The intervention debate: towards a posture of principled judgement
"The author argues that American policymakers must take an approach based on "principled judgment" when deciding on the use of force. The 1990s showed the extremes of deciding when and how to use force, one of the central elements of strategy. Throughout American history, debate has r...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
[Carlisle Barracks, PA]
Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College
[2002]
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | "The author argues that American policymakers must take an approach based on "principled judgment" when deciding on the use of force. The 1990s showed the extremes of deciding when and how to use force, one of the central elements of strategy. Throughout American history, debate has raged over whether force is appropriate only in defense of the homeland and vital national interests or whether it should also be used to promote more expansive objectives like regional security and stopping humanitarian disasters in regions with few tangible U.S. interests. He concludes with a discussion of Army roles and requirements for future contingencies."--SSI site. |
Beschreibung: | "January 2002.". - Includes bibliographical references (p. 76-89) -- Also available via Internet from the SSI web site. Address as of 6/4/02: http://www.carlisle.army.mil/usassi/ssipubs/pubs2002/debate/debate.htm; current access is available via PURL. |
Beschreibung: | v, 89 p. 23 cm |
ISBN: | 1584870818 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV018004492 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20230301 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 040413s2002 xxu|||| ||||z00||| eng d | ||
010 | |a 2002410014 | ||
020 | |a 1584870818 |9 1-584-87081-8 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)49280536 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV018004492 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
044 | |a xxu |c US | ||
049 | |a DE-12 | ||
050 | 0 | |a JX4481 | |
050 | 0 | |a JZ1480 | |
082 | 0 | |a 327.1/17 |2 22 | |
100 | 1 | |a Garofano, John |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a The intervention debate |b towards a posture of principled judgement |c John Garofano |
264 | 1 | |a [Carlisle Barracks, PA] |b Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College |c [2002] | |
300 | |a v, 89 p. |b 23 cm | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a "January 2002.". - Includes bibliographical references (p. 76-89) -- Also available via Internet from the SSI web site. Address as of 6/4/02: http://www.carlisle.army.mil/usassi/ssipubs/pubs2002/debate/debate.htm; current access is available via PURL. | ||
520 | 3 | |a "The author argues that American policymakers must take an approach based on "principled judgment" when deciding on the use of force. The 1990s showed the extremes of deciding when and how to use force, one of the central elements of strategy. Throughout American history, debate has raged over whether force is appropriate only in defense of the homeland and vital national interests or whether it should also be used to promote more expansive objectives like regional security and stopping humanitarian disasters in regions with few tangible U.S. interests. He concludes with a discussion of Army roles and requirements for future contingencies."--SSI site. | |
648 | 4 | |a Geschichte 1900-2000 | |
650 | 4 | |a Geschichte | |
650 | 4 | |a Politik | |
650 | 4 | |a Intervention (International law) |x Government policy |z United States |x Evaluation | |
650 | 4 | |a Intervention (International law) |x History |y 20th century | |
650 | 4 | |a Military assistance, American |x History |y 20th century | |
650 | 4 | |a National security |z United States | |
651 | 4 | |a USA | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS19517 |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-010780431 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804130623456018432 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Garofano, John |
author_facet | Garofano, John |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Garofano, John |
author_variant | j g jg |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV018004492 |
callnumber-first | J - Political Science |
callnumber-label | JX4481 |
callnumber-raw | JX4481 JZ1480 |
callnumber-search | JX4481 JZ1480 |
callnumber-sort | JX 44481 |
callnumber-subject | JX - International Law |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)49280536 (DE-599)BVBBV018004492 |
dewey-full | 327.1/17 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 327 - International relations |
dewey-raw | 327.1/17 |
dewey-search | 327.1/17 |
dewey-sort | 3327.1 217 |
dewey-tens | 320 - Political science (Politics and government) |
discipline | Politologie |
era | Geschichte 1900-2000 |
era_facet | Geschichte 1900-2000 |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02320nam a2200445zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV018004492</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230301 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">040413s2002 xxu|||| ||||z00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2002410014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1584870818</subfield><subfield code="9">1-584-87081-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)49280536</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV018004492</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">JX4481</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">JZ1480</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">327.1/17</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Garofano, John</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The intervention debate</subfield><subfield code="b">towards a posture of principled judgement</subfield><subfield code="c">John Garofano</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">[Carlisle Barracks, PA]</subfield><subfield code="b">Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College</subfield><subfield code="c">[2002]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">v, 89 p.</subfield><subfield code="b">23 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"January 2002.". - Includes bibliographical references (p. 76-89) -- Also available via Internet from the SSI web site. Address as of 6/4/02: http://www.carlisle.army.mil/usassi/ssipubs/pubs2002/debate/debate.htm; current access is available via PURL.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"The author argues that American policymakers must take an approach based on "principled judgment" when deciding on the use of force. The 1990s showed the extremes of deciding when and how to use force, one of the central elements of strategy. Throughout American history, debate has raged over whether force is appropriate only in defense of the homeland and vital national interests or whether it should also be used to promote more expansive objectives like regional security and stopping humanitarian disasters in regions with few tangible U.S. interests. He concludes with a discussion of Army roles and requirements for future contingencies."--SSI site.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1900-2000</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Geschichte</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Politik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intervention (International law)</subfield><subfield code="x">Government policy</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">Evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intervention (International law)</subfield><subfield code="x">History</subfield><subfield code="y">20th century</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Military assistance, American</subfield><subfield code="x">History</subfield><subfield code="y">20th century</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">National security</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS19517</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-010780431</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | USA |
geographic_facet | USA |
id | DE-604.BV018004492 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T19:23:58Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 1584870818 |
language | English |
lccn | 2002410014 |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-010780431 |
oclc_num | 49280536 |
open_access_boolean | 1 |
owner | DE-12 |
owner_facet | DE-12 |
physical | v, 89 p. 23 cm |
publishDate | 2002 |
publishDateSearch | 2002 |
publishDateSort | 2002 |
publisher | Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Garofano, John Verfasser aut The intervention debate towards a posture of principled judgement John Garofano [Carlisle Barracks, PA] Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College [2002] v, 89 p. 23 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier "January 2002.". - Includes bibliographical references (p. 76-89) -- Also available via Internet from the SSI web site. Address as of 6/4/02: http://www.carlisle.army.mil/usassi/ssipubs/pubs2002/debate/debate.htm; current access is available via PURL. "The author argues that American policymakers must take an approach based on "principled judgment" when deciding on the use of force. The 1990s showed the extremes of deciding when and how to use force, one of the central elements of strategy. Throughout American history, debate has raged over whether force is appropriate only in defense of the homeland and vital national interests or whether it should also be used to promote more expansive objectives like regional security and stopping humanitarian disasters in regions with few tangible U.S. interests. He concludes with a discussion of Army roles and requirements for future contingencies."--SSI site. Geschichte 1900-2000 Geschichte Politik Intervention (International law) Government policy United States Evaluation Intervention (International law) History 20th century Military assistance, American History 20th century National security United States USA http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS19517 kostenfrei Volltext |
spellingShingle | Garofano, John The intervention debate towards a posture of principled judgement Geschichte Politik Intervention (International law) Government policy United States Evaluation Intervention (International law) History 20th century Military assistance, American History 20th century National security United States |
title | The intervention debate towards a posture of principled judgement |
title_auth | The intervention debate towards a posture of principled judgement |
title_exact_search | The intervention debate towards a posture of principled judgement |
title_full | The intervention debate towards a posture of principled judgement John Garofano |
title_fullStr | The intervention debate towards a posture of principled judgement John Garofano |
title_full_unstemmed | The intervention debate towards a posture of principled judgement John Garofano |
title_short | The intervention debate |
title_sort | the intervention debate towards a posture of principled judgement |
title_sub | towards a posture of principled judgement |
topic | Geschichte Politik Intervention (International law) Government policy United States Evaluation Intervention (International law) History 20th century Military assistance, American History 20th century National security United States |
topic_facet | Geschichte Politik Intervention (International law) Government policy United States Evaluation Intervention (International law) History 20th century Military assistance, American History 20th century National security United States USA |
url | http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS19517 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garofanojohn theinterventiondebatetowardsapostureofprincipledjudgement |