The doctrine of the Sabbath vindicated: in a confutation of a treatise of the Sabbath, written by M. Edward Breerwood against M. Nic. Byfield, wherein these five things are maintained: first, that the fourth Commandement is given to the servant and not to the master onely. Seecondly, that the fourth Commandement is morall. Thirdly, that our owne light workes as well as gainefull and toilesome are forbidden on the Sabbath. Fourthly, that the Lords day is of divine institution. Fifthly, that the Sabbath was instituted from the beginning. By the industrie of an unworthy labourer in Gods vineyard, Richard Byfield, pastor in Long Ditton in Surrey
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
London
Imprinted by Felix Kyngston for Philemon Stephens and Christopher Meredith at the golden Lyon in Pauls Church-yard
1631
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | BSB01 LCO01 SBR01 UBA01 UBG01 UBM01 UBR01 UBT01 UEI01 UER01 Volltext |
| Item Description: | A reply to: Brerewood, Edward. A learned treatise of the Sabbath. - Reproduction of the original in the University of Chicago Library. - STC (2nd ed.), 4238 |
| Physical Description: | Online-Ressource |
Staff View
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV022673538 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 070831s1631 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)216625260 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV022673538 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-384 |a DE-473 |a DE-703 |a DE-824 |a DE-29 |a DE-19 |a DE-355 |a DE-155 |a DE-70 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Byfield, Richard |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The doctrine of the Sabbath vindicated |b in a confutation of a treatise of the Sabbath, written by M. Edward Breerwood against M. Nic. Byfield, wherein these five things are maintained: first, that the fourth Commandement is given to the servant and not to the master onely. Seecondly, that the fourth Commandement is morall. Thirdly, that our owne light workes as well as gainefull and toilesome are forbidden on the Sabbath. Fourthly, that the Lords day is of divine institution. Fifthly, that the Sabbath was instituted from the beginning. By the industrie of an unworthy labourer in Gods vineyard, Richard Byfield, pastor in Long Ditton in Surrey |
| 264 | 1 | |a London |b Imprinted by Felix Kyngston for Philemon Stephens and Christopher Meredith at the golden Lyon in Pauls Church-yard |c 1631 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a A reply to: Brerewood, Edward. A learned treatise of the Sabbath. - Reproduction of the original in the University of Chicago Library. - STC (2nd ed.), 4238 | ||
| 533 | |a Online-Ausgabe |b Ann Arbor, Mich |c UMI |d 1999- |f Early English books online |n Sonstige Standardnummer des Gesamttitels: 20723581 |n Digital version of: (Early English books, 1475-1640 ; 1059:04) |7 s1999 | ||
| 600 | 1 | 4 | |a Brerewood, Edward |d 1565?-1613 |t Learned treatise of the Sabbath |v Controversial literature |
| 650 | 4 | |a aSabbath vEarly works to 1800 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a aSunday vEarly works to 1800 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Sabbath |v Early works to 1800 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Sunday |v Early works to 1800 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Reproduktion von |a Byfield, Richard |t The doctrine of the Sabbath vindicated |d 1631 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://search.proquest.com/docview/2240873923 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-EEB | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-015879397 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://search.proquest.com/docview/2240873923 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-1-EEB |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://search.proquest.com/docview/2240873923 |l LCO01 |p ZDB-1-EEB |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://search.proquest.com/docview/2240873923 |l SBR01 |p ZDB-1-EEB |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://search.proquest.com/docview/2240873923 |l UBA01 |p ZDB-1-EEB |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://search.proquest.com/docview/2240873923 |l UBG01 |p ZDB-1-EEB |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://search.proquest.com/docview/2240873923 |l UBM01 |p ZDB-1-EEB |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://search.proquest.com/docview/2240873923 |l UBR01 |p ZDB-1-EEB |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://search.proquest.com/docview/2240873923 |l UBT01 |p ZDB-1-EEB |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://search.proquest.com/docview/2240873923 |l UEI01 |p ZDB-1-EEB |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://search.proquest.com/docview/2240873923 |l UER01 |p ZDB-1-EEB |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Record in the Search Index
| _version_ | 1804136864922206208 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Byfield, Richard |
| author_facet | Byfield, Richard |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Byfield, Richard |
| author_variant | r b rb |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV022673538 |
| collection | ZDB-1-EEB |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)216625260 (DE-599)BVBBV022673538 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03295nmm a2200481 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV022673538</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070831s1631 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)216625260</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV022673538</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-155</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Byfield, Richard</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The doctrine of the Sabbath vindicated</subfield><subfield code="b">in a confutation of a treatise of the Sabbath, written by M. Edward Breerwood against M. Nic. Byfield, wherein these five things are maintained: first, that the fourth Commandement is given to the servant and not to the master onely. Seecondly, that the fourth Commandement is morall. Thirdly, that our owne light workes as well as gainefull and toilesome are forbidden on the Sabbath. Fourthly, that the Lords day is of divine institution. Fifthly, that the Sabbath was instituted from the beginning. By the industrie of an unworthy labourer in Gods vineyard, Richard Byfield, pastor in Long Ditton in Surrey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">London</subfield><subfield code="b">Imprinted by Felix Kyngston for Philemon Stephens and Christopher Meredith at the golden Lyon in Pauls Church-yard</subfield><subfield code="c">1631</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A reply to: Brerewood, Edward. A learned treatise of the Sabbath. - Reproduction of the original in the University of Chicago Library. - STC (2nd ed.), 4238</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="b">Ann Arbor, Mich</subfield><subfield code="c">UMI</subfield><subfield code="d">1999-</subfield><subfield code="f">Early English books online</subfield><subfield code="n">Sonstige Standardnummer des Gesamttitels: 20723581</subfield><subfield code="n">Digital version of: (Early English books, 1475-1640 ; 1059:04)</subfield><subfield code="7">s1999</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Brerewood, Edward</subfield><subfield code="d">1565?-1613</subfield><subfield code="t">Learned treatise of the Sabbath</subfield><subfield code="v">Controversial literature</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">aSabbath vEarly works to 1800</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">aSunday vEarly works to 1800</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sabbath</subfield><subfield code="v">Early works to 1800</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sunday</subfield><subfield code="v">Early works to 1800</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Reproduktion von</subfield><subfield code="a">Byfield, Richard</subfield><subfield code="t">The doctrine of the Sabbath vindicated</subfield><subfield code="d">1631</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/2240873923</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-EEB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-015879397</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/2240873923</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-1-EEB</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/2240873923</subfield><subfield code="l">LCO01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-1-EEB</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/2240873923</subfield><subfield code="l">SBR01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-1-EEB</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/2240873923</subfield><subfield code="l">UBA01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-1-EEB</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/2240873923</subfield><subfield code="l">UBG01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-1-EEB</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/2240873923</subfield><subfield code="l">UBM01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-1-EEB</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/2240873923</subfield><subfield code="l">UBR01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-1-EEB</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/2240873923</subfield><subfield code="l">UBT01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-1-EEB</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/2240873923</subfield><subfield code="l">UEI01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-1-EEB</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/2240873923</subfield><subfield code="l">UER01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-1-EEB</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV022673538 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-02T18:25:37Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T21:03:11Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-015879397 |
| oclc_num | 216625260 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-384 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-703 DE-824 DE-29 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-155 DE-BY-UBR DE-70 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-384 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-703 DE-824 DE-29 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-155 DE-BY-UBR DE-70 |
| physical | Online-Ressource |
| psigel | ZDB-1-EEB |
| publishDate | 1631 |
| publishDateSearch | 1631 |
| publishDateSort | 1631 |
| publisher | Imprinted by Felix Kyngston for Philemon Stephens and Christopher Meredith at the golden Lyon in Pauls Church-yard |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Byfield, Richard Verfasser aut The doctrine of the Sabbath vindicated in a confutation of a treatise of the Sabbath, written by M. Edward Breerwood against M. Nic. Byfield, wherein these five things are maintained: first, that the fourth Commandement is given to the servant and not to the master onely. Seecondly, that the fourth Commandement is morall. Thirdly, that our owne light workes as well as gainefull and toilesome are forbidden on the Sabbath. Fourthly, that the Lords day is of divine institution. Fifthly, that the Sabbath was instituted from the beginning. By the industrie of an unworthy labourer in Gods vineyard, Richard Byfield, pastor in Long Ditton in Surrey London Imprinted by Felix Kyngston for Philemon Stephens and Christopher Meredith at the golden Lyon in Pauls Church-yard 1631 Online-Ressource txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier A reply to: Brerewood, Edward. A learned treatise of the Sabbath. - Reproduction of the original in the University of Chicago Library. - STC (2nd ed.), 4238 Online-Ausgabe Ann Arbor, Mich UMI 1999- Early English books online Sonstige Standardnummer des Gesamttitels: 20723581 Digital version of: (Early English books, 1475-1640 ; 1059:04) s1999 Brerewood, Edward 1565?-1613 Learned treatise of the Sabbath Controversial literature aSabbath vEarly works to 1800 aSunday vEarly works to 1800 Sabbath Early works to 1800 Sunday Early works to 1800 Reproduktion von Byfield, Richard The doctrine of the Sabbath vindicated 1631 https://search.proquest.com/docview/2240873923 Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Byfield, Richard The doctrine of the Sabbath vindicated in a confutation of a treatise of the Sabbath, written by M. Edward Breerwood against M. Nic. Byfield, wherein these five things are maintained: first, that the fourth Commandement is given to the servant and not to the master onely. Seecondly, that the fourth Commandement is morall. Thirdly, that our owne light workes as well as gainefull and toilesome are forbidden on the Sabbath. Fourthly, that the Lords day is of divine institution. Fifthly, that the Sabbath was instituted from the beginning. By the industrie of an unworthy labourer in Gods vineyard, Richard Byfield, pastor in Long Ditton in Surrey Brerewood, Edward 1565?-1613 Learned treatise of the Sabbath Controversial literature aSabbath vEarly works to 1800 aSunday vEarly works to 1800 Sabbath Early works to 1800 Sunday Early works to 1800 |
| title | The doctrine of the Sabbath vindicated in a confutation of a treatise of the Sabbath, written by M. Edward Breerwood against M. Nic. Byfield, wherein these five things are maintained: first, that the fourth Commandement is given to the servant and not to the master onely. Seecondly, that the fourth Commandement is morall. Thirdly, that our owne light workes as well as gainefull and toilesome are forbidden on the Sabbath. Fourthly, that the Lords day is of divine institution. Fifthly, that the Sabbath was instituted from the beginning. By the industrie of an unworthy labourer in Gods vineyard, Richard Byfield, pastor in Long Ditton in Surrey |
| title_auth | The doctrine of the Sabbath vindicated in a confutation of a treatise of the Sabbath, written by M. Edward Breerwood against M. Nic. Byfield, wherein these five things are maintained: first, that the fourth Commandement is given to the servant and not to the master onely. Seecondly, that the fourth Commandement is morall. Thirdly, that our owne light workes as well as gainefull and toilesome are forbidden on the Sabbath. Fourthly, that the Lords day is of divine institution. Fifthly, that the Sabbath was instituted from the beginning. By the industrie of an unworthy labourer in Gods vineyard, Richard Byfield, pastor in Long Ditton in Surrey |
| title_exact_search | The doctrine of the Sabbath vindicated in a confutation of a treatise of the Sabbath, written by M. Edward Breerwood against M. Nic. Byfield, wherein these five things are maintained: first, that the fourth Commandement is given to the servant and not to the master onely. Seecondly, that the fourth Commandement is morall. Thirdly, that our owne light workes as well as gainefull and toilesome are forbidden on the Sabbath. Fourthly, that the Lords day is of divine institution. Fifthly, that the Sabbath was instituted from the beginning. By the industrie of an unworthy labourer in Gods vineyard, Richard Byfield, pastor in Long Ditton in Surrey |
| title_exact_search_txtP | The doctrine of the Sabbath vindicated in a confutation of a treatise of the Sabbath, written by M. Edward Breerwood against M. Nic. Byfield, wherein these five things are maintained: first, that the fourth Commandement is given to the servant and not to the master onely. Seecondly, that the fourth Commandement is morall. Thirdly, that our owne light workes as well as gainefull and toilesome are forbidden on the Sabbath. Fourthly, that the Lords day is of divine institution. Fifthly, that the Sabbath was instituted from the beginning. By the industrie of an unworthy labourer in Gods vineyard, Richard Byfield, pastor in Long Ditton in Surrey |
| title_full | The doctrine of the Sabbath vindicated in a confutation of a treatise of the Sabbath, written by M. Edward Breerwood against M. Nic. Byfield, wherein these five things are maintained: first, that the fourth Commandement is given to the servant and not to the master onely. Seecondly, that the fourth Commandement is morall. Thirdly, that our owne light workes as well as gainefull and toilesome are forbidden on the Sabbath. Fourthly, that the Lords day is of divine institution. Fifthly, that the Sabbath was instituted from the beginning. By the industrie of an unworthy labourer in Gods vineyard, Richard Byfield, pastor in Long Ditton in Surrey |
| title_fullStr | The doctrine of the Sabbath vindicated in a confutation of a treatise of the Sabbath, written by M. Edward Breerwood against M. Nic. Byfield, wherein these five things are maintained: first, that the fourth Commandement is given to the servant and not to the master onely. Seecondly, that the fourth Commandement is morall. Thirdly, that our owne light workes as well as gainefull and toilesome are forbidden on the Sabbath. Fourthly, that the Lords day is of divine institution. Fifthly, that the Sabbath was instituted from the beginning. By the industrie of an unworthy labourer in Gods vineyard, Richard Byfield, pastor in Long Ditton in Surrey |
| title_full_unstemmed | The doctrine of the Sabbath vindicated in a confutation of a treatise of the Sabbath, written by M. Edward Breerwood against M. Nic. Byfield, wherein these five things are maintained: first, that the fourth Commandement is given to the servant and not to the master onely. Seecondly, that the fourth Commandement is morall. Thirdly, that our owne light workes as well as gainefull and toilesome are forbidden on the Sabbath. Fourthly, that the Lords day is of divine institution. Fifthly, that the Sabbath was instituted from the beginning. By the industrie of an unworthy labourer in Gods vineyard, Richard Byfield, pastor in Long Ditton in Surrey |
| title_short | The doctrine of the Sabbath vindicated |
| title_sort | the doctrine of the sabbath vindicated in a confutation of a treatise of the sabbath written by m edward breerwood against m nic byfield wherein these five things are maintained first that the fourth commandement is given to the servant and not to the master onely seecondly that the fourth commandement is morall thirdly that our owne light workes as well as gainefull and toilesome are forbidden on the sabbath fourthly that the lords day is of divine institution fifthly that the sabbath was instituted from the beginning by the industrie of an unworthy labourer in gods vineyard richard byfield pastor in long ditton in surrey |
| title_sub | in a confutation of a treatise of the Sabbath, written by M. Edward Breerwood against M. Nic. Byfield, wherein these five things are maintained: first, that the fourth Commandement is given to the servant and not to the master onely. Seecondly, that the fourth Commandement is morall. Thirdly, that our owne light workes as well as gainefull and toilesome are forbidden on the Sabbath. Fourthly, that the Lords day is of divine institution. Fifthly, that the Sabbath was instituted from the beginning. By the industrie of an unworthy labourer in Gods vineyard, Richard Byfield, pastor in Long Ditton in Surrey |
| topic | Brerewood, Edward 1565?-1613 Learned treatise of the Sabbath Controversial literature aSabbath vEarly works to 1800 aSunday vEarly works to 1800 Sabbath Early works to 1800 Sunday Early works to 1800 |
| topic_facet | Brerewood, Edward 1565?-1613 Learned treatise of the Sabbath Controversial literature aSabbath vEarly works to 1800 aSunday vEarly works to 1800 Sabbath Early works to 1800 Sunday Early works to 1800 |
| url | https://search.proquest.com/docview/2240873923 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT byfieldrichard thedoctrineofthesabbathvindicatedinaconfutationofatreatiseofthesabbathwrittenbymedwardbreerwoodagainstmnicbyfieldwhereinthesefivethingsaremaintainedfirstthatthefourthcommandementisgiventotheservantandnottothemasteronelyseecondlythatthefourthcommandementis |