Judicial activism: a restrained defense
In his new study of the American judicial system Sterling Harwood, J.D., Professor of Philosophy at San Jose State University, scrutinizes the particular legal, moral and philosophical claims about judicial activism. This study explores the various arguments in favor and against activism offered in...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
San Francisco [u.a.]
Austin & Winfield
1996
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Zusammenfassung: | In his new study of the American judicial system Sterling Harwood, J.D., Professor of Philosophy at San Jose State University, scrutinizes the particular legal, moral and philosophical claims about judicial activism. This study explores the various arguments in favor and against activism offered in leading theories, including treatment of the democratic framework of courts, of the importance of predecent or stare decisis in judicial decision, and of the justification of activism by procedural due process. Reconsidering these same criticisms passivists make about activism, Harwood builds a tightly-argued case in favor of activism. Complemented with tables of judges (including John Austin) and judicial decisions, Judicial Activism is a work rich in thought-provoking arguments that concern not only judges, but the entire legal and political community as well. |
| Beschreibung: | 167 S. |
| ISBN: | 1880921685 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV011351115 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 970522s1996 |||| 00||| engod | ||
| 020 | |a 1880921685 |9 1-880921-68-5 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)28890993 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV011351115 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a KF8775 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 347.73/14 |2 20 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 347.30714 |2 20 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Harwood, Sterling |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Judicial activism |b a restrained defense |c Sterling Harwood |
| 264 | 1 | |a San Francisco [u.a.] |b Austin & Winfield |c 1996 | |
| 300 | |a 167 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a In his new study of the American judicial system Sterling Harwood, J.D., Professor of Philosophy at San Jose State University, scrutinizes the particular legal, moral and philosophical claims about judicial activism. This study explores the various arguments in favor and against activism offered in leading theories, including treatment of the democratic framework of courts, of the importance of predecent or stare decisis in judicial decision, and of the justification of activism by procedural due process. Reconsidering these same criticisms passivists make about activism, Harwood builds a tightly-argued case in favor of activism. Complemented with tables of judges (including John Austin) and judicial decisions, Judicial Activism is a work rich in thought-provoking arguments that concern not only judges, but the entire legal and political community as well. | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Juges - États-Unis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Politique et pouvoir judiciaire - États-Unis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Processus judiciaire - États-Unis | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Rechters |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Rechtsontwikkeling |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Rechtspraak |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Rechtssociologie |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Judges |z United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Judicial process |z United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Political questions and judicial power |z United States | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Richter |0 (DE-588)4049923-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Prozess |0 (DE-588)4047577-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 4 | |a USA | |
| 651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Richter |0 (DE-588)4049923-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Prozess |0 (DE-588)4047577-3 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007627402 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804125860637179904 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Harwood, Sterling |
| author_facet | Harwood, Sterling |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Harwood, Sterling |
| author_variant | s h sh |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV011351115 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | KF8775 |
| callnumber-raw | KF8775 |
| callnumber-search | KF8775 |
| callnumber-sort | KF 48775 |
| callnumber-subject | KF - United States |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)28890993 (DE-599)BVBBV011351115 |
| dewey-full | 347.73/14 347.30714 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 347 - Procedure and courts |
| dewey-raw | 347.73/14 347.30714 |
| dewey-search | 347.73/14 347.30714 |
| dewey-sort | 3347.73 214 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02470nam a2200517 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV011351115</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">970522s1996 |||| 00||| engod</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1880921685</subfield><subfield code="9">1-880921-68-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)28890993</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV011351115</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KF8775</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.73/14</subfield><subfield code="2">20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.30714</subfield><subfield code="2">20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Harwood, Sterling</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judicial activism</subfield><subfield code="b">a restrained defense</subfield><subfield code="c">Sterling Harwood</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">San Francisco [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Austin & Winfield</subfield><subfield code="c">1996</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">167 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In his new study of the American judicial system Sterling Harwood, J.D., Professor of Philosophy at San Jose State University, scrutinizes the particular legal, moral and philosophical claims about judicial activism. This study explores the various arguments in favor and against activism offered in leading theories, including treatment of the democratic framework of courts, of the importance of predecent or stare decisis in judicial decision, and of the justification of activism by procedural due process. Reconsidering these same criticisms passivists make about activism, Harwood builds a tightly-argued case in favor of activism. Complemented with tables of judges (including John Austin) and judicial decisions, Judicial Activism is a work rich in thought-provoking arguments that concern not only judges, but the entire legal and political community as well.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Juges - États-Unis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Politique et pouvoir judiciaire - États-Unis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Processus judiciaire - États-Unis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechters</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsontwikkeling</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtspraak</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtssociologie</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judges</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judicial process</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Political questions and judicial power</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Richter</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4049923-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Prozess</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4047577-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Richter</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4049923-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Prozess</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4047577-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007627402</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | USA USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd |
| geographic_facet | USA |
| id | DE-604.BV011351115 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T18:08:16Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 1880921685 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007627402 |
| oclc_num | 28890993 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 167 S. |
| publishDate | 1996 |
| publishDateSearch | 1996 |
| publishDateSort | 1996 |
| publisher | Austin & Winfield |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Harwood, Sterling Verfasser aut Judicial activism a restrained defense Sterling Harwood San Francisco [u.a.] Austin & Winfield 1996 167 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier In his new study of the American judicial system Sterling Harwood, J.D., Professor of Philosophy at San Jose State University, scrutinizes the particular legal, moral and philosophical claims about judicial activism. This study explores the various arguments in favor and against activism offered in leading theories, including treatment of the democratic framework of courts, of the importance of predecent or stare decisis in judicial decision, and of the justification of activism by procedural due process. Reconsidering these same criticisms passivists make about activism, Harwood builds a tightly-argued case in favor of activism. Complemented with tables of judges (including John Austin) and judicial decisions, Judicial Activism is a work rich in thought-provoking arguments that concern not only judges, but the entire legal and political community as well. Juges - États-Unis Politique et pouvoir judiciaire - États-Unis Processus judiciaire - États-Unis Rechters gtt Rechtsontwikkeling gtt Rechtspraak gtt Rechtssociologie gtt Judges United States Judicial process United States Political questions and judicial power United States Richter (DE-588)4049923-6 gnd rswk-swf Prozess (DE-588)4047577-3 gnd rswk-swf USA USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g Richter (DE-588)4049923-6 s Prozess (DE-588)4047577-3 s DE-604 |
| spellingShingle | Harwood, Sterling Judicial activism a restrained defense Juges - États-Unis Politique et pouvoir judiciaire - États-Unis Processus judiciaire - États-Unis Rechters gtt Rechtsontwikkeling gtt Rechtspraak gtt Rechtssociologie gtt Judges United States Judicial process United States Political questions and judicial power United States Richter (DE-588)4049923-6 gnd Prozess (DE-588)4047577-3 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4049923-6 (DE-588)4047577-3 (DE-588)4078704-7 |
| title | Judicial activism a restrained defense |
| title_auth | Judicial activism a restrained defense |
| title_exact_search | Judicial activism a restrained defense |
| title_full | Judicial activism a restrained defense Sterling Harwood |
| title_fullStr | Judicial activism a restrained defense Sterling Harwood |
| title_full_unstemmed | Judicial activism a restrained defense Sterling Harwood |
| title_short | Judicial activism |
| title_sort | judicial activism a restrained defense |
| title_sub | a restrained defense |
| topic | Juges - États-Unis Politique et pouvoir judiciaire - États-Unis Processus judiciaire - États-Unis Rechters gtt Rechtsontwikkeling gtt Rechtspraak gtt Rechtssociologie gtt Judges United States Judicial process United States Political questions and judicial power United States Richter (DE-588)4049923-6 gnd Prozess (DE-588)4047577-3 gnd |
| topic_facet | Juges - États-Unis Politique et pouvoir judiciaire - États-Unis Processus judiciaire - États-Unis Rechters Rechtsontwikkeling Rechtspraak Rechtssociologie Judges United States Judicial process United States Political questions and judicial power United States Richter Prozess USA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT harwoodsterling judicialactivismarestraineddefense |