Cross-border litigation within ASEAN: the prospects for harmonization of civil and commercial litigation
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis Book |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
The Hague [u.a.]
Kluwer Law Internat.
1997
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Physical Description: | LXXII, 755 S. |
| ISBN: | 9041103961 |
Staff View
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV011748578 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 19980605 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 980204s1997 m||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9041103961 |9 90-411-0396-1 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)36629914 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV011748578 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-739 |a DE-12 |a DE-355 |a DE-188 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a KNC473 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 347.59/012 |2 21 | |
| 084 | |a PT 520 |0 (DE-625)139909: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Ong, Colin Y. C. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Cross-border litigation within ASEAN |b the prospects for harmonization of civil and commercial litigation |c by Colin Y. C. Ong |
| 246 | 1 | 3 | |a Cross border litigation within ASEAN |
| 264 | 1 | |a The Hague [u.a.] |b Kluwer Law Internat. |c 1997 | |
| 300 | |a LXXII, 755 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 502 | |a Teilw. zugl.: London, Univ. of London, Diss., 1995 | ||
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Association of Southeast Asian Nations |0 (DE-588)116362-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 7 | |a Entraide judiciaire internationale - Asie du Sud-Est |2 ram | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Jugements étrangers - Asie du Sud-Est |2 ram | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Juridiction - Asie du Sud-Est |2 ram | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Judgments, Foreign |z Southeast Asia | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Judicial assistance |z Southeast Asia | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Jurisdiction |z Southeast Asia | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Internationales Zivilprozessrecht |0 (DE-588)4114041-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 4 | |a Südostasien | |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Association of Southeast Asian Nations |0 (DE-588)116362-0 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Internationales Zivilprozessrecht |0 (DE-588)4114041-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m GBV Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=007927250&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007927250 | ||
Record in the Search Index
| _version_ | 1804126291303071744 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | CROSS-BORDER LITIGATION WITHINASEAN THE PROSPECTS FOR HARMONIZATION OF
CIVIL AND COMMERCIAL LITIGATION BY COLIN Y.C. ONG BARRISTER OF THE INNER
TEMPLE; ASSOCIATE OF THE CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF ARBITRATORS; VISITING
FELLOW OF THE CENTRE FOR COMMERCIAL LAW STUDIES, QUEEN MARY & WESTFIELD
COLLEGE, UNIVERSITY OF LONDON; LL.B. (HONS)(SHEFFIELD); LL.M.; PH. D.
(LONDON) KLUWEFM.AW INTERNATIONAL THE HAGUE - LONDON - BOSTON CONTENTS
DEDICATIONS V FOREWORD VII PREFACE IX REQUEST FOR INFORMATION XIII TABLE
OF CONTENTS XV TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS XXXIX TABLE OF CASES XLIII
INTRODUCTION LXVII CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO ASEAN AND THE AFTA 1 1.1.1
ASEAN AS AN INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZA- TION 1 1.1.2 AN HISTORICAL ACCOUNT
OF THE ASEAN REGION 3 1.1.3 ORIGINS OF THE ASEAN PEOPLE 4 1.1.4 EXTERNAL
HISTORICAL INFLUENCES ON ASEAN 5 1.1.5 THE ARRIVAI OF THE EUROPEAN
COLONIAL POWERS 7 1.1.6 INDEPENDENCE OF THE MODEM SOUTHEAST ASIAN
COUNTRIES 8 1.1.7 EARLY ATTEMPTS AT FORMING REGIONAL BLOCS IN ASEAN 9
1.1.8 INCOMPETENCE OF SEATO AND THE FORMATION OF AS A 9 1.2.1 THE
FORMATION OF ASEAN 10 1.2.2 ANNUAL MEETING OF ASEAN MINISTERS 11 1.2.3
THE EFFECTOFTHEBALISUMMITOF 1976 ON ASEAN 13 1.2.4 THE KUALA LUMPUR
SUMMITOF 1977 14 1.2.5 THE THIRD ASEAN SUMMIT IN MANILA 14 XVI CONTENTS
1.2.6 THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE ASEAN SECRETARIAT 16 1.3.0 UNWRITTEN
CONSTITUTION OF ASEAN 17 1.3.1 THE ASEAN PREFERENTIAL TRADING
ARRANGEMENTS 17 1.3.2 THE FOURTH ASEAN SUMMIT AND THE CREATION OF THE
ASEAN FREE TRADE AREA (AFTA) 19 1.3.3 THE TURNING POINT AND THE
NECESSITY FOR AN ASEAN LEGAL REGIME 21 1.3.4 THE FOURTH ASEAN SUMMIT 22
1.3.5 AFTA AND A COMPARISON WITH THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIE AREA 25 1.3.6
PROPOSAI FOR AN AD-HOC ASEAN CENTRAL COURT OF JUSTICE TO DEAL WITH
ISSUES OF THE PROPOSED ASEAN CONVENTION 28 CHAPTER 2 THE CONTRAST AND
SIMILARITIES IN THE CHARACTERSOF ASEAN AND THE EC 33 2.1.1 INTRODUCTION
33 2.1.2 THE HISTORICAL CREATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE EC 34 2.1.3 THE
CREATION OF THE EUROPEAN COAL AND STEEL COMMUNITY 35 2.1.4 THE
SIGNINGOFTHEEC AND EURATOM TREATIES 36 2.1.5 THE OBJECTIVES OF THE
ORIGINAL TWO COMMUNITIES 37 2.1.6 THE MERGER TREATY OF 1965 38 2.1.7
TREATIES OF ACCESSION 38 2.1.8 THE LEGAL CONCEPT OF THE EUROPEAN
COMMUNITY 39 2.1.9 SUPRANATIONAL ENTITIES AND COMMUNITY LAW 41 2.2.0
HARMONIOUS DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES 42 2.2.1 THE EUROPEAN
SINGLEMARKET 43 2.2.2 THE MAASTRICHT TREATY AND BEYOND 44 2.2.3 THE
HISTORICAL ORIGINS AND ALLEGED REASONS FOR THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION 45
CONTENTS XVII 2.2.4 THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION: A GENERAI OUTLINE 47 2.2.5
COMPARISONS BETWEEN ASEAN AND THE EC PRIOR TO THE FORMATION OF AFTA 49
2.3.0 POLITICAL INTEGRATION AND ASEAN 50 2.3.1 ASEAN TREATY OFAMITY AND
COOPERATION 50 2.3.2 DIFFERENCES IN METHODS OF GOVERNMENT: ASEAN MEMBER
STATES AND EU MEMBER STATES 52 2.3.3 THE POLITICAL ADVANTAGES THAT ASEAN
HAS OVER THE EU (AND ORIGINAL EC) 52 2.3.4 ASEAN * THE EARLIEST
PROPOSAIS FOR AN ASEAN COMMON MARKET 55 2.3.5 AFTA: THE NEW FACE OF
ASEAN 58 2.3.6 FURTHER DEVELOPMENTS OF ASEAN SINCE THE SINGAPORE
DECLARATION OF 1992 AND AFTA 59 2.3.7 THE LEGAL NATURE OF ASEAN 60 2.4.0
THE NEW NATURE OF ASEAN AFTER 1992 (POST-SINGAPORE DECLARATION) 62 2.4.1
LEGAL NATURE OF AFTA 67 2.4.2 POSSIBLE REASONS AS TO WHY THE DRAFTING OF
LEGAL DOCUMENTATION IN ASEAN SEEMS TO BE NEGLIGIBLE WHEN COMPARED TO THE
EU AND NAFTA 69 2.4.3 FREE TRADE AREA, CUSTOMS UNION OR COMMON MARKET?
73 2.4.4 POLITICAL PRE-OCCUPATIONS BY ASEAN MINISTERIAL MEETING BEFORE
THE FOURTH ASEAN SUMMIT IN 1992 76 2.4.5 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND THE
IMPORTANCE OF AFTA IN ALTERING THE MEANINGOF ASEAN 76 2.4.6 CONCLUSION
OF COMPARISON BETWEEN ASEAN AND THE 1968-EC (PRE-BRUSSELS CONVENTION
EUROPE) 77 2.4.7 DIFFERENCES BETWEEN COMMON LAW AND CIVIL LAW IN EUROPE
WHICH HAD TO BE SORTED OUT 77 XVIII CONTENTS 2.5.1 PROBLEMS AND
NON-LEGAL DEFECTS OF THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION THAT SHOULD BE AVOIDED BY
THE NEW PROPOSED ASEAN CONVENTION 78 2.5.2 SPECIAL FEATURES OF ASEAN
WHICH WERE ABSENT FROM PRE-BRUSSELS CONVENTION EUROPE 80 2.5.3
DIFFERENCES IN THE BALANCE OF COMMON LAW AND CIVIL LAW COUNTRIES IN THE
TWO ORGANIZATIONS 81 2.5.4 FIRST IN TIME: MAJORITY OF CIVIL LAW STATES
IN THE EC 81 2.5.5 VARIATIONS ON AN ORIGINAL THEME 82 2.5.6 NOT TOO MUCH
DIVERGENCE IN COMMERCIAL LAW AREAS 83 2.5.7 INEXPERIENCE AND THE
ADVANTAGE OF HAVING A CENTRAL COURT OF JUSTICE 83 2.6.0 THE DIFFERENT
TYPES OF CONVENTIONS AVAILABLE 85 2.6.1 ARGUMENTS FOR A MULTILATERAL
JUDGMENTS CONVENTION FOR ASEAN 87 2.6.2 AN INTRODUCTION TO THE CONCEPT
OF THE DOUBLE CONVENTION 90 2.6.3 THE CONCEPT OF THE MIXED
CONVENTION 92 2.6.4 ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF THE THREE TYPES OF
CONVENTION 93 2.7.0 THE ARGUMENTS FOR THE REJECTION OF THE USE OF A
MIXED CONVENTION IN ASEAN 94 2.7.1 THE THREE REASONS FOR SELECTION OF A
DOUBLE CONVENTION OVER A MIXED CONVENTION FOR ASEAN 97 2.7.2 A ROSE BY
ANY OTHER NAME ... IS AS SWEET 97 2.7.3 THE DISADVANTAGE OF A LACK OF
PRECEDENTS AND A LEAP OF FAITH INTO THE DARK 100 2.7.4 THE ARGUMENTS OF
ADOPTING A JUDGMENTS CONVENTION THAT CAN PARALLEL THE BRUSSELS-LUGANO
CONVENTION WHERE FEASIBLE 101 CONTENTS XIX 2.7.5 CONCLUSION ON DOUBLE
CONVENTION IDEA FOR ASEAN 102 2.7.6 FORUM SHOPPING AND THE APPLICABILITY
OF THE DOCTRINE OF FORUM NON CONVENIENS IN AN ASEAN DOUBLE CONVENTION?
104 2.7.7 FURTHER ARGUMENTS: REASONS BEHIND THE CREATION OF THE BRUSSELS
CONVENTION AND THE ADVANTAGE OF A DOUBLE CONVENTION IN CONTROLLING THE
TAKING OF JURISDICTION 107 2.7.7.1 THE CLASSICAL ARGUMENTS FOR THE
CREATION OF THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION 107 2.7.8 THE PRACTICAL REASONS AND
A CASE FOR ASEAN 108 2.7.9 REASONS FOR USING DOMICILE AS THE
CONNECTING FACTOR 111 2.7.10 NATIONALITY AS A CONNECTING FACTOR? 111
CHAPTER 3 BASIC CONCEPTS OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION, LEGAL SYSTEMS OF
ASEAN AND SUGGESTED REFORMS IN CERTAIN BASIC CONCEPTS 115 3.1.0
INTRODUCTION 115 3.1.1 INTRODUCTION TO THE LEGAL SYSTEMS OF SOME
COUNTRIES IN ASEAN 117 3.1.2 LEGAL SYSTEM OF THE PHILIPPINES 117 3.1.3
THE CASE OF THE PHILIPPINES: COMMON LAW OR CIVIL LAW? 120 3.1.4 THE
PHILIPPINE JUDICIAL SYSTEM 122 3.1.5 PRIMARY LEGAL MATERIALS OF THE
PHILIPPINES 123 3.1.6 JURISDICTION IN THE PHILIPPINES 124 3.2.1
INTRODUCTION TO THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF THAILAND 125 3.2.2 THE LEGAL SYSTEM
OFTHAILAND 125 3.2.3 THAILAND ON JURISDICTION 127 3.3.0 THE LEGAL SYSTEM
AND LAWS OF INDONESIA 128 3.3.1 DUTCH INFLUENCE IN INDONESIA 129 3.3.2
THE GENERAI JUDICATURE 131 XX CONTENTS 3.3.3 THE GOVERNMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS OF JUSTICE 132 3.3.4 THE MILITARY COURTS OF
JUSTICE 133 3.3.5 THE RELIGIOUS COURTS 133 3.3.6 DUTCH PROCEDURAL LAW
133 3.3.7 THE LEGAL SYSTEM AND LAWS OF BRUNEI DARUSSALAM 135 3.3.8 THE
LEGAL SYSTEM AND LAWS OF SINGAPORE 136 3.3.9 THE LEGAL SYSTEM AND LAWS
OF MALAYSIA 137 3.3.10 THE LEGAL SYSTEM AND LAWS OF VIETNAM 138 3.4.1
THE BASIC SKELETON OF THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION 140 3.4.2 CIVIL AND
COMMERCIAL MATTERS 141 3.4.3 THE CONCEPT OF DOMICILE 143 3.4.4 THE
BASIC PROBLEM OF THE TRADITIONAL COMMON LAW CONCEPT OF DOMICILE WITHIN
THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION 146 3.4.5 A HARMONISED AND STANDARD ASEAN
CONCEPT OF DOMICILE 148 3.4.6 A CHANGE OF NAME FOR DOMICILE 149 3.5.1
DEPARTURE FROM THE BRUSSELS CONVEN- TION: NEW TEST FOR DETERMINING
HABIT- UAL RESIDENCE 150 3.5.2 EXORBITANT JURISDICTION RULES 153 3.5.3
IN PERSONAM JURISDICTION AND VOLUNTARY SUBMISSION: ARTICLE 18 155 3.5.4
EXCEPTIONS TO THE CARDINAL RULE OF ARTICLE 2: ARTICLES 16, 17, 5(1) AND
5 (3) AND PROBLEMS OF DEFINITION 160 3.5.5 FURTHER SUGGESTIONS AND
CONCLUSION ON CHAPTER 3 161 CHAPTER 4 ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS
AND SUMMARY OF LEGAL SYSTEMS IN ASEAN; POSITION UNDER THE BRUSSELS
CONVENTION AND THE PROPOSED ASEAN JUDGMENTS CONVENTION 163 CONTENTS XXI
4.1.1 PREAMBLE AND INTRODUCTION 163 4.1.2 RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT OF
JUDGMENTS IN INDONESIA 164 4.1.3 MODEM INDONESIAN LEGAL PRACTICE 164
4.1.4 SPECIFIE PERFORMANCE AND INJUNCTIONS 166 4.1.5 RECOGNITION OF
DECLARATORY JUDGMENTS 167 4.1.6 CONCLUSION: NO ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN
JUDGMENTS? 169 4.1.7 BILATERAL AGREEMENT WITH THAILAND 170 4.2.1
MALAYSIA *A GENERAL INTRODUCTION 171 4.2.2 RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT OF
JUDGMENTS IN MALAYSIA 172 4.2.3 FIRST SCHEDULE OF THE REJA 173 4.2.4
SECTION 2 OF THE 1958 REJA 174 4.2.5 SAFEGUARDS UNDER THE REJA 175 4.2.6
PROCEDURE FOR THE APPLICATION OF REGISTRATION 176 4.2.7
NON-RECIPROCATING COUNTRIES 176 4.2.8 RECIPROCATING COUNTRIES 177 4.2.9
REGISTRATION AND ITS EFFECT 178 4.3.0 SETTTNG ASIDE REGISTERED JUDGMENTS
UN- DER THE REJA AND COMMON LAW 179 4.3.1 ACTION INPERSONAM 181 4.3.2
ACTION IN REM 182 4.3.3 MALAYSIAN ATTITUDE TOWARDS OTHER ASEAN COUNTRIES
184 4.3.4 ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS IN THE PHILIPPINES 184 4.3.5
RECOGNITION BY PHILIPPINE COURTS 186 4.3.6 SEPARATE NEW ACTION REQUIRED
187 4.3.7 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ENFORCEMENT OF A FOREIGN JUDGMENT IN
THE PHILIPPINES 188 4.3.8 PHILIPPINE PROCEDURE FOR ENFORCEMENT 192 4.3.9
THE EFFECT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS IN REM AND IN PERSONAM 194 XXII CONTENTS
4.3.9.1 ACTIONS IN REM 194 4.3.9.2 ACTIONS INPERSONAM 194 4.3.10 WANT OF
JURISDICTION 195 4.3.11 WANT OF NOTICE TO THE PARTY 195 4.3.12 FRAUD 196
4.3.13 MISTAKE OF FACT OR LAW 198 4.4.1 THE FOREIGN JUDGMENT USED AS A
DEFENCE .... 199 4.4.2 CONCLUSION OF PHILIPPINE LAW ON ENFORCEMENT OF
JUDGMENTS 199 4.4.3 ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS IN SINGAPORE 200
4.4.4 ENFORCEMENT UNDER SINGAPORE STATUTES 200 4.4.5 CONTROL BY A
SINGAPORE COURT 202 4.4.6 RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS
ACT 1959 (CAP. 265, 1985 EDITION) 202 4.4.7 SECTION 5 (1) (A) OF THE
REFJA 204 4.5.1 REGISTRATION PROCEDURE APPLICABLE TO BOTH ACTS 205 4.5.2
ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS AGAINST STATE ENTITIES 208 4.5.3
ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS AGAINST THE SINGAPORE GOVERNMENT 208
4.5.4 ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS AGAINST OTHER STATES 209 4.5.5
ENFORCEMENT UNDER THE COMMON LAW IN THE FORM OF A DEBT 210 4.5.6
ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS IN THAILAND 210 4.5.7 SECTION 48 OF THE TCCC
212 4.5.8 COMMERCIAL CODE OF THAILAND 213 4.5.9 SERVICE OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THAILAND 213 CONTENTS XXIII 4.6.0 THE RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF
FOREIGN JUDGMENTS WITHIN THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION 215 4.6.1 THE SCOPE OF
THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION: A GENERAI DESCRIPTION 215 4.6.2 SPECIFICALLY
EXCLUDED EXCEPTIONS 217 4.6.3 MATRIMONIAL LAW MATTERS: ARTICLE 1 (1) 217
4.6.4 BANKRUPTCY AND PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO THE WINDING-UP OF INSOLVENT
COMPANIES OR OTHER LEGAL PERSONS, JUDICIAL ARRANGEMENTS, COMPOSITIONS
AND ANALOGOUS PRO- CEEDINGS: ARTICLE 1 (2) 217 4.6.5 SOCIAL SECURITY:
ARTICLE 1 (3) 218 4.6.6 ARBITRATION: ARTICLE 1 (4) 219 4.6.7 RECOGNITION
AND ENFORCEMENT RULES UNDER THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION 220 4.6.8 GENERAL
DISCUSSION AND INTRODUCTION 220 4.6.9 RECOGNITION PROVISIONS UNDER THE
BRUSSELS CONVENTION 223 4.7.0 PRINCIPAL GROUNDS OF NON-RECOGNITION UNDER
THE CONVENTION 225 4.7.1 ARTICLE 27 (1): PUBLIC POLICY 225 4.7.2 ARTICLE
27 (2): THE RIGHTS OF THE DEFENDANT IN THE ABSENCE OF SERVICE 228 4.7.3
ARTICLE 27 (3): THE PROSPECT OF IRRECONCILABLE JUDGMENTS 229 4.7.4
ARTICLE 27 (4): PRELIMINARY QUESTIONS AND CONFLICT OF LAWS RULES 230
4.7.5 ARTICLE 27 (5): INCOMPATIBILITY WITH A JUDGMENT OF A
NON-CONTRACTING STATE 231 4.7.6 ARTICLES 28 AND 29 232 4.7.7 ARTICLE 30:
AN APPEAL IN THE STATE OF ORIGIN 233 4.7.8 ENFORCEMENT PROVISIONS OF THE
BRUSSELS CONVENTION 233 4.7.9 PROCEDURAL FORMALITIES 235 XXIV CONTENTS
4.8.1 APPEALS PENDING BEFORE THE RENDERTNG COURT 237 4.8.2 CONCLUSIONS
AND SUGGESTED RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED ASEAN JUDGMENTS
CONVENTION 238 4.8.3 SUGGESTED RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED ASEAN
JUDGMENTS CONVENTION 242 4.8.3.1 ARTICLE 3 243 4.8.3.2 ARTICLE 4 244
4.8.3.3 SECTION 2 SPECIAL JURISDICTION ARTICLE 5 244 CHAPTER5 CONTRACTS
AND SPECIAL JURISDICTION 255 5.1.0 SPECIAL JURISDICTION FOR CONTRACTUAL
MATTERS: ARTICLE 5(1) 255 5.1.1 DEFENDANTS WHO ARE DOMICILED IN A
NON-MEMBER STATE * 256 5.1.2 COMPARISON BETWEEN ARTICLE 5(1) AND ARTICLE
17 258 5.1.3 INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 5 (1) AND PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS
FOR ASEAN 261 5.1.4 DETERMINATION OF THE PLACE OF PERFORMANCE 261 5.1.5
THE OBLIGATION IN QUESTION AND ASEAN 264 5.1.6 REFINEMENT OF THE
INTERPRETATION 266 5.1.7 THE IVENEL RULING AND ITS CONSEQUENCES 268
5.2.1 CLAUSE 3 OF ARTICLE 5(1) AND PLACE OF ENGAGEMENT OF EMPLOYEES 273
5.2.2 DETERMINATION OF PLACE OFCONTRACTUAL PERFORMANCE 274 5.2.3 THE
PLACE OF PERFORMANCE OF THE OBLIGATION OFPAYMENT 276 5.2.4 RELATIONSHIP
BETWEEN ARTICLE 5 (1) AND ARTICLE 17 OF THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION AND
ASEAN MODIFICATION 281 5.2.5 EXISTENCE OF THE CONTRACT: PUTATIVE
CONTRACTS 283 5.2.6 ARTICLE 5 (1): NARROW OR BROAD INTERPRETATION? 285
5.2.7 MISCELLANEOUS PROBLEMS OF INTERPRETING ARTICLE 5 (1) 290 5.3.1
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARTICLE 2 AND AR- TICLE5(1) 292 CONTENTS XXV 5.3.2
PROXIMITY OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COURT AND DISPUTE 293 5.3.3 ARTICLE 5
(L)AND THE COURT OF A SINGLE MEMBER STATE 295 5.4.1 CONCLUSION OF
ARTICLE 5(1) DISCUSSIONS 297 CHAPTER 6 JURISDICTION IN MATTERS RELATING
TO TORT OR DELICT 301 6.1.1 LIKELY PROBLEMS TO RESULT FROM FREE MOVEMENT
OF GOODS AND SERVICES WITHIN THE ASEAN FREE TRADE AREA 301 6.1.2
NECESSITY FOR ARTICLE 5 (3) AND THE RIGHT TO SUE THE DEFENDANT IN THE
COURTS WHERE THE HARMFUL EVENT OCCURRED 302 6.1.3 MATTERS RELATING TO
TORT, DELICT OR QUASI-DELICT 303 6.1.4 DEFINING THE SCOPE OF ARTICLE 5
(3) 306 6.2.1 MUTUAL EXCLUSION OF PARAGRAPHS 5 (1) AND (3) AND SUGGESTED
DEPARTURE FROM KALFELIS FOR ASEAN 307 6.2.2 THE PROBLEM OF OVERLAPPING
ACTIONS 311 6.2.3 THE DETERMINATION OF THE LOCUS DELICTI OR THE PLACE
OF THE TORT 313 6.2.4 THE PLACE WHERE THE HARMFUL EVENT OCCURRED 313
6.2.5 CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGE OR LOSS AFTER THE FIRST LOSS IN A DIFFERENT
CONTRACTING STATE 321 6.3.1 THE NECESSITY FOR A MORE RESTRICTIVE IN-
TERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 5 (3) 324 6.3.2 EXAMPLES OF RESTRICTIVE
INTERPRETATION 325 6.3.3 CONFLICTING JUDGMENTS OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE
326 6.3.4 THE RELATIONSHIP AND CONFLICT BETWEEN CONTRACT AND TORT IN
ARTICLE 5 AND A SUGGESTED NEW APPROACH 327 6.3.5 PROVISO FOR NECESSITY
FOR TOTAL CONDITIONS FOR A CONTRACT 329 6.4.1 CONCLUSION ON SEPARATION
BETWEEN TORT AND CONTRACT MATTERS 331 6.4.2
AREPARAGRAPHS(L)AND(3)ALL-EMBRACING? 333 XXVI CONTENTS 6.4.3 FINAL
CONCLUSIONS ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARTICLE 5 (1) AND ARTICLE 5 (3)
335 6.4.4 ANTICIPATORY TORTS UNDER THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION 337 6.4.5
ARTICLE 5 (3), ANTICIPATED TORTS AND MAREVA AND INTERLOCUTORY
INJUNCTIONS 340 6.5.1 OTHER PROVISIONAL MEASURES FOR ARTI- CLE 5 (3) 341
6.5.2 TORTS BASED UPON NEGLIGENT MISSTATEMENTS 343 6.5.3 PROFESSIONAL
NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS 344 6.5.4 CONTRACT AS A DEFENCE IN TORT UNDER ARTICLE
5 (3)? 344 6.6.1 DAMAGE IN QUASI-CONTRACTUAL OR RESTI- TUTIONARY CASES
346 6.6.2 ARTICLE 5 (3) AND DIRECT AND INDIRECT VICTIMS OF A TORT
AND SUGGESTED APPROACH 348 6.6.3 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARTICLE 5 (3) AND
THE LAW OF PROPERTY 351 6.6.4 COMMON LAW MEANING OF PLACE AND ITS USE
UNDER ARTICLE 5 (3) 352 6.7.1 CONCLUSION ON DISCUSSIONS OF ARTICLE 5 (3)
353 CHAPTER 7 EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION REGARDLESS OF DOMICILE: SITUS OF
IMMOVABLE PROPERTY 357 7.1.1 IMMOVABLE PROPERTY AND THE ULTIMATE
EXCLUSIVITY IN JURISDICTION 357 7.1.2 RIGHTS IN REM AND SOVEREIGNTY OF
NATIONS 358 7.1.3 ARTICLE 16(1) AND THE MEANING OF RIGHTS IN REM 362
7.1.4 UNFORTUNATE CONSEQUENCE OF REICHERT ON THIRD PARTIES AND PUBLIC
POLICY 364 7.1.5 ARTICLE 16 AS AN EXCEPTION TO THE GENERAI RULE 366
7.1.6 MANDATORY RULES OF ARTICLE 16 367 7.2.1 TENANCIES OF IMMOVABLE
PROPERTY IN AR- TICLE 16 367 CONTENTS XXVII 7.2.2 DEFINITION OF THE
PHRASE TENANCIES OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY 370 7.2.3 SUGGESTION ON SHORT
HOLIDAY LETTINGS FOR ASEAN 370 7.3.1 ARTICLE 16 (1) (B) AND A NEW
PROVISO FOR ASEAN 371 7.3.2 RECOVERY OF RENT AND NEW AMENDMENTS UNDER
THE SAN SEBASTIAN ACCESSION CONVENTION OF 1989 372 7.3.3 CONTRACTS
INVOLVING SALE OF LAND 374 7.3.4 ACTIONS RELATING TO TRUSTS OF LAND 375
7.4.1 IMMOVABLE PROPERTY SITUATED IN MORE THAN ONE CONTRACTING STATE 379
7.5.1 ARTICLE 16 (5) ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS 381 7.5.2 ARTICLE 16 (5)
AND IMMOVABLE PROPERTY IN A NON-CONTRACTING STATE 382 7.5.3 ARTICLE 16
(5) AND ITS RELATION TO OTHER PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 16 384 7.5.4 ARTICLE
16 (5) AND POST-JUDGMENT MAREVA INJUNCTIONS 386 7.5.5 ARTICLE 19: THE
DUTY TO DECLINE JURISDICTION WHERE ANOTHER CONTRACTING STATE S COURTS
POSSESS EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION UNDER ARTICLE 16 AND THE NEW SUGGESTION
FOR ASEAN 388 7.6.0 CONCLUSION ON ARTICLE 16 389 CHAPTER 8 FORUM
SELECTION CLAUSES 395 8.1.0 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 395 8.1.1 PRECAUTIONARY
ACTS IN THE GUISE OF FORUM SELECTION CLAUSES 396 8.1.2 U.S. LAW ON THE
TREATMENT OF FORUM SELECTION CLAUSES 397 8.1.3 U.S. TREATMENT OF
DEROGATION CASES 399 8.1.4 BREMEN AND RECOGNITION OF FORUM SELECTION
CLAUSES 400 8.1.5 THEDEATHOFTHEOUSTERTHEORY 402 8.1.6 FEDERAL COURTS AND
FORUM SELECTION CLAUSES 403 XXVIII CONTENTS 8.1.7 U.S. STATE COURTS AND
FORUM SELECTION CLAUSES 406 8.1.8 EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION AND
NON-EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION CLAUSES 407 8.1.9 AMBIGUOUS FORUM SELECTION
CLAUSES 408 8.2.0 INTERPRETATION OF A FORUM SELECTION CLAUSE 409 8.2.1
BREADTH AND EXTENT OF THE USE OF FORUM SELECTION CLAUSES IN THE U.S 410
8.2.2 EFFECT OF 28 U.S.C. SECTION 1404 (A) 1988 ON FORUM SELECTION
CLAUSES AFTER STEWART V. RICOH 412 8.2.3 THE EFFECT OF FORUM SELECTION
CLAUSES ON FORUM NON CONVENIENS IN THE US 413 8.2.4 FORUM SELECTION
CLAUSES IN CONSUMER CONTRACTS AND THE DECISION OF CARNIVAL CRUISE LINES
V . SHUTE 414 8.2.5 CONCLUSION: SUMMARY AND LESSONS TO BE LEARNT FROM
THE U.S. EXPERIENCE 415 8.3.1 THE ENGLISH POSITION ON THE TREATMENT OF
FORUM SELECTION CLAUSES 416 8.3.2 THE ELEFTHERIA GUIDELINES 417 8.3.3
MANIPULATION OIELEFTHERIA GUIDELINES BY THE COURTS 419 8.3.4 FORUM
SELECTION CLAUSES AND FORUM NON CONVENIENS IN ENGLISH COURTS AND THE
PROPER LAW OF THE CONTRACT 420 8.3.5 EXCLUSIVE AND NON-EXCLUSIVE FORUM
SELECTION CLAUSES UNDER ENGLISH LAW 421 8.3.6 THE GOVERNING LAW AND
FORUM SELECTION CLAUSES 423 8.4.0 ASEANSECTION 426 8.4.1 SINGAPORE CASE
LAW ON FORUM SELECTION CLAUSES 426 8.4.2 RECENT SINGAPORE DECISIONS ON
FORUM SELECTION CLAUSES 428 8.4.3 STATUTORY PROTECTION OF FORUM
SELECTION CLAUSES 431 8.4.4 SUMMARY OF SINGAPORE POSITION 432 8.4.5 THE
MALAYSIAN POSITION ON FORUM SELECTION CLAUSES 433 CONTENTS XXIX 8.4.6
LANDMARK DECISION IN MALAYSIA 434 8.4.7 RECENT MALAYSIAN CASES ON FORUM
SELECTION CLAUSES 437 8.4.8 MALAYSIAN STATUTORY PROTECTION OF FORUM
SELECTION CLAUSES 440 8.4.10 THE BRUNEI POSITION ON FORUM SELECTION
CLAUSES 441 8.4.11 THE PHILIPPINE POSITION ON FORUM SELECTION CLAUSES
443 8.4.12 THE POSITION OF FORUM SELECTION CLAUSES IN INDONESIA AND
THAILAND 445 8.5.0 ARTICLE 17 OF THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION 446 8.5.1 NO
DISCRETION AS REGARDS ENFORCEMENT OF ARTICLE 17 447 8.5.2 PARTIES
DOMICILED IN THE SAME CONTRACTING STATE AND ARTICLE 17 448 8.5.3 TWO
DOMICILED MEMBERS OF A MEMBER STATE AND A FORUM SELECTION CLAUSE IN
FAVOUR OF ANOTHER MEMBER STATE 449 8.5.4 FORUM SELECTION CLAUSES AND TWO
PARTIES WHO ARE NOT DOMICILED IN ANY MEMBER STATE 450 8.5.5 ARTICLE 17
AND COURTS OF MORE THAN ONE CONTRACTING STATE 451 8.5.6 A NEW
ALTERNATIVE TO THE INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 17 AND FORUM SELECTION
CLAUSES IN ASEAN 452 8.5.7 ARTICLE 17 AND DEROGATION OF JURISDICTION 453
8.5.8 WRITTEN FORUM SELECTION AGREEMENTS AND ARTICLE 17 454 8.5.9 THE
DEFINITION OF INTERNATIONAL PRACTICE WITHIN ARTICLE 17 456 8.6.0 BILLS
OF LADING AND ARTICLE 17 458 8.6.1 A MODIFICATION TO SUIT THE PACE OF
THE INTERNATIONAL MARKET 459 8.6.2 A MORE LIBERAL INTERPRETATION OF
ARTICLE 17? 461 8.6.3 PLACE OF PERFORMANCE OF THE OBLIGATION AND ARTICLE
17 462 XXX CONTENTS 8.6.4 THIRD PARTY ALONE IS A DOMICILIARY OF A
CONTRACTING STATE 463 8.6.5 NON-MEMBER STATE LITIGANTS, FORUM NON
CONVENIENS AND ARTICLE 17 464 8.6.6 NONE OF THE PARTIES ARE DOMICILED IN
A MEMBER STATE BUT HAVE SELECTED THE COURTS OF A MEMBER STATE 465 8.6.7
CHOICE OF A NON-CONTRACTING STATE BY A FORUM SELECTION AGREEMENT 468
8.7.1 CONCLUSION ON FORUM SELECTION CLAUSES 471 CHAPTER 9 STAYING AN
ACTION IN SITUATIONS OF MULTIPLICITY OF PROCEEDINGS BY MEANS OF THE LIS
ALIBIPENDENS DOCTRINE 473 9.1.0 INTRODUCTION TO THE DOCTRINE OF LIS
ALIBI PENDENS 473 9.1.1 LIS ALIBI PENDENS * THE POSITION UNDER ENGLISH
COMMON LAW 474 9.1.2 THE DE DAMPIERRE DECISION AND LIS ALIBI PENDENS 476
9.1.3 THE PROMOTION OF FORUM SHOPPING? 477 9.1.4 AN OPPOSING BUT EQUALLY
EXTREME METHOD 478 9.1.5 A SUITABLE COMPROMISE FOR ASEAN? 479 9.1.6
MULTIPLICITY OF PROCEEDINGS 481 9.2.0 AMERICAN LAW ON LIS ALIBI PENDENS
482 9.2.1 FEDERAL COURTS AND ABSTENTION 484 9.2.2 THE ALLOWANCE OF
PARALLEL PROCEEDINGS 486 9.2.3 LIS ALIBI PENDENS AS A PROCEDURAL TOOL
487 9.2.4 CRITERIA FOR LIS ALIBI PENDENS 489 9.2.5 ARTIFICIAL TREATMENT
OF STAYS 490 9.3.0 ASEAN SECTION ON LIS ALIBI PENDENS 490 9.3.1
SINGAPORE LAW ON LIS ALIBI PENDENS 490 CONTENTS XXXI 9.3.2 THE IMPACT OF
DE DAMPIERRE V. DE DAMPIERRE ON SINGAPORE LAW 493 9.3.3 MALAYSIAN CASES
ON LIS ALIBI PENDENS (POST-1963) 494 9.3.4 THE BRUNEI POSITION ON LIS
ALIBI PENDENS 495 9.3.5 LIS ALIBI PENDENS IN THE PHILIPPINES 496 9.3.6 A
POSSIBILITY OF AN EQUIVALENT ARTICLES 21-23 FOR ASEAN 499 9.4.0 LIS
ALIBI PENDENS AND THE POSITION UNDER THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION OF ARTICLES
21-23 500 9.4.1 A MORE RIGID DOCTRINE OF LIS ALIBI PENDENS? 501 9.4.2
ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS AND NON-ENFORCEMENT OF A FOREIGN JUDGMENT 502 9.4.3
DEFENDANTS WHO ARE NOT DOMICILED IN A MEMBER STATE 503 9.4.4 DISCRETION
BY NATIONAL COURTS? 504 9.4.5 SAME PARTIES AND PARALLEL SETS OF
PROCEEDINGS 506 9.4.6 INTERPRETATION OF THE SAME CAUSE OF ACTION AND
DOMICILE OF THE PARTIES 509 9.4.7 COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS FOR THE
PURPOSES OF ARTICLES 21-23 511 9.4.8 PROCEDURAL RULES AND THE CONVENTION
513 9.4.9 PREVENTION OF FORUM SHOPPING 514 9.5.0 LIS ALIBI PENDENS AS A
FACTOR IN FORUM NON CONVENIENS 516 9.5.1 NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS AND THEIR
EFFECT ON LIS ALIBI PENDENS 518 9.5.2 A BACK DOOR METHOD 520 9.5.3
NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS AND LIS ALIBI PENDENS 521 9.5.4 ANTI-SUIT
INJUNCTIONS IN AID OF LIS ALIBI PENDENS PROCEEDINGS AND IMPACT OF DE
DAMPIERE V. DE DAMPIERE 524 XXXII CONTENTS 9.5.5 ARTICLE 22 OFTHE
BRUSSELS CONVENTION 526 9.6.1 ARTICLE 17 IN RELATION TO ARTICLES 21-23
AND A PROPOSED SOLUTION TO CONFLICTS BETWEEN THEM 529 9.6.2 MISTAKEN
ASSUMPTION OF EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION 531 9.6.3 SITUATION WHERE ONE COURT
CONSIDERS ITSELF TO HAVE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION 532 9.6.4 NEW SUBSECTION
FOR PROPOSED ASEAN CONVENTION 534 9.6.5 ARTICLE 23 OFTHE BRUSSELS
CONVENTION 535 9.6.6 ALTERNATIVE SUGGESTION FOR EXCLUSIVITY 536 9.7.0
CONCLUSION ON LIS ALIBI PENDENS CHAPTER .... 536 CHAPTER10 THE PROBLEM
OF FORUM SHOPPING 539 10.1.0 THE CONCEPT OF FORUM SHOPPING AND THE
DOCTRINE OF FORUM NON CONVENIENS AS A COUNTER-BALANCE 539 10.1.1 FORUM
NON CONVENIENS IN ASEAN AND THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION 542 10.1.2 FORUM
SHOPPING AND LITIGATION OVER THE VENUE OF LITIGATION 544 10.1.3 THE
ENGLISH COMMON LAW ON FORUM NON CONVENIENS 546 10.1.3.1 WHAT IS FORUM
NON CONVENIENS? 546 10.1.3.2 RELATIONSHIP TO ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTIONS AND
THE SPILIADA 550 10.1.3.3 BURDEN OF PROOF IN STAYS AND IN ORDER 11
SITUATIONS 553 10.1.3.4 ROLE OF FORUM NON CONVENIENS IN MODEM ENGLISH
PRACTICE 554 10.2.1 FORUM NON CONVENIENS IN THE UNITED STATES 558 10.2.2
MOST SUITABLE FORUM TEST 561 CONTENTS XXXIII 10.2.3 DIVERSITY CASES AND
MOTIONS FOR FORUM NON CONVENIENS 562 10.2.4 DOMESTIC PROCEDURAL RULES
SIMILAR TO FORUM NON CONVENIENS 562 10.2.5 PIPER AIRCRAFT V. REYNO 564
10.2.6 CONDITIONS IMPOSED UPON THE DEFENDANT IN ALLOWING A
SUCCESSFULYORW/K NON CONVENIENS PLEA 568 10.2.7 SIMILARITY TO THE
SPILIADA APPROACH 569 10.2.8 FORUM NON CONVENIENS AND LIS ALIBI PENDENS
570 10.2.9 STATUTORY EXCLUSION OF FORU M NON CONVENIENS DOCTRINE IN NEW
YORK 571 10.3.1 THE CURRENT PRACTICE OF FORUM NON CONVENIENS INASEAN
571 10.3.1.1 APPLICATION OFTHE DOCTRINE IN BRUNEI, MALAYSIA AND
SINGAPORE 571 10.3.1.2 EARLIER DEVELOPMENT OF SIMILAR PRINCIPLES IN
SINGAPORE 573 10.3.1.3 INTERPLAY BETWEEN FORUM NON CONVENIENS AND FORUM
SELECTION CLAUSES 574 10.3.1.4 APPLICATION OF THE SPILIADA IN SINGAPORE
TORT CASES 576 10.3.1.5 CROSS-BORDER LITIGATION CASES INVOLVING^ORW/W
NON CONVENIENS IN SINGAPORE 577 10.3.1.6 BRUNEI CASES ONFORUM NON
CONVENIENS 584 10.3.1.7 MALAYSIAN CASES ON FORUM NON CONVENIENS 584
10.3.1.8 THE PHILIPPINE CONCERNS ON THE ELIMINATION OF FORUM SHOPPING
592 10.3.1.9 APPLICABILITY OF THE FORUM NON CONVENIENS DOCTRINE IN THE
PHILIPPINES 597 10.3.1.10 FORUM NON CONVENIENS IN NON-COMMON LAW ASEAN
COUNTRIES 599 10.4.1 FORUM NON CONVENIENS UNDER THE BRUS- SELS
CONVENTION? 600 XXXIV CONTENTS 10.4.2 THE UK ACCESSION AND ITS IMPACT ON
THE DOCTRINE OF FORUM NON CONVENIENS 602 10.4.3 COUNTER-ARGUMENT AGAINST
THE APPLICABILITY OF FORUM NON CONVENIENS IN THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION 606
10.4.4 SILENCE OFTHE BRUSSELS CONVENTION ON THE MATTER 607 10.4.5 EFFECT
OF FOREIGN JURISDICTION CLAUSES ON FORUM NON CONVENIENS 608 10.5.1
SUGGESTED SITUATIONS WHERE THE COURTS SHOULD HAVE A DISCRETION TO STAY
PROCEEDINGS UNDER A FORUM NON CONVENIENS DOCTRINE 609 10.5.2 REHARRODS
(BUENOS AIRES) LTD. 612 10.5.3 GENERAL SUMMARY OFTHE LAW CONCEMING THE
STAYING OF ENGLISH PROCEEDINGS 614 10.5.4 CONTROL OF CONGESTION OF COURT
CASES 615 10.5.5 OVERLY BROAD PROVISION AND REACHING EFFECTS OF ARTICLE
2 615 10.6.1 DIFFERENT TREATMENT BETWEEN CON- TRACTING AND
NON-CONTRACTING STATES .... 616 10.6.2 REDRAFTING OF BRUSSELS CONVENTION
FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PROPOSED ASEAN JUDGMENTS CONVENTION 619 10.6.3
SAFETY MECHANISM FOR FORUM NON CONVENIENS IN THE PROPOSED ASEAN
JUDGMENTS CONVENTION 621 10.6.4 SUMMARY OF RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN
ENGLISH LAW THAT ARE CONCERNED WITH THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION 622 10.6.5
CORRECTNESS OFTHE REHARRODS DECISION 625 10.6.6 POSSIBLE HIDDEN MOTIVES
OFTHE ENGLISH COURT 625 10.6.7 PROCEDURAL RULES OF NON-JURISDICTIONAL
CHARACTER AND FORUM NON CONVENIENS 626 10.6.8 UNFAIMESSOF
JTEIFARRODSFORNON-EUPLAINTIFFS? 627 CONTENTS XXXV 10.6.9 CAN THE FORUM
NON CONVENIENS DOCTRINE EXIST WITHIN THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION TO RESOLVE
JURISDICTIONAL DISPUTES BETWEEN TWO COURTS OF CONTRACTING STATES? 628
10.7.1 POSSIBILITY OF INTERNATIONAL BILATERAL TREATIES WITH FRIENDLY
NON- CONTRACTTNG MEMBER STATES IN THE PRO- POSED ASEAN CONVENTION 630
10.7.2 CONCLUSION OF CHAPTER 10 631 CHAPTER 11 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE
RELIEF 635 11.1.0 INTRODUCTION AND AIMS OF THIS CHAPTER .... 635 11.1.1
WHAT IS A MAREVA INJUNCTION? 637 11.1.2 EUROPEAN CIVIL LAW AND
PRELIMINARY RELIEF 639 11.1.3 HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OFTHE MAREVA
INJUNCTION 640 11.1.4 BURDEN OFPROOFIS ON THE PLAINTIFF 642 11.1.5
STATUTORY RECOGNITION OF MAREVA INJUNCTIONS IN ENGLAND 643 11.1.6
INJUNCTION TO PREVENT ASSETS FROM BEING DISSIPATED WITHIN THE COUNTRY
ITSELF 644 11.1.7 SHIFTINGOFAPPROACH 645 11.1.8 MAREVA INJUNCTIONS FOR
UNLIQUIDATED CLAIMS 647 11.2.1 THE USE OF MAREVA INJUNCTIONS IN THE
DOMESTIC JURISDICTION 648 11.2.2 WORLD-WIDE INJUNCTIONS 650 11.2.3
WORLD-WIDE MAREVA INJUNCTIONS IN THE ASEAN CONTEXT? 653 11.2.4 THE
MAREVA INJUNCTION AS A TOOL OF OPPRESSION 654 11.2.5 EX PARTE O R INTER
PARTES MAREVA? 654 11.2.6 MULTINATIONAL COMPANIES AND FRAUD 657 11.2.7
MAREVA INJUNCTIONS AND DISCOVERY ORDERS 657 11.2.8 CONCLUSION ON ENGLISH
LAW SECTION 658 AMERICAN SECTION 660 XXXVI CONTENTS 11.3.0 INTRODUCTION
TO U.S. TREATMENT ON PRE- LIMINARY RELIEF 660 11.3.1 MONETARY
COMPENSATION AS AN ADEQUATE REMEDY 661 11.3.2 THE PREJUDGMENT ATTACHMENT
AND ITS LIMITATIONS 662 11.3.3 PREJUDGMENT STATUTES 663 11.3.4
SUBJECT-MATTER LIMITATIONS OF PREJUDGMENT ATTACHMENT * 664 11.3.5
LIMITED GEOGRAPHIE REACHOF ATTACHMENT PROCEEDINGS 664 11.3.6 STATE
REMEDIES IN FEDERAL PROCEDURES 665 11.3.7
DISADVANTAGEOFATTACHMENTASAREMEDY 666 11.3.8 CONCLUSION OF ATTACHMENT AS
A POSSIBLE REMEDY FOR ASEAN 667 11.4.0 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIONS IN THE
UNITED STATES 668 11.4.1 FREEZING ASSETS AS A PROTECTIVE MEASURE 670
11.4.2 PREFERENCE FOR FOREIGNERS? 671 11.4.3 DISCLOSURE OF ASSETS AS A
FACTOR FOR AN INJUNCTION 672 11.4.4 RISK OF DISSIPATION 672 11.4.5 STATE
PUBLIC INTEREST CONSIDERATIONS 673 11.4.6 INJUNCTIONS AND DAMAGES AS AN
ALTERNATIVE 673 11.4.7 BALANCE OF HARDSHIPS 675 11.5.0 SAFEGUARDS FOR
THE DEFENDANT 675 11.5.1 ALTERNATIVE AND CONDITIONAL RELIEF FOR THE
DEFENDANT 676 11.5.2 DIFFERENCE BETWEEN US PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND
MAREVA 678 ASEAN PRACTICE ON PRELIMINARY AND PROTECTIVE INJUNCTIONS 679
11.6.1 INDONESIA 679 11.6.2 THE PHILIPPINES AND MAREVA INJUNCTIONS 681
11.6.3 EXPORTE AND PERMANENT MAREVA INJUNCTIONS 683 11.6.4 THE THAI
POSITION ON MAREVA TYPE INJUNCTIONS 684 CONTENTS XXXVII 11.6.5 THE
BRUNEI POSITION ON MAREVA INJUNCTIONS 687 11.6.6 THE MALAYSIAN POSITION
ON MAREVA INJUNCTIONS 688 11.6.7 THE SINGAPORE TREATMENT OF MAREVA
INJUNCTIONS 692 11.7.1 THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION AND MAREVA INJUNCTIONS
693 11.7.2 INTERIM RELIEF FROM CONTRACTING STATE COURTS 695 11.8.0
MAREVA INJUNCTIONS AND TACTICS OF DE- LA YING PROCEEDINGS 696 11.8.1
FINAL CONCLUSIONS ON MAREVA INJUNCTIONS 697 CHAPTER 12 SUMMARY OF FINAL
CONCLUSIONS 701 APPENDIX DRAFT PROPOSED ASEAN CONVENTION 709 SELECTED
BIBLIOGRAPHY 729 INDEX 751
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Ong, Colin Y. C. |
| author_facet | Ong, Colin Y. C. |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Ong, Colin Y. C. |
| author_variant | c y c o cyc cyco |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV011748578 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | KNC473 |
| callnumber-raw | KNC473 |
| callnumber-search | KNC473 |
| callnumber-sort | KNC 3473 |
| classification_rvk | PT 520 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)36629914 (DE-599)BVBBV011748578 |
| dewey-full | 347.59/012 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 347 - Procedure and courts |
| dewey-raw | 347.59/012 |
| dewey-search | 347.59/012 |
| dewey-sort | 3347.59 212 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Thesis Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02039nam a2200481 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV011748578</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">19980605 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">980204s1997 m||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9041103961</subfield><subfield code="9">90-411-0396-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)36629914</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV011748578</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KNC473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.59/012</subfield><subfield code="2">21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PT 520</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139909:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ong, Colin Y. C.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cross-border litigation within ASEAN</subfield><subfield code="b">the prospects for harmonization of civil and commercial litigation</subfield><subfield code="c">by Colin Y. C. Ong</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Cross border litigation within ASEAN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">The Hague [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Kluwer Law Internat.</subfield><subfield code="c">1997</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LXXII, 755 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Teilw. zugl.: London, Univ. of London, Diss., 1995</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Association of Southeast Asian Nations</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)116362-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Entraide judiciaire internationale - Asie du Sud-Est</subfield><subfield code="2">ram</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Jugements étrangers - Asie du Sud-Est</subfield><subfield code="2">ram</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Juridiction - Asie du Sud-Est</subfield><subfield code="2">ram</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judgments, Foreign</subfield><subfield code="z">Southeast Asia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judicial assistance</subfield><subfield code="z">Southeast Asia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Jurisdiction</subfield><subfield code="z">Southeast Asia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internationales Zivilprozessrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4114041-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Südostasien</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Association of Southeast Asian Nations</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)116362-0</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Internationales Zivilprozessrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4114041-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">GBV Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=007927250&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007927250</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Hochschulschrift |
| geographic | Südostasien |
| geographic_facet | Südostasien |
| id | DE-604.BV011748578 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T18:15:07Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9041103961 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007927250 |
| oclc_num | 36629914 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-739 DE-12 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-188 |
| owner_facet | DE-739 DE-12 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-188 |
| physical | LXXII, 755 S. |
| publishDate | 1997 |
| publishDateSearch | 1997 |
| publishDateSort | 1997 |
| publisher | Kluwer Law Internat. |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Ong, Colin Y. C. Verfasser aut Cross-border litigation within ASEAN the prospects for harmonization of civil and commercial litigation by Colin Y. C. Ong Cross border litigation within ASEAN The Hague [u.a.] Kluwer Law Internat. 1997 LXXII, 755 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Teilw. zugl.: London, Univ. of London, Diss., 1995 Association of Southeast Asian Nations (DE-588)116362-0 gnd rswk-swf Entraide judiciaire internationale - Asie du Sud-Est ram Jugements étrangers - Asie du Sud-Est ram Juridiction - Asie du Sud-Est ram Judgments, Foreign Southeast Asia Judicial assistance Southeast Asia Jurisdiction Southeast Asia Internationales Zivilprozessrecht (DE-588)4114041-2 gnd rswk-swf Südostasien (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content Association of Southeast Asian Nations (DE-588)116362-0 b Internationales Zivilprozessrecht (DE-588)4114041-2 s DE-604 GBV Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=007927250&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Ong, Colin Y. C. Cross-border litigation within ASEAN the prospects for harmonization of civil and commercial litigation Association of Southeast Asian Nations (DE-588)116362-0 gnd Entraide judiciaire internationale - Asie du Sud-Est ram Jugements étrangers - Asie du Sud-Est ram Juridiction - Asie du Sud-Est ram Judgments, Foreign Southeast Asia Judicial assistance Southeast Asia Jurisdiction Southeast Asia Internationales Zivilprozessrecht (DE-588)4114041-2 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)116362-0 (DE-588)4114041-2 (DE-588)4113937-9 |
| title | Cross-border litigation within ASEAN the prospects for harmonization of civil and commercial litigation |
| title_alt | Cross border litigation within ASEAN |
| title_auth | Cross-border litigation within ASEAN the prospects for harmonization of civil and commercial litigation |
| title_exact_search | Cross-border litigation within ASEAN the prospects for harmonization of civil and commercial litigation |
| title_full | Cross-border litigation within ASEAN the prospects for harmonization of civil and commercial litigation by Colin Y. C. Ong |
| title_fullStr | Cross-border litigation within ASEAN the prospects for harmonization of civil and commercial litigation by Colin Y. C. Ong |
| title_full_unstemmed | Cross-border litigation within ASEAN the prospects for harmonization of civil and commercial litigation by Colin Y. C. Ong |
| title_short | Cross-border litigation within ASEAN |
| title_sort | cross border litigation within asean the prospects for harmonization of civil and commercial litigation |
| title_sub | the prospects for harmonization of civil and commercial litigation |
| topic | Association of Southeast Asian Nations (DE-588)116362-0 gnd Entraide judiciaire internationale - Asie du Sud-Est ram Jugements étrangers - Asie du Sud-Est ram Juridiction - Asie du Sud-Est ram Judgments, Foreign Southeast Asia Judicial assistance Southeast Asia Jurisdiction Southeast Asia Internationales Zivilprozessrecht (DE-588)4114041-2 gnd |
| topic_facet | Association of Southeast Asian Nations Entraide judiciaire internationale - Asie du Sud-Est Jugements étrangers - Asie du Sud-Est Juridiction - Asie du Sud-Est Judgments, Foreign Southeast Asia Judicial assistance Southeast Asia Jurisdiction Southeast Asia Internationales Zivilprozessrecht Südostasien Hochschulschrift |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=007927250&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ongcolinyc crossborderlitigationwithinaseantheprospectsforharmonizationofcivilandcommerciallitigation AT ongcolinyc crossborderlitigationwithinasean |