The American common law method:
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Irvington-on-Hudson, NY
Transnat. Publ.
1997
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Beschreibung: | XVI, 371 S. |
ISBN: | 1571050418 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV011541261 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20120614 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 970919s1997 xxu |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 1571050418 |9 1-57105-041-8 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)35397819 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV011541261 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
044 | |a xxu |c XD-US | ||
049 | |a DE-739 |a DE-12 |a DE-M382 |a DE-521 |a DE-19 |a DE-188 | ||
050 | 0 | |a KF394.C37 1997 | |
082 | 0 | |a 347.73/1 347.3071 20 | |
082 | 0 | |a 347.3071 |2 20 | |
082 | 0 | |a 347.73/1 |2 20 | |
084 | |a PU 5320 |0 (DE-625)140628: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Cappalli, Richard B. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a The American common law method |c Richard B. Cappalli |
264 | 1 | |a Irvington-on-Hudson, NY |b Transnat. Publ. |c 1997 | |
300 | |a XVI, 371 S. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
650 | 4 | |a Common law - États-Unis | |
650 | 7 | |a Common law |2 gtt | |
650 | 7 | |a Methodologie |2 gtt | |
650 | 4 | |a Processus judiciaire - États-Unis | |
650 | 7 | |a Rechtspleging |2 gtt | |
650 | 4 | |a Stare decisis - États-Unis | |
650 | 4 | |a Methode | |
650 | 4 | |a Common law -- United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Judicial process -- United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Stare decisis -- United States | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Common law |0 (DE-588)4130774-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
651 | 4 | |a USA | |
651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Common law |0 (DE-588)4130774-4 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m GBV Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=007769097&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007769097 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804126064249667584 |
---|---|
adam_text | THE AMERICAN COMMON LAW METHOD RICHARD B. CAPPALLI TRANSNATIONAL
PUBLISHERS, INC. IRVINGTON-ON-HUDSON, NEW YORK CONTENTS PREFACE XIII
AUTHOR S NOTE XV PART I: COMMON LAW METHODOLOGY IN THE UNITED STATES
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 3 § 1.01 PURPOSE OF WORK: AMERICAN METHODOLOGY 3
§ 1.02 CRAFT AND TRADITION 4 § 1.03 FREQUENT BREACHES 4 § 1.04 PICTURE
OF THE MAXIMUM JUDICIAL CRAFT 5 § 1.05 NARROW FOCUS ON CONVENTIONS OF
LEGAL COMMUNITY 5 § 1.06 READER MUST JUDGE ACTUAL PRACTICES 6 § 1.07
LARGER QUESTIONS NOT ADDRESSED 6 § 1.08 COMPOSITE OF AMERICAN THINKING
IN PART ONE 7 § 1.09 SECOND AND THIRD PARTS 7 CHAPTER 2: THE COMMON LAW
METHOD: CONCEPTS 9 § 2.01 FUNDAMENTAL PREMISE: PRECEDENTS SET RULES 9 §
2.02 PRINCIPLES AND POLICIES COMPARED 9 § 2.03 THE COMPARISON
ILLUSTRATED 10 § 2.04 COMMON LAW COMPARED TO LEGISLATION 11 § 2.05
UNWRITTEN LAW 12 § 2.06 FUNDAMENTAL PREMISE: COURTS DO NOT WRITE LAW 12
§ 2.07 INFLUENCE OF THE JUDICIAL OPINION 13 § 2.08 LOOSE VIEW OF
PRECEDENT 13 § 2.09 TRADITIONAL ROLE OF JUDICIAL OPINIONS 14 § 2.10
POWER OF COURT APPLYING PRECEDENT: CONSTANT MOVEMENT OF COMMON LAW 14 §
2.11 PIECEMEAL GROWTH OF COMMON LAW AS STRENGTH 15 VI * THE AMERICAN
COMMON LAW METHOD § 2.12 FUTURE EFFECTS: DOCTRINAL MOVEMENT 16 § 2.13
PERFECT CODES AN ILLUSION 17 § 2.14 COMMON LAW: RATIONAL, PRAGMATIC,
FUNCTIONAL 17 § 2.15 CASE FACTS CONTROL COURTS POWER 18 § 2.16
HYPOTHETICAL ILLUSTRATING COMMON LAW EFFICIENCY 18 § 2.17 DICTA 18 §
2.18 DICTA DEFINED: NONBINDING NATURE 19 § 2.19 JUDGES FREEDOM IN
WRITING OPINIONS 19 § 2.20 TERRITORIAL REACH OF PRECEDENTS 20 CHAPTER 3:
SHADOWS OF THE PRECEDENTS 21 § 3.01 TECHNIQUES OF PRECEDENT-SETTING
COURT 21 § 3.02 WHY COURT S WORDS ARE NOT LAW 21 § 3.03 INCHOATE NATURE
OF A HOLDING 22 § 3.04 TECHNIQUES OF PRECEDENTIAL COURT 22 § 3.05(A)
SYNOPSIS OF TECHNIQUES: MATERIAL FACTS 23 § 3.05(B) SYNOPSIS OF
TECHNIQUES: GENERALIZING CASE FACTS 24 § 3.05(C) SYNOPSIS OF TECHNIQUES:
GENERALIZED FACTS REQUIRED FOR GENERAL RULE 24 § 3.05(D) SYNOPSIS OF
TECHNIQUES: ANALOGICAL REASONING 25 § 3.05(E) SYNOPSIS OF TECHNIQUES:
REASONS BEHIND FACT EMPHASIS 25 § 3.05(F) SYNOPSIS OF TECHNIQUES:
STATING THE HOLDING 25 § 3.05(G) SYNOPSIS OF TECHNIQUES: DICTA 26 § 3.06
COURTS MUST USE TECHNIQUES 26 § 3.07 DUTIES OF PRECEDENT-ISSUING COURT
27 § 3.08 POPULAR ARGUMENTS 27 § 3.09(A) SELECTION OF MATERIAL FACTS 27
§ 3.09(B) MATERIALITY OF FACTS KNOWN THROUGH RATIONALE 28 § 3.09(C) JACK
J. JONES HYPOTHETICAL 28 § 3.09(D) SUMMARY OF FACT-RATIONALE CONNECTION
29 § 3.09(E) PRECEDENT-SETTER S FACT SELECTION CONTROLLING 29 § 3.09(F)
RECORD FACT IGNORED % 29 § 3.09(G) KNOWN FACT IGNORED 30 § 3.09(H)
SUMMARY: CRITICAL ROLE OF CASE FACTS 30 § 3.09(I) AUTHORITY OF CASE
SQUARELY ON POINT 31 § 3.10 SUCCESSOR COURTS MAY ELABORATE; MAY VARY
RATIONALE 31 § 3.11 (A) CREATING CATEGORIES BY CHARACTERIZING FACTS 31 §
3.11(B) EXAMPLE OF NEGLECTFUL JUDGE 32 CONTENTS * VII § 3.11 (C) OPTIONS
OF WRITING COURT 33 § 3.11(D) POWER OF PRECEDENT S VERBIAGE 33 § 3.1
L(E) EXAMPLE OF NEGLIGENT JUDICIAL CLERK 34 § 3.12(A) REASONS FOR THE
RULE 34 § 3.12(B) EXAMPLE OF NEGLECTFUL JUDGE: APPEAL AVAILABLE 35 §
3.12(C) EXAMPLE OF NEGLECTFUL JUDGE: DIFFICULTIES OF JUDGING 35 §
3.12(D) COURT S DUTY TO FUTURE: LOWER COURT APPLICATION 36 § 3.12(E)
COURT S DUTY TO FUTURE: HORIZONTAL APPLICATION 36 § 3.12(F) FORMALISM
36 § 3.13(A) STATING THE HOLDING EFFECT 37 § 3.13(B) BROAD
FORMULATIONS 37 § 3.13(C) ONE STEP AT A TIME 38 § 3.13(D) LATER USES OF
BROAD LANGUAGE 38 § 3.13(E) FLAWED GROWTH OF COMMON LAW 39 § 3.14(A)
DICTA 39 § 3.14(B) INSIDIOUS IMPACTS OF DICTA 40 § 3.15 AN ILLUSTRATIVE
CASE: BLUR V. PAC-MAN 40 CHAPTER 4: THE SHADOWED COURT 45 § 4.01 SCOPE
OF CHAPTER 45 § 4.02 DUTY TO EXTRACT AND APPLY HOLDING: ON POINT OR
NOT 45 § 4.03 WHEN IS PRECEDENT INDISTINGUISHABLE? 46 § 4.04 EXAMPLE OF
NEGLECTFUL JUDGE 46 § 4.05(A) CONTROLS BEYOND CORE PRECEDENT? 47 §
4.05(B) NO; DIFFERENT FACTS LIBERATE LATER COURT 47 § 4.05(C) STATUTORY
ISSUES COMPARED 48 § 4.05(D) YES; REMAINING INFLUENCES OF PRECEDENT 48 §
4.06 SHADOWS OF THE PRECEDENT: MALLEABILITY AND FRINGES 49 § 4.07
MATERIAL FROM PRECEDENTS AND OTHER SOURCES 49 CHAPTER 5: REASONING FROM
PRECEDENTS 51 § 5.01 SCOPE OF CHAPTER: LEGAL REASONING 51 § 5.02 SINGLE
PRECEDENT FOUND 51 § 5.03 QUESTION OF SIMILARITY 52 § 5.04 NEED FOR
CRITERION OF RELEVANCE 52 § 5.05 START BY CONSTRUCTING HOLDING 53 § 5.06
HOW TO DETERMINE HOLDING 53 § 5.07 USER S PREROGATIVE TO CONSTRUCT
HOLDING 53 VIII * THE AMERICAN COMMON LAW METHOD § 5.08 EXAMPLES OF FACT
ABSTRACTION 54 § 5.09 NARROW OR BROAD HOLDINGS FOR ADVERSARIAL PURPOSES
55 § 5.10 SUBSUME CASE FACTS UNDER HOLDING 55 § 5.11 RULE S PURPOSE
SOLVES AMBIGUOUS FACT-TO-LAW MATCHING 56 § 5.12 AMBIGUITY AT ANY
FACT-LAW JUNCTURE 56 § 5.13 PRECEDENT S VERBIAGE UNIMPORTANT, UNLIKE THE
CASE OF A STATUTE 57 § 5.14 KNOWING CONTENT OF COMMON LAW RULE 57 § 5.15
FIT BETWEEN CASE FACTS AND ELEMENTS OF HOLDING 58 § 5.16 SHORTCUTS:
DIRECT FACT COMPARISON 58 § 5.17 CLUSTERS OF PRECEDENTS: SYNTHESIS 59 §
5.18 DIFFERENT FOCI OF SYNTHESIS 59 § 5.19 REASONS SUPPORTING PRECEDENT
CUMULATE 60 § 5.20 SYSTEMIZATION OF PRECEDENTS 60 § 5.21 INFERIOR STATUS
OF COMMON LAW COMPENDIUMS 61 § 5.22 WHY NOT A SYSTEMATIC CODE? 61
CHAPTER 6: THE SHAPE OF THE RULE 63 § 6.01 DIFFERENT RULE SHAPES 63 §
6.02 A COMPLETE RULE FROM A MAGICAL CASE 63 § 6.03(A) JUDICIAL FUNCTION
64 § 6.03(B) TOUGH CHOICES 65 § 6.03(C) HIGH STAKES 66 § 6.03(D)
IMPORTANCE OF JUDGE 66 § 6.03(E) NEGLIGENCE OR INTENTION 66 § 6.03(F)
CORRECTABILITY 67 § 6.03(G) JURISDICTION 67 § 6.03(H) WHAT PROTECTION?
68 § 6.04 MAGIC CASE OPINION I 68 § 6.05 MAGIC CASE OPINION I: HOLDING
71 § 6.06 OBSERVATIONS ABOUT MAGIC CASE HOLDING I 72 § 6.07 MAGIC CASE
OPINION II 73 § 6.08 OBSERVATIONS ABOUT MAGIC CASE HOLDING II 74 § 6.09
FURTHER COMPARISONS BETWEEN FORMULAS AND BALANCES 75 CONTENTS * IX
CHAPTER 7: HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL PRECEDENT 79 § 7.01 SCOPE OF CHAPTER:
EQUAL DUTIES OF OBEDIENCE TO PRECEDENT 79 § 7.02 DOCTRINE OF STARE
DECISIS 80 § 7.03 STARE DECISIS ENHANCES LAWFULNESS 80 § 7.04 DECISIONS
BASED ON LEGAL PRINCIPLES AND RULES 81 § 7.05 EQUAL TREATMENT OF
SIMILARLY SITUATED PERSONS 81 § 7.06 EQUALITY GOAL: SAME OBLIGATION AT
ALL COURT LEVELS 81 § 7.07 STARE DECISIS ENHANCE S PREDICTABILITY AND
STABILITY IN LAW 83 § 7.08 GREATER VOLUME OF PRECEDENT APPLICATIONS IN
LOWER COURTS 83 § 7.09 GREATER REACH OF PRECEDENTS SET BY HIGH COURTS 84
§ 7.10 LOWER COURT DUTY TO HIGH COURT DICTA 84 § 7.11 JUDICIAL DUTY AT
ALL LEVELS 85 § 7.12 HIGH COURT DISPLEASURE 85 § 7.13 OVERRULING POWER
86 § 7.14 CIRCUMSTANCES WHEN OVERRULING IS PROPER 86 § 7.15 STARE
DECISIS PROMOTES EFFICIENCY 87 § 7.16 GREATER BURDEN ON TRIAL JUDGES 88
§ 7.17 ON HIGH: PRECEDENT ANALYSIS AS DAILY FARE 88 § 7.18 STARE DECISIS
ENHANCES LEGITIMACY OF COURTS 89 § 7.19 SYMBOLIC IMPACT OF HIGH COURT
OVERRULING 89 § 7.20 HIGH COURT DUTY TO EFFECT NEEDED CHANGE 90 CHAPTER
8: CREATIVITY IN THE COMMON LAW 91 § 8.01 OPPORTUNITIES TO ADVANCE THE
LAW 91 § 8.02 SINGULARITY OF CASES: LEGAL CATEGORIES 92 § 8.03
INEVITABILITY OF COMMON LAW GROWTH 92 § 8.04 QUESTION OF EAGERNESS: TWO
CARICATURES 92 § 8.05 JUDGE JUDICIOUS 93 § 8.06 JUDICIOUS NEEDS RULE ON
POINT 93 § 8.07 DEFENDANT NEEDS NO RULE 93 § 8.08 WHERE JUDICIOUS
CONCEPTIONS FAIL 94 § 8.09 CLASSIC EXAMPLE 94 § 8.10 A CRUEL JOKE: GO
TO LEGISLATURE 95 § 8.11 A SPECIOUS ARGUMENT 95 X * THE AMERICAN COMMON
LAW METHOD § 8.12 JUDGE BODACIOUS 95 § 8.13 TOO MUCH ACTIVISM? 96 PART
II: THE DOCTRINE OF JUDICIAL AND EXECUTIVE IMMUNITY IN THE U.S. SUPREME
COURT CHAPTER 9: THE U.S. SUPREME COURT AND JUDICIAL AND EXECUTIVE
IMMUNITY 99 § 9.01 THE CASE LINE 99 § 9.02 VALUE OF CASE STUDY 100 §
9.03 SUGGESTED APPROACH 100 § 9.04 RANDALL V. BRIGHAM 101 § 9.05 BRADLEY
V. FISHER 106 § 9.03 SPALDING V. VILAS 110 § 9.07 YASELLI V. GOFF 116 §
9.08 ADAIR V. BANK OF AMERICA NAT L TRUST & SAVINGS ASS N 119 § 9.09
BARR V. MATTEO 121 § 9.10 PIERSON V. RAY 129 § 9.11 SCHEUERV. RHODES 137
§ 9.12 BUTZ V. ECONOMOU 141 § 9.13 IMBLER V. PACHTMAN 144 § 9.14 STUMP
V. SPARKMAN 146 § 9.15 DENNIS V. SPARKS 150 § 9.16 FORRESTER V. WHITE
152 § 9.17 MIRELES V. WACO 154 § 9.18 THE DOCTRINE 155 PART III: GENERAL
OBSERVATIONS CHAPTER 10: THE QUEST FOR CERTAINTY 159 CHAPTER 11: COMMON
LAW UNDER STATUTES 169 CHAPTER 12: CIVIL AND COMMON LAW 175 CHAPTER 13:
RETROACTIVE CASE LAW 191 CONTENTS * XI CHAPTER 14: JUDICIAL POLICY 197
APPENDIX A: SUPREME COURT IMMUNITY CASES 207 RANDALL V. BRIGHAM 207
BRADLEY V. FISHER 211 SPALDING V. VILAS 219 YASELLI V. GOFF 228 ADAIR V.
BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST & SAVINGS ASSN. 229 BARR V. MATTEO 235
PIERSON V. RAY 250 SCHEUER V. RHODES 260 BUTZ V. ECONOMOU 269 IMBLER V.
PACHTMAN 297 STUMP V. SPARKMAN 316 DENNIS V. SPARKS 328 FORRESTER V.
WHITE 332 MIRELES V. WACO 337 APPENDIX B: BASIC WRITINGS ON THE COMMON
LAW METHOD 343 APPENDIX C: CHALLENGES FOR THE READER 355 INDEX 363
|
any_adam_object | 1 |
author | Cappalli, Richard B. |
author_facet | Cappalli, Richard B. |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Cappalli, Richard B. |
author_variant | r b c rb rbc |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV011541261 |
callnumber-first | K - Law |
callnumber-label | KF394 |
callnumber-raw | KF394.C37 1997 |
callnumber-search | KF394.C37 1997 |
callnumber-sort | KF 3394 C37 41997 |
callnumber-subject | KF - United States |
classification_rvk | PU 5320 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)35397819 (DE-599)BVBBV011541261 |
dewey-full | 347.73/1347.307120 347.3071 347.73/1 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 347 - Procedure and courts |
dewey-raw | 347.73/1 347.3071 20 347.3071 347.73/1 |
dewey-search | 347.73/1 347.3071 20 347.3071 347.73/1 |
dewey-sort | 3347.73 11 3347.3071 220 |
dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01851nam a2200529 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV011541261</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20120614 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">970919s1997 xxu |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1571050418</subfield><subfield code="9">1-57105-041-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)35397819</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV011541261</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">XD-US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KF394.C37 1997</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.73/1 347.3071 20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.3071</subfield><subfield code="2">20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.73/1</subfield><subfield code="2">20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PU 5320</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)140628:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cappalli, Richard B.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The American common law method</subfield><subfield code="c">Richard B. Cappalli</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Irvington-on-Hudson, NY</subfield><subfield code="b">Transnat. Publ.</subfield><subfield code="c">1997</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XVI, 371 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Common law - États-Unis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Common law</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Methodologie</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Processus judiciaire - États-Unis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtspleging</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Stare decisis - États-Unis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Methode</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Common law -- United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judicial process -- United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Stare decisis -- United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Common law</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4130774-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Common law</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4130774-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">GBV Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=007769097&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007769097</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | USA USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd |
geographic_facet | USA |
id | DE-604.BV011541261 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T18:11:30Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 1571050418 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007769097 |
oclc_num | 35397819 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-739 DE-12 DE-M382 DE-521 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-188 |
owner_facet | DE-739 DE-12 DE-M382 DE-521 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-188 |
physical | XVI, 371 S. |
publishDate | 1997 |
publishDateSearch | 1997 |
publishDateSort | 1997 |
publisher | Transnat. Publ. |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Cappalli, Richard B. Verfasser aut The American common law method Richard B. Cappalli Irvington-on-Hudson, NY Transnat. Publ. 1997 XVI, 371 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Common law - États-Unis Common law gtt Methodologie gtt Processus judiciaire - États-Unis Rechtspleging gtt Stare decisis - États-Unis Methode Common law -- United States Judicial process -- United States Stare decisis -- United States Common law (DE-588)4130774-4 gnd rswk-swf USA USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g Common law (DE-588)4130774-4 s DE-604 GBV Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=007769097&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
spellingShingle | Cappalli, Richard B. The American common law method Common law - États-Unis Common law gtt Methodologie gtt Processus judiciaire - États-Unis Rechtspleging gtt Stare decisis - États-Unis Methode Common law -- United States Judicial process -- United States Stare decisis -- United States Common law (DE-588)4130774-4 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4130774-4 (DE-588)4078704-7 |
title | The American common law method |
title_auth | The American common law method |
title_exact_search | The American common law method |
title_full | The American common law method Richard B. Cappalli |
title_fullStr | The American common law method Richard B. Cappalli |
title_full_unstemmed | The American common law method Richard B. Cappalli |
title_short | The American common law method |
title_sort | the american common law method |
topic | Common law - États-Unis Common law gtt Methodologie gtt Processus judiciaire - États-Unis Rechtspleging gtt Stare decisis - États-Unis Methode Common law -- United States Judicial process -- United States Stare decisis -- United States Common law (DE-588)4130774-4 gnd |
topic_facet | Common law - États-Unis Common law Methodologie Processus judiciaire - États-Unis Rechtspleging Stare decisis - États-Unis Methode Common law -- United States Judicial process -- United States Stare decisis -- United States USA |
url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=007769097&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cappallirichardb theamericancommonlawmethod |