Unification of tort law: fault:
Gespeichert in:
| Format: | Buch |
|---|---|
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
The Hague
Kluwer Law International
2005
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Principles of European tort law
10 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | XXIX, 391 S. |
| ISBN: | 904112098X 9789041120984 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zcb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV021660036 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20200108 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 060718s2005 ne |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 010 | |a 2005618653 | ||
| 020 | |a 904112098X |9 90-411-2098-X | ||
| 020 | |a 9789041120984 |9 978-90-411-2098-4 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)61894995 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV021660036 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a ne |c NL | ||
| 049 | |a DE-355 |a DE-19 |a DE-384 |a DE-188 |a DE-11 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a KJC1663 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 346.403/8 |2 22 | |
| 084 | |a PS 3740 |0 (DE-625)139786: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a PU 1532 |0 (DE-625)139918: |2 rvk | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Unification of tort law: fault |c P. Widmer (ed.). W. H. van Boom ... |
| 264 | 1 | |a The Hague |b Kluwer Law International |c 2005 | |
| 300 | |a XXIX, 391 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Principles of European tort law |v 10 | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Onrechtmatige daad |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Unificatie |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Wettelijke aansprakelijkheid |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Liability (Law) |z Europe | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Strict liability |z Europe | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Unerlaubte Handlung |0 (DE-588)4061688-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Haftung |0 (DE-588)4022898-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsvergleich |0 (DE-588)4115712-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 4 | |a Europa | |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4143413-4 |a Aufsatzsammlung |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Unerlaubte Handlung |0 (DE-588)4061688-5 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Haftung |0 (DE-588)4022898-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Rechtsvergleich |0 (DE-588)4115712-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Widmer, Pierre |d 1938-2020 |e Sonstige |0 (DE-588)11734270X |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Boom, Willem H. van |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 830 | 0 | |a Principles of European tort law |v 10 |w (DE-604)BV012558902 |9 10 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Regensburg |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=014874543&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-014874543 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804135470727168000 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Contents
List of Abbreviations
Fault: Questionnaire and Cases
Pierre Widmer and Helmut
Part I
1.
of liability
2.
causation)
3.
4.
wrongfulness in the context of contributory negligence
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Part II
1.
2.
a) Carelessness
b) Intention
3.
4.
a) Domestic drinker
b) Bar drinker
5.
6.
7.
8.
viii Contents
9.
a) Inadvertence
b) Intention
10.
11.
a) Without warning sign
b) With warning sign
Fault under Austrian Law
Helmut
Part I
1.
of liability
a) The importance of fault in establishing liability
b) The relationship between liability based on fault and strict liability
c) The aims of a fault requirement
2.
causation)
3.
4.
wrongfulness in the context of contributory negligence
5.
6.
a) Subjective yardstick
b) Exceptions from the subjective yardstick
7.
8.
9.
a) Extent of compensation
b) Internal relationship between several tortfeasors
c) Extent of compensation in the case of contributory negligence
d) Exemption clauses
10.
11.
Part II
1.
2.
Contents ix
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Fault under Belgian Law
Herman Cousy and
Part I
1.
of liability
2.
causation)
3.
4.
wrongfulness in the context of contributory negligence
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Part II
1.
2.
3.
4.
a) Domestic drinker
b) Bar drinker
5.
x
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Fault under Czech Law
Luboš Tichý
Part I
1.
of liability
a) The current meaning of fault
b) The role of fault
2.
causation)
a) Fault and wrongfulness
b) Fault and causation
c) Fault and damages
d) Relationship between fault and primary or subsequent damage
e) Other relationships
3.
4.
wrongfulness in the context of contributory negligence
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Part II
1.
2.
3.
4.
Contents xi
5. Walker
6.
7.
8.
9.
a) Inadvertence
b) Intention
10.
11.
Fault under English Law
W.V.
Part I
1.
of liability
a) Place of fault in the law
b) Aims of fault requirement
2.
causation)
3.
4.
wrongfulness in the context of contributory negligence
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Part II
1.
2.
a) Carelessness
b) Intention
3.
xii Contents
4.
576.
7.
8.
9.
a) Inadvertence
b) Intention
10.
11.
a) Without warning sign
b) With warning sign
Fault under French Law
Suzanne Galand-Carval
Part I
1.
of liability
2.
causation)
3.
4.
wrongfulness in the context of contributory negligence
5./6. Conditions of capacity; Objective standard or subjective assessment of
fault
7.
8./9. Gradations of fault and their legal impact; Legal impact and practical
consequences
10.
11.
Part II
1.
2.
3.
4.
5./6. Walker with slow reactions; Car driver with slow reactions
Contents xiii
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Fault under German Law
Ulrich
Part I
1.
of liability -Aims of the fault requirement
a) Role and importance of fault
b) Relationship between fault-based and strict liability
c) Forms of liability between fault and strict liability
d) Aims of the fault requirement
2.
causation)
3.
4.
wrongfulness in the context of contributory negligence
a) Dividing line between fault and wrongfulness
b) Wrongfulness as a prerequisite of fault?
c) Contributory negligence and the role of fault
5.
6.
7.
a) Former occurrence of the damage etc
b) Acting in an emergency situation
c) Conformity with technical norms or administrative prescriptions
d) Injured person knew tortfeasor
8.
9.
a) Impact on tort liability
b) Exemption clauses
c) Insurance payments
d) Degree of fault as measure of compensation
e) Internal relationship between several tortfeasors
xiv Contents
10.
11.
Part II
1.
2.
3.
4.
a) Domestic drinker
b) Bar drinker
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
a) Inadvertence
b) Intention
10.
11.
a) Is the company at fault? Would it make a difference if there had
been a fence or if the company had placed a warning sign in front
of the coach?
b) How can a corporation or other non-physical legal entity be made
liable for fault?
Fault under Greek Law
Konstantinos D.
Part I
1.
of liability
2.
causation)
3.
4.
wrongfulness in the context of contributory negligence
5.
6.
Contents xv
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Part II
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Fault under Israeli Law
Israel Gilead
Part I
1.
of liability
2.
causation)
3.
4.
wrongfulness in the context of contributory negligence
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
xvi Contents
11.
Part II
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
a) Inadvertence
b) Intention
10.
11.
a) Without warning sign
b) With warning sign
Fault under Italian Law
Francesco Donato Busnelli,
Part I
1.
of liability
a) Fault in establishing liability
b) Relationship between fault-based liability and other forms
of liability
c) Aims of the fault requirement
2.
causation)
a) Relationship between fault and other requirements
b) (No) Relationship between fault and causation
3.
a) Statutory definition
b) Generally accepted definition
4.
wrongfulness in the context of contributory negligence
a) Fault and wrongfulness
Contents xvii
b) Fault and wrongfulness in
5.
a) Preliminary remarks
b) Age and natural capacity
6.
a) Objective standard
b) Typical abilities
7.
a) Preliminary remarks
b) Particular factors
8.
9.
10.
11.
Part II
1.
2.
3.
4.
a) Domestic drinker
b) Bar drinker
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
a) Inadvertence
b) Intention
10.
11.
a) Without warning sign
b) With warning sign
xviii Contents
Fault
Willem H. van Boom
Part
1 ./10.
forms of liability
excluding fault
2.- . Relationship between fault and other requirements (wrongfulness,
causation)
damage; Definitions of fault; Distinction between fault and
wrongfulness
4.
negligence
5./6. Conditions of capacity; Objective standard or subjective assessment
of fault
7.
8./9.
consequences
10.
11.
Part II
1.
2.
3.
4.
a) Domestic drinker
b) Bar drinker
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
a) Without warning sign
b) With warning sign
Contents xix
Fault
Jorge
Part I
1.
of liability
a) Importance of fault
b) Cases of liability without fault
c) Relationship between fault and strict liability
d) Aims of the fault requirement
2.
causation)
a) Fault and wrongfulness
b) Fault and foreseeability
3.
4.
wrongfulness in the context of contributory negligence
a) Relationship between fault and wrongfulness
b) Fault, wrongfulness and contributory negligence
5.
6.
a) Statutory description of the standard of care
b) Circumstances of the case
c) Justification
d) Criticism
e) Relative value
7.
8.
a) Grades or types of fault accepted
b) Prerequisites of intent
9.
a) Limitation of damages in case of non-intentional fault
b) Exclusion or limitation of damages in case of contributory negligence
c) Assessment and extent of compensation of non-pecuniary damages
d) Internal relationship of joint debtors
e) Right to redress in insurance law
f) Exemption clauses
g) Right to redress of the State and public bodies
h) Liability of spouses as administrators
10.
xx Contents
a) Excusable mistake
b) Insuperable or invincible state of fear
c) Excusability
11.
a) Rule of the burden of proof
b) Legal presumptions of fault
c) Shifting the burden of proof
d) Collateral effects of the presumption of fault
e) Significance
Part II
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
a) Without warning sign
b) How can a corporation or other non-physical legal entity be made
liable for fault?
c) With warning sign
Fault under South African Law
Johann Neethling
Part I
1.
of liability
2.
causation)
3.
4.
wrongfulness in the context of contributory negligence
Contents xxi
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Part II
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
a) Without warning sign
b) With warning sign
Fault under Spanish Law
Miquel Martin-Casals and Josep
Part I
1.
of liability
a) The general rule of fault liability
b) The evolution of the Spanish Supreme Court decisions towards a
strict liability approach to fault liability
the burden of proof
c) Increased duties of care?
d) Reversal of the burden of proof?
e) Strict liability in Spanish legislation
f) The different intensity of the instances of strict liability: between the
traditional fault liability system and absolute strict liability
xxii Contents
g)
2.
causation)
a) Fault and wrongfulness
b) Fault and causation
3.
4.
wrongfulness in the context of contributory negligence
a)/b) Is it possible to establish a clear dividing line between fault and
wrongfulness? Is wrongfulness a prerequisite for fault?
c) Are there differences under this aspect between fault and contributory
negligence (is the fault of the victim as an element of his
auto-responsibility treated in the same way as that of the tortfeasor?)
5.
a) Insane
b) Minors
6.
a) Which yardstick has to be used in establishing whether the damaging
party acted negligently (objective standard or subjective assessment)?
b) Are the typical abilities of a certain category of persons decisive or
the (lower or higher) individual mental and physical abilities of the
wrongdoer?
7.
8.
a) Intent
b) Fault
9.
10.
11.
Part II
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Contents xxiii
8.
9.
a) Inadvertence
b) Intention
10.
11.
a) Without warning sign
b) How can a corporation or other non-physical legal entity be made
liable for fault?
Fault under Swedish Law
Bill W. Dufwa
Part I
1.
of liability
a) What is the role and the importance of fault in establishing liability?
b) Is liability always based on fault?
c) If not, what is the relationship between liability based on fault and
other forms of liability (strict liability in particular)?
d) Are there forms of liability which can be classified as standing in
between liability based on fault and liability based on other grounds?.
e) Which are the aims of a fault requirement?
2.
causation)
3.
4.
wrongfulness in the context of contributory negligence
a) Does a clear dividing line exist between fault and wrongfulness?
b) Is wrongfulness a prerequisite for fault?
c) Are there differences in this connection between fault and contributory
negligence (is the fault of the victim as an element of his
auto-responsibility treated in the same way as that of the tortfeasor)?
5.
6.
a) Which yardstick has to be used in establishing whether the damaging
party acted negligently (objective standard or subjective standard)?
xxiv Contents
b) Are
higher) individual mental and physical abilities of the wrongdoer
decisive?
7.
8.
9.
a) Exemption clauses
b) The insurer s right to recourse actions
c) The insured s duty not to cause the damage
d) Recourse actions between joint and several tortfeasors
10.
11.
a) In general
b) Reversal of burden
c) Presumption of fault
Part II
1.
2.
3.
4.
a) Domestic drinker
b) Bar drinker
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
a) Inadvertence
b) Intention
10.
11.
a) Without warning sign
b) In the affirmative: how can a corporation or other non-physical legal
entity be made liable for fault?
c) With warning sign?
Contents xxv
Fault
Pierre
Part I
1.
of liability
a) Role and importance of fault
b) Relationship between fault-based liability and other forms of liability
c) The Swiss trilogy of torts
d) Aims of the fault requirement
2.
causation)
a) Damage
b) Wrongfulness
c) Causation
3.
4.
wrongfulness in the context of contributory negligence
a) In general
b) In the context of contributory negligence
5.
a) In general
b) Liability for (or notwithstanding) incapacity?
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Part II
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
xxvi Contents
9.
a) Inadvertence
b) Intention
10.
11.
a) Without warning sign
b) With warning sign
Fault under US Law
Gary T. Schwartzf and Michael D. Green
Part I
1.
of liability
2.
causation)
3.
4.
wrongfulness in the context of contributory negligence
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Part II
1.
2.
a) Carelessness
b) Intention
3.
4.
a) Bar drinker
b) Domestic drinker
5.
6.
Contents
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Economic Analysis of Fault
Michael Faure
Part I
Part II
Part III
Part IV
1.
2.
3.
Part V
1.
a) Economic analysis
b) The law
c) The cases
2.
3.
Part VI
Part
1.
2.
3.
Part
xxviii Contents
Comparative
Criterion of Imputation (Attribution)
Pierre Widmer
Introductive Remark
Part I
1.
of liability
a) Fault as a prerequisite of liability
b) Relationship between fault-based liability and other forms
of liability
c) Aim of the fault requirement
2.
causation)
a) Preliminary remark
b) Fault and wrongfulness
c) Fault and Causation
3.
4.
wrongfulness in the context of contributory negligence
a) Objective fault and wrongfulness
b) Fault and wrongfulness under the aspect of contributory negligence
5.
a) Age, childhood in particular
b) Insane persons
c) Exceptionally admitted liability of incapable persons
d) Liability of persons in charge of the incapable
e) Fault without capacity?
6.
a) Fault as individual blameworthiness
b) The majority approach: a fundamentally objective standard
c) Liability of specialists
7.
a) Preliminary remark
b) Foreseeability (in particular previous accidents)
c) Emergency
d) Conformity (or lack of conformity) with prescriptions, technical or
deontological norms
e) Personal relations between wrongdoer and injured person
8.
Contents xxix
9.
10.
a) Preliminary remark
b) Reversal of the burden of proof
11.
Part II
Preliminary remark
1.
2.
a) Carelessness
b) Intention
3.
4.
a) Domestic drinker
b) Bar drinker
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
a) Inadvertence
b) Intention
10.
11.
a) Without warning sign
b) With warning sign
Appendix: Principles of European Tort Law
European Group on Tort Law
Index
|
| adam_txt |
Contents
List of Abbreviations
Fault: Questionnaire and Cases
Pierre Widmer and Helmut
Part I
1.
of liability
2.
causation)
3.
4.
wrongfulness in the context of 'contributory negligence'
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Part II
1.
2.
a) Carelessness
b) Intention
3.
4.
a) Domestic drinker
b) Bar drinker
5.
6.
7.
8.
viii Contents
9.
a) Inadvertence
b) Intention
10.
11.
a) Without warning sign
b) With warning sign
Fault under Austrian Law
Helmut
Part I
1.
of liability
a) The importance of fault in establishing liability
b) The relationship between liability based on fault and strict liability
c) The aims of a fault requirement
2.
causation)
3.
4.
wrongfulness in the context of 'contributory negligence'
5.
6.
a) Subjective yardstick
b) Exceptions from the subjective yardstick
7.
8.
9.
a) Extent of compensation
b) Internal relationship between several tortfeasors
c) Extent of compensation in the case of contributory negligence
d) Exemption clauses
10.
11.
Part II
1.
2.
Contents ix
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Fault under Belgian Law
Herman Cousy and
Part I
1.
of liability
2.
causation)
3.
4.
wrongfulness in the context of 'contributory negligence'
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Part II
1.
2.
3.
4.
a) Domestic drinker
b) Bar drinker
5.
x
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Fault under Czech Law
Luboš Tichý
Part I
1.
of liability
a) The current meaning of fault
b) The role of fault
2.
causation)
a) Fault and wrongfulness
b) Fault and causation
c) Fault and damages
d) Relationship between fault and primary or subsequent damage
e) Other relationships
3.
4.
wrongfulness in the context of 'contributory negligence'
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Part II
1.
2.
3.
4.
Contents xi
5. Walker
6.
7.
8.
9.
a) Inadvertence
b) Intention
10.
11.
Fault under English Law
W.V.
Part I
1.
of liability
a) Place of fault in the law
b) Aims of fault requirement
2.
causation)
3.
4.
wrongfulness in the context of 'contributory negligence'
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Part II
1.
2.
a) Carelessness
b) Intention
3.
xii Contents
4.
576.
7.
8.
9.
a) Inadvertence
b) Intention
10.
11.
a) Without warning sign
b) With warning sign
Fault under French Law
Suzanne Galand-Carval
Part I
1.
of liability
2.
causation)
3.
4.
wrongfulness in the context of 'contributory negligence'
5./6. Conditions of capacity; Objective standard or subjective assessment of
fault
7.
8./9. Gradations of fault and their legal impact; Legal impact and practical
consequences
10.
11.
Part II
1.
2.
3.
4.
5./6. Walker with slow reactions; Car driver with slow reactions
Contents xiii
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Fault under German Law
Ulrich
Part I
1.
of liability -Aims of the fault requirement
a) Role and importance of fault
b) Relationship between fault-based and strict liability
c) Forms of liability between fault and strict liability
d) Aims of the fault requirement
2.
causation)
3.
4.
wrongfulness in the context of 'contributory negligence'
a) Dividing line between fault and wrongfulness
b) Wrongfulness as a prerequisite of fault?
c) Contributory negligence and the role of fault
5.
6.
7.
a) Former occurrence of the damage etc
b) Acting in an emergency situation
c) Conformity with technical norms or administrative prescriptions
d) Injured person knew tortfeasor
8.
9.
a) Impact on tort liability
b) Exemption clauses
c) Insurance payments
d) Degree of fault as measure of compensation
e) Internal relationship between several tortfeasors
xiv Contents
10.
11.
Part II
1.
2.
3.
4.
a) Domestic drinker
b) Bar drinker
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
a) Inadvertence
b) Intention
10.
11.
a) Is the company at fault? Would it make a difference if there had
been a fence or if the company had placed a warning sign in front
of the coach?
b) How can a corporation or other non-physical legal entity be made
liable for fault?
Fault under Greek Law
Konstantinos D.
Part I
1.
of liability
2.
causation)
3.
4.
wrongfulness in the context of 'contributory negligence'
5.
6.
Contents xv
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Part II
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Fault under Israeli Law
Israel Gilead
Part I
1.
of liability
2.
causation)
3.
4.
wrongfulness in the context of 'contributory negligence'
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
xvi Contents
11.
Part II
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
a) Inadvertence
b) Intention
10.
11.
a) Without warning sign
b) With warning sign
Fault under Italian Law
Francesco Donato Busnelli,
Part I
1.
of liability
a) Fault in establishing liability
b) Relationship between fault-based liability and other forms
of liability
c) Aims of the fault requirement
2.
causation)
a) Relationship between fault and other requirements
b) (No) Relationship between fault and causation
3.
a) Statutory definition
b) Generally accepted definition
4.
wrongfulness in the context of 'contributory negligence'
a) Fault and wrongfulness
Contents xvii
b) Fault and wrongfulness in
5.
a) Preliminary remarks
b) Age and natural capacity
6.
a) Objective standard
b) Typical abilities
7.
a) Preliminary remarks
b) Particular factors
8.
9.
10.
11.
Part II
1.
2.
3.
4.
a) Domestic drinker
b) Bar drinker
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
a) Inadvertence
b) Intention
10.
11.
a) Without warning sign
b) With warning sign
xviii Contents
Fault
Willem H. van Boom
Part
1 ./10.
forms of liability
excluding fault
2.-\. Relationship between fault and other requirements (wrongfulness,
causation)
damage; Definitions of fault; Distinction between fault and
wrongfulness
4.
negligence'
5./6. Conditions of capacity; Objective standard or subjective assessment
of fault
7.
8./9.
consequences
10.
11.
Part II
1.
2.
3.
4.
a) Domestic drinker
b) Bar drinker
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
a) Without warning sign
b) With warning sign
Contents xix
Fault
Jorge
Part I
1.
of liability
a) Importance of fault
b) Cases of 'liability without fault'
c) Relationship between fault and strict liability
d) Aims of the fault requirement
2.
causation)
a) Fault and wrongfulness
b) Fault and foreseeability
3.
4.
wrongfulness in the context of 'contributory negligence'
a) Relationship between fault and wrongfulness
b) Fault, wrongfulness and contributory negligence
5.
6.
a) Statutory description of the standard of care
b) 'Circumstances of the case'
c) Justification
d) Criticism
e) Relative value
7.
8.
a) Grades or types of fault accepted
b) Prerequisites of intent
9.
a) Limitation of damages in case of non-intentional fault
b) Exclusion or limitation of damages in case of contributory negligence
c) Assessment and extent of compensation of non-pecuniary damages
d) Internal relationship of joint debtors
e) Right to redress in insurance law
f) Exemption clauses
g) Right to redress of the State and public bodies
h) Liability of spouses as administrators
10.
xx Contents
a) Excusable mistake
b) Insuperable or invincible state of fear
c) Excusability
11.
a) Rule of the burden of proof
b) Legal presumptions of fault
c) Shifting the burden of proof
d) Collateral effects of the presumption of fault
e) Significance
Part II
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
a) Without warning sign
b) How can a corporation or other non-physical legal entity be made
liable for fault?
c) With warning sign
Fault under South African Law
Johann Neethling
Part I
1.
of liability
2.
causation)
3.
4.
wrongfulness in the context of 'contributory negligence'
Contents xxi
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Part II
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
a) Without warning sign
b) With warning sign
Fault under Spanish Law
Miquel Martin-Casals and Josep
Part I
1.
of liability
a) The general rule of fault liability
b) The evolution of the Spanish Supreme Court decisions towards a
strict liability approach to fault liability
the burden of proof
c) Increased duties of care?
d) Reversal of the burden of proof?
e) Strict liability in Spanish legislation
f) The different intensity of the instances of strict liability: between the
traditional fault liability system and absolute strict liability
xxii Contents
g)
2.
causation)
a) Fault and wrongfulness
b) Fault and causation
3.
4.
wrongfulness in the context of 'contributory negligence'
a)/b) Is it possible to establish a clear dividing line between fault and
wrongfulness? Is wrongfulness a prerequisite for fault?
c) Are there differences under this aspect between fault and contributory
negligence (is the 'fault' of the victim as an element of his
auto-responsibility treated in the same way as that of the tortfeasor?)
5.
a) Insane
b) Minors
6.
a) Which yardstick has to be used in establishing whether the damaging
party acted negligently (objective standard or subjective assessment)?
b) Are the typical abilities of a certain category of persons decisive or
the (lower or higher) individual mental and physical abilities of the
wrongdoer?
7.
8.
a) Intent
b) Fault
9.
10.
11.
Part II
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Contents xxiii
8.
9.
a) Inadvertence
b) Intention
10.
11.
a) Without warning sign
b) How can a corporation or other non-physical legal entity be made
liable for fault?
Fault under Swedish Law
Bill W. Dufwa
Part I
1.
of liability
a) What is the role and the importance of fault in establishing liability?
b) Is liability always based on fault?
c) If not, what is the relationship between liability based on fault and
other forms of liability (strict liability in particular)?
d) Are there forms of liability which can be classified as standing in
between liability based on fault and liability based on other grounds?.
e) Which are the aims of a fault requirement?
2.
causation)
3.
4.
wrongfulness in the context of 'contributory negligence'
a) Does a clear dividing line exist between fault and wrongfulness?
b) Is wrongfulness a prerequisite for fault?
c) Are there differences in this connection between fault and contributory
negligence (is the 'fault' of the victim as an element of his
auto-responsibility treated in the same way as that of the tortfeasor)?
5.
6.
a) Which yardstick has to be used in establishing whether the damaging
party acted negligently (objective standard or subjective standard)?
xxiv Contents
b) Are
higher) individual mental and physical abilities of the wrongdoer
decisive?
7.
8.
9.
a) Exemption clauses
b) The insurer's right to recourse actions
c) The insured's duty not to cause the damage
d) Recourse actions between joint and several tortfeasors
10.
11.
a) In general
b) Reversal of burden
c) Presumption of fault
Part II
1.
2.
3.
4.
a) Domestic drinker
b) Bar drinker
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
a) Inadvertence
b) Intention
10.
11.
a) Without warning sign
b) In the affirmative: how can a corporation or other non-physical legal
entity be made liable for fault?
c) With warning sign?
Contents xxv
Fault
Pierre
Part I
1.
of liability
a) Role and importance of fault
b) Relationship between fault-based liability and other forms of liability
c) The Swiss trilogy of torts
d) Aims of the fault requirement
2.
causation)
a) Damage
b) Wrongfulness
c) Causation
3.
4.
wrongfulness in the context of 'contributory negligence'
a) In general
b) In the context of 'contributory negligence'
5.
a) In general
b) Liability for (or notwithstanding) incapacity?
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Part II
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
xxvi Contents
9.
a) Inadvertence
b) Intention
10.
11.
a) Without warning sign
b) With warning sign
Fault under US Law
Gary T. Schwartzf and Michael D. Green
Part I
1.
of liability
2.
causation)
3.
4.
wrongfulness in the context of 'contributory negligence'
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Part II
1.
2.
a) Carelessness
b) Intention
3.
4.
a) Bar drinker
b) Domestic drinker
5.
6.
Contents
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Economic Analysis of Fault
Michael Faure
Part I
Part II
Part III
Part IV
1.
2.
3.
Part V
1.
a) Economic analysis
b) The law
c) The cases
2.
3.
Part VI
Part
1.
2.
3.
Part
xxviii Contents
Comparative
Criterion of Imputation (Attribution)
Pierre Widmer
Introductive Remark
Part I
1.
of liability
a) Fault as a prerequisite of liability
b) Relationship between fault-based liability and other forms
of liability
c) Aim of the fault requirement
2.
causation)
a) Preliminary remark
b) Fault and wrongfulness
c) Fault and Causation
3.
4.
wrongfulness in the context of 'contributory negligence'
a) Objective fault and wrongfulness
b) Fault and wrongfulness under the aspect of contributory negligence
5.
a) Age, childhood in particular
b) Insane persons
c) Exceptionally admitted liability of incapable persons
d) Liability of persons in charge of the incapable
e) Fault without capacity?
6.
a) Fault as individual blameworthiness
b) The majority approach: a fundamentally objective standard
c) Liability of specialists
7.
a) Preliminary remark
b) Foreseeability (in particular previous accidents)
c) Emergency
d) Conformity (or lack of conformity) with prescriptions, technical or
deontological norms
e) Personal relations between wrongdoer and injured person
8.
Contents xxix
9.
10.
a) Preliminary remark
b) Reversal of the burden of proof
11.
Part II
Preliminary remark
1.
2.
a) Carelessness
b) Intention
3.
4.
a) Domestic drinker
b) Bar drinker
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
a) Inadvertence
b) Intention
10.
11.
a) Without warning sign
b) With warning sign
Appendix: Principles of European Tort Law
European Group on Tort Law
Index |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author_GND | (DE-588)11734270X |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV021660036 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | KJC1663 |
| callnumber-raw | KJC1663 |
| callnumber-search | KJC1663 |
| callnumber-sort | KJC 41663 |
| classification_rvk | PS 3740 PU 1532 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)61894995 (DE-599)BVBBV021660036 |
| dewey-full | 346.403/8 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 346 - Private law |
| dewey-raw | 346.403/8 |
| dewey-search | 346.403/8 |
| dewey-sort | 3346.403 18 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02122nam a2200553zcb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV021660036</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20200108 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">060718s2005 ne |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2005618653</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">904112098X</subfield><subfield code="9">90-411-2098-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789041120984</subfield><subfield code="9">978-90-411-2098-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)61894995</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV021660036</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ne</subfield><subfield code="c">NL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KJC1663</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">346.403/8</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PS 3740</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139786:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PU 1532</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139918:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Unification of tort law: fault</subfield><subfield code="c">P. Widmer (ed.). W. H. van Boom ...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">The Hague</subfield><subfield code="b">Kluwer Law International</subfield><subfield code="c">2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XXIX, 391 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Principles of European tort law</subfield><subfield code="v">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Onrechtmatige daad</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Unificatie</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Wettelijke aansprakelijkheid</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Liability (Law)</subfield><subfield code="z">Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Strict liability</subfield><subfield code="z">Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Unerlaubte Handlung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4061688-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Haftung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4022898-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvergleich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115712-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Europa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4143413-4</subfield><subfield code="a">Aufsatzsammlung</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Unerlaubte Handlung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4061688-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Haftung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4022898-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvergleich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115712-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Widmer, Pierre</subfield><subfield code="d">1938-2020</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)11734270X</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Boom, Willem H. van</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Principles of European tort law</subfield><subfield code="v">10</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV012558902</subfield><subfield code="9">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Regensburg</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=014874543&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-014874543</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4143413-4 Aufsatzsammlung gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Aufsatzsammlung |
| geographic | Europa |
| geographic_facet | Europa |
| id | DE-604.BV021660036 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-02T15:05:45Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T20:41:01Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 904112098X 9789041120984 |
| language | English |
| lccn | 2005618653 |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-014874543 |
| oclc_num | 61894995 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-384 DE-188 DE-11 |
| owner_facet | DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-384 DE-188 DE-11 |
| physical | XXIX, 391 S. |
| publishDate | 2005 |
| publishDateSearch | 2005 |
| publishDateSort | 2005 |
| publisher | Kluwer Law International |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Principles of European tort law |
| series2 | Principles of European tort law |
| spelling | Unification of tort law: fault P. Widmer (ed.). W. H. van Boom ... The Hague Kluwer Law International 2005 XXIX, 391 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Principles of European tort law 10 Onrechtmatige daad gtt Unificatie gtt Wettelijke aansprakelijkheid gtt Liability (Law) Europe Strict liability Europe Unerlaubte Handlung (DE-588)4061688-5 gnd rswk-swf Haftung (DE-588)4022898-8 gnd rswk-swf Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd rswk-swf Europa (DE-588)4143413-4 Aufsatzsammlung gnd-content Unerlaubte Handlung (DE-588)4061688-5 s Haftung (DE-588)4022898-8 s Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 s DE-604 Widmer, Pierre 1938-2020 Sonstige (DE-588)11734270X oth Boom, Willem H. van Sonstige oth Principles of European tort law 10 (DE-604)BV012558902 10 Digitalisierung UB Regensburg application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=014874543&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Unification of tort law: fault Principles of European tort law Onrechtmatige daad gtt Unificatie gtt Wettelijke aansprakelijkheid gtt Liability (Law) Europe Strict liability Europe Unerlaubte Handlung (DE-588)4061688-5 gnd Haftung (DE-588)4022898-8 gnd Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4061688-5 (DE-588)4022898-8 (DE-588)4115712-6 (DE-588)4143413-4 |
| title | Unification of tort law: fault |
| title_auth | Unification of tort law: fault |
| title_exact_search | Unification of tort law: fault |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Unification of tort law: fault |
| title_full | Unification of tort law: fault P. Widmer (ed.). W. H. van Boom ... |
| title_fullStr | Unification of tort law: fault P. Widmer (ed.). W. H. van Boom ... |
| title_full_unstemmed | Unification of tort law: fault P. Widmer (ed.). W. H. van Boom ... |
| title_short | Unification of tort law: fault |
| title_sort | unification of tort law fault |
| topic | Onrechtmatige daad gtt Unificatie gtt Wettelijke aansprakelijkheid gtt Liability (Law) Europe Strict liability Europe Unerlaubte Handlung (DE-588)4061688-5 gnd Haftung (DE-588)4022898-8 gnd Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd |
| topic_facet | Onrechtmatige daad Unificatie Wettelijke aansprakelijkheid Liability (Law) Europe Strict liability Europe Unerlaubte Handlung Haftung Rechtsvergleich Europa Aufsatzsammlung |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=014874543&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV012558902 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT widmerpierre unificationoftortlawfault AT boomwillemhvan unificationoftortlawfault |