Rule, G. (1689). A rational defence of non-conformity: Wherein the practice of nonconformists is vindicated from promoting popery, and ruining the church, imputed to them by Dr. Stillingfleet in his Unreasonableness of separation. Printed for John Salusbury.
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationRule, Gilbert. A Rational Defence of Non-conformity: Wherein the Practice of Nonconformists Is Vindicated from Promoting Popery, and Ruining the Church, Imputed to Them by Dr. Stillingfleet in His Unreasonableness of Separation. London: Printed for John Salusbury, 1689.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationRule, Gilbert. A Rational Defence of Non-conformity: Wherein the Practice of Nonconformists Is Vindicated from Promoting Popery, and Ruining the Church, Imputed to Them by Dr. Stillingfleet in His Unreasonableness of Separation. Printed for John Salusbury, 1689.