The idea of property in law:
The common sense view that the right to property is 'the right to things' has long been regarded by lawyers and philosophers as impossible to sustain, given the broad range of property in the law and the reliance of philosophers on ideas of 'property' or 'ownership' to...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford
Clarendon Press
1997
|
Schlagworte: | |
Zusammenfassung: | The common sense view that the right to property is 'the right to things' has long been regarded by lawyers and philosophers as impossible to sustain, given the broad range of property in the law and the reliance of philosophers on ideas of 'property' or 'ownership' to explain complex issues like privacy or civil rights like freedom of speech In this book a coherent and sensible idea of property is developed that vindicates the common sense view of property. Relying on Raz's work on norms and the structure of legal systems, the legal practice that regulates our interactions with things is set against the background of other laws. By situating property in the context of a system of norms, one is able to distinguish its essential features. In particular, a sharp distinction can be drawn between the practice of property, which concerns the normative relations between people and things, and the practice of contract, which concerns personal relations between people arising by agreement. Property and contract have for far too long been considered as inextricably intertwined, and the work of Hegel and Locke is examined from this critical perspective. In contrast, the gratuitous social use of property, giving and sharing, is explained as fundamental to the practice of property itself Finally, the role that idea of property plays in our moral and legal understanding is taken up; the claim is made that the interesting 'distributional' aspect of property is the way in which property is applied to different objects in different societies, rather than the actual distribution of property or wealth amongst individuals, which concerns the much broader question of the proper scope and overlap of gift, command, and market economies |
Beschreibung: | VIII, 240 S. |
ISBN: | 0198260296 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV011289766 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20080902 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 970408s1997 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 0198260296 |9 0-19-826029-6 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)35620409 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV011289766 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-M382 |a DE-11 |a DE-188 | ||
050 | 0 | |a K720 | |
082 | 0 | |a 342.64 |2 20 | |
082 | 0 | |a 346.04 |2 20 | |
084 | |a PI 3220 |0 (DE-625)136597: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Penner, James E. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a The idea of property in law |c J. E. Penner |
264 | 1 | |a Oxford |b Clarendon Press |c 1997 | |
300 | |a VIII, 240 S. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | 3 | |a The common sense view that the right to property is 'the right to things' has long been regarded by lawyers and philosophers as impossible to sustain, given the broad range of property in the law and the reliance of philosophers on ideas of 'property' or 'ownership' to explain complex issues like privacy or civil rights like freedom of speech | |
520 | |a In this book a coherent and sensible idea of property is developed that vindicates the common sense view of property. Relying on Raz's work on norms and the structure of legal systems, the legal practice that regulates our interactions with things is set against the background of other laws. By situating property in the context of a system of norms, one is able to distinguish its essential features. In particular, a sharp distinction can be drawn between the practice of property, which concerns the normative relations between people and things, and the practice of contract, which concerns personal relations between people arising by agreement. Property and contract have for far too long been considered as inextricably intertwined, and the work of Hegel and Locke is examined from this critical perspective. In contrast, the gratuitous social use of property, giving and sharing, is explained as fundamental to the practice of property itself | ||
520 | |a Finally, the role that idea of property plays in our moral and legal understanding is taken up; the claim is made that the interesting 'distributional' aspect of property is the way in which property is applied to different objects in different societies, rather than the actual distribution of property or wealth amongst individuals, which concerns the much broader question of the proper scope and overlap of gift, command, and market economies | ||
650 | 7 | |a Eigendom |2 gtt | |
650 | 4 | |a Propriété | |
650 | 7 | |a Propriété |2 ram | |
650 | 7 | |a Rechtstheorie |2 gtt | |
650 | 4 | |a Property | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsphilosophie |0 (DE-588)4048821-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsordnung |0 (DE-588)4135330-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Geschichte |0 (DE-588)4020517-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Eigentum |0 (DE-588)4013793-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Eigentum |0 (DE-588)4013793-4 |D s |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Rechtsphilosophie |0 (DE-588)4048821-4 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Geschichte |0 (DE-588)4020517-4 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
689 | 1 | 0 | |a Eigentum |0 (DE-588)4013793-4 |D s |
689 | 1 | 1 | |a Rechtsordnung |0 (DE-588)4135330-4 |D s |
689 | 1 | |5 DE-604 | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007581878 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804125794644000768 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Penner, James E. |
author_facet | Penner, James E. |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Penner, James E. |
author_variant | j e p je jep |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV011289766 |
callnumber-first | K - Law |
callnumber-label | K720 |
callnumber-raw | K720 |
callnumber-search | K720 |
callnumber-sort | K 3720 |
callnumber-subject | K - General Law |
classification_rvk | PI 3220 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)35620409 (DE-599)BVBBV011289766 |
dewey-full | 342.64 346.04 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 342 - Constitutional and administrative law 346 - Private law |
dewey-raw | 342.64 346.04 |
dewey-search | 342.64 346.04 |
dewey-sort | 3342.64 |
dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03323nam a2200529 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV011289766</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20080902 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">970408s1997 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0198260296</subfield><subfield code="9">0-19-826029-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)35620409</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV011289766</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-11</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K720</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.64</subfield><subfield code="2">20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">346.04</subfield><subfield code="2">20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PI 3220</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)136597:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Penner, James E.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The idea of property in law</subfield><subfield code="c">J. E. Penner</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford</subfield><subfield code="b">Clarendon Press</subfield><subfield code="c">1997</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">VIII, 240 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The common sense view that the right to property is 'the right to things' has long been regarded by lawyers and philosophers as impossible to sustain, given the broad range of property in the law and the reliance of philosophers on ideas of 'property' or 'ownership' to explain complex issues like privacy or civil rights like freedom of speech</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this book a coherent and sensible idea of property is developed that vindicates the common sense view of property. Relying on Raz's work on norms and the structure of legal systems, the legal practice that regulates our interactions with things is set against the background of other laws. By situating property in the context of a system of norms, one is able to distinguish its essential features. In particular, a sharp distinction can be drawn between the practice of property, which concerns the normative relations between people and things, and the practice of contract, which concerns personal relations between people arising by agreement. Property and contract have for far too long been considered as inextricably intertwined, and the work of Hegel and Locke is examined from this critical perspective. In contrast, the gratuitous social use of property, giving and sharing, is explained as fundamental to the practice of property itself</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Finally, the role that idea of property plays in our moral and legal understanding is taken up; the claim is made that the interesting 'distributional' aspect of property is the way in which property is applied to different objects in different societies, rather than the actual distribution of property or wealth amongst individuals, which concerns the much broader question of the proper scope and overlap of gift, command, and market economies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Eigendom</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Propriété</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Propriété</subfield><subfield code="2">ram</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtstheorie</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Property</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsphilosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048821-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsordnung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4135330-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020517-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Eigentum</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4013793-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Eigentum</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4013793-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Rechtsphilosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048821-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Geschichte</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020517-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Eigentum</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4013793-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Rechtsordnung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4135330-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007581878</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV011289766 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T18:07:13Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 0198260296 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007581878 |
oclc_num | 35620409 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 DE-M382 DE-11 DE-188 |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-M382 DE-11 DE-188 |
physical | VIII, 240 S. |
publishDate | 1997 |
publishDateSearch | 1997 |
publishDateSort | 1997 |
publisher | Clarendon Press |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Penner, James E. Verfasser aut The idea of property in law J. E. Penner Oxford Clarendon Press 1997 VIII, 240 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier The common sense view that the right to property is 'the right to things' has long been regarded by lawyers and philosophers as impossible to sustain, given the broad range of property in the law and the reliance of philosophers on ideas of 'property' or 'ownership' to explain complex issues like privacy or civil rights like freedom of speech In this book a coherent and sensible idea of property is developed that vindicates the common sense view of property. Relying on Raz's work on norms and the structure of legal systems, the legal practice that regulates our interactions with things is set against the background of other laws. By situating property in the context of a system of norms, one is able to distinguish its essential features. In particular, a sharp distinction can be drawn between the practice of property, which concerns the normative relations between people and things, and the practice of contract, which concerns personal relations between people arising by agreement. Property and contract have for far too long been considered as inextricably intertwined, and the work of Hegel and Locke is examined from this critical perspective. In contrast, the gratuitous social use of property, giving and sharing, is explained as fundamental to the practice of property itself Finally, the role that idea of property plays in our moral and legal understanding is taken up; the claim is made that the interesting 'distributional' aspect of property is the way in which property is applied to different objects in different societies, rather than the actual distribution of property or wealth amongst individuals, which concerns the much broader question of the proper scope and overlap of gift, command, and market economies Eigendom gtt Propriété Propriété ram Rechtstheorie gtt Property Rechtsphilosophie (DE-588)4048821-4 gnd rswk-swf Rechtsordnung (DE-588)4135330-4 gnd rswk-swf Geschichte (DE-588)4020517-4 gnd rswk-swf Eigentum (DE-588)4013793-4 gnd rswk-swf Eigentum (DE-588)4013793-4 s Rechtsphilosophie (DE-588)4048821-4 s Geschichte (DE-588)4020517-4 s DE-604 Rechtsordnung (DE-588)4135330-4 s |
spellingShingle | Penner, James E. The idea of property in law Eigendom gtt Propriété Propriété ram Rechtstheorie gtt Property Rechtsphilosophie (DE-588)4048821-4 gnd Rechtsordnung (DE-588)4135330-4 gnd Geschichte (DE-588)4020517-4 gnd Eigentum (DE-588)4013793-4 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4048821-4 (DE-588)4135330-4 (DE-588)4020517-4 (DE-588)4013793-4 |
title | The idea of property in law |
title_auth | The idea of property in law |
title_exact_search | The idea of property in law |
title_full | The idea of property in law J. E. Penner |
title_fullStr | The idea of property in law J. E. Penner |
title_full_unstemmed | The idea of property in law J. E. Penner |
title_short | The idea of property in law |
title_sort | the idea of property in law |
topic | Eigendom gtt Propriété Propriété ram Rechtstheorie gtt Property Rechtsphilosophie (DE-588)4048821-4 gnd Rechtsordnung (DE-588)4135330-4 gnd Geschichte (DE-588)4020517-4 gnd Eigentum (DE-588)4013793-4 gnd |
topic_facet | Eigendom Propriété Rechtstheorie Property Rechtsphilosophie Rechtsordnung Geschichte Eigentum |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pennerjamese theideaofpropertyinlaw |