W., H. v. (1641). Arguments proving the jurisdiction used by the president and counsell in the marches of Wales, over the counties of Glouc., Worcester, Hereford, and Salop to be illegall, and injurious, and a meere incroachment beyond their appointed limits: And the proofe is like a threefold cord, not easily broken, viz. [brace] by statutes, by law bookes, by records. Printed for Thomas Wakley.
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationW., H. v. Arguments Proving the Jurisdiction Used by the President and Counsell in the Marches of Wales, over the Counties of Glouc., Worcester, Hereford, and Salop to Be Illegall, and Injurious, and a Meere Incroachment Beyond Their Appointed Limits: And the Proofe Is like a Threefold Cord, Not Easily Broken, Viz. [brace] by Statutes, by Law Bookes, by Records. London: Printed for Thomas Wakley, 1641.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationW., H. v. Arguments Proving the Jurisdiction Used by the President and Counsell in the Marches of Wales, over the Counties of Glouc., Worcester, Hereford, and Salop to Be Illegall, and Injurious, and a Meere Incroachment Beyond Their Appointed Limits: And the Proofe Is like a Threefold Cord, Not Easily Broken, Viz. [brace] by Statutes, by Law Bookes, by Records. Printed for Thomas Wakley, 1641.