Objectivity in law:
The question of objectivity in legal interpretation has emerged in recent years as a highly important topic in contemporary jurisprudence. This original book addresses the issue of how and in what sense legal interpretation can be objective. The author supports the possibility of objectivity in law...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford
Clarendon Press
1996
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Zusammenfassung: | The question of objectivity in legal interpretation has emerged in recent years as a highly important topic in contemporary jurisprudence. This original book addresses the issue of how and in what sense legal interpretation can be objective. The author supports the possibility of objectivity in law and spells out the content of objectivity involved. He then provides a comprehensive defence against the classical, as well as less well-known, objections to the possibility of objectivity in legal interpretation The discussion is firmly grounded in metaphysics, which sets the book apart from other similar discussions in jurisprudence. Stavropoulos identifies an important source of resistance to acceptance of the possibility of objectivity in legal interpretation: a widely-held but faulty semantic. He then develops an alternative semantic framework which draws on influential theories in contemporary philosophy. The book shows that objectivism is a natural, commonsensical position, and rejects the currently popular notion that objectivism requires extravagant or bizarre metaphysics. Furthermore, the discussion presents the opportunity to reinterpret major debates in jurisprudence and to show how influential theories, notably H. L. A. Hart's and Ronald Dworkin's, bear on that central issue |
| Beschreibung: | Hier auch später erschienene, unveränderte Nachdrucke |
| Beschreibung: | XI, 216 S. |
| ISBN: | 0198258992 9780198258995 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV010946470 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20150202 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 960912s1996 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 0198258992 |9 0-19-825899-2 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780198258995 |9 978-0-19-825899-5 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)33008506 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV010946470 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-739 |a DE-12 |a DE-355 |a DE-29 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a K290 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 340/.1 |2 20 | |
| 084 | |a PI 3040 |0 (DE-625)136587: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a PI 3400 |0 (DE-625)136607: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Stavropoulos, Nicos |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Objectivity in law |c Nicos Stavropoulos |
| 264 | 1 | |a Oxford |b Clarendon Press |c 1996 | |
| 300 | |a XI, 216 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Hier auch später erschienene, unveränderte Nachdrucke | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a The question of objectivity in legal interpretation has emerged in recent years as a highly important topic in contemporary jurisprudence. This original book addresses the issue of how and in what sense legal interpretation can be objective. The author supports the possibility of objectivity in law and spells out the content of objectivity involved. He then provides a comprehensive defence against the classical, as well as less well-known, objections to the possibility of objectivity in legal interpretation | |
| 520 | |a The discussion is firmly grounded in metaphysics, which sets the book apart from other similar discussions in jurisprudence. Stavropoulos identifies an important source of resistance to acceptance of the possibility of objectivity in legal interpretation: a widely-held but faulty semantic. He then develops an alternative semantic framework which draws on influential theories in contemporary philosophy. The book shows that objectivism is a natural, commonsensical position, and rejects the currently popular notion that objectivism requires extravagant or bizarre metaphysics. Furthermore, the discussion presents the opportunity to reinterpret major debates in jurisprudence and to show how influential theories, notably H. L. A. Hart's and Ronald Dworkin's, bear on that central issue | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Argumentatieleer |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Droit - Interprétation |2 ram | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Objectiviteit |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Objectivité |2 ram | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Rechtsinterpretatie |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Rechtstheorie |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Recht | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Law |x Interpretation and construction | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Objectivity | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsanwendung |0 (DE-588)4048765-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Auslegung |0 (DE-588)4069008-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Recht |0 (DE-588)4048737-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Objektivität |0 (DE-588)4172310-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Recht |0 (DE-588)4048737-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Objektivität |0 (DE-588)4172310-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 1 | 0 | |a Rechtsanwendung |0 (DE-588)4048765-9 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | 1 | |a Objektivität |0 (DE-588)4172310-7 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 2 | 0 | |a Auslegung |0 (DE-588)4069008-8 |D s |
| 689 | 2 | 1 | |a Objektivität |0 (DE-588)4172310-7 |D s |
| 689 | 2 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007320777 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804125432985944064 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Stavropoulos, Nicos |
| author_facet | Stavropoulos, Nicos |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Stavropoulos, Nicos |
| author_variant | n s ns |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV010946470 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | K290 |
| callnumber-raw | K290 |
| callnumber-search | K290 |
| callnumber-sort | K 3290 |
| callnumber-subject | K - General Law |
| classification_rvk | PI 3040 PI 3400 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)33008506 (DE-599)BVBBV010946470 |
| dewey-full | 340/.1 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 340 - Law |
| dewey-raw | 340/.1 |
| dewey-search | 340/.1 |
| dewey-sort | 3340 11 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03247nam a2200613 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV010946470</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20150202 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">960912s1996 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0198258992</subfield><subfield code="9">0-19-825899-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780198258995</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-19-825899-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)33008506</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV010946470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K290</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">340/.1</subfield><subfield code="2">20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PI 3040</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)136587:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PI 3400</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)136607:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stavropoulos, Nicos</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Objectivity in law</subfield><subfield code="c">Nicos Stavropoulos</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford</subfield><subfield code="b">Clarendon Press</subfield><subfield code="c">1996</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XI, 216 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hier auch später erschienene, unveränderte Nachdrucke</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The question of objectivity in legal interpretation has emerged in recent years as a highly important topic in contemporary jurisprudence. This original book addresses the issue of how and in what sense legal interpretation can be objective. The author supports the possibility of objectivity in law and spells out the content of objectivity involved. He then provides a comprehensive defence against the classical, as well as less well-known, objections to the possibility of objectivity in legal interpretation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The discussion is firmly grounded in metaphysics, which sets the book apart from other similar discussions in jurisprudence. Stavropoulos identifies an important source of resistance to acceptance of the possibility of objectivity in legal interpretation: a widely-held but faulty semantic. He then develops an alternative semantic framework which draws on influential theories in contemporary philosophy. The book shows that objectivism is a natural, commonsensical position, and rejects the currently popular notion that objectivism requires extravagant or bizarre metaphysics. Furthermore, the discussion presents the opportunity to reinterpret major debates in jurisprudence and to show how influential theories, notably H. L. A. Hart's and Ronald Dworkin's, bear on that central issue</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Argumentatieleer</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Droit - Interprétation</subfield><subfield code="2">ram</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Objectiviteit</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Objectivité</subfield><subfield code="2">ram</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsinterpretatie</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtstheorie</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield><subfield code="x">Interpretation and construction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Objectivity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsanwendung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048765-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Auslegung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4069008-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048737-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Objektivität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4172310-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048737-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Objektivität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4172310-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rechtsanwendung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048765-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Objektivität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4172310-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Auslegung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4069008-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Objektivität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4172310-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007320777</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV010946470 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T18:01:28Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 0198258992 9780198258995 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007320777 |
| oclc_num | 33008506 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-739 DE-12 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-29 |
| owner_facet | DE-739 DE-12 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-29 |
| physical | XI, 216 S. |
| publishDate | 1996 |
| publishDateSearch | 1996 |
| publishDateSort | 1996 |
| publisher | Clarendon Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Stavropoulos, Nicos Verfasser aut Objectivity in law Nicos Stavropoulos Oxford Clarendon Press 1996 XI, 216 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Hier auch später erschienene, unveränderte Nachdrucke The question of objectivity in legal interpretation has emerged in recent years as a highly important topic in contemporary jurisprudence. This original book addresses the issue of how and in what sense legal interpretation can be objective. The author supports the possibility of objectivity in law and spells out the content of objectivity involved. He then provides a comprehensive defence against the classical, as well as less well-known, objections to the possibility of objectivity in legal interpretation The discussion is firmly grounded in metaphysics, which sets the book apart from other similar discussions in jurisprudence. Stavropoulos identifies an important source of resistance to acceptance of the possibility of objectivity in legal interpretation: a widely-held but faulty semantic. He then develops an alternative semantic framework which draws on influential theories in contemporary philosophy. The book shows that objectivism is a natural, commonsensical position, and rejects the currently popular notion that objectivism requires extravagant or bizarre metaphysics. Furthermore, the discussion presents the opportunity to reinterpret major debates in jurisprudence and to show how influential theories, notably H. L. A. Hart's and Ronald Dworkin's, bear on that central issue Argumentatieleer gtt Droit - Interprétation ram Objectiviteit gtt Objectivité ram Rechtsinterpretatie gtt Rechtstheorie gtt Recht Law Interpretation and construction Objectivity Rechtsanwendung (DE-588)4048765-9 gnd rswk-swf Auslegung (DE-588)4069008-8 gnd rswk-swf Recht (DE-588)4048737-4 gnd rswk-swf Objektivität (DE-588)4172310-7 gnd rswk-swf Recht (DE-588)4048737-4 s Objektivität (DE-588)4172310-7 s DE-604 Rechtsanwendung (DE-588)4048765-9 s Auslegung (DE-588)4069008-8 s |
| spellingShingle | Stavropoulos, Nicos Objectivity in law Argumentatieleer gtt Droit - Interprétation ram Objectiviteit gtt Objectivité ram Rechtsinterpretatie gtt Rechtstheorie gtt Recht Law Interpretation and construction Objectivity Rechtsanwendung (DE-588)4048765-9 gnd Auslegung (DE-588)4069008-8 gnd Recht (DE-588)4048737-4 gnd Objektivität (DE-588)4172310-7 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4048765-9 (DE-588)4069008-8 (DE-588)4048737-4 (DE-588)4172310-7 |
| title | Objectivity in law |
| title_auth | Objectivity in law |
| title_exact_search | Objectivity in law |
| title_full | Objectivity in law Nicos Stavropoulos |
| title_fullStr | Objectivity in law Nicos Stavropoulos |
| title_full_unstemmed | Objectivity in law Nicos Stavropoulos |
| title_short | Objectivity in law |
| title_sort | objectivity in law |
| topic | Argumentatieleer gtt Droit - Interprétation ram Objectiviteit gtt Objectivité ram Rechtsinterpretatie gtt Rechtstheorie gtt Recht Law Interpretation and construction Objectivity Rechtsanwendung (DE-588)4048765-9 gnd Auslegung (DE-588)4069008-8 gnd Recht (DE-588)4048737-4 gnd Objektivität (DE-588)4172310-7 gnd |
| topic_facet | Argumentatieleer Droit - Interprétation Objectiviteit Objectivité Rechtsinterpretatie Rechtstheorie Recht Law Interpretation and construction Objectivity Rechtsanwendung Auslegung Objektivität |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT stavropoulosnicos objectivityinlaw |