Balkanskijat XIX vek: druhi pročiti
Gespeichert in:
| Format: | Buch |
|---|---|
| Sprache: | Bulgarian |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Sofija
Riva
2006
|
| Ausgabe: | 1. izd. |
| Schriftenreihe: | Izsledovatelski forum / Centre for Advanced Study, Sofia
1 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Abstract |
| Beschreibung: | In kyrill. Schr., bulg. - Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: The Balkan nineteenth century |
| Beschreibung: | 318 S. |
| ISBN: | 9543200823 9789543200825 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV022456456 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20070620 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 070608s2006 |||| 00||| bul d | ||
| 020 | |a 9543200823 |9 954-320-082-3 | ||
| 020 | |a 9789543200825 |9 978-954-320-082-5 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)160302202 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV022456456 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a bul | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-188 |a DE-Re13 | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Balkanskijat XIX vek |b druhi pročiti |c săst. o naučen red. Diana Miškova |
| 250 | |a 1. izd. | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Sofija |b Riva |c 2006 | |
| 300 | |a 318 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Izsledovatelski forum / Centre for Advanced Study, Sofia |v 1 | |
| 500 | |a In kyrill. Schr., bulg. - Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: The Balkan nineteenth century | ||
| 648 | 7 | |a Geschichte 1800-1900 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Identität |0 (DE-588)4026482-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Nationale Wiedergeburt |0 (DE-588)4361398-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Bulgarien |0 (DE-588)4008866-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Südosteuropa |0 (DE-588)4058449-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4143413-4 |a Aufsatzsammlung |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Südosteuropa |0 (DE-588)4058449-5 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Identität |0 (DE-588)4026482-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Geschichte 1800-1900 |A z |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 1 | 0 | |a Bulgarien |0 (DE-588)4008866-2 |D g |
| 689 | 1 | 1 | |a Nationale Wiedergeburt |0 (DE-588)4361398-6 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | 2 | |a Identität |0 (DE-588)4026482-8 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | 3 | |a Geschichte 1800-1900 |A z |
| 689 | 1 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Miškova, Diana |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 810 | 2 | |a Centre for Advanced Study, Sofia |t Izsledovatelski forum |v 1 |w (DE-604)BV022456449 |9 1 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSBMuenchen |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015664213&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015664213&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Abstract |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 09034 |g 496 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 306.09 |e 22/bsb |f 09034 |g 496 |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-015664213 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1806960612533600256 |
|---|---|
| adam_text |
Съдържание
Диана Миткова
Вместо въведение, или за отговорностите
на маргиналите
Даниела Колева, Иван Еленков
Промените в българската историческа наука след
очертания и граници
Александър Везепков
Очевидно само на пръв поглед:
„Българското възраждане" като отделна епоха
Чавдар Маринов
„Што е тоа македонска преродба?"
Към македонската историографска концепция
за национално възраждане
Румен Даскалов
Проблематизация на Възраждането
Николай Поппетров
Българското възраждане: бележки към един (невъзмо¬
жен дебат/
Мартин Иванов
Какво би станало, ако.
Конструиране на хипотезата
„развитие без Освобождение"
Десислава Лилова
Варварите, цивилизованите и българите: дефиниции на
идентичността в учебниците и печата
Диана
В
Стефан
Два проекта за
края на
The Balkan Nineteenth Century. Other Readings.
and Contributors
The Balkan Nineteenth Century.
Other Readings.
Resumes and Contributors
Danieva Koleva, Ivan Elenkov
POST-1989 CHANGES IN BULGARIAN HISTORICAL
SCIENCE: LINES AND BOUNDARIES
Abstract:
The study sets out to analyze whether and how the paradigm of Bul¬
garian Historical Science has been altered after
cumstances of its formation, it focuses on the institutions of historical knowl¬
edge in post-war Bulgaria. The accent falls on the political context of their
development and the main tasks set before them. The second part of the study
sketches the post-
the end of isolation for Bulgarian science. Those have taken the form of new
thematic areas, new approaches and methodological innovations leading to
new readings of established empirical information, the discovery of new
sources, etc. Special attention is paid to the nature and limitations of these
changes. The third part looks into the debate on fascism as a symptom of the
current state of Bulgarian historical science demonstrating how notions of
professionalism and scientific value have remained unchanged, allowing the
authors to prove that despite the abovementioned changes the paradigm of
historical science has not been altered.
Ivan Elenkov, PhD, is an associate professor at the Department for
History and Theory of Culture, Sofia University 'St.
search interests: history of Bulgarian culture of 20th century; Bulgarian his¬
toriography. Major publications: Native and Right-Wing. Sofia:
(in Bulgarian). E-mail: ivan_elenkov@yahoo.com
Daniela
History and Theory of Culture, Sofia University 'St.
search interests: oral history and anthropology of socialism; biographical re¬
search. Major publications: Biography and Normality. Sofia:
Bulgarian).
E-mail: daniela@sclg.uni-sofia.bg
313
Alexander
NOT SO APPARENT TRUTHS: THE BULGARIAN
,
Abstract:
The article studies the problematic representation of the Bulgarian Na¬
tional Revival as a separate historical period discontinuous from the centuries
'under Ottoman rule'. The first part briefly exposes the contradictions of this
construction. The second draws a parallel with other Balkan historiographies,
demonstrating that such a division exists only in Albania and not in countries
which had gained their independence in the early nineteenth century (Greece,
Serbia, Romania). Part three proves that the so-called 'Revival era' cannot be
properly studied outside the wider Ottoman context. It is essential to take into
account the changes,undergone by the Ottoman state and society during the
Tanzimat period which largely triggered the 'Bulgarian Revival' itself. The last
part tackles the problem of the uncritical reproduction of the 'Revival' concept
and its mstitutionalization as a separate school of Bulgarian historiography.
Alexander Vezenkov, PhD graduated the Faculty of History at Sofia
University „St. kliment
He works mainly on XIX-XX
the communist regimes. Among his recent work are 'Paradoksalnata
na
ish Words in the Bulgarian National Discourse),
No
Always Think of the Balkans as Part of Europe?' In: Junior Visiting Fellows'
Conferences, vol.
forthcoming at: www.imw.at
E-mail: avezenkov @ hotmail.com
Tchavdar Marinov
„WHAT IS THE MACEDONIAN REBIRTH?" NOTES ON
THE MACEDONIAN HISTORIOGRAPHICAL CONCEPT
OF NATIONAL REVIVAL
Abstract
The article describes the stages in constructing the concept of 'National
Revival' in the contemporary Macedonian historiographical context and the
impact of wider cultural, political and 'academic' factors on its scientific sta¬
tus. Two interrelated observations form the core of the argument: as the idea of
the 'Macedonian Revival' is rooted in Bulgarian historiographical traditions,
Macedonian historiography had to find a new meaning for this concept. Inter-
314
pretati ve
poral range of the 'Revival era' to its marginalization and even rejection. There
have been some 'revisionist' attempts to reconstruct
by rewriting the established historiographical narrative in an even more nation¬
alistic key. Analyzing these strategies, the article shows how far historiography
is biased by considerations of the practical use and 'political correctness' of its
concepts. On the other hand, however, the article questions the stereotypical
notion that the Macedonian idea of the 'National Revival' is a mirror image of
its Bulgarian counterpart, only with different ethnonyms.
Tchavdar Marinov, PhD is teaching at the Department of Sociology,
Faculty of Philosophy, Sofia University 'St.
revolves around the theories of citizenship, nationalism and nation-state; na¬
tion-building processes in the Balkans; anthropological approaches on eth¬
nicity. He is the author of
politiques d'Etat et ethnicité'
Politics and Ethnicity), Balkanologie, Vol.
Macedonians. Identity Politics, Political Activism, Refugee Memories', Cen¬
tre for Advanced Study Sofia, www.cas.bg
E-mail:
Roumen
PROBLEMATIZING THE REVIVAL
Abstract
This contribution is prompted by the debates on the Bulgarian Revival
era at the Centre for Advanced Study Sofia stirred by the author's book How
Do We Think the Bulgarian Revival
Sofia,
participants took a particularly critical view by challenging the concept of a
Bulgarian Revival as a historical era. While agreeing with some of the points
made, Roumen
meaningful to speak of a Bulgarian Revival.
Roumen
University, Sofia and the Central European University, Budapest. His research
focuses on the modern history of Bulgaria and South Eastern Europe; devel¬
opment and modernization; national identities and nationalism. He is the au¬
thor of several books, among them The Bulgarian Society
II, Sofia: Gutenberg
the Balkans. Historiography of the Bulgarian revival. Budapest:
2004;
315
Sociology of Max Weber. Sofia,
e-mail: daskalovOceu.hu
Nikolay Poppetrov
THE BULGARIAN REVIVAL: NOTES TOWARDS AN
(IMPOSSIBLE DEBATE
Abstract:
The paper examines the question whether it is possible to debate the prob¬
lem field known as 'the Bulgarian Revival'. The discussion focuses mainly on
terminology, temporal and spatial localization of processes and events; activity
centres and contact zones; factors, allowing us to define the Revival as an aggre¬
gate of processes; the political flows as well as ideological concepts and refer¬
ence points. Attention has been also paid to the image of the Other; the patterns
of influence; the social agents of the main tendencies. The most salient features
of the Bulgarian historiography of the Revival have been exposed: preconceived
judgments, politicization, prevalence of stereotypes, descriptiveness instead of
conceptuality, underrating of foreign historiography, absence of debate. The au¬
thor suggests directions for reinterpretation of the revivalist
veying the range of preconceived images and the deconstruction of myths could
serve as a starting point for the as yet missing debate.
The author, a historian, is a deputy editor-in-chief of 'The History' jour¬
nal. His main interests are in the field of contemporary history: political my¬
thology, history of ideas, authoritarianism/fascism, new interpretative models.
Selected major publications: The Image of King Boris III on the Agenda of
Bulgarian Society
74;
On the Public Use of History in Time of Transition -In: Historical Science in
Bulgaria: State and Prospects. Sofia,
dress:
Martin
WHAT IF.
HYPOTHESIS
Abstract:
As Bulgarian historiography is still reluctant to compare the historical
contexts before and after the war of liberation
fertile area for nurturing discourses of romantic lament. On the basis of three
tests which draw upon existing statistical information the article indicates the
316
deep and prolonged economic crisis in post-Liberation Bulgaria. (For ex¬
ample, between
number of domestic animals.) This fact has prompted the author to try to test
the hypothesis of a 'development without Liberation' laid out in the third part
of the article. Had they remained part of the Ottoman
until World War I, the Bulgarians would have had the chance to develop a
more intensive agriculture based on stock-breeding rather than grain, which
renders less added value. Without the state's ambition for developing a 'na¬
tional industry', the Bulgarian economy would have avoided the tight limita¬
tions of the import-substituting industrial model. 'Safeguarded' against an
early political independence, Bulgaria would not have had to go into huge
armament expenses. Without the fratricide of the second Balkan War
and the subsequent inferiority complex, the country would have entered the
twentieth century as a winner, next to Yugoslavia or Czecho-slovakia. In the
era of nationalisms, however, such a scenario had little chance to win the day.
Martin
emy of Science. His scientific interests are in the area of economic and social
history in Bulgaria and on the Balkans between
of
Crises and Progress. Sofia:Sofia University Press:
of Bulgaria,
E-mail:
Dessislava
THE BARBARIANS, THE CIVILIZED AND THE
BULGARIANS: DEFINITIONS OF IDENTITY
IN TEXTBOOKS AND PERIODICALS
Abstract:
What were the ideological uses of the notions of barbarism and civiliza¬
tion in the Bulgarian Revival culture? In order to explain why these categories
were transformed into a coordinate system for the construction of national iden¬
tity, the author investigates how their definitions in the geography textbooks
changed during the period between 1830s and 1870s. The hypothesis is that
geography was used as a channel for ideological transfer through which the
grammar of modernity and the taxonomies of progress were imported. Looking
into the periodical press of the time, we can see how the imported definitions
hindered the formation of a prestigious national image by prompting identifica¬
tion with the 'barbaric world'. This explains why it took so long to adapi\the
basic vocabulary of modernity to the Bulgarian context. The text focuses on
three different strategies for evading the barbaric stigma:
317
colic
theoretical canon of evolutionism, which legitimized the lack of essential dif¬
ference between the 'barbarians' and the 'civilized';
a colonial master denying the Bulgarians access to progress and modernity.
Dessislava
Cultural Studies, South-West University, Blagoevgrad. Her research deals
with questions of nationalism, imagined geographies, historiography and na¬
tional identity. She is the author of The Meanings of the Bulgarian National
Name in the Revival Period, Sofia: Prosveta,
universelle à l'appui d'une culture nationale. In: Histoire et Nation en Eu¬
rope centrale et orientale XDCe-XXe siècles. Sous la
Paris: INRP,
E-mail: dessislavalilovaCS'vahoo.com
Diana Mishkova
IN QUEST OF BALKAN OCCIDENTALISM
Abstract:
The article seeks to revise the current mainstream interpretation of the
relationship between the Balkans and the West outside the mirror reading of the
Balkanism paradigm. The issue of „the Bulgarian attitude to Europe" is refor¬
mulated as the issue of „the Bulgarian knowledge of Europe" where the impact
of communication agents and channels of cultural transfer is brought to the
forefront. The chosen vantage point thus underscores the importance of both
the imperial and the wider Balkan context for the formation of Bulgarian (and
Balkan) ideas of modernity. The article takes this as a starting point for
problematizing, on the one hand, the tendency of interpreting the western dis¬
course of the Balkans in the light of Western Orientalism and, on the other, the
interpretation of the Balkan visions of Europe as primarily shaped by the hege¬
monic Western discourse on the Balkans. The interaction between the Western
representations and the local production of images and ideologies is powerful
and long-lasting, but its results cannot be reduced to the assimilation, 'sublima¬
tion' or opposition to the hegemonic discourse and the superior power of the
West. From the point of view of the politics of representation the pro- and anti-
European, the Utopian and anti-utopian visions of the Bulgarian nationalist elite
coexist
role of Europe, on the other hand, was maintained only as a metonymy of mo¬
dernity rather than as an independent cluster of ideological meanings.
Diana Mishkova, PhD is an associate professor, teaching modern and con¬
temporary Balkan history at Sofia University. Her research revolves around prob-
318
lems of nationalism
the history of modern political ideas, and intellectual history. She is the author,
among others, of Domestication of Freedom. Modernity-Legitimacy in Serbia
and Romania in the Nineteenth Century, Sofia:
The Uses of Tradition and National Identity in the Balkans. In: M. Todorova
(ed.),
Interesting Anomaly of Balkan Liberalism. In: Ivan Denes
Search for Identity. Imperial Heritages and Liberal Nationalisms in a Compara¬
tive Perspective, Budapest and New York:
Stefan Detchev
TWO PROJECTS OF BULGARIAN NATIONAL IDENTITY
FROM THE LATE
Abstract:
The text analyzes two ideological versions of the Bulgarian national iden¬
tity that engaged the public political space of the 1880s and 1890s, mostly through
publications in the periodical press. For the most part the article focuses on some
important elements of national ideology in the context of the relationship be¬
tween Sofia and St. Petersburg, mostly after the Union of Eastern Rumelia with
the Principality of Bulgaria, i.e. from
were constructed in the context of the controversy surrounding the Russian poli¬
tics towards Bulgaria in this period. In the debates on the shared orthodox reli¬
gion and Slavonic roots, the Russophile and Russophobe ideologies demonstrated
the possible existence of two different concepts of Bulgarian national identity,
their justification and juxtaposition, In the context of Russophile ideology Bul¬
garian identity is interpreted mostly as 'Slavonic' and 'Orthodox', whereas the
Russophobe took a more diverse approach and defmeds the Bulgarian as non-
Russian, European,, a city artisan, small merchant or farmer owning his land, and
having a distinctive culture, lifestyle and 'manliness'
Stefan Detchev, PhD is an assistant professor at the Department of
Bulgarian History, South-West University, Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria. His main
field of research is modern Bulgarian history, especially history of political
ideologies, nationalism, race and racial thought, political culture and public
sphere. He is the author of 'Mapping Russia in the Bulgarian Press
1894У
European University, Budapest, Center for Historical Studies,
'
godina proshlog
cial History, vol. IV,
E-mail: |
| adam_txt |
Съдържание
Диана Миткова
Вместо въведение, или за отговорностите
на маргиналите
Даниела Колева, Иван Еленков
Промените в българската историческа наука след
очертания и граници
Александър Везепков
Очевидно само на пръв поглед:
„Българското възраждане" като отделна епоха
Чавдар Маринов
„Што е тоа македонска преродба?"
Към македонската историографска концепция
за национално възраждане
Румен Даскалов
Проблематизация на Възраждането
Николай Поппетров
Българското възраждане: бележки към един (невъзмо¬
жен дебат/
Мартин Иванов
Какво би станало, ако.
Конструиране на хипотезата
„развитие без Освобождение"
Десислава Лилова
Варварите, цивилизованите и българите: дефиниции на
идентичността в учебниците и печата
Диана
В
Стефан
Два проекта за
края на
The Balkan Nineteenth Century. Other Readings.
and Contributors
The Balkan Nineteenth Century.
Other Readings.
Resumes and Contributors
Danieva Koleva, Ivan Elenkov
POST-1989 CHANGES IN BULGARIAN HISTORICAL
SCIENCE: LINES AND BOUNDARIES
Abstract:
The study sets out to analyze whether and how the paradigm of Bul¬
garian Historical Science has been altered after
cumstances of its formation, it focuses on the institutions of historical knowl¬
edge in post-war Bulgaria. The accent falls on the political context of their
development and the main tasks set before them. The second part of the study
sketches the post-
the end of isolation for Bulgarian science. Those have taken the form of new
thematic areas, new approaches and methodological innovations leading to
new readings of established empirical information, the discovery of new
sources, etc. Special attention is paid to the nature and limitations of these
changes. The third part looks into the debate on fascism as a symptom of the
current state of Bulgarian historical science demonstrating how notions of
professionalism and scientific value have remained unchanged, allowing the
authors to prove that despite the abovementioned changes the paradigm of
historical science has not been altered.
Ivan Elenkov, PhD, is an associate professor at the Department for
History and Theory of Culture, Sofia University 'St.
search interests: history of Bulgarian culture of 20th century; Bulgarian his¬
toriography. Major publications: Native and Right-Wing. Sofia:
(in Bulgarian). E-mail: ivan_elenkov@yahoo.com
Daniela
History and Theory of Culture, Sofia University 'St.
search interests: oral history and anthropology of socialism; biographical re¬
search. Major publications: Biography and Normality. Sofia:
Bulgarian).
E-mail: daniela@sclg.uni-sofia.bg
313
Alexander
NOT SO APPARENT TRUTHS: THE BULGARIAN
,
Abstract:
The article studies the problematic representation of the Bulgarian Na¬
tional Revival as a separate historical period discontinuous from the centuries
'under Ottoman rule'. The first part briefly exposes the contradictions of this
construction. The second draws a parallel with other Balkan historiographies,
demonstrating that such a division exists only in Albania and not in countries
which had gained their independence in the early nineteenth century (Greece,
Serbia, Romania). Part three proves that the so-called 'Revival era' cannot be
properly studied outside the wider Ottoman context. It is essential to take into
account the changes,undergone by the Ottoman state and society during the
Tanzimat period which largely triggered the 'Bulgarian Revival' itself. The last
part tackles the problem of the uncritical reproduction of the 'Revival' concept
and its mstitutionalization as a separate school of Bulgarian historiography.
Alexander Vezenkov, PhD graduated the Faculty of History at Sofia
University „St. kliment
He works mainly on XIX-XX
the communist regimes. Among his recent work are 'Paradoksalnata
na
ish Words in the Bulgarian National Discourse),
No
Always Think of the Balkans as Part of Europe?' In: Junior Visiting Fellows'
Conferences, vol.
forthcoming at: www.imw.at
E-mail: avezenkov @ hotmail.com
Tchavdar Marinov
„WHAT IS THE MACEDONIAN REBIRTH?" NOTES ON
THE MACEDONIAN HISTORIOGRAPHICAL CONCEPT
OF NATIONAL REVIVAL
Abstract
The article describes the stages in constructing the concept of 'National
Revival' in the contemporary Macedonian historiographical context and the
impact of wider cultural, political and 'academic' factors on its scientific sta¬
tus. Two interrelated observations form the core of the argument: as the idea of
the 'Macedonian Revival' is rooted in Bulgarian historiographical traditions,
Macedonian historiography had to find a new meaning for this concept. Inter-
314
pretati ve
poral range of the 'Revival era' to its marginalization and even rejection. There
have been some 'revisionist' attempts to reconstruct
by rewriting the established historiographical narrative in an even more nation¬
alistic key. Analyzing these strategies, the article shows how far historiography
is biased by considerations of the practical use and 'political correctness' of its
concepts. On the other hand, however, the article questions the stereotypical
notion that the Macedonian idea of the 'National Revival' is a mirror image of
its Bulgarian counterpart, only with different ethnonyms.
Tchavdar Marinov, PhD is teaching at the Department of Sociology,
Faculty of Philosophy, Sofia University 'St.
revolves around the theories of citizenship, nationalism and nation-state; na¬
tion-building processes in the Balkans; anthropological approaches on eth¬
nicity. He is the author of
politiques d'Etat et ethnicité'
Politics and Ethnicity), Balkanologie, Vol.
Macedonians. Identity Politics, Political Activism, Refugee Memories', Cen¬
tre for Advanced Study Sofia, www.cas.bg
E-mail:
Roumen
PROBLEMATIZING THE REVIVAL
Abstract
This contribution is prompted by the debates on the Bulgarian Revival
era at the Centre for Advanced Study Sofia stirred by the author's book How
Do We Think the Bulgarian Revival
Sofia,
participants took a particularly critical view by challenging the concept of a
Bulgarian Revival as a historical era. While agreeing with some of the points
made, Roumen
meaningful to speak of a Bulgarian Revival.
Roumen
University, Sofia and the Central European University, Budapest. His research
focuses on the modern history of Bulgaria and South Eastern Europe; devel¬
opment and modernization; national identities and nationalism. He is the au¬
thor of several books, among them The Bulgarian Society
II, Sofia: Gutenberg
the Balkans. Historiography of the Bulgarian revival. Budapest:
2004;
315
Sociology of Max Weber. Sofia,
e-mail: daskalovOceu.hu
Nikolay Poppetrov
THE BULGARIAN REVIVAL: NOTES TOWARDS AN
(IMPOSSIBLE DEBATE
Abstract:
The paper examines the question whether it is possible to debate the prob¬
lem field known as 'the Bulgarian Revival'. The discussion focuses mainly on
terminology, temporal and spatial localization of processes and events; activity
centres and contact zones; factors, allowing us to define the Revival as an aggre¬
gate of processes; the political flows as well as ideological concepts and refer¬
ence points. Attention has been also paid to the image of the Other; the patterns
of influence; the social agents of the main tendencies. The most salient features
of the Bulgarian historiography of the Revival have been exposed: preconceived
judgments, politicization, prevalence of stereotypes, descriptiveness instead of
conceptuality, underrating of foreign historiography, absence of debate. The au¬
thor suggests directions for reinterpretation of the revivalist
veying the range of preconceived images and the deconstruction of myths could
serve as a starting point for the as yet missing debate.
The author, a historian, is a deputy editor-in-chief of 'The History' jour¬
nal. His main interests are in the field of contemporary history: political my¬
thology, history of ideas, authoritarianism/fascism, new interpretative models.
Selected major publications: The Image of King Boris III on the Agenda of
Bulgarian Society
74;
On the Public Use of History in Time of Transition -In: Historical Science in
Bulgaria: State and Prospects. Sofia,
dress:
Martin
WHAT IF.
HYPOTHESIS
Abstract:
As Bulgarian historiography is still reluctant to compare the historical
contexts before and after the war of liberation
fertile area for nurturing discourses of romantic lament. On the basis of three
tests which draw upon existing statistical information the article indicates the
316
deep and prolonged economic crisis in post-Liberation Bulgaria. (For ex¬
ample, between
number of domestic animals.) This fact has prompted the author to try to test
the hypothesis of a 'development without Liberation' laid out in the third part
of the article. Had they remained part of the Ottoman
until World War I, the Bulgarians would have had the chance to develop a
more intensive agriculture based on stock-breeding rather than grain, which
renders less added value. Without the state's ambition for developing a 'na¬
tional industry', the Bulgarian economy would have avoided the tight limita¬
tions of the import-substituting industrial model. 'Safeguarded' against an
early political independence, Bulgaria would not have had to go into huge
armament expenses. Without the fratricide of the second Balkan War
and the subsequent inferiority complex, the country would have entered the
twentieth century as a winner, next to Yugoslavia or Czecho-slovakia. In the
era of nationalisms, however, such a scenario had little chance to win the day.
Martin
emy of Science. His scientific interests are in the area of economic and social
history in Bulgaria and on the Balkans between
of
Crises and Progress. Sofia:Sofia University Press:
of Bulgaria,
E-mail:
Dessislava
THE BARBARIANS, THE CIVILIZED AND THE
BULGARIANS: DEFINITIONS OF IDENTITY
IN TEXTBOOKS AND PERIODICALS
Abstract:
What were the ideological uses of the notions of barbarism and civiliza¬
tion in the Bulgarian Revival culture? In order to explain why these categories
were transformed into a coordinate system for the construction of national iden¬
tity, the author investigates how their definitions in the geography textbooks
changed during the period between 1830s and 1870s. The hypothesis is that
geography was used as a channel for ideological transfer through which the
grammar of modernity and the taxonomies of progress were imported. Looking
into the periodical press of the time, we can see how the imported definitions
hindered the formation of a prestigious national image by prompting identifica¬
tion with the 'barbaric world'. This explains why it took so long to adapi\the
basic vocabulary of modernity to the Bulgarian context. The text focuses on
three different strategies for evading the barbaric stigma:
317
colic
theoretical canon of evolutionism, which legitimized the lack of essential dif¬
ference between the 'barbarians' and the 'civilized';
a colonial master denying the Bulgarians access to progress and modernity.
Dessislava
Cultural Studies, South-West University, Blagoevgrad. Her research deals
with questions of nationalism, imagined geographies, historiography and na¬
tional identity. She is the author of The Meanings of the Bulgarian National
Name in the Revival Period, Sofia: Prosveta,
universelle à l'appui d'une culture nationale. In: Histoire et Nation en Eu¬
rope centrale et orientale XDCe-XXe siècles. Sous la
Paris: INRP,
E-mail: dessislavalilovaCS'vahoo.com
Diana Mishkova
IN QUEST OF BALKAN OCCIDENTALISM
Abstract:
The article seeks to revise the current mainstream interpretation of the
relationship between the Balkans and the West outside the mirror reading of the
Balkanism paradigm. The issue of „the Bulgarian attitude to Europe" is refor¬
mulated as the issue of „the Bulgarian knowledge of Europe" where the impact
of communication agents and channels of cultural transfer is brought to the
forefront. The chosen vantage point thus underscores the importance of both
the imperial and the wider Balkan context for the formation of Bulgarian (and
Balkan) ideas of modernity. The article takes this as a starting point for
problematizing, on the one hand, the tendency of interpreting the western dis¬
course of the Balkans in the light of Western Orientalism and, on the other, the
interpretation of the Balkan visions of Europe as primarily shaped by the hege¬
monic Western discourse on the Balkans. The interaction between the Western
representations and the local production of images and ideologies is powerful
and long-lasting, but its results cannot be reduced to the assimilation, 'sublima¬
tion' or opposition to the hegemonic discourse and the superior power of the
West. From the point of view of the politics of representation the pro- and anti-
European, the Utopian and anti-utopian visions of the Bulgarian nationalist elite
coexist
role of Europe, on the other hand, was maintained only as a metonymy of mo¬
dernity rather than as an independent cluster of ideological meanings.
Diana Mishkova, PhD is an associate professor, teaching modern and con¬
temporary Balkan history at Sofia University. Her research revolves around prob-
318
lems of nationalism
the history of modern political ideas, and intellectual history. She is the author,
among others, of Domestication of Freedom. Modernity-Legitimacy in Serbia
and Romania in the Nineteenth Century, Sofia:
The Uses of Tradition and National Identity in the Balkans. In: M. Todorova
(ed.),
Interesting Anomaly of Balkan Liberalism. In: Ivan Denes
Search for Identity. Imperial Heritages and Liberal Nationalisms in a Compara¬
tive Perspective, Budapest and New York:
Stefan Detchev
TWO PROJECTS OF BULGARIAN NATIONAL IDENTITY
FROM THE LATE
Abstract:
The text analyzes two ideological versions of the Bulgarian national iden¬
tity that engaged the public political space of the 1880s and 1890s, mostly through
publications in the periodical press. For the most part the article focuses on some
important elements of national ideology in the context of the relationship be¬
tween Sofia and St. Petersburg, mostly after the Union of Eastern Rumelia with
the Principality of Bulgaria, i.e. from
were constructed in the context of the controversy surrounding the Russian poli¬
tics towards Bulgaria in this period. In the debates on the shared orthodox reli¬
gion and Slavonic roots, the Russophile and Russophobe ideologies demonstrated
the possible existence of two different concepts of Bulgarian national identity,
their justification and juxtaposition, In the context of Russophile ideology Bul¬
garian identity is interpreted mostly as 'Slavonic' and 'Orthodox', whereas the
Russophobe took a more diverse approach and defmeds the Bulgarian as non-
Russian, European,, a city artisan, small merchant or farmer owning his land, and
having a distinctive culture, lifestyle and 'manliness'
Stefan Detchev, PhD is an assistant professor at the Department of
Bulgarian History, South-West University, Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria. His main
field of research is modern Bulgarian history, especially history of political
ideologies, nationalism, race and racial thought, political culture and public
sphere. He is the author of 'Mapping Russia in the Bulgarian Press
1894У
European University, Budapest, Center for Historical Studies,
'
godina proshlog
cial History, vol. IV,
E-mail: |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV022456456 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)160302202 (DE-599)BVBBV022456456 |
| edition | 1. izd. |
| era | Geschichte 1800-1900 gnd |
| era_facet | Geschichte 1800-1900 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV022456456</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20070620</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070608s2006 |||| 00||| bul d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9543200823</subfield><subfield code="9">954-320-082-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789543200825</subfield><subfield code="9">978-954-320-082-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)160302202</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV022456456</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">bul</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-Re13</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Balkanskijat XIX vek</subfield><subfield code="b">druhi pročiti</subfield><subfield code="c">săst. o naučen red. Diana Miškova</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1. izd.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sofija</subfield><subfield code="b">Riva</subfield><subfield code="c">2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">318 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Izsledovatelski forum / Centre for Advanced Study, Sofia</subfield><subfield code="v">1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In kyrill. Schr., bulg. - Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: The Balkan nineteenth century</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1800-1900</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Identität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4026482-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Nationale Wiedergeburt</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4361398-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Bulgarien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4008866-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Südosteuropa</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4058449-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4143413-4</subfield><subfield code="a">Aufsatzsammlung</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Südosteuropa</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4058449-5</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Identität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4026482-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1800-1900</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Bulgarien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4008866-2</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Nationale Wiedergeburt</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4361398-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Identität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4026482-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1800-1900</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Miškova, Diana</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="810" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Centre for Advanced Study, Sofia</subfield><subfield code="t">Izsledovatelski forum</subfield><subfield code="v">1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV022456449</subfield><subfield code="9">1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSBMuenchen</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015664213&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015664213&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09034</subfield><subfield code="g">496</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">306.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09034</subfield><subfield code="g">496</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-015664213</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4143413-4 Aufsatzsammlung gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Aufsatzsammlung |
| geographic | Bulgarien (DE-588)4008866-2 gnd Südosteuropa (DE-588)4058449-5 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Bulgarien Südosteuropa |
| id | DE-604.BV022456456 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-02T17:38:24Z |
| indexdate | 2024-08-10T01:05:25Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9543200823 9789543200825 |
| language | Bulgarian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-015664213 |
| oclc_num | 160302202 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-188 DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-188 DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR |
| physical | 318 S. |
| publishDate | 2006 |
| publishDateSearch | 2006 |
| publishDateSort | 2006 |
| publisher | Riva |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Izsledovatelski forum / Centre for Advanced Study, Sofia |
| spelling | Balkanskijat XIX vek druhi pročiti săst. o naučen red. Diana Miškova 1. izd. Sofija Riva 2006 318 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Izsledovatelski forum / Centre for Advanced Study, Sofia 1 In kyrill. Schr., bulg. - Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: The Balkan nineteenth century Geschichte 1800-1900 gnd rswk-swf Identität (DE-588)4026482-8 gnd rswk-swf Nationale Wiedergeburt (DE-588)4361398-6 gnd rswk-swf Bulgarien (DE-588)4008866-2 gnd rswk-swf Südosteuropa (DE-588)4058449-5 gnd rswk-swf (DE-588)4143413-4 Aufsatzsammlung gnd-content Südosteuropa (DE-588)4058449-5 g Identität (DE-588)4026482-8 s Geschichte 1800-1900 z DE-604 Bulgarien (DE-588)4008866-2 g Nationale Wiedergeburt (DE-588)4361398-6 s Miškova, Diana Sonstige oth Centre for Advanced Study, Sofia Izsledovatelski forum 1 (DE-604)BV022456449 1 Digitalisierung BSBMuenchen application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015664213&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015664213&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Abstract |
| spellingShingle | Balkanskijat XIX vek druhi pročiti Identität (DE-588)4026482-8 gnd Nationale Wiedergeburt (DE-588)4361398-6 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4026482-8 (DE-588)4361398-6 (DE-588)4008866-2 (DE-588)4058449-5 (DE-588)4143413-4 |
| title | Balkanskijat XIX vek druhi pročiti |
| title_auth | Balkanskijat XIX vek druhi pročiti |
| title_exact_search | Balkanskijat XIX vek druhi pročiti |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Balkanskijat XIX vek druhi pročiti |
| title_full | Balkanskijat XIX vek druhi pročiti săst. o naučen red. Diana Miškova |
| title_fullStr | Balkanskijat XIX vek druhi pročiti săst. o naučen red. Diana Miškova |
| title_full_unstemmed | Balkanskijat XIX vek druhi pročiti săst. o naučen red. Diana Miškova |
| title_short | Balkanskijat XIX vek |
| title_sort | balkanskijat xix vek druhi prociti |
| title_sub | druhi pročiti |
| topic | Identität (DE-588)4026482-8 gnd Nationale Wiedergeburt (DE-588)4361398-6 gnd |
| topic_facet | Identität Nationale Wiedergeburt Bulgarien Südosteuropa Aufsatzsammlung |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015664213&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015664213&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV022456449 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT miskovadiana balkanskijatxixvekdruhiprociti |