APA (7th ed.) Citation

Baxter, R. (1681). A third defence of the cause of peace: Proving 1. the need of our concord, 2. the impossibility of it, on the terms of the present impositions against the accusations and storms of, viz., Mr. John Hinckley, a nameless impleader, a nameless reflector, or Speculum, &c., Mr. John Cheny's second accusation, Mr. Roger L'Strange, justice, &c., the Dialogue between the Pope and a fanatic, J. Varney's phanatic Prophesie. Printed for Jacob Sampson.

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Baxter, Richard. A Third Defence of the Cause of Peace: Proving 1. the Need of Our Concord, 2. the Impossibility of It, on the Terms of the Present Impositions Against the Accusations and Storms of, Viz., Mr. John Hinckley, a Nameless Impleader, a Nameless Reflector, or Speculum, &c., Mr. John Cheny's Second Accusation, Mr. Roger L'Strange, Justice, &c., the Dialogue Between the Pope and a Fanatic, J. Varney's Phanatic Prophesie. London: Printed for Jacob Sampson, 1681.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Baxter, Richard. A Third Defence of the Cause of Peace: Proving 1. the Need of Our Concord, 2. the Impossibility of It, on the Terms of the Present Impositions Against the Accusations and Storms of, Viz., Mr. John Hinckley, a Nameless Impleader, a Nameless Reflector, or Speculum, &c., Mr. John Cheny's Second Accusation, Mr. Roger L'Strange, Justice, &c., the Dialogue Between the Pope and a Fanatic, J. Varney's Phanatic Prophesie. Printed for Jacob Sampson, 1681.