The strange career of legal liberalism:
Legal scholarship is in a state of crisis, argues Laura Kalman in this history of the most prestigious field in law studies, constitutional theory. Since the New Deal, Kalman says, most law scholars have identified themselves as liberals who believe in the power of the Supreme Court to effect progre...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
New Haven [u.a.]
Yale Univ. Press
1996
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Book review (H-Net) Book review (H-Net) |
| Zusammenfassung: | Legal scholarship is in a state of crisis, argues Laura Kalman in this history of the most prestigious field in law studies, constitutional theory. Since the New Deal, Kalman says, most law scholars have identified themselves as liberals who believe in the power of the Supreme Court to effect progressive social change. In recent years, however, new political and interdisciplinary perspectives have undermined the tenets of legal liberalism, and liberal law professors have enlisted other disciplines in the attempt to legitimize their beliefs. Such prominent legal thinkers as Cass Sunstein, Bruce Ackerman, and Frank Michelman have incorporated the work of historians into their legal theories and arguments, turning to eighteenth-century republicanism - which stressed communal values and an active citizenry - to justify their goals Kalman, a historian and a lawyer, suggests that reliance on history in legal thinking makes sense at a time when the Supreme Court repeatedly declares that it will protect only those liberties rooted in history and tradition. There are pitfalls in interdisciplinary argumentation, she cautions, for historians' reactions to this use of their work have been unenthusiastic and even hostile. Yet lawyers, law professors, and historians have cooperated in some recent Supreme Court cases, and Kalman concludes with a practical examination of the ways they can work together more effectively as social activists |
| Beschreibung: | VIII, 375 S. |
| ISBN: | 0300063695 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV010970421 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20110203 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 960925s1996 xxu |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 0300063695 |9 0-300-06369-5 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)33405298 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV010970421 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a xxu |c XD-US | ||
| 049 | |a DE-355 |a DE-739 |a DE-521 |a DE-188 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a KF4552.K35 1996 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 342.73/001 347.30201 20 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 342.73/001 |2 20 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 347.30201 |2 20 | |
| 084 | |a PL 731 |0 (DE-625)137267: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a PL 733 |0 (DE-625)137269: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a PU 5310 |0 (DE-625)140627: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kalman, Laura |d 1955- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)131927957 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The strange career of legal liberalism |c Laura Kalman |
| 264 | 1 | |a New Haven [u.a.] |b Yale Univ. Press |c 1996 | |
| 300 | |a VIII, 375 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a Legal scholarship is in a state of crisis, argues Laura Kalman in this history of the most prestigious field in law studies, constitutional theory. Since the New Deal, Kalman says, most law scholars have identified themselves as liberals who believe in the power of the Supreme Court to effect progressive social change. In recent years, however, new political and interdisciplinary perspectives have undermined the tenets of legal liberalism, and liberal law professors have enlisted other disciplines in the attempt to legitimize their beliefs. Such prominent legal thinkers as Cass Sunstein, Bruce Ackerman, and Frank Michelman have incorporated the work of historians into their legal theories and arguments, turning to eighteenth-century republicanism - which stressed communal values and an active citizenry - to justify their goals | |
| 520 | |a Kalman, a historian and a lawyer, suggests that reliance on history in legal thinking makes sense at a time when the Supreme Court repeatedly declares that it will protect only those liberties rooted in history and tradition. There are pitfalls in interdisciplinary argumentation, she cautions, for historians' reactions to this use of their work have been unenthusiastic and even hostile. Yet lawyers, law professors, and historians have cooperated in some recent Supreme Court cases, and Kalman concludes with a practical examination of the ways they can work together more effectively as social activists | ||
| 648 | 4 | |a Geschichte 1900-2000 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Droit - États-Unis - Méthodologie - Histoire | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Droit constitutionnel - États-Unis - Interprétation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Droit constitutionnel - États-Unis - Philosophie | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Libéralisme - États-Unis - Histoire - 20e siècle | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Geschichte | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Philosophie | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Recht | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Verfassungsrecht | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitutional law |z United States |x Philosophy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitutional law |z United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Liberalism |z United States |x History |y 20th century | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Law |z United States |x Methodology |x History | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Liberalismus |0 (DE-588)4035582-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Verfassungsauslegung |0 (DE-588)4187678-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsphilosophie |0 (DE-588)4048821-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Verfassungsrecht |0 (DE-588)4062801-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Juristische Methodik |0 (DE-588)4114116-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 4 | |a USA | |
| 651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Juristische Methodik |0 (DE-588)4114116-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Liberalismus |0 (DE-588)4035582-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 1 | 0 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
| 689 | 1 | 1 | |a Verfassungsrecht |0 (DE-588)4062801-2 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | 2 | |a Rechtsphilosophie |0 (DE-588)4048821-4 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 2 | 0 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
| 689 | 2 | 1 | |a Verfassungsauslegung |0 (DE-588)4187678-7 |D s |
| 689 | 2 | 2 | |a Liberalismus |0 (DE-588)4035582-2 |D s |
| 689 | 2 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 3 | 0 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
| 689 | 3 | 1 | |a Verfassungsrecht |0 (DE-588)4062801-2 |D s |
| 689 | 3 | 2 | |a Liberalismus |0 (DE-588)4035582-2 |D s |
| 689 | 3 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | |u http://www.h-net.org/review/hrev-a0a6r9-aa |3 Book review (H-Net) | |
| 856 | 4 | |u http://www.h-net.org/review/hrev-a0a2y3-aa |3 Book review (H-Net) | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007340128 | ||
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804125458283888640 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Kalman, Laura 1955- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)131927957 |
| author_facet | Kalman, Laura 1955- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Kalman, Laura 1955- |
| author_variant | l k lk |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV010970421 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | KF4552 |
| callnumber-raw | KF4552.K35 1996 |
| callnumber-search | KF4552.K35 1996 |
| callnumber-sort | KF 44552 K35 41996 |
| callnumber-subject | KF - United States |
| classification_rvk | PL 731 PL 733 PU 5310 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)33405298 (DE-599)BVBBV010970421 |
| dewey-full | 342.73/001347.3020120 342.73/001 347.30201 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 342 - Constitutional and administrative law 347 - Procedure and courts |
| dewey-raw | 342.73/001 347.30201 20 342.73/001 347.30201 |
| dewey-search | 342.73/001 347.30201 20 342.73/001 347.30201 |
| dewey-sort | 3342.73 11 3347.30201 220 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| era | Geschichte 1900-2000 |
| era_facet | Geschichte 1900-2000 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04541nam a2200841 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV010970421</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20110203 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">960925s1996 xxu |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0300063695</subfield><subfield code="9">0-300-06369-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)33405298</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV010970421</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">XD-US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KF4552.K35 1996</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.73/001 347.30201 20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.73/001</subfield><subfield code="2">20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.30201</subfield><subfield code="2">20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PL 731</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)137267:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PL 733</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)137269:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PU 5310</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)140627:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kalman, Laura</subfield><subfield code="d">1955-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)131927957</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The strange career of legal liberalism</subfield><subfield code="c">Laura Kalman</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New Haven [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Yale Univ. Press</subfield><subfield code="c">1996</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">VIII, 375 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Legal scholarship is in a state of crisis, argues Laura Kalman in this history of the most prestigious field in law studies, constitutional theory. Since the New Deal, Kalman says, most law scholars have identified themselves as liberals who believe in the power of the Supreme Court to effect progressive social change. In recent years, however, new political and interdisciplinary perspectives have undermined the tenets of legal liberalism, and liberal law professors have enlisted other disciplines in the attempt to legitimize their beliefs. Such prominent legal thinkers as Cass Sunstein, Bruce Ackerman, and Frank Michelman have incorporated the work of historians into their legal theories and arguments, turning to eighteenth-century republicanism - which stressed communal values and an active citizenry - to justify their goals</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kalman, a historian and a lawyer, suggests that reliance on history in legal thinking makes sense at a time when the Supreme Court repeatedly declares that it will protect only those liberties rooted in history and tradition. There are pitfalls in interdisciplinary argumentation, she cautions, for historians' reactions to this use of their work have been unenthusiastic and even hostile. Yet lawyers, law professors, and historians have cooperated in some recent Supreme Court cases, and Kalman concludes with a practical examination of the ways they can work together more effectively as social activists</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1900-2000</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Droit - États-Unis - Méthodologie - Histoire</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Droit constitutionnel - États-Unis - Interprétation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Droit constitutionnel - États-Unis - Philosophie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Libéralisme - États-Unis - Histoire - 20e siècle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Geschichte</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Philosophie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Verfassungsrecht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional law</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">Philosophy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional law</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Liberalism</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">History</subfield><subfield code="y">20th century</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">Methodology</subfield><subfield code="x">History</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Liberalismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4035582-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verfassungsauslegung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4187678-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsphilosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048821-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verfassungsrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4062801-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Juristische Methodik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4114116-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Juristische Methodik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4114116-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Liberalismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4035582-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Verfassungsrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4062801-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Rechtsphilosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048821-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Verfassungsauslegung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4187678-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Liberalismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4035582-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="3" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="3" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Verfassungsrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4062801-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="3" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Liberalismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4035582-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://www.h-net.org/review/hrev-a0a6r9-aa</subfield><subfield code="3">Book review (H-Net)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://www.h-net.org/review/hrev-a0a2y3-aa</subfield><subfield code="3">Book review (H-Net)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007340128</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | USA USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd |
| geographic_facet | USA |
| id | DE-604.BV010970421 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T18:01:53Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 0300063695 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007340128 |
| oclc_num | 33405298 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-739 DE-521 DE-188 |
| owner_facet | DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-739 DE-521 DE-188 |
| physical | VIII, 375 S. |
| publishDate | 1996 |
| publishDateSearch | 1996 |
| publishDateSort | 1996 |
| publisher | Yale Univ. Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Kalman, Laura 1955- Verfasser (DE-588)131927957 aut The strange career of legal liberalism Laura Kalman New Haven [u.a.] Yale Univ. Press 1996 VIII, 375 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Legal scholarship is in a state of crisis, argues Laura Kalman in this history of the most prestigious field in law studies, constitutional theory. Since the New Deal, Kalman says, most law scholars have identified themselves as liberals who believe in the power of the Supreme Court to effect progressive social change. In recent years, however, new political and interdisciplinary perspectives have undermined the tenets of legal liberalism, and liberal law professors have enlisted other disciplines in the attempt to legitimize their beliefs. Such prominent legal thinkers as Cass Sunstein, Bruce Ackerman, and Frank Michelman have incorporated the work of historians into their legal theories and arguments, turning to eighteenth-century republicanism - which stressed communal values and an active citizenry - to justify their goals Kalman, a historian and a lawyer, suggests that reliance on history in legal thinking makes sense at a time when the Supreme Court repeatedly declares that it will protect only those liberties rooted in history and tradition. There are pitfalls in interdisciplinary argumentation, she cautions, for historians' reactions to this use of their work have been unenthusiastic and even hostile. Yet lawyers, law professors, and historians have cooperated in some recent Supreme Court cases, and Kalman concludes with a practical examination of the ways they can work together more effectively as social activists Geschichte 1900-2000 Droit - États-Unis - Méthodologie - Histoire Droit constitutionnel - États-Unis - Interprétation Droit constitutionnel - États-Unis - Philosophie Libéralisme - États-Unis - Histoire - 20e siècle Geschichte Philosophie Recht Verfassungsrecht Constitutional law United States Philosophy Constitutional law United States Liberalism United States History 20th century Law United States Methodology History Liberalismus (DE-588)4035582-2 gnd rswk-swf Verfassungsauslegung (DE-588)4187678-7 gnd rswk-swf Rechtsphilosophie (DE-588)4048821-4 gnd rswk-swf Verfassungsrecht (DE-588)4062801-2 gnd rswk-swf Juristische Methodik (DE-588)4114116-7 gnd rswk-swf USA USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g Juristische Methodik (DE-588)4114116-7 s Liberalismus (DE-588)4035582-2 s DE-604 Verfassungsrecht (DE-588)4062801-2 s Rechtsphilosophie (DE-588)4048821-4 s Verfassungsauslegung (DE-588)4187678-7 s 1\p DE-604 http://www.h-net.org/review/hrev-a0a6r9-aa Book review (H-Net) http://www.h-net.org/review/hrev-a0a2y3-aa Book review (H-Net) 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
| spellingShingle | Kalman, Laura 1955- The strange career of legal liberalism Droit - États-Unis - Méthodologie - Histoire Droit constitutionnel - États-Unis - Interprétation Droit constitutionnel - États-Unis - Philosophie Libéralisme - États-Unis - Histoire - 20e siècle Geschichte Philosophie Recht Verfassungsrecht Constitutional law United States Philosophy Constitutional law United States Liberalism United States History 20th century Law United States Methodology History Liberalismus (DE-588)4035582-2 gnd Verfassungsauslegung (DE-588)4187678-7 gnd Rechtsphilosophie (DE-588)4048821-4 gnd Verfassungsrecht (DE-588)4062801-2 gnd Juristische Methodik (DE-588)4114116-7 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4035582-2 (DE-588)4187678-7 (DE-588)4048821-4 (DE-588)4062801-2 (DE-588)4114116-7 (DE-588)4078704-7 |
| title | The strange career of legal liberalism |
| title_auth | The strange career of legal liberalism |
| title_exact_search | The strange career of legal liberalism |
| title_full | The strange career of legal liberalism Laura Kalman |
| title_fullStr | The strange career of legal liberalism Laura Kalman |
| title_full_unstemmed | The strange career of legal liberalism Laura Kalman |
| title_short | The strange career of legal liberalism |
| title_sort | the strange career of legal liberalism |
| topic | Droit - États-Unis - Méthodologie - Histoire Droit constitutionnel - États-Unis - Interprétation Droit constitutionnel - États-Unis - Philosophie Libéralisme - États-Unis - Histoire - 20e siècle Geschichte Philosophie Recht Verfassungsrecht Constitutional law United States Philosophy Constitutional law United States Liberalism United States History 20th century Law United States Methodology History Liberalismus (DE-588)4035582-2 gnd Verfassungsauslegung (DE-588)4187678-7 gnd Rechtsphilosophie (DE-588)4048821-4 gnd Verfassungsrecht (DE-588)4062801-2 gnd Juristische Methodik (DE-588)4114116-7 gnd |
| topic_facet | Droit - États-Unis - Méthodologie - Histoire Droit constitutionnel - États-Unis - Interprétation Droit constitutionnel - États-Unis - Philosophie Libéralisme - États-Unis - Histoire - 20e siècle Geschichte Philosophie Recht Verfassungsrecht Constitutional law United States Philosophy Constitutional law United States Liberalism United States History 20th century Law United States Methodology History Liberalismus Verfassungsauslegung Rechtsphilosophie Juristische Methodik USA |
| url | http://www.h-net.org/review/hrev-a0a6r9-aa http://www.h-net.org/review/hrev-a0a2y3-aa |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kalmanlaura thestrangecareeroflegalliberalism |