A comparison of two methods for Boolean query relevance feedback:
The relevance feedback process uses information derived from an initially retrieved set of documents to improve subsequent search formulations and retrieval output. In a Boolean query environment this implies that new query terms must be identified and Boolean operators must be chosen automatically...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Ithaca, New York
1983
|
| Series: | Cornell University <Ithaca, NY> / Department of Computer Science: Technical report
564 |
| Subjects: | |
| Summary: | The relevance feedback process uses information derived from an initially retrieved set of documents to improve subsequent search formulations and retrieval output. In a Boolean query environment this implies that new query terms must be identified and Boolean operators must be chosen automatically to connect the various query terms. In this study, two recently proposed automatic methods for relevance feedback of Boolean queries are evaluated and conclusions are drawn concerning the use of effective feedback methods in a Boolean query environment. |
| Physical Description: | 28 S. |
Staff View
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV010584631 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20191104 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 960125s1983 |||| 00||| engod | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)10649493 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV010584631 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-91G | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a Z699.3 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Salton, Gerard |d 1927-1995 |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)170160424 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a A comparison of two methods for Boolean query relevance feedback |c G. Salton ; E. A. Fox ; E. Voorhees |
| 264 | 1 | |a Ithaca, New York |c 1983 | |
| 300 | |a 28 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Cornell University <Ithaca, NY> / Department of Computer Science: Technical report |v 564 | |
| 520 | 3 | |a The relevance feedback process uses information derived from an initially retrieved set of documents to improve subsequent search formulations and retrieval output. In a Boolean query environment this implies that new query terms must be identified and Boolean operators must be chosen automatically to connect the various query terms. In this study, two recently proposed automatic methods for relevance feedback of Boolean queries are evaluated and conclusions are drawn concerning the use of effective feedback methods in a Boolean query environment. | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Information retrieval |x Automation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Online bibliographic searching | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fox, Edward Alan |d 1950- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)130414344 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Voorhees, Ellen |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 810 | 2 | |a Department of Computer Science: Technical report |t Cornell University <Ithaca, NY> |v 564 |w (DE-604)BV006185504 |9 564 | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007057170 | ||
Record in the Search Index
| _version_ | 1804125054223515648 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Salton, Gerard 1927-1995 Fox, Edward Alan 1950- Voorhees, Ellen |
| author_GND | (DE-588)170160424 (DE-588)130414344 |
| author_facet | Salton, Gerard 1927-1995 Fox, Edward Alan 1950- Voorhees, Ellen |
| author_role | aut aut aut |
| author_sort | Salton, Gerard 1927-1995 |
| author_variant | g s gs e a f ea eaf e v ev |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV010584631 |
| callnumber-first | Z - Library Science |
| callnumber-label | Z699 |
| callnumber-raw | Z699.3 |
| callnumber-search | Z699.3 |
| callnumber-sort | Z 3699.3 |
| callnumber-subject | Z - Books and Writing |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)10649493 (DE-599)BVBBV010584631 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01765nam a2200337 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV010584631</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20191104 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">960125s1983 |||| 00||| engod</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)10649493</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV010584631</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-91G</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Z699.3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Salton, Gerard</subfield><subfield code="d">1927-1995</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)170160424</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A comparison of two methods for Boolean query relevance feedback</subfield><subfield code="c">G. Salton ; E. A. Fox ; E. Voorhees</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Ithaca, New York</subfield><subfield code="c">1983</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">28 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cornell University <Ithaca, NY> / Department of Computer Science: Technical report</subfield><subfield code="v">564</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The relevance feedback process uses information derived from an initially retrieved set of documents to improve subsequent search formulations and retrieval output. In a Boolean query environment this implies that new query terms must be identified and Boolean operators must be chosen automatically to connect the various query terms. In this study, two recently proposed automatic methods for relevance feedback of Boolean queries are evaluated and conclusions are drawn concerning the use of effective feedback methods in a Boolean query environment.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Information retrieval</subfield><subfield code="x">Automation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Online bibliographic searching</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fox, Edward Alan</subfield><subfield code="d">1950-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)130414344</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Voorhees, Ellen</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="810" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Department of Computer Science: Technical report</subfield><subfield code="t">Cornell University <Ithaca, NY></subfield><subfield code="v">564</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV006185504</subfield><subfield code="9">564</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007057170</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV010584631 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T17:55:27Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007057170 |
| oclc_num | 10649493 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-91G DE-BY-TUM |
| owner_facet | DE-91G DE-BY-TUM |
| physical | 28 S. |
| publishDate | 1983 |
| publishDateSearch | 1983 |
| publishDateSort | 1983 |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Cornell University <Ithaca, NY> / Department of Computer Science: Technical report |
| spelling | Salton, Gerard 1927-1995 Verfasser (DE-588)170160424 aut A comparison of two methods for Boolean query relevance feedback G. Salton ; E. A. Fox ; E. Voorhees Ithaca, New York 1983 28 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Cornell University <Ithaca, NY> / Department of Computer Science: Technical report 564 The relevance feedback process uses information derived from an initially retrieved set of documents to improve subsequent search formulations and retrieval output. In a Boolean query environment this implies that new query terms must be identified and Boolean operators must be chosen automatically to connect the various query terms. In this study, two recently proposed automatic methods for relevance feedback of Boolean queries are evaluated and conclusions are drawn concerning the use of effective feedback methods in a Boolean query environment. Information retrieval Automation Online bibliographic searching Fox, Edward Alan 1950- Verfasser (DE-588)130414344 aut Voorhees, Ellen Verfasser aut Department of Computer Science: Technical report Cornell University <Ithaca, NY> 564 (DE-604)BV006185504 564 |
| spellingShingle | Salton, Gerard 1927-1995 Fox, Edward Alan 1950- Voorhees, Ellen A comparison of two methods for Boolean query relevance feedback Information retrieval Automation Online bibliographic searching |
| title | A comparison of two methods for Boolean query relevance feedback |
| title_auth | A comparison of two methods for Boolean query relevance feedback |
| title_exact_search | A comparison of two methods for Boolean query relevance feedback |
| title_full | A comparison of two methods for Boolean query relevance feedback G. Salton ; E. A. Fox ; E. Voorhees |
| title_fullStr | A comparison of two methods for Boolean query relevance feedback G. Salton ; E. A. Fox ; E. Voorhees |
| title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of two methods for Boolean query relevance feedback G. Salton ; E. A. Fox ; E. Voorhees |
| title_short | A comparison of two methods for Boolean query relevance feedback |
| title_sort | a comparison of two methods for boolean query relevance feedback |
| topic | Information retrieval Automation Online bibliographic searching |
| topic_facet | Information retrieval Automation Online bibliographic searching |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV006185504 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT saltongerard acomparisonoftwomethodsforbooleanqueryrelevancefeedback AT foxedwardalan acomparisonoftwomethodsforbooleanqueryrelevancefeedback AT voorheesellen acomparisonoftwomethodsforbooleanqueryrelevancefeedback |