APA (7th ed.) Citation

Cock, C. G. (1655). Englands compleat law-judge, and lawyer: Declared in these ensuing heads: 1. Whether that law, and those judges and practizers, owned time out of mind by the supreme authority of the nation, be not the laws, judges, and lawyers of this Commonwealth, &c. 2. Whether courts so constituted are not records of the nation? 3. Whether each court hath not power, as such, to enforce its own decrees. 4. That the decrees and usages of such a court are as valid as of any court. 5. Whether it be not against reason, that when divers courts in the same nation act by divers lawes, one of the courts should have power to prohibit the other to proceed to bring the matters in difference before it self. 6. Concerning judges of appeal. Printed for Edmund Paxton at Pauls-Chaine over against the Castle-Taverne.

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Cock, Charles George. Englands Compleat Law-judge, and Lawyer: Declared in These Ensuing Heads: 1. Whether That Law, and Those Judges and Practizers, Owned Time Out of Mind by the Supreme Authority of the Nation, Be Not the Laws, Judges, and Lawyers of This Commonwealth, &c. 2. Whether Courts so Constituted Are Not Records of the Nation? 3. Whether Each Court Hath Not Power, as Such, to Enforce Its Own Decrees. 4. That the Decrees and Usages of Such a Court Are as Valid as of Any Court. 5. Whether It Be Not Against Reason, That When Divers Courts in the Same Nation Act by Divers Lawes, One of the Courts Should Have Power to Prohibit the Other to Proceed to Bring the Matters in Difference Before It Self. 6. Concerning Judges of Appeal. London: Printed for Edmund Paxton at Pauls-Chaine over against the Castle-Taverne, 1655.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Cock, Charles George. Englands Compleat Law-judge, and Lawyer: Declared in These Ensuing Heads: 1. Whether That Law, and Those Judges and Practizers, Owned Time Out of Mind by the Supreme Authority of the Nation, Be Not the Laws, Judges, and Lawyers of This Commonwealth, &c. 2. Whether Courts so Constituted Are Not Records of the Nation? 3. Whether Each Court Hath Not Power, as Such, to Enforce Its Own Decrees. 4. That the Decrees and Usages of Such a Court Are as Valid as of Any Court. 5. Whether It Be Not Against Reason, That When Divers Courts in the Same Nation Act by Divers Lawes, One of the Courts Should Have Power to Prohibit the Other to Proceed to Bring the Matters in Difference Before It Self. 6. Concerning Judges of Appeal. Printed for Edmund Paxton at Pauls-Chaine over against the Castle-Taverne, 1655.