Long, T. (1682). A continuation and vindication of the Defence of Dr. Stillingfleet's Unreasonableness of separation in answer to Mr. Baxter, Mr. Lob, &c: Containing a further explication and defence of the doctrine of Catholick communication. Printed for R. Chiswell.
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationLong, Thomas. A Continuation and Vindication of the Defence of Dr. Stillingfleet's Unreasonableness of Separation in Answer to Mr. Baxter, Mr. Lob, &c: Containing a Further Explication and Defence of the Doctrine of Catholick Communication. London: Printed for R. Chiswell, 1682.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationLong, Thomas. A Continuation and Vindication of the Defence of Dr. Stillingfleet's Unreasonableness of Separation in Answer to Mr. Baxter, Mr. Lob, &c: Containing a Further Explication and Defence of the Doctrine of Catholick Communication. Printed for R. Chiswell, 1682.