APA (7th ed.) Citation

Martin, H. W. (1823). A counter appeal: In answer to "An appeal" from William Wilberforce, Esq., M.P., designed to prove that the emancipation of the Negroes in the West Indies, by a legislative enactment, without the consent of the planters, would be a flagrant breach of national honour, hostile to the principles of religion, justice, and humanity, and highly injurious to the planter and to the slave. Printed for C. & J. Rivington, and sold by Lloyd.

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Martin, Henry William. A Counter Appeal: In Answer to "An Appeal" from William Wilberforce, Esq., M.P., Designed to Prove That the Emancipation of the Negroes in the West Indies, by a Legislative Enactment, Without the Consent of the Planters, Would Be a Flagrant Breach of National Honour, Hostile to the Principles of Religion, Justice, and Humanity, and Highly Injurious to the Planter and to the Slave. London: Printed for C. & J. Rivington, and sold by Lloyd, 1823.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Martin, Henry William. A Counter Appeal: In Answer to "An Appeal" from William Wilberforce, Esq., M.P., Designed to Prove That the Emancipation of the Negroes in the West Indies, by a Legislative Enactment, Without the Consent of the Planters, Would Be a Flagrant Breach of National Honour, Hostile to the Principles of Religion, Justice, and Humanity, and Highly Injurious to the Planter and to the Slave. Printed for C. & J. Rivington, and sold by Lloyd, 1823.