Free public reason: making it up as we go
Free Public Reason examines the idea of public justification, stressing its importance but also questioning the coherence of the concept itself. Although public justification is employed in the work of theorists such as John Rawls, Jeremy Waldron, Thomas Nagel, and others, it has received little att...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
New York [u.a.]
Oxford Univ. Press
1996
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Zusammenfassung: | Free Public Reason examines the idea of public justification, stressing its importance but also questioning the coherence of the concept itself. Although public justification is employed in the work of theorists such as John Rawls, Jeremy Waldron, Thomas Nagel, and others, it has received little attention on its own as a philosophical concept. D'Agostino shows that the ideal behind this concept is constituted by many, sometimes competing, demands and that no formal way of weighing these demands can be identified. The notion of public justification itself is thus shown to be contestable. In demonstrating this, D'Agostino questions many current political theories that rely on this concept Having broken down the foundations of public justification, D'Agostino then draws on the ideas of Dworkin and Kuhn as well as insights from feminism and post-modernism to offer an alternative model of how a workable consensus on its meaning might be reached through the interactions of a community of interpreters or delegates at a constitutional convention |
Beschreibung: | XII, 203 S. |
ISBN: | 0195097610 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV010859764 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 960718s1996 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 0195097610 |9 0-19-509761-0 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)32199222 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV010859764 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-11 | ||
050 | 0 | |a JA71 | |
082 | 0 | |a 320/.01 |2 20 | |
084 | |a CC 7800 |0 (DE-625)17691: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a D'Agostino, Fred |d 1946- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)140794816 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Free public reason |b making it up as we go |c Fred D'Agostino |
264 | 1 | |a New York [u.a.] |b Oxford Univ. Press |c 1996 | |
300 | |a XII, 203 S. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | 3 | |a Free Public Reason examines the idea of public justification, stressing its importance but also questioning the coherence of the concept itself. Although public justification is employed in the work of theorists such as John Rawls, Jeremy Waldron, Thomas Nagel, and others, it has received little attention on its own as a philosophical concept. D'Agostino shows that the ideal behind this concept is constituted by many, sometimes competing, demands and that no formal way of weighing these demands can be identified. The notion of public justification itself is thus shown to be contestable. In demonstrating this, D'Agostino questions many current political theories that rely on this concept | |
520 | |a Having broken down the foundations of public justification, D'Agostino then draws on the ideas of Dworkin and Kuhn as well as insights from feminism and post-modernism to offer an alternative model of how a workable consensus on its meaning might be reached through the interactions of a community of interpreters or delegates at a constitutional convention | ||
650 | 7 | |a Openbaarheid |2 gtt | |
650 | 7 | |a Rationaliteit |2 gtt | |
650 | 7 | |a Rechtvaardiging |2 gtt | |
650 | 7 | |a Rede (filosofie) |2 gtt | |
650 | 4 | |a Philosophie | |
650 | 4 | |a Politische Wissenschaft | |
650 | 4 | |a Justification (Theory of knowledge) | |
650 | 4 | |a Political science |x Philosophy | |
650 | 4 | |a Reason | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Legitimität |0 (DE-588)4035043-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Politische Theorie |0 (DE-588)4046563-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Legitimität |0 (DE-588)4035043-5 |D s |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Politische Theorie |0 (DE-588)4046563-9 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m HEBIS Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=007258320&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007258320 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804125345630126080 |
---|---|
adam_text | Contents
1 Introduction, 3
1 Precis, 3
2 Retrospective, 4
3 Prospective, 6
Part I Construction
2 Some Apparatus, 15
4 Ideas about Ideas, 15
5 Pluralism, 17
6 Essential Contestability and the Problem of Public Justification, 19
3 The Idea of Public Justification, 23
7 The Circumstances of, Conditions for, and Limits on Politics, 23
8 The Rationale for and Realm of Public Justification, 26
9 The Concept and Some Dimensions of Public Justification, 30
4 Some Conceptions of Public Justification, 38
10 Rawis’s Conception, 38
11 Gauthier’s Conception, 40
12 Ackerman’s Conception, 42
13 A ‘Utilitarian’ Conception, 44
14, Habermas’s Conception, 47
15 Gaus’s Conception, 50
5 The Ideal of Public Justification, 56
16 Two Families of Desiderata, 56
17 The Moralistic Desiderata, 58
18 The Realistic Desiderata, 62
Part II Deconstruction
6 Prima Facie Incoherence, 73
19 Contestability of the Concept of Public Justification?, 73
20 Dimensional Failures of Tracking, 75
21 Other Failures of Tracking, 80
7 Overarching Principles and Perspectives?, 89
22 Some Preliminaries, 89
23 MacIntyre’s Strategy, 91
xii Contents
24 The Majoritarianism of Ackerman and Gaus, 94
25 Hurley’s Social Knowledge Functions, 98
26 Minimax Relative Concession 4 la Gauthier and Gaus, 101
27 The Question of Extensional Equivalence, and Other Issues, 103
8 Responses to and Diagnosis of Prima Facie Incoherence, 109
28 Liberalism and Postmodernism, 109
29 Anarchism, 110
30 Authoritarianism, 113
31 Substitutionism and Its Inadequacy, 116
32 A Political Alternative, 121
Part IT Reconstruction
9 ‘Solving’ the Problem, 129
33 A Political Solution, 129
34 Normal Discursive’ Constitution Making, 130
35 Pre-Constitutional Theorizing, 140
10 Assessing the Solution, 155
36 Delegates and Their Principals, 155
37 The Prospects for Convergence, 158
38 Satisfaction of the Desiderata?, 161
11 Conclusion, 173
39 The Superiority of a Political Approach, 173
40 Further Remarks about Constitution Making, 177
41 Perpetual Instability and the Nature of Philosophical Thinking, 181
Bibliography, 187
Index, 193
|
any_adam_object | 1 |
author | D'Agostino, Fred 1946- |
author_GND | (DE-588)140794816 |
author_facet | D'Agostino, Fred 1946- |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | D'Agostino, Fred 1946- |
author_variant | f d fd |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV010859764 |
callnumber-first | J - Political Science |
callnumber-label | JA71 |
callnumber-raw | JA71 |
callnumber-search | JA71 |
callnumber-sort | JA 271 |
callnumber-subject | JA - Political Science |
classification_rvk | CC 7800 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)32199222 (DE-599)BVBBV010859764 |
dewey-full | 320/.01 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 320 - Political science (Politics and government) |
dewey-raw | 320/.01 |
dewey-search | 320/.01 |
dewey-sort | 3320 11 |
dewey-tens | 320 - Political science (Politics and government) |
discipline | Politologie Philosophie |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02766nam a2200493 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV010859764</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">960718s1996 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0195097610</subfield><subfield code="9">0-19-509761-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)32199222</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV010859764</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">JA71</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">320/.01</subfield><subfield code="2">20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CC 7800</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)17691:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">D'Agostino, Fred</subfield><subfield code="d">1946-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)140794816</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Free public reason</subfield><subfield code="b">making it up as we go</subfield><subfield code="c">Fred D'Agostino</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New York [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Oxford Univ. Press</subfield><subfield code="c">1996</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XII, 203 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Free Public Reason examines the idea of public justification, stressing its importance but also questioning the coherence of the concept itself. Although public justification is employed in the work of theorists such as John Rawls, Jeremy Waldron, Thomas Nagel, and others, it has received little attention on its own as a philosophical concept. D'Agostino shows that the ideal behind this concept is constituted by many, sometimes competing, demands and that no formal way of weighing these demands can be identified. The notion of public justification itself is thus shown to be contestable. In demonstrating this, D'Agostino questions many current political theories that rely on this concept</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Having broken down the foundations of public justification, D'Agostino then draws on the ideas of Dworkin and Kuhn as well as insights from feminism and post-modernism to offer an alternative model of how a workable consensus on its meaning might be reached through the interactions of a community of interpreters or delegates at a constitutional convention</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Openbaarheid</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rationaliteit</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtvaardiging</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rede (filosofie)</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Philosophie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Politische Wissenschaft</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Justification (Theory of knowledge)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Political science</subfield><subfield code="x">Philosophy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Reason</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Legitimität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4035043-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Politische Theorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4046563-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Legitimität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4035043-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Politische Theorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4046563-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">HEBIS Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=007258320&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007258320</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV010859764 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T18:00:05Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 0195097610 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007258320 |
oclc_num | 32199222 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 DE-11 |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-11 |
physical | XII, 203 S. |
publishDate | 1996 |
publishDateSearch | 1996 |
publishDateSort | 1996 |
publisher | Oxford Univ. Press |
record_format | marc |
spelling | D'Agostino, Fred 1946- Verfasser (DE-588)140794816 aut Free public reason making it up as we go Fred D'Agostino New York [u.a.] Oxford Univ. Press 1996 XII, 203 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Free Public Reason examines the idea of public justification, stressing its importance but also questioning the coherence of the concept itself. Although public justification is employed in the work of theorists such as John Rawls, Jeremy Waldron, Thomas Nagel, and others, it has received little attention on its own as a philosophical concept. D'Agostino shows that the ideal behind this concept is constituted by many, sometimes competing, demands and that no formal way of weighing these demands can be identified. The notion of public justification itself is thus shown to be contestable. In demonstrating this, D'Agostino questions many current political theories that rely on this concept Having broken down the foundations of public justification, D'Agostino then draws on the ideas of Dworkin and Kuhn as well as insights from feminism and post-modernism to offer an alternative model of how a workable consensus on its meaning might be reached through the interactions of a community of interpreters or delegates at a constitutional convention Openbaarheid gtt Rationaliteit gtt Rechtvaardiging gtt Rede (filosofie) gtt Philosophie Politische Wissenschaft Justification (Theory of knowledge) Political science Philosophy Reason Legitimität (DE-588)4035043-5 gnd rswk-swf Politische Theorie (DE-588)4046563-9 gnd rswk-swf Legitimität (DE-588)4035043-5 s Politische Theorie (DE-588)4046563-9 s DE-604 HEBIS Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=007258320&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
spellingShingle | D'Agostino, Fred 1946- Free public reason making it up as we go Openbaarheid gtt Rationaliteit gtt Rechtvaardiging gtt Rede (filosofie) gtt Philosophie Politische Wissenschaft Justification (Theory of knowledge) Political science Philosophy Reason Legitimität (DE-588)4035043-5 gnd Politische Theorie (DE-588)4046563-9 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4035043-5 (DE-588)4046563-9 |
title | Free public reason making it up as we go |
title_auth | Free public reason making it up as we go |
title_exact_search | Free public reason making it up as we go |
title_full | Free public reason making it up as we go Fred D'Agostino |
title_fullStr | Free public reason making it up as we go Fred D'Agostino |
title_full_unstemmed | Free public reason making it up as we go Fred D'Agostino |
title_short | Free public reason |
title_sort | free public reason making it up as we go |
title_sub | making it up as we go |
topic | Openbaarheid gtt Rationaliteit gtt Rechtvaardiging gtt Rede (filosofie) gtt Philosophie Politische Wissenschaft Justification (Theory of knowledge) Political science Philosophy Reason Legitimität (DE-588)4035043-5 gnd Politische Theorie (DE-588)4046563-9 gnd |
topic_facet | Openbaarheid Rationaliteit Rechtvaardiging Rede (filosofie) Philosophie Politische Wissenschaft Justification (Theory of knowledge) Political science Philosophy Reason Legitimität Politische Theorie |
url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=007258320&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dagostinofred freepublicreasonmakingitupaswego |