APA (7th ed.) Citation

Nichols, E. H. (1870). Argument before the Hon. J.D. Cox, secretary of the interior: Showing that the act of 1866 has not repealed the right of the Central Branch Union Pacific Railroad Company, under pre-existing laws, to continue and extend its road to the "main trunk" (the Union Pacific R.R.) as one of the branches thereof. Gibson Bros.

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Nichols, Effingham Howard. Argument Before the Hon. J.D. Cox, Secretary of the Interior: Showing That the Act of 1866 Has Not Repealed the Right of the Central Branch Union Pacific Railroad Company, Under Pre-existing Laws, to Continue and Extend Its Road to the "Main Trunk" (the Union Pacific R.R.) as One of the Branches Thereof. Washington: Gibson Bros, 1870.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Nichols, Effingham Howard. Argument Before the Hon. J.D. Cox, Secretary of the Interior: Showing That the Act of 1866 Has Not Repealed the Right of the Central Branch Union Pacific Railroad Company, Under Pre-existing Laws, to Continue and Extend Its Road to the "Main Trunk" (the Union Pacific R.R.) as One of the Branches Thereof. Gibson Bros, 1870.