Kant and the capacity to judge: sensibility and discursivity in the transcendental analytic of the "Critique of pure reason"
Kant claims to have established his table of categories or "pure concepts of the understanding" according to the "guiding thread" provided by logical forms of judgment. By drawing extensively on Kant's logical writings, Beatrice Longuenesse analyzes this controversial claim,...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English French |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Princeton, N.J.
Princeton Univ. Press
1998
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Zusammenfassung: | Kant claims to have established his table of categories or "pure concepts of the understanding" according to the "guiding thread" provided by logical forms of judgment. By drawing extensively on Kant's logical writings, Beatrice Longuenesse analyzes this controversial claim, and then follows the thread through its continuation in the transcendental deduction of the categories, the transcendental schemata, and the principles of pure understanding. The result is a systematic, persuasive new interpretation of the Critique of Pure Reason. Longuenesse shows that although Kant adopts his inventory of the forms of judgment from logic textbooks of his time, he is nevertheless original in selecting just those forms he holds to be indispensable to our ability to relate representations to objects. Kant gives formal representation to this relation between conceptual thought and its objects by introducing the term "x" into his analysis of logical forms to stand for the object that is "thought under" the concepts that are combined in judgment. This "x" plays no role in Kant's forms of logical inference, but instead plays a role in clarifying the relation between logical forms (forms of concept subordination) and combinations ("syntheses") of perceptual data, necessary for empirical cognition. Considering Kant's logical forms of judgment thus helps illuminate crucial aspects of the Transcendental Analytic as a whole, while revealing the systematic unity between Kant's theory of judgment in the first Critique and his analysis of "merely reflective" (aesthetic and teleological) judgments in the third Critique. Longuenesse opens new avenues for investigating the relation between logic, psychology, and metaphysics in Kantian and post-Kantian philosophy. |
| Beschreibung: | Franz. Ausg. zugl.: Paris, Univ., Diss., 1992 |
| Beschreibung: | XV, 420 S. |
| ISBN: | 0691043485 0691074518 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV012332291 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20040402 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 981229s1998 m||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 0691043485 |9 0-691-04348-5 | ||
| 020 | |a 0691074518 |9 0-691-07451-8 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)36922746 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV012332291 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 1 | |a eng |h fre | |
| 049 | |a DE-29 |a DE-355 |a DE-11 |a DE-188 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a B2779 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 121 |2 21 | |
| 084 | |a CF 5015 |0 (DE-625)18105:11614 |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a CF 5017 |0 (DE-625)18105:11616 |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a 5,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Longuenesse, Béatrice |d 1950- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)132919419 |4 aut | |
| 240 | 1 | 0 | |a Kant et le pouvoir de juger |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Kant and the capacity to judge |b sensibility and discursivity in the transcendental analytic of the "Critique of pure reason" |c Béatrice Longuenesse |
| 264 | 1 | |a Princeton, N.J. |b Princeton Univ. Press |c 1998 | |
| 300 | |a XV, 420 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Franz. Ausg. zugl.: Paris, Univ., Diss., 1992 | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a Kant claims to have established his table of categories or "pure concepts of the understanding" according to the "guiding thread" provided by logical forms of judgment. By drawing extensively on Kant's logical writings, Beatrice Longuenesse analyzes this controversial claim, and then follows the thread through its continuation in the transcendental deduction of the categories, the transcendental schemata, and the principles of pure understanding. The result is a systematic, persuasive new interpretation of the Critique of Pure Reason. Longuenesse shows that although Kant adopts his inventory of the forms of judgment from logic textbooks of his time, he is nevertheless original in selecting just those forms he holds to be indispensable to our ability to relate representations to objects. Kant gives formal representation to this relation between conceptual thought and its objects by introducing the term "x" into his analysis of logical forms to stand for the object that is "thought under" the concepts that are combined in judgment. This "x" plays no role in Kant's forms of logical inference, but instead plays a role in clarifying the relation between logical forms (forms of concept subordination) and combinations ("syntheses") of perceptual data, necessary for empirical cognition. Considering Kant's logical forms of judgment thus helps illuminate crucial aspects of the Transcendental Analytic as a whole, while revealing the systematic unity between Kant's theory of judgment in the first Critique and his analysis of "merely reflective" (aesthetic and teleological) judgments in the third Critique. Longuenesse opens new avenues for investigating the relation between logic, psychology, and metaphysics in Kantian and post-Kantian philosophy. | |
| 600 | 1 | 4 | |a Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> - Et la logique |
| 600 | 1 | 4 | |a Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> - Et la théorie de la connaissance |
| 600 | 1 | 4 | |a Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> - Et le jugement |
| 600 | 1 | 4 | |a Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> / Kritik der reinen Vernunft |
| 600 | 1 | 4 | |a Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> |t Kritik der reinen Vernunft |
| 600 | 1 | 7 | |a Kant, Immanuel |d 1724-1804 |t Kritik der reinen Vernunft |0 (DE-588)4099256-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 4 | |a Jugement (Logique) | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Kritik der reinen Vernunft (Kant) |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Oordeel |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Judgment | |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
| 655 | 7 | |a Die transzendentale Analytik |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Kant, Immanuel |d 1724-1804 |t Kritik der reinen Vernunft |0 (DE-588)4099256-1 |D u |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Die transzendentale Analytik |A f |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-008361867 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804126958621032448 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Longuenesse, Béatrice 1950- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)132919419 |
| author_facet | Longuenesse, Béatrice 1950- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Longuenesse, Béatrice 1950- |
| author_variant | b l bl |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV012332291 |
| callnumber-first | B - Philosophy, Psychology, Religion |
| callnumber-label | B2779 |
| callnumber-raw | B2779 |
| callnumber-search | B2779 |
| callnumber-sort | B 42779 |
| callnumber-subject | B - Philosophy |
| classification_rvk | CF 5015 CF 5017 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)36922746 (DE-599)BVBBV012332291 |
| dewey-full | 121 |
| dewey-hundreds | 100 - Philosophy & psychology |
| dewey-ones | 121 - Epistemology (Theory of knowledge) |
| dewey-raw | 121 |
| dewey-search | 121 |
| dewey-sort | 3121 |
| dewey-tens | 120 - Epistemology, causation, humankind |
| discipline | Philosophie |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03846nam a2200541 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV012332291</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20040402 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">981229s1998 m||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0691043485</subfield><subfield code="9">0-691-04348-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0691074518</subfield><subfield code="9">0-691-07451-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)36922746</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV012332291</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="h">fre</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-11</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">B2779</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">121</subfield><subfield code="2">21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CF 5015</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)18105:11614</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CF 5017</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)18105:11616</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5,1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Longuenesse, Béatrice</subfield><subfield code="d">1950-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)132919419</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="240" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Kant et le pouvoir de juger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Kant and the capacity to judge</subfield><subfield code="b">sensibility and discursivity in the transcendental analytic of the "Critique of pure reason"</subfield><subfield code="c">Béatrice Longuenesse</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Princeton, N.J.</subfield><subfield code="b">Princeton Univ. Press</subfield><subfield code="c">1998</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XV, 420 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Franz. Ausg. zugl.: Paris, Univ., Diss., 1992</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kant claims to have established his table of categories or "pure concepts of the understanding" according to the "guiding thread" provided by logical forms of judgment. By drawing extensively on Kant's logical writings, Beatrice Longuenesse analyzes this controversial claim, and then follows the thread through its continuation in the transcendental deduction of the categories, the transcendental schemata, and the principles of pure understanding. The result is a systematic, persuasive new interpretation of the Critique of Pure Reason. Longuenesse shows that although Kant adopts his inventory of the forms of judgment from logic textbooks of his time, he is nevertheless original in selecting just those forms he holds to be indispensable to our ability to relate representations to objects. Kant gives formal representation to this relation between conceptual thought and its objects by introducing the term "x" into his analysis of logical forms to stand for the object that is "thought under" the concepts that are combined in judgment. This "x" plays no role in Kant's forms of logical inference, but instead plays a role in clarifying the relation between logical forms (forms of concept subordination) and combinations ("syntheses") of perceptual data, necessary for empirical cognition. Considering Kant's logical forms of judgment thus helps illuminate crucial aspects of the Transcendental Analytic as a whole, while revealing the systematic unity between Kant's theory of judgment in the first Critique and his analysis of "merely reflective" (aesthetic and teleological) judgments in the third Critique. Longuenesse opens new avenues for investigating the relation between logic, psychology, and metaphysics in Kantian and post-Kantian philosophy.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> - Et la logique</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> - Et la théorie de la connaissance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> - Et le jugement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> / Kritik der reinen Vernunft</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804></subfield><subfield code="t">Kritik der reinen Vernunft</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kant, Immanuel</subfield><subfield code="d">1724-1804</subfield><subfield code="t">Kritik der reinen Vernunft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4099256-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Jugement (Logique)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kritik der reinen Vernunft (Kant)</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Oordeel</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judgment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Die transzendentale Analytik</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Kant, Immanuel</subfield><subfield code="d">1724-1804</subfield><subfield code="t">Kritik der reinen Vernunft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4099256-1</subfield><subfield code="D">u</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Die transzendentale Analytik</subfield><subfield code="A">f</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-008361867</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content Die transzendentale Analytik gnd |
| genre_facet | Hochschulschrift Die transzendentale Analytik |
| id | DE-604.BV012332291 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T18:25:43Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 0691043485 0691074518 |
| language | English French |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-008361867 |
| oclc_num | 36922746 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-29 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-11 DE-188 |
| owner_facet | DE-29 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-11 DE-188 |
| physical | XV, 420 S. |
| publishDate | 1998 |
| publishDateSearch | 1998 |
| publishDateSort | 1998 |
| publisher | Princeton Univ. Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Longuenesse, Béatrice 1950- Verfasser (DE-588)132919419 aut Kant et le pouvoir de juger Kant and the capacity to judge sensibility and discursivity in the transcendental analytic of the "Critique of pure reason" Béatrice Longuenesse Princeton, N.J. Princeton Univ. Press 1998 XV, 420 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Franz. Ausg. zugl.: Paris, Univ., Diss., 1992 Kant claims to have established his table of categories or "pure concepts of the understanding" according to the "guiding thread" provided by logical forms of judgment. By drawing extensively on Kant's logical writings, Beatrice Longuenesse analyzes this controversial claim, and then follows the thread through its continuation in the transcendental deduction of the categories, the transcendental schemata, and the principles of pure understanding. The result is a systematic, persuasive new interpretation of the Critique of Pure Reason. Longuenesse shows that although Kant adopts his inventory of the forms of judgment from logic textbooks of his time, he is nevertheless original in selecting just those forms he holds to be indispensable to our ability to relate representations to objects. Kant gives formal representation to this relation between conceptual thought and its objects by introducing the term "x" into his analysis of logical forms to stand for the object that is "thought under" the concepts that are combined in judgment. This "x" plays no role in Kant's forms of logical inference, but instead plays a role in clarifying the relation between logical forms (forms of concept subordination) and combinations ("syntheses") of perceptual data, necessary for empirical cognition. Considering Kant's logical forms of judgment thus helps illuminate crucial aspects of the Transcendental Analytic as a whole, while revealing the systematic unity between Kant's theory of judgment in the first Critique and his analysis of "merely reflective" (aesthetic and teleological) judgments in the third Critique. Longuenesse opens new avenues for investigating the relation between logic, psychology, and metaphysics in Kantian and post-Kantian philosophy. Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> - Et la logique Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> - Et la théorie de la connaissance Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> - Et le jugement Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> / Kritik der reinen Vernunft Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> Kritik der reinen Vernunft Kant, Immanuel 1724-1804 Kritik der reinen Vernunft (DE-588)4099256-1 gnd rswk-swf Jugement (Logique) Kritik der reinen Vernunft (Kant) gtt Oordeel gtt Judgment (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content Die transzendentale Analytik gnd rswk-swf Kant, Immanuel 1724-1804 Kritik der reinen Vernunft (DE-588)4099256-1 u Die transzendentale Analytik f DE-604 |
| spellingShingle | Longuenesse, Béatrice 1950- Kant and the capacity to judge sensibility and discursivity in the transcendental analytic of the "Critique of pure reason" Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> - Et la logique Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> - Et la théorie de la connaissance Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> - Et le jugement Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> / Kritik der reinen Vernunft Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> Kritik der reinen Vernunft Kant, Immanuel 1724-1804 Kritik der reinen Vernunft (DE-588)4099256-1 gnd Jugement (Logique) Kritik der reinen Vernunft (Kant) gtt Oordeel gtt Judgment |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4099256-1 (DE-588)4113937-9 |
| title | Kant and the capacity to judge sensibility and discursivity in the transcendental analytic of the "Critique of pure reason" |
| title_alt | Kant et le pouvoir de juger |
| title_auth | Kant and the capacity to judge sensibility and discursivity in the transcendental analytic of the "Critique of pure reason" |
| title_exact_search | Kant and the capacity to judge sensibility and discursivity in the transcendental analytic of the "Critique of pure reason" |
| title_full | Kant and the capacity to judge sensibility and discursivity in the transcendental analytic of the "Critique of pure reason" Béatrice Longuenesse |
| title_fullStr | Kant and the capacity to judge sensibility and discursivity in the transcendental analytic of the "Critique of pure reason" Béatrice Longuenesse |
| title_full_unstemmed | Kant and the capacity to judge sensibility and discursivity in the transcendental analytic of the "Critique of pure reason" Béatrice Longuenesse |
| title_short | Kant and the capacity to judge |
| title_sort | kant and the capacity to judge sensibility and discursivity in the transcendental analytic of the critique of pure reason |
| title_sub | sensibility and discursivity in the transcendental analytic of the "Critique of pure reason" |
| topic | Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> - Et la logique Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> - Et la théorie de la connaissance Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> - Et le jugement Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> / Kritik der reinen Vernunft Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> Kritik der reinen Vernunft Kant, Immanuel 1724-1804 Kritik der reinen Vernunft (DE-588)4099256-1 gnd Jugement (Logique) Kritik der reinen Vernunft (Kant) gtt Oordeel gtt Judgment |
| topic_facet | Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> - Et la logique Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> - Et la théorie de la connaissance Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> - Et le jugement Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> / Kritik der reinen Vernunft Kant, Immanuel <1724-1804> Kritik der reinen Vernunft Kant, Immanuel 1724-1804 Kritik der reinen Vernunft Jugement (Logique) Kritik der reinen Vernunft (Kant) Oordeel Judgment Hochschulschrift Die transzendentale Analytik |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT longuenessebeatrice kantetlepouvoirdejuger AT longuenessebeatrice kantandthecapacitytojudgesensibilityanddiscursivityinthetranscendentalanalyticofthecritiqueofpurereason |