Thomas, J. P. (1822). A legal and constitutional argument against the alleged judicial right of restraining the publication of reports of judicial proceedings: As assumed in the King v. Thistlewood and others, enforced against the proprietor of the Observer by a fine of £500, and afterwards confirmed by the Court of King's Bench. Printed by I.L. Turner for S. Sweet.
Chicago-Zitierstil (17. Ausg.)Thomas, John Penford. A Legal and Constitutional Argument Against the Alleged Judicial Right of Restraining the Publication of Reports of Judicial Proceedings: As Assumed in the King V. Thistlewood and Others, Enforced Against the Proprietor of the Observer by a Fine of £500, and Afterwards Confirmed by the Court of King's Bench. London: Printed by I.L. Turner for S. Sweet, 1822.
MLA-Zitierstil (9. Ausg.)Thomas, John Penford. A Legal and Constitutional Argument Against the Alleged Judicial Right of Restraining the Publication of Reports of Judicial Proceedings: As Assumed in the King V. Thistlewood and Others, Enforced Against the Proprietor of the Observer by a Fine of £500, and Afterwards Confirmed by the Court of King's Bench. Printed by I.L. Turner for S. Sweet, 1822.