 31: ENTRY INTO FORCE 178 VII. ARTICLE 32:
DECLARATIONS 179 VIII. RESERVATIONS UNDER THE CONVENTION 180 IX. ARTICLE
33: DENUNCIATION 180 X. ARTICLE 34: NOTIFICATIONS BY THE DEPOSITARY 181
PART III: CHOICE OF COURT IN THE ABSENCE OF A MULTILATERAL CONVENTION 9
TREATMENT OF CHOICE OF COURT CLAUSES IN U.S. COURTS 185 I. FROM OUTCAST
TO ACCEPTED PRACTICE 185 II. THE BREMEN STANDARD 185 III. THE NEW YORK
STATUTE ON CHOICE OF COURT 189 IV COMPARISON WITH THE BRUSSELS
REGULATION 189 V FROM CURRENT PRACTICE TO THE HAGUE CONVENTION 191 10
RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS IN THE UNITED STATES: WITH AND
WITHOUT CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENTS 192 I. INTRODUCTION 192 II.
FEDERALISM AND THE FOUNDATIONS OF U.S. JUDGMENT RECOGNITION PRACTICE 193
A. THE GENERAL PROBLEM OF FEDERAL COURTS APPLYING STATE LAW 193 B.
CONSTITUTIONAL FOUNDATIONS FOR SISTER STATE JUDGMENTS RECOGNITION 193 C.
FOREIGN NATION JUDGMENTS IN A FEDERAL SYSTEM 195 1. COMMON LAW
FOUNDATIONS 195 2. THE UNIFORM FOREIGN MONEY-JUDGMENTS RECOGNITION ACT
AND THE RESTATEMENT OF COMMON LAW 196 A. BASIC RULES OF RECOGNITION AND
ENFORCEMENT 196 B. GROUNDS FOR DENIAL OF RECOGNITION 197 1) FINALITY AND
CONCLUSIVENESS OF THE JUDGMENT 197 2) DUE PROCESS 198 3) IN PERSONAM AND
IN REM JURISDICTION 198 4) SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION 199 5) NOTICE AND
OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD 200 6) FRAUD 200 7) PUBLIC POLICY 201 8)
INCONSISTENT JUDGMENTS 202 9) JUDGMENTS CONTRARY TO PARTY AGREEMENT 202
10) INCONVENIENT FORUM 202 D. SORTING OUT THE ISSUES IN A FEDERAL SYSTEM
203 III. ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS: THE PROCEDURAL SIBLING TO RECOGNITION
204 IV. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS 207 A. THE 2005 UNIFORM FOREIGN-COUNTRY
MONEY JUDGMENTS RECOGNITION ACT 207 B. THE 2005 AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE
PROPOSED FEDERAL STATUTE ON THE RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN
JUDGMENTS 208 V. SPECIFIC ISSUES REGARDING THE RECOGNITION AND
ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS BASED ON CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENTS 210 PART
IV: LITIGATION AND ARBITRATION CHOICES AFTER THE HAGUE CONVENTION 11
PLANNING THE CHOICE OF FORUM: CHOICE OF COURT UNDER THE HAGUE CONVENTION
AND ARBITRATION UNDER THE NEW YORK CONVENTION . . . .215 I. INTRODUCTION
215 II. COMPARING ARBITRATION AND LITIGATION 216 III. THE CONTRIBUTION
OF THE CONVENTION ON CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENTS TO BALANCED
DECISION-MAKING IN INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS 218 A. GENERAL
SIMILARITIES BETWEEN THE TWO CONVENTIONS 218 B. DISTINCTIONS THAT MAY
AFFECT THE CHOICE OF FORUM 218 1. MATTERS OF SCOPE 218 2. OBLIGATIONS OF
A COURT THAT IS NOT THE CHOSEN FORUM 219 3. GROUNDS FOR NON-RECOGNITION
OF THE RESULTING AWARD OR JUDGMENT 219 4. THE EFFECT OF AVAILABLE
DECLARATIONS 220 IV. FINAL COMMENTS 221 APPENDIX A: EXPLANATORY REPORT
BY TREVOR HARTLEY & MASATO DOGAUCHI (INCLUDING THE TEXT OF THE 2005
HAGUE CONVENTION ON CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENTS) 223 APPENDIX B: CITED
EXCERPTS FROM THE NYGH-POCAR REPORT 306 INDEX 313
|
| adam_txt |
CONTENTS PREFACE PAGE XV PART I: A BASIC INTRODUCTION TO THE 2005 HAGUE
CHOICE OF COURT CONVENTION 1 THE CONTEXT AND HISTORY OF THE HAGUE
NEGOTIATIONS 3 I. INTRODUCTION 3 II. THE CONTEXT OF THE HAGUE
NEGOTIATIONS 3 III. THE HISTORY OF THE HAGUE NEGOTIATIONS 5 A. THE
PRE-EXISTING INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR A NEW CONVENTION 5 B. THE
NEGOTIATIONS 6 2 THE CONVENTION STRUCTURE AND CONTENT 11 I. INTRODUCTION
11 II. THE THREE BASIC RULES 11 A. ARTICLE 5: THE CHOSEN COURT SHALL
HAVE JURISDICTION 11 B. ARTICLE 6: COURTS NOT CHOSEN SHALL SUSPEND OR
DISMISS THE CASE 12 C. ARTICLE 8: A JUDGMENT GIVEN ON JURISDICTION BASED
ON AN EXCLUSIVE CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENT SHALL BE RECOGNIZED AND
ENFORCED 13 D. THE OPTIONAL FOURTH RULE: RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF
JUDGMENTS BASED ON NON-EXCLUSIVE CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENTS 15 III.
CONVENTION SCOPE 15 A. THE THREE BASIC LIMITATIONS 15 1. THE
INTERNATIONAL CASE LIMITATION 15 2. THE EXCLUSIVE CHOICE OF COURT
AGREEMENT LIMITATION 16 3. THE CIVIL OR COMMERCIAL MATTERS LIMITATION 17
B. ARTICLE 2 EXCLUSIONS FROM SCOPE 18 C. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE ARTICLE 2
EXCLUSIONS 18 IV. SPECIFIC ADDITIONAL ISSUES 19 A. CONSENT AND VALIDITY
19 B. DAMAGES 21 C. SPECIAL MENTION FOR INSURANCE CONTRACTS 22 V.
CREATING A SENSE OF BALANCE: THE PROCESS OF NEGOTIATION AND THE FINAL
RESULT 22 A. ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF A CONSENSUS PROCESS 22 B.
TENSIONS, CHOICES, AND COMPROMISES 23 1. PARTY AUTONOMY AND STATE
INTEREST 23 2. SPECIFICITY AND FLEXIBILITY 24 3 INTERPRETATION AND USE
OF THE CONVENTION 26 I. INTERPRETATION OF THE CONVENTION 26 A.
INTRODUCTION 26 B. SOURCES ESTABLISHING CONSENSUS 27 1. THE TEXT 27 2.
THE PREAMBLE 27 3. EXTRA-TEXTUAL SOURCES OF CONSENSUS 29 A. THE
INTERPRETIVE REPORT 29 B. STATEMENTS IN THE PLENARY OF THE DIPLOMATIC
CONFERENCE 30 C. CONSENSUS FROM SOURCES OTHER THAN THE PLENARY SESSION
OF THE CONFERENCE 31 II. USE OF THE CONVENTION 32 A. TRANSACTIONAL
LAWYERS 33 B. LITIGATORS 34 C. JUDGES 35 D. AVOIDING THE HOMEWARD TREND
35 PART II: ARTICLE-BY-ARTICLE COMMENTARY ON THE CONVENTION 4 SCOPE AND
DEFINITIONS (ARTICLES 1-4) 39 I. GENERAL MATTERS 39 II. ARTICLE 1: THE
THREE BASIC ELEMENTS OF SCOPE 39 A. AN EXCLUSIVE CHOICE OF COURT
AGREEMENT 40 1. ARTICLE 3(A) AND (B): DEFINING EXCLUSIVE CHOICE OF COURT
AGREEMENTS 40 A. AN AGREEMENT 40 B. DESIGNATING A COURT OR COURTS 41 C.
TO THE EXCLUSION OF ANY OTHER COURTS 42 1) AGREEMENTS DEEMED TO BE
EXCLUSIVE 42 2) EXAMPLES 43 D. FOR THE PURPOSE OF DECIDING PARTICULAR
CLASSES OF DISPUTES 44 2. ARTICLE 3(C): OTHER ASPECTS OF "EXCLUSIVE
CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENTS" 45 A. REQUIREMENTS OF FORM 45 B. PARTIES TO
THE AGREEMENT 46 C. THE SEVERABILITY RULE 46 B. CONCLUDED IN CIVIL OR
COMMERCIAL MATTERS 47 C. IN INTERNATIONAL CASES 49 1. "CASE" 49 2.
"INTERNATIONAL" 50 A. "INTERNATIONAL" FOR PURPOSES OF JURISDICTION
(ARTICLE 1(2)) 50 1) THE "NOT INTERNATIONAL" TEST 50 2) THE IMPORTANCE
OF NATIONAL LAW 50 3) THE TIME AT WHICH INTERNATIONAL STATUS IS
DETERMINED 51 4) APPLICATION IN NON-UNIFIED LEGAL SYSTEMS 52 5)
CONSEQUENCES OF A CASE THAT IS NOT INTERNATIONAL 52 B. "INTERNATIONAL"
FOR PURPOSES OF RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT (ARTICLE 1(3)) 53 1) GENERAL
ISSUES 53 2) DEFINING "JUDGMENT" (ARTICLE 4(1)) 54 D. A GENERAL
OBSERVATION 54 III. ARTICLE 2: EXCLUSIONS FROM SCOPE 54 A. ARTICLE 2(1):
EXCLUSIONS FOR PROTECTIVE PURPOSES BASED ON THE TYPE OF AGREEMENT 55 B.
ARTICLE 2(2): EXCLUSIONS BASED ON SUBJECT MATTER 56 1. GENERAL ISSUES 56
2. FAMILY AND DOMESTIC LAW MATTERS 58 A. STATUS AND LEGAL CAPACITY OF
NATURAL PERSONS 58 B. MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS 58 C. "OTHER FAMILY LAW
MATTERS" 59 D. WILLS AND SUCCESSION 59 3. BANKRUPTCY MATTERS 60 4.
TRANSPORTATION EXCLUSIONS 61 5. ANTITRUST MATTERS 62 6. LIABILITY FOR
NUCLEAR DAMAGE 63 7. CERTAIN TORT CLAIMS 63 8. RIGHTS IN RAN AND
TENANCIES OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY 65 9. CERTAIN INTERNAL MATTERS OF LEGAL
PERSONS 67 10. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MATTERS 67 A. GENERALLY 67 B.
VALIDITY OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS 68 C. INFRINGEMENT OF
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS 69 11. ENTRIES IN PUBLIC REGISTERS 70 IV.
CLARIFICATIONS TO, AMPLIFICATIONS OF, AND EXCEPTIONS TO EXCLUSIONS FROM
SCOPE IN CHAPTER I 71 A. PRELIMINARY MATTERS (ARTICLE 2(3)) 71 B.
ARBITRATION AND RELATED PROCEEDINGS (ARTICLE 2(4)) 73 C. STATES AS
PARTIES 74 1. STATES AS PARTIES TO CIVIL OR COMMERCIAL MATTERS (ARTICLE
2(5)) 74 2. STATES AS DEFENDANTS (ARTICLE 2(6)) 75 D. OTHER MATTERS 76
1. PROVISIONS IN OTHER CHAPTERS WHICH MAY AFFECT SCOPE 76 2. OTHER
LIMITATIONS ON THE EFFECT AND OPERATION OF THE CONVENTION 76 3. THE
MANDATORY NATURE OF THE CONVENTION 76 5 JURISDICTION (ARTICLES 5-7) 78
I. INTRODUCTION 78 II. EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURT 78 A.
ARTICLE 5(1): THE COURT CHOSEN SHALL HAVE JURISDICTION 78 1. THE BASIC
RULE 78 2. THE VALIDITY EXCEPTION 79 A. EXISTENCE OF AN AGREEMENT 79 B.
DETERMINING WHETHER THE AGREEMENT IS "NULL AND VOID" 79 C. THE
AUTONOMOUS CONVENTION CHOICE OF LAW RULE 80 3, THE RULE AGAINST
DECLINING JURISDICTION 82 4. INTERNAL RULES OF SUBJECT MATTER
JURISDICTION AND TRANSFER 84 B. ARTICLE 6: A COURT NOT CHOSEN SHALL NOT
EXERCISE JURISDICTION 87 1. THE BASIC RULE 87 2. THE EXCEPTIONS 89 A.
THE VALIDITY EXCEPTION 90 B. LACK OF CAPACITY 90 C. PUBLIC POLICY 91 D.
THE AGREEMENT CANNOT REASONABLY BE PERFORMED 94 E. THE CHOSEN COURT HAS
DECIDED NOT TO HEAR THE CASE 95 III. ARTICLE 7: AVOIDING INTERFERENCE
WITH INTERIM MEASURES OF PROTECTION 95 IV. FINAL COMMENTS ON THE
JURISDICTIONAL RULES AND INTERIM MEASURES 96 6 RECOGNITION AND
ENFORCEMENT (ARTICLES 8-15) 98 I. INTRODUCTION 98 II. ARTICLE 8(1): A
JUDGMENT SHALL BE RECOGNIZED AND ENFORCED 98 A. DEFINING "RECOGNITION"
AND "ENFORCEMENT" 98 B. THE THREE CONDITIONS OF ARTICLE 8(1) 99 C. THE
CONSEQUENCES OF MEETING THE THREE CONDITIONS 101 D. BASES FOR REFUSAL OF
RECOGNITION OR ENFORCEMENT 101 III. ARTICLE 8(2): PROHIBITIONS ON REVIEW
OF DECISIONS OF THE COURT OF ORIGIN 102 A. NO REVIEW ON IHE MERITS 102
B. BOUND BY THE FINDINGS OF FACT 103 1. THE GENERAL RULE 103 A. FINDINGS
OF FACT AND JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATIONS 103 B. FINDINGS OF FACT AND
SCOPE OF THE CONVENTION 104 C. SUMMARIZING THE EFFECT OF THE GENERAL
RULE 104 2. THE QUALIFICATION TO THE GENERAL RULE 105 3. THE CONVENTION
AND THE TRADITIONAL APPROACH TO REVIEW BY THE COURT ADDRESSED 105 IV.
ARTICLE 8(3): EFFECT AND ENFORCEABILITY IN THE ORIGINATING COURT 106 V.
ARTICLE 8(4): POSTPONEMENT OR REFUSAL OF RECOGNITION OR ENFORCEMENT 107
VI. ARTICLE 8(5): THE EFFECT OF INTERNAL TRANSFER RULES ON RECOGNITION
AND ENFORCEMENT 109 VII. ARTICLE 9: GROUNDS FOR DENIAL OF RECOGNITION OR
ENFORCEMENT 110 A. REVISITING THE QUESTION OF VALIDITY 111 B. PARTY
CAPACITY 111 C. LACK OF NOTICE TO THE DEFENDANT 112 1. DOCUMENTS COVERED
113 2. NOTICE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE DEFENDANT TO ARRANGE FOR HIS
DEFENSE 113 3. EFFECT IF DEFENDANT FAILS TO CHALLENGE NOTICE IN THE
COURT OF ORIGIN 114 4. PROTECTION OF STATE INTERESTS 115 5. IMPACT ON
ARTICLE 2(6) 116 D. EXTRINSIC FRAUD 116 E. PUBLIC POLICY AND FUNDAMENTAL
PRINCIPLES OF PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS 117 1. "MANIFESTLY INCOMPATIBLE WITH
THE PUBLIC POLICY OF THE REQUESTED STATE" 117 2. "INCOMPATIBLE WITH
FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS" 118 3. SUBSTANTIVE PUBLIC
POLICY 118 4. RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 9 119 5.
APPLICATION IN NON-UNIFIED LEGAL SYSTEMS 119 F. INCONSISTENT JUDGMENTS
FROM COURTS IN THE REQUESTED STATE 119 1. TIMING ISSUES 120 2.
INCONSISTENT JUDGMENTS BETWEEN THE SAME PARTIES 120 3. THE RELATIONSHIP
BETWEEN ARTICLE 9(F) AND ARTICLE 6 120 4. THE DISCRETIONARY NATURE OF
ARTICLE 9(F) 121 G. INCONSISTENT JUDGMENTS FROM OTHER COURTS 121 VIII.
ARTICLE 10: PRELIMINARY QUESTIONS 122 A. ARTICLE 10(1): NON-RECOGNITION
OF RULINGS ON PRELIMINARY QUESTIONS 123 B. ARTICLE 10(2):
NON-RECOGNITION OF JUDGMENTS BASED ON RULINGS ON PRELIMINARY QUESTIONS
123 C. ARTICLE 10(3): SPECIAL RULE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
RULINGS 124 D. ARTICLE 10(4): PRELIMINARY QUESTIONS IMPLICATING ARTICLE
21 DECLARATIONS 126 IX. ARTICLE 11: DISCRETIONARY NON-RECOGNITION OF
NON-COMPENSATORY DAMAGES 126 X. ARTICLE 12: JUDICIAL SETTLEMENTS IN
CIVIL LAW SYSTEMS 130 XI. ARTICLE 13: DOCUMENTS TO BE PRODUCED 132 A.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 133 B. ARTICLE 13(1): DOCUMENTS TO BE PRODUCED 133
C. ARTICLE 13(2): ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS THAT MIGHT BE REQUIRED 135 D.
ARTICLE 13(3): STANDARD FORM TO ACCOMPANY DOCUMENTS 135 E. ARTICLE
13(4): TRANSLATION REQUIREMENTS 135 XII. ARTICLE 14: PROCEDURE FOR
RECOGNITION 136 XIII. ARTICLE 15: SEVERABILITY 137 7 GENERAL CLAUSES
(ARTICLES 16-26) 139 I. INTRODUCTION 139 II. ARTICLE 16: TRANSITIONAL
PROVISIONS 139 A. ARTICLE 16(1): THE DATE OF CONCLUSION OF AN EXCLUSIVE
CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENT AND THE APPLICATION OF CHAPTER II RULES ON
JURISDICTION 140 1. GENERAL APPLICATION OF THE RULE 140 2. APPLICATION
OF THE RULE TO CASES INVOLVING CONVENTION DECLARATIONS 140 B. ARTICLE
16(2): THE DATE PROCEEDINGS ARE BROUGHT 141 C. TIMING AND THE SCOPE OF
REVIEW 142 III. ARTICLE 17: INSURANCE AND REINSURANCE CONTRACTS 142 IV.
ARTICLE 18: NO LEGALIZATION REQUIREMENTS 144 V. THE DECLARATION SYSTEM
145 A. DECLARATIONS IN GENERAL 145 B. ARTICLE 19: DECLARATIONS LIMITING
JURISDICTION 146 1. THE SUBSTANCE OF ARTICLE 19 146 2. THE POTENTIAL
ARTICLE 19 INTERPRETATION PROBLEM 148 C. ARTICLE 20: DECLARATIONS
LIMITING RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT 149 D. ARTICLE 21: DECLARATIONS TO
EXCLUDE SPECIFIC MATTERS FROM SCOPE ON A STATE-BY-STATE BASIS 150 1.
ARTICLE 21(1): MAKING THE DECLARATION 151 2. ARTICLE 21(2): RECIPROCAL
TREATMENT 152 E. ARTICLE 22: RECIPROCAL DECLARATIONS TO RECOGNIZE AND
ENFORCE JUDGMENTS BASED UPON NON-EXCLUSIVE CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENTS
153 1. THE GENERAL CONTOURS OF ARTICLE 22 DECLARATIONS 154 2. CONDITIONS
REQUIRED BY ARTICLE 22(2) 155 3. SPECIAL ISSUES 158 4. PLANNING FOR
ARTICLE 22 PRIOR TO ENTRY INTO FORCE 158 VI. ARTICLE 23: UNIFORM
INTERPRETATION 159 VII. ARTICLE 24: REVIEW OF OPERATION OF THE
CONVENTION 161 VIII. ARTICLE 25: NON-UNIFIED LEGAL SYSTEMS 161 A.
REFERENCES TO THE LAW OR PROCEDURE OF A STATE 162 B. REFERENCES TO
RESIDENCE IN A STATE 163 C. REFERENCES TO THE COURT OR COURTS OF A STATE
164 D. REFERENCES TO A CONNECTION WITH A STATE 164 E. THE INSULATION OF
INTERNAL LEGAL ORDERS FROM CONVENTION RULES 164 IX. ARTICLE 26:
RELATIONSHIP OF THE CONVENTION TO OTHER SETS OF RULES 165 A. GENERAL
CONCERNS 167 B. THE CONVENTION AND OTHER TREATIES 167 1. ARTICLE 26(1):
THE RULE OF COMPATIBLE INTERPRETATION 167 2. ARTICLE 26(2)-(5): PRIORITY
RULES IN THE EVENT OF AN INCONSISTENCY WITH ANOTHER TREATY 168 A.
ARTICLE 26(2): PRIORITY WHEN ALL PARTIES ARE RESIDENT IN STATES THAT ARE
PARTY TO THE OTHER TREATY 168 B. ARTICLE 26(3): PRIORITY TO AN EARLIER
TREATY WITH A NON-CONTRACTING STATE 169 C. ARTICLE 26(4): PRIORITY TO
RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT PROVISIONS IN OTHER TREATIES 170 D. ARTICLE
26(5): PRIORITY TO TREATIES DEALING WITH SPECIFIC SUBJECT MATTERS WHEN A
DECLARATION HAS BEEN MADE 170 3. ARTICLE 26(6): PRIORITY RULES IN THE
EVENT OF AN INCONSISTENCY WITH THE RULES OF A REGIONAL ECONOMIC
INTEGRATION ORGANIZATION 172 FINAL CLAUSES (ARTICLES 27-34) 174 I.
INTRODUCTION 174 II. ARTICLE 27: SIGNATURE, RATIFICATION, ACCEPTANCE,
APPROVAL OR ACCESSION 174 III. ARTICLE 28: DECLARATIONS WITH RESPECT TO
NON-UNIFIED LEGAL SYSTEMS 175 IV. ARTICLE 29: REGIONAL ECONOMIC
INTEGRATION ORGANIZATIONS 176 V. ARTICLE 30: REIO ACCESSION WITHOUT ITS
MEMBER STATES 177 VI. ARTICLE 31: ENTRY INTO FORCE 178 VII. ARTICLE 32:
DECLARATIONS 179 VIII. RESERVATIONS UNDER THE CONVENTION 180 IX. ARTICLE
33: DENUNCIATION 180 X. ARTICLE 34: NOTIFICATIONS BY THE DEPOSITARY 181
PART III: CHOICE OF COURT IN THE ABSENCE OF A MULTILATERAL CONVENTION 9
TREATMENT OF CHOICE OF COURT CLAUSES IN U.S. COURTS 185 I. FROM OUTCAST
TO ACCEPTED PRACTICE 185 II. THE BREMEN STANDARD 185 III. THE NEW YORK
STATUTE ON CHOICE OF COURT 189 IV COMPARISON WITH THE BRUSSELS
REGULATION 189 V FROM CURRENT PRACTICE TO THE HAGUE CONVENTION 191 10
RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS IN THE UNITED STATES: WITH AND
WITHOUT CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENTS 192 I. INTRODUCTION 192 II.
FEDERALISM AND THE FOUNDATIONS OF U.S. JUDGMENT RECOGNITION PRACTICE 193
A. THE GENERAL PROBLEM OF FEDERAL COURTS APPLYING STATE LAW 193 B.
CONSTITUTIONAL FOUNDATIONS FOR SISTER STATE JUDGMENTS RECOGNITION 193 C.
FOREIGN NATION JUDGMENTS IN A FEDERAL SYSTEM 195 1. COMMON LAW
FOUNDATIONS 195 2. THE UNIFORM FOREIGN MONEY-JUDGMENTS RECOGNITION ACT
AND THE RESTATEMENT OF COMMON LAW 196 A. BASIC RULES OF RECOGNITION AND
ENFORCEMENT 196 B. GROUNDS FOR DENIAL OF RECOGNITION 197 1) FINALITY AND
CONCLUSIVENESS OF THE JUDGMENT 197 2) DUE PROCESS 198 3) IN PERSONAM AND
IN REM JURISDICTION 198 4) SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION 199 5) NOTICE AND
OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD 200 6) FRAUD 200 7) PUBLIC POLICY 201 8)
INCONSISTENT JUDGMENTS 202 9) JUDGMENTS CONTRARY TO PARTY AGREEMENT 202
10) INCONVENIENT FORUM 202 D. SORTING OUT THE ISSUES IN A FEDERAL SYSTEM
203 III. ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS: THE PROCEDURAL SIBLING TO RECOGNITION
204 IV. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS 207 A. THE 2005 UNIFORM FOREIGN-COUNTRY
MONEY JUDGMENTS RECOGNITION ACT 207 B. THE 2005 AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE
PROPOSED FEDERAL STATUTE ON THE RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN
JUDGMENTS 208 V. SPECIFIC ISSUES REGARDING THE RECOGNITION AND
ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS BASED ON CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENTS 210 PART
IV: LITIGATION AND ARBITRATION CHOICES AFTER THE HAGUE CONVENTION 11
PLANNING THE CHOICE OF FORUM: CHOICE OF COURT UNDER THE HAGUE CONVENTION
AND ARBITRATION UNDER THE NEW YORK CONVENTION . . . .215 I. INTRODUCTION
215 II. COMPARING ARBITRATION AND LITIGATION 216 III. THE CONTRIBUTION
OF THE CONVENTION ON CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENTS TO BALANCED
DECISION-MAKING IN INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS 218 A. GENERAL
SIMILARITIES BETWEEN THE TWO CONVENTIONS 218 B. DISTINCTIONS THAT MAY
AFFECT THE CHOICE OF FORUM 218 1. MATTERS OF SCOPE 218 2. OBLIGATIONS OF
A COURT THAT IS NOT THE CHOSEN FORUM 219 3. GROUNDS FOR NON-RECOGNITION
OF THE RESULTING AWARD OR JUDGMENT 219 4. THE EFFECT OF AVAILABLE
DECLARATIONS 220 IV. FINAL COMMENTS 221 APPENDIX A: EXPLANATORY REPORT
BY TREVOR HARTLEY & MASATO DOGAUCHI (INCLUDING THE TEXT OF THE 2005
HAGUE CONVENTION ON CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENTS) 223 APPENDIX B: CITED
EXCERPTS FROM THE NYGH-POCAR REPORT 306 INDEX 313 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Brand, Ronald A. 1952- Herrup, Paul |
| author_GND | (DE-588)139805303 (DE-588)139805311 |
| author_facet | Brand, Ronald A. 1952- Herrup, Paul |
| author_role | aut aut |
| author_sort | Brand, Ronald A. 1952- |
| author_variant | r a b ra rab p h ph |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV023326113 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | K7625 |
| callnumber-raw | K7625 |
| callnumber-search | K7625 |
| callnumber-sort | K 47625 |
| callnumber-subject | K - General Law |
| classification_rvk | PT 317 PT 340 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)173749300 (DE-599)BSZ277461545 |
| dewey-full | 341.5/22 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 341 - Law of nations |
| dewey-raw | 341.5/22 |
| dewey-search | 341.5/22 |
| dewey-sort | 3341.5 222 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| edition | 1. publ. |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02125nam a22004938c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV023326113</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20091217 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">080603s2008 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780521878661</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-521-87866-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)173749300</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BSZ277461545</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="045" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">011495968</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-11</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K7625</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">341.5/22</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PT 317</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139854:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PT 340</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139872:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Brand, Ronald A.</subfield><subfield code="d">1952-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)139805303</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements</subfield><subfield code="b">commentary and documents</subfield><subfield code="c">Ronald A. Brand ; Paul Herrup</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">The two thousand and five Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1. publ.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge Univ. Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XV, 319 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="630" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements</subfield><subfield code="d">(2005)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="630" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Haager Übereinkommen über Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen</subfield><subfield code="f">2005 Juni 30</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)7541149-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Arbitrage (droit international privé)</subfield><subfield code="2">ram</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Droit international privé</subfield><subfield code="2">ram</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Juridiction</subfield><subfield code="2">ram</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Arbitration agreements, Commercial</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Arbitration and award, International</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conflict of laws</subfield><subfield code="x">Jurisdiction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4136710-8</subfield><subfield code="a">Kommentar</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Haager Übereinkommen über Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen</subfield><subfield code="f">2005 Juni 30</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)7541149-0</subfield><subfield code="D">u</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Herrup, Paul</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)139805311</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">SWB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016510125&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016510125</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4136710-8 Kommentar gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Kommentar |
| id | DE-604.BV023326113 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-02T20:55:37Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T21:15:56Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780521878661 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016510125 |
| oclc_num | 173749300 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-M382 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-703 DE-739 DE-12 DE-11 DE-188 |
| owner_facet | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-M382 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-703 DE-739 DE-12 DE-11 DE-188 |
| physical | XV, 319 S. |
| publishDate | 2008 |
| publishDateSearch | 2008 |
| publishDateSort | 2008 |
| publisher | Cambridge Univ. Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Brand, Ronald A. 1952- Verfasser (DE-588)139805303 aut The 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements commentary and documents Ronald A. Brand ; Paul Herrup The two thousand and five Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements 1. publ. Cambridge [u.a.] Cambridge Univ. Press 2008 XV, 319 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements (2005) Haager Übereinkommen über Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen 2005 Juni 30 (DE-588)7541149-0 gnd rswk-swf Arbitrage (droit international privé) ram Droit international privé ram Juridiction ram Arbitration agreements, Commercial Arbitration and award, International Conflict of laws Jurisdiction (DE-588)4136710-8 Kommentar gnd-content Haager Übereinkommen über Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen 2005 Juni 30 (DE-588)7541149-0 u DE-604 Herrup, Paul Verfasser (DE-588)139805311 aut SWB Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016510125&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Brand, Ronald A. 1952- Herrup, Paul The 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements commentary and documents Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements (2005) Haager Übereinkommen über Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen 2005 Juni 30 (DE-588)7541149-0 gnd Arbitrage (droit international privé) ram Droit international privé ram Juridiction ram Arbitration agreements, Commercial Arbitration and award, International Conflict of laws Jurisdiction |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)7541149-0 (DE-588)4136710-8 |
| title | The 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements commentary and documents |
| title_alt | The two thousand and five Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements |
| title_auth | The 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements commentary and documents |
| title_exact_search | The 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements commentary and documents |
| title_exact_search_txtP | The 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements commentary and documents |
| title_full | The 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements commentary and documents Ronald A. Brand ; Paul Herrup |
| title_fullStr | The 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements commentary and documents Ronald A. Brand ; Paul Herrup |
| title_full_unstemmed | The 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements commentary and documents Ronald A. Brand ; Paul Herrup |
| title_short | The 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements |
| title_sort | the 2005 hague convention on choice of court agreements commentary and documents |
| title_sub | commentary and documents |
| topic | Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements (2005) Haager Übereinkommen über Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen 2005 Juni 30 (DE-588)7541149-0 gnd Arbitrage (droit international privé) ram Droit international privé ram Juridiction ram Arbitration agreements, Commercial Arbitration and award, International Conflict of laws Jurisdiction |
| topic_facet | Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements (2005) Haager Übereinkommen über Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen 2005 Juni 30 Arbitrage (droit international privé) Droit international privé Juridiction Arbitration agreements, Commercial Arbitration and award, International Conflict of laws Jurisdiction Kommentar |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016510125&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT brandronalda the2005hagueconventiononchoiceofcourtagreementscommentaryanddocuments AT herruppaul the2005hagueconventiononchoiceofcourtagreementscommentaryanddocuments AT brandronalda thetwothousandandfivehagueconventiononchoiceofcourtagreements AT herruppaul thetwothousandandfivehagueconventiononchoiceofcourtagreements |