Norton Rose on civil jurisdiction and judgments:
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
London u.a.
Lloyd's of London Press
1993
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Beschreibung: | XXXIV, 349 S. |
ISBN: | 1850445001 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV009806180 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20190709 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 940916s1993 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 1850445001 |9 1-85044-500-1 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)29329937 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV009806180 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-20 | ||
050 | 0 | |a KD7121.5 | |
082 | 0 | |a 341.78026 |2 20 | |
084 | |a PT 425 |0 (DE-625)139896: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Briggs, Adrian |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Norton Rose on civil jurisdiction and judgments |c by Adrian Briggs |
264 | 1 | |a London u.a. |b Lloyd's of London Press |c 1993 | |
300 | |a XXXIV, 349 S. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
650 | 7 | |a Common law |2 gtt | |
650 | 7 | |a Europees bevoegdheids- en executieverdrag |2 gtt | |
650 | 7 | |a Verdrag betreffende de rechterlijke bevoegdheid en de tenuitvoerlegging van beslissingen in burgerlijke en handelszaken van 1988 |2 gtt | |
650 | 4 | |a Judgments, Foreign |z European Economic Community countries | |
650 | 4 | |a Judgments, Foreign |z Great Britain | |
650 | 4 | |a Judicial assistance |z European Economic Community countries | |
650 | 4 | |a Judicial assistance |z Great Britain | |
650 | 4 | |a Jurisdiction |z European Economic Community countries | |
650 | 4 | |a Jurisdiction |z Great Britain | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Internationales Zivilprozessrecht |0 (DE-588)4114041-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
651 | 4 | |a Europäische Gemeinschaften. Mitgliedsstaaten | |
651 | 4 | |a Großbritannien | |
651 | 7 | |a England |0 (DE-588)4014770-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a England |0 (DE-588)4014770-8 |D g |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Internationales Zivilprozessrecht |0 (DE-588)4114041-2 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m GBV Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=006489439&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-006489439 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804124157291528192 |
---|---|
adam_text | NORTON ROSE ON CIVIL JURISDICTION AND JUDGMENTS BY ADRIAN BRIGGS EDITED
BY PETER REES LLP LONDON NEW YORK HAMBURG HONGKONG LLOYD S OF LONDON
PRESS LTD. 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD PREFACE TABLE OF CASES TABLE
OF CONVENTIONS TABLE OF LEGISLATION PARA. 1 INTRODUCTION AND
JUSTIFICATION THE REASONS FOR, AND SCOPE OF, THIS WORK 1.1 THE
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE CONVENTIONS AND THE COMMON LAW 1.2 THE
CONVENTIONS, AND THE CONTRACTING STATES 1.3 THE ORIGINAL BRUSSELS
CONVENTION 1.3.1 THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION 1.3.2 THE GREEK ACCESSION
CONVENTION 1.3.3 THE SAN SEBASTIAN CONVENTION 1.3.4 THE LUGANO
CONVENTION 1.3.5 WHICH CONVENTION? 1.3.6 SECONDARY SOURCES OF THE LAW
1.4 OFFICIAL COMMENTARIES 1.4.1 REFERENCES TO THE COURT OF JUSTICE, AND
DECIDED CASES 1.4.2 ACADEMIC SOURCES 1.4.3 GEOGRAPHICAL MATTERS 1.5 PAGE
III V XXI XXVIII XXXI 2 JURISDICTION UNDER THE BRUSSELS (AND SAN
SEBASTIAN) CONVENTIONS GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF INTERPRETATION AND
APPLICATION VII 2.0 VIII TABLE OF CONTENTS PRINCIPLES OF INTERPRETATION
OF THE CONVENTIONS 2.0.1 AN EQUAL AND UNIFORM INTERPRETATION 2.0.1.1
EXCEPTIONS TO THE DOMICILIARY RULE WILL BE NARROWLY CONSTRUED 2.0.1.2
THE RISK OF INCONSISTENT DECISIONS MUST BE MINIMISED 2.0.1.3 EVALUATION
2.0.1.4 THE HIERARCHY OF JURISDICTIONAL RULES 2.0.2 CHALLENGING THE
JURISDICTION OF THE ENGLISH COURT 2.0.2.1 THE NEED TO COMMENCE
PROCEEDINGS FIRST 2.0.3 PROSPECTIVE PLAINTIFF 2.0.3.1 PROSPECTIVE
DEFENDANT 2.0.3.2 OTHER MEANS OF PREVENTING A COURT FROM EXERCISING
JURISDICTION 2.0.3.3 TAKING PROCEEDINGS IN A NON-CONTRACTING STATE?
2.0.3.4 WHAT TO DO IF SERVED WITH A WRIT IN A CASE TO WHICH THE
CONVENTION APPLIES 2.0.4 THE SCOPE OF THE CONVENTION: ARTICLES 54 AND 1
2.1 SCOPE OF THE CONVENTION RATIONE TEMPORIS: ARTICLE 54 2.1.1 SCOPE OF
THE CONVENTION RATIONE MATERIAE: ARTICLE 1 2.1.2 THE STATUS OR LEGAL
CAPACITY OF NATURAL PERSONS, RIGHTS IN PROPERTY ARISING OUT OF A
MATRIMONIAL RELATIONSHIP, WILLS AND SUCCESSION: ARTICLE 1(1) 2.1.2.1
BANKRUPTCY, PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO THE WINDING-UP OF INSOLVENT
COMPANIES OR OTHER LEGAL PERSONS, JUDICIAL ARRANGEMENTS, COMPOSITIONS
AND ANALOGOUS PROCEEDINGS: ARTICLE 1(2) 2.1.2.2 SOCIAL SECURITY: ARTICLE
1(3) 2.1.2.3 ARBITRATION: ARTICLE 1(4) 2.1.2.4 THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE
CONVENTION: GENERAL 2.1.2.5 SCOPE OF THE CONVENTION: JURISDICTION FROM
OTHER CONVENTIONS 2.1.3 SCOPE OF THE CONVENTION: INTERNATIONAL
JURISDICTION 2.1.4 JURISDICTION UNDER ANOTHER CONVENTION: ARTICLE 57 2.2
MARITIME AND OTHER CONVENTIONS 2.2.1 THE LUGANO CONVENTION 2.2.2
EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION, REGARDLESS OF DOMICILE: ARTICLE 16 2.3 TITLE TO
IMMOVABLE PROPERTY: ARTICLE 16(1) 2.3.1 CONTRACTS FOR THE CONVEYANCE OF
IMMOVABLE PROPERTY 2.3.1.1 TRUSTS OTHERWISE ARISING IN CONNEXION WITH
FOREIGN LAND 2.3.1.2 SAN SEBASTIAN AMENDMENT 2.3.1.3 COMPANY LAW:
ARTICLE 16(2) 2.3.2 VALIDITY OF ENTRIES IN PUBLIC REGISTERS: ARTICLE
16(3) 2.3.3 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS: ARTICLE 16(4) 2.3.4
ENFORCEMENT OF CONTRACTING STATE JUDGMENTS: ARTICLE 16(5) 2.3.5 ARTICLE
16 JURISDICTION: LAND, ETC, IN A NON-CONTRACTING STATE? 2.3.6 TABLE OF
CONTENTS ENTERING AN APPEARANCE: ARTICLE 18 2.4 ENTERING AN APPEARANCE,
OR SUBMISSION? 2.4.1 CONTESTING THE JURISDICTION OF THE COURT 2.4.2 THE
PRINCIPLES 2.4.2.1 THE PROCEDURE 2.4.2.2 SPECIAL RULES CONCERNING
INSURANCE CONTRACTS: ARTICLES 7*12A 2.5 JURISDICTIONAL RULES: GENERAL:
ARTICLES 7-11 2.5.1 CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENTS IN INSURANCE CASES:
ARTICLES 12, 12A 2.5.2 SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR CERTAIN CONSUMER
CONTRACTS: ARTICLES 13*15 2.6 CONSUMER CONTRACTS: ARTICLES 13 2.6.1
JURISDICTIONAL RULES: ARTICLE 14 2.6.2 CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENTS:
ARTICLE 15 2.6.3 CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENTS: ARTICLE 17 2.7 FORMAL
REQUIREMENTS UNDER ARTICLE 17 2.7.1 IN WRITING, OR EVIDENCED IN WRITING
2.7.1.1 COURSES OF PREVIOUS DEALING 2.7.1.2 REASONABLY KNOWN FROM, AND
OBSERVED IN, INTERNATIONAL TRADE 2.7.1.3 OTHER POINTS RELATING TO FORMAL
VALIDITY 2.7.1.4 FORMALITY AND THIRD PARTIES TO THE AGREEMENT 2.7.1.5
THE CONTENTS OF THE CLAUSE: DEPARTURES FROM THE STRAIGHTFORWARD CASE
2.7.2 THE COURTS OF TWO CONTRACTING STATES 2.7.2.1 THE COURTS OF A
NON-CONTRACTING STATE 2.7.2.2 NON-EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION 2.7.2.3
CHALLENGES TO THE VALIDITY OF THE CLAUSE UNDER NATIONAL LAW 2.7.3
CHALLENGES UPON FORMAL OR PROCEDURAL GROUNDS 2.7.3.1 CHALLENGES UPON
SUBSTANTIVE GROUNDS 2.7.3.2 CLAUSES BENEFITING ONE PARTY ONLY 2.7.4
CHOICE OF COURT WITHIN TRUST INSTRUMENTS 2.7.5 CHOICE OF COURT IN
INDIVIDUAL CONTRACTS OF EMPLOYMENT 2.7.6 LUXEMBOURG DOMICILIARIES 2.7.7
JURISDICTION ON THE BASIS OF OTHER KINDS OF CONTRACTUAL TERMS 2.7.8
CONTRACTS MADE BEFORE 1987 GOVERNED BY ENGLISH LAW 2.7.8.1 CONTRACTUAL
PLACE OF PERFORMANCE 2.7.8.2 IS THE DEFENDANT DOMICILED IN THE UNITED
KINGDOM? ARTICLE 2. AND, WITHIN THE UNITED KINGDOM, IN ENGLAND? ARTICLE
2 OF SCHEDULE 4 2.8 THE DETERMINATION OF A DEFENDANT S DOMICILE 2.8.1
DOMICILE IN ENGLAND ACCORDING TO ENGLISH LAW: INDIVIDUALS 2.8.2 DOMICILE
OF CORPORATIONS AND ASSOCIATIONS 2.8.3 X TABLE OF CONTENTS DOMICILE OF
CORPORATIONS OR ASSOCIATIONS FOR GENERAL PURPOSES 2.8.3.1 DOMICILE OF
CORPORATIONS: THE SPECIAL CASE OF ARTICLE 16(2) 2.8.3.2 DOMICILE OF
EXTERNAL INSURERS AND SUPPLIERS 2.8.4 DOMICILE OF TRUSTS 2.8.5 DOMICILE
OF THE CROWN 2.8.6 IS THE DEFENDANT DOMICILED IN ANOTHER CONTRACTING
STATE? 2.9 WHERE, IF NOT IN THE UNITED KINGDOM, IS THE DEFENDANT
DOMICILED? 2.9.1 INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS: ARTICLE 52 2.9.1.1 CORPORATE AND
OTHER ARTIFICIAL PERSONS: ARTICLE 53 2.9.1.2 DEFENDANT NOT DOMICILED IN
ANY CONTRACTING STATE: ARTICLE 4 2.9.2 ARTICLE 4 JURISDICTION AND US
ALIBI PENDENS 2.9.2.1 DEFENDANT DOMICILED IN ANOTHER CONTRACTING STATE
2.9.3 SPECIAL JURISDICTION OVER EC DOMICILIARIES: ARTICLES 5 AND 6 2.10
SPECIAL JURISDICTION UNDER ARTICLE 5 2.10.1-7 JURISDICTION IN MATTERS
RELATING TO A CONTRACT: ARTICLE 5(1) 2.10.1 MATTERS RELATING TO A
CONTRACT 2.10.1.1 QUASI-CONTRACTUAL, OR RESTITUTIONARY, CLAIMS
2.10.1.1.1 THE OBLIGATION IN QUESTION 2.10.1.2 MULTIPLE BROKEN
OBLIGATIONS 2.10.1.2.1 OBLIGATIONS TO BE PERFORMED ACROSS BORDERS
2.10.1.2.2 PRIMARY OR SECONDARY OBLIGATIONS? 2.10.1.2.3 EMPLOYMENT
CONTRACTS 2.10.1.2.4 THE PLACE OF PERFORMANCE OF THE OBLIGATION 2.10.1.3
THE PLACE OF PAYMENT OF MONEY 2.10.1.3.1 THE PLACE OF CONTRACTUAL
ACCOUNTING 2.10.1.3.2 CONTRACTUAL AND NON-CONTRACTUAL CLAIMS 2.10.1.4
DISPUTES AS TO THE VERY EXISTENCE OF A CONTRACT 2.10.1.5 ACTIONS BY THE
PLAINTIFF TO ENFORCE THE CONTRACT AS SUCH 2.10.1.5.1 ACTIONS BY A
PLAINTIFF TO ENFORCE THE CONSEQUENCES OF A CONTRACT BEING A NULLITY
2.10.1.5.2 LUXEMBOURG DOMICILIARIES 2.10.1.6 JURISDICTION IN MATTERS
RELATING TO MAINTENANCE: ARTICLE 5(2) 2.10.2 JURISDICTION IN MATTERS
RELATING TO TORT: ARTICLE 5(3) 2.10.3 MATTERS RELATING TO TORT, DELICT
OR QUASI-DELICT 2.10.3.1 THE STRAINED DICHOTOMY OF CONTRACT AND TORT
2.10.3.1.1 OBLIGATIONS BASED ON NEGLIGENCE 2.10.3.1.2 CLAIMS AGAINST
PROFESSIONAL MEN 2.10.3.1.3 TORT CLAIMS WITH CONTRACTUAL DEFENCES
2.10.3.1.4 EQUITABLE OBLIGATIONS 2.10.3.1.5 ACTIONS DERIVED FROM THE LAW
OF PROPERTY 2.10.3.1.6 QUASI-CONTRACTUAL CLAIMS, OR OBLIGATIONS NOT
BASED ON WRONGS 2.10.3.1.7 PRODUCT LIABILITY 2.10.3.1.8 ARTICLES 5(1)
AND 5(3): CONCLUSIONS 2.10.3.1.9 THE HARMFUL EVENT 2.10.3.2 TABLE OF
CONTENTS XI DIRECT AND INDIRECT VICTIMS 2.10.3.2.1 CONSEQUENTIAL
LIABILITIES 2.10.3.2.2 THE HARMFUL EVENT: CONCLUSIONS 2.10.3.2.3 THE
PLACE WHERE THE HARMFUL EVENT OCCURRED 2.10.3.3 THE EVENT GIVING RISE TO
THE DAMAGE 2.10.3.3.1 THE DAMAGE 2.10.3.3.2 THE DAMAGE IN INDIVIDUAL
TORTS 2.10.3.3.3 DAMAGE IN A NUMBER OF CONTRACTING STATES 2.10.3.3.4
DAMAGE IN QUASI-CONTRACTUAL OR RESTITUTIONARY CLAIMS 2.10.3.3.5 FURTHER
LIMITATIONS UPON ARTICLE 5(3) 2.10.3.4 NO JURISDICTION OVER RELATED
CLAIMS 2.10.3.4.1 THREATENED OR ANTICIPATED TORTS 2.10.3.4.2
JURISDICTION OVER CIVIL CLAIMS IN CRIMINAL CASES: ARTICLE 5(4) 2.10.4
JURISDICTION OVER DEFENDANTS DEALING THROUGH BRANCHES AND AGENCIES:
ARTICLE 5(5) 2.10.5 BRANCH, AGENCY OR OTHER ESTABLISHMENT 2.10.5.1
DISPUTE ARISING FROM THE OPERATIONS OF THE BRANCH 2.10.5.2 JURISDICTION
OVER A TRUSTEE, BENEFICIARY OR SETTLOR SUED AS SUCH: ARTICLE 5(6) 2.10.6
JURISDICTION OVER SALVAGE CLAIMS: ARTICLE 5(7) 2.10.7 SPECIAL
JURISDICTION UNDER ARTICLE 6 2.10.8-11 JURISDICTION OVER CO-DEFENDANTS:
ARTICLE 6(1) 2.10.8 THE LINK BETWEEN THE CLAIMS MADE 2.10.8.1 A DUTY TO
ACCEPT JURISDICTION UNDER ARTICLE 6(1)? 2.10.8.2 JURISDICTION OVER THIRD
PARTY PROCEEDINGS: ARTICLE 6(2) 2.10.9 PRECONDITIONS FOR ARTICLE 6(2) TO
OPERATE 2.10.9.1 THE TYPES OF PROCEEDINGS WITHIN THE ARTICLE 2.10.9.2 A
DISCRETION TO DECLINE TO EXERCISE JURISDICTION? 2.10.9.3 JURISDICTION
OVER COUNTERCLAIMS: ARTICLE 6(3) 2.10.10 JURISDICTION OVER CONTRACTS
RELATING TO LAND: ARTICLE 6(4) 2.10.11 JURISDICTION TO LIMIT LIABILITY:
ARTICLE 6A 2.10.12 EXAMINING JURISDICTION (ARTICLES 19 AND 20); THE
EFFECT OF A LIS ALIBI PENDENS (ARTICLES 21-23); AND THE LUGANO
CONVENTION 2.11 EXAMINATION OF JURISDICTION: ARTICLES 19 AND 20 2.11.1
CHECKING FOR EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION: ARTICLE 19 2.11.1.1 EXAMINATION OF
JURISDICTION WHERE THE DEFENDANT DOES NOT APPEAR: ARTICLE 20 2.11.1.2
LIS ALIBI PENDENS: ARTICLES 21 TO 23 2.11.2 SAME CAUSE OF ACTION,
BETWEEN SAME PARTIES, IN ANOTHER CONTRACTING STATE: ARTICLE 21 2.11.2.1
GENERAL APPROACH TO ARTICLE 21 2.11.2.1.1 THE SAME CAUSE OF ACTION
2.11.2.1.2 THE SAME PARTIES 2.11.2.1.3 WHEN IS THE COURT SEISED?
2.11.2.1.4 WHAT IF THE COURT SEISED SECOND BELIEVES THAT IT HAS
JURISDICTION AND THAT THE COURT SEISED FIRST DOES NOT? 2.11.2.1.5 XII
TABLE OF CONTENTS WHAT IF THE COURT SEISED SECOND BELIEVES IT HAS
EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION, AND THE COURT SEISED FIRST DOES NOT? 2.11.2.1.6
RELATED ACTION IN ANOTHER CONTRACTING STATE: ARTICLE 22 2.11.2.2 RELATED
ACTIONS 2.11.2.2.1 STAYING PROCEEDINGS WHILE THE ACTION IS PENDING AT
FIRST INSTANCE 2.11.2.2.2 DECLINING JURISDICTION TO PERMIT CONSOLIDATION
ELSEWHERE: THE BETTER VIEW 2.11.2.2.3 DECLINING JURISDICTION: THE
LITERAL VIEW 2.11.2.2.4 MULTIPLE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTIONS: ARTICLE 23
2.11.2.3 DECLINING JURISDICTION BECAUSE OF THE LUGANO CONVENTION 2.11.3
7S THERE DISCRETION TO DECLINE TO EXERCISE JURISDICTION? 2.1 2 THE
GENERAL ARGUMENT THAT THE EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION IS MANDATORY 2.12.1
ANSWERS TO THESE ARGUMENTS 2.12.1.1 THE GENERAL CONTRARY ARGUMENT: THAT
THERE IS A DISCRETION TO STAY 2.12.2 THE PREFERRED VIEW: THAT THERE IS
NO GENERAL DISCRETION TO STAY 2.12.3 MORE APPROPRIATE FORUM IN ANOTHER
CONTRACTING STATE 2.12.3.1 DEFENDANT DOMICILED IN ENGLAND, NATURAL FORUM
IN A NON- CONTRACTING STATE 2.12.3.2 DEFENDANT NOT DOMICILED IN A
CONTRACTING STATE, NATURAL FORUM IN A NON-CONTRACTING STATE 2.12.3.3
CHOICE OF COURT CLAUSE FOR A NON-CONTRACTING STATE 2.12.3.4 TITLE TO
LAND IN A NON-CONTRACTING STATE 2.12.3.5 PRIOR PROCEEDINGS IN A
NON-CONTRACTING STATE 2.12.3.6 CONCLUSIONS 2.12.3.7 THE SCOPE OF THE
CONVENTION REVISITED 2.12.4 OTHER MEANS OF CIRCUMVENTING THE
JURISDICTIONAL RULES OF THE CONVENTION 2.12.5 INJUNCTION TO RESTRAIN THE
FOREIGN PLAINTIFF 2.12.5.1 DECLARATIONS OF NON-LIABILITY 2.12.5.2 3
JURISDICTION UNDER THE LUGANO CONVENTION DOES THE LUGANO CONVENTION
APPLY? SUMMARY OF THE APPROACH 3.1 THE RULES OF THE LUGANO CONVENTION
WHICH, IF THAT CONVENTION APPLIES, ALLOCATE JURISDICTION 3.2 THE SCOPE
OF THE CONVENTION 3.2.1 JURISDICTION FROM OTHER CONVENTIONS 3.2.2
EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION, REGARDLESS OF DOMICILE: ARTICLE 16 3.2.3 ENTRY
OF AN APPEARANCE: ARTICLE 18 3.2.4 INSURANCE CONTRACTS: ARTICLES 7-12A
3.2.5 CONSUMER CONTRACTS: ARTICLES 13-15 3.2.6 CHOICE OF COURT
AGREEMENTS: ARTICLE 17 3.2.7 TABLE OF CONTENTS IS THE DEFENDANT
DOMICILED IN THE UNITED KINGDOM, AND WITHIN IT, IN ENGLAND? ARTICLE 2
3.2.8 IS THE DEFENDANT DOMICILED IN A CONTRACTING STATE? ARTICLES 2, 52,
53 AND 4 3.2.9 SPECIAL JURISDICTION OVER DEFENDANTS DOMICILED IN EFTA
STATES: ARTICLES 5 AND 6 3.2.10 LIS ALIBI PENDENS: ARTICLES 21*23 3.2.11
WHY IS IT NECESSARY TO DEAL WITH THE LUGANO CONVENTION SEPARATELY? 3.3 A
SEPARATE CONVENTION 3.3.1 THE LUGANO CONVENTION IN THE FUTURE 3.3.2
INTERPRETATION OF THE LUGANO CONVENTION 3.4 ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS
UNDER THE LUGANO CONVENTION 3.5 4 THE COMMON LAW RULES OF JURISDICTION:
SPHERE OF APPLICATION THE COMMON LAW RULES OF JURISDICTION: SUMMARY 4.2
SERVICE WITHIN THE JURISDICTION 4.2.1 SERVICE OUT OF THE JURISDICTION
4.2.2 LIMITATIONS UPON COMMON LAW JURISDICTION 4.2.3 DISCRETIONARY STAYS
OF PROCEEDINGS COMMENCED AS OF RIGHT 4.3 SUMMARY, AND JUSTIFICATION
4.3.1 THE LAW STATED (I): STAYING PROCEEDINGS WHERE THERE IS NO PRIOR
CONTRACTUAL CHOICE OF COURT 4.3.2 THE FOREIGN FORUM IS CLEARLY AND
DISTINCTLY MORE APPROPRIATE 4.3.2.1 THE OVERRIDING INJUSTICE OF SENDING
THE PLAINTIFF TO THAT COURT 4.3.2.2 THE LAW ASSESSED 4.3.2.3 THE LAW
STATED (II): STAYING PROCEEDINGS WHERE THERE IS A PRIOR AGREEMENT UPON
CHOICE OF COURT 4.3.3 DOES THE AGREEMENT COVER THE PRESENT CASE? 4.3.3.1
STAYING UPON THE BASIS OF THE CLAUSE: ORTHODOXY 4.3.3.2 STAYING ON THE
BASIS OF THE CLAUSE: ANOTHER VIEW 4.3.3.3 FOUNDING JURISDICTION AT THE
DISCRETION OF THE COURT: SERVICE OUT OF THE JURISDICTION UNDER RSC ORDER
11 4.4 OUTLINE AND SUMMARY 4.4.1 THE CASES IN WHICH THERE IS
JURISDICTION TO GRANT LEAVE: THE HEADS OF ORDER 11, RULE 1(1) 4 - 4 -
2 XIV TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGLISH DOMICILED DEFENDANT: SUB-RULE (A)
4.4.2.1 INJUNCTIONS: SUB-RULE (B) 4.4.2.2 NECESSARY OR PROPER PARTY:
SUB-RULE (C) 4.4.2.3 CONTRACT CLAIMS (1): SUB-RULE (D) 4.4.2A THE RELIEF
4.4.2.4.1 A CONTRACT 4.4.2.4.2 TYPE OF CONTRACT 4.4.2.4.3 CONTRACT
CLAIMS (2): SUB-RULE (E) 4.4.2.5 TORTS: SUB-RULE (F) 4.4.2.6 A TORT
4.4.2.6.1 DAMAGE SUSTAINED 4.4.2.6.2 ACT COMMITTED 4.4.2.6.3 REAL
PROPERTY CLAIMS: SUB-RULES (G) AND (H) 4.4.2.7 DEBTS SECURED ON PROPERTY
WITHIN THE JURISDICTION: SUB-RULE (I) 4.4.2.8 TRUSTS: SUB-RULE (J)
4.4.2.9 ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATES: SUB-RULE (K) 4.4.2.10 PROBATE:
SUB-RULE (1) 4.4.2.11 ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS AND AWARDS: SUB-RULE (M)
4.4.2.12 TAXES: SUB-RULE (N) 4.4.2.13 CERTAIN EC LEVIES: SUB-RULE (P)
4.4.2.14 PARTICULAR STATUTES: SUB-RULES (O), (Q), (R), (S) 4.4.2.15
ACCOUNTS AND CONSTRUCTIVE TRUSTEESHIP: SUB-RULE (T) 4.4.2.16 STANDARD OF
PROOF FOR ORDER 11, RULE 1(1) 4.4.3 A PROPER CASE FOR SERVICE OUT OF THE
JURISDICTION 4.4.4 ENGLAND IS CLEARLY AND DISTINCTLY THE NATURAL FORUM
4.4.4.1 IF ENGLAND IS NOT THE NATURAL FORUM 4.4.4.1.1 IS IT UNJUST TO
REQUIRE THE DEFENDANT TO COME TO ENGLAND? 4.4.4.2 THE PLAINTIFF HAS A
GOOD ARGUABLE CASE ON THE MERITS OF THE CLAIM 4.4.4.3 WHY IS THE
STANDARD SO DEMANDING? SHOULD IT BE MORE SO? 4.4.4.4 THWARTING THE
PLAINTIFF WHO HAS COMMENCED PROCEEDINGS OVERSEAS (I): ANTI-SUIT
INJUNCTIONS 4.5 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 4.5.1 JURISDICTION OVER THE
OVERSEAS PLAINTIFF TO ORDER AN INJUNCTION 4.5.2 THE PRINCIPLES UPON
WHICH AN INJUNCTION IS ORDERED 4.5.3 BREACH OF LEGAL RIGHT NOT TO BE
SUED 4.5.3.1 AN EQUITABLE RIGHT NOT TO BE SUED 4.5.3.2 VEXATIOUS OR
OPPRESSIVE CONDUCT IN SUING IN THE FOREIGN COURT 4.5.3.2.1 WHERE THE
INJUNCTION PROTECTS THE JURISDICTION OF THE ENGLISH COURT 4.5.3.2.2
OTHER UNCONSCIONABLE ACTS 4.5.3.2.3 THE TIMING OF THE APPLICATION 4.5.4
BREACH OF AN ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTION 4.5.5 INJUNCTIONS: THE IMPACT OF THE
BRUSSELS AND LUGANO CONVENTIONS 4.5.6 INJUNCTIONS: CRITIQUE AND FURTHER
DEVELOPMENT 4.5.7 THWARTING THE PLAINTIFF WHO HAS COMMENCED PROCEEDINGS
OVERSEAS (II): PROCEEDINGS IN ENGLNAD FOR A DECLARATION OF NON-LIABILITY
4.6 TABLE OF CONTENTS JURISDICTION TO MAKE A DECLARATION OF
NON-LIABILITY MAKING THE DECLARATION: SUBSTANTIVE LAW THE AUTHORITIES
ANALYSIS NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS: THE IMPACT OF THE BRUSSELS AND LUGANO
CONVENTIONS JURISDICTION SUBSTANTIVE LAW 4.6.1 4.6.2 4.6.2.1 4.6.2.2
4.6.3 4.6.3.1 4.6.3.2 5 PROCEDURAL LAW: SERVICE OF WRITS, AND
CHALLENGING JURISDICTION SERVICE OF PROCESS 5.1 TIME OF SERVICE 5.1.1
MANNER OF SERVICE: TYPES OF DEFENDANT 5.1.2 UPON AN INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANT
5.1.2.1 UPON A PARTNERSHIP 5.1.2.2 UPON A CORPORATION 5.1.2.3 METHOD OF
SERVICE OUT OF THE JURISDICTION 5.1.3 CHALLENGING JURISDICTION:
PROCEDURAL LAW 5.2 GENERAL 5.2.1 TECHNICAL JURISDICTION 5.2.2 IGNORING
SERVICE OF THE WRIT 5.2.3 CHALLENGING THE JURISDICTION OF THE ENGLISH
COURT 5.2.4 THE PROCEDURE OF THE CHALLENGE 5.2.4.1 GROUNDS FOR THE
CHALLENGE 5.2.4.2 SHOULD THE DEFENDANT SEEK A STAY OF PROCEEDINGS?
5.2.4.3 SHOULD THE DEFENDANT SEEK TO STRIKE OUT THE CLAIM ON SUBSTANTIVE
GROUNDS? 5.2.4.4 CONTESTING THE JURISDICTION: CONCLUSIONS 5.2.5 6
INTERIM RELIEF, LOCAL AND OVERSEAS INTERIM RELIEF FROM THE ENGLISH
COURTS 6.1 GRANTING INTERIM RELIEF WHERE THE ENGLISH COURT HAS AND WILL
EXERCISE JURISDICTION OVER THE DISPUTE 6. 2 GRANTING INTERIM RELIEF
WHERE ENGLISH COURTS MAY NOT EXERCISE JURISDICTION OVER THE DISPUTE 6.3
XVI TABLE OF CONTENTS WHERE THE PROCEEDINGS ARE IN ANOTHER CONTRACTING
STATE 6.3.1 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS 6.3.1.1 SERVICE OF THE WRIT CLAIMING
THE RELIEF 6.3.1.2 WHERE THE PROCEEDINGS ARE IN A NON-CONTRACTING STATE
6.3.2 INTERIM RELIEF FROM THE COURTS OF OTHER CONTRACTING STATES 6.4
INTERIM RELIEF FROM THE COURTS OF A NON-CONTRACTING STATE 6.5 INTERIM
RELIEF IN ADMIRALTY PROCEEDINGS 6.6 7 THE RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF
FOREIGN JUDGMENTS THE VARIOUS SCHEMES FOR THE RECOGNITION AND
ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS; AND THEIR INTER-RELATIONSHIP 7.1
RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT UNDER THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION: JUDGMENTS
FROM EC COURTS 7.2 GENERAL 7.2.1 RECOGNITION OF THE JUDGMENT: THE ORDER
OF ENQUIRY 7.2.2 THE SUBJECT MATTER SCOPE OF THE CONVENTION: ARTICLE 1
7.2.2.1 WAS THE CONVENTION IN FORCE IN BOTH COURTS WHEN THE PROCEEDINGS
WERE INSTITUTED? ARTICLE 54 7.2.2.2 HAD THE CONVENTION COME INTO FORCE
IN BOTH STATES BY THE TIME JUDGMENT WAS GIVEN? ARTICLE 54 7.2.2.3 IS THE
ORDER A JUDGMENT FROM A COURT? ARTICLE 25 7.2.2.4 OBJECTIONS TO THE
JURISDICTION OF THE ADJUDICATING COURT: ARTICLE 28 7.2.2.5 WHERE IT IS
ALLEGED THAT THE ADJUDICATING COURT TOOK JURISDICTION IN VIOLATION OF
THE INSURANCE CONTRACT, CONSUMER CONTRACT, OR ARTICLE 16 PROVISIONS
7.2.2.5.1 WHERE A TREATY ENTERED INTO UNDER ARTICLE 59 APPLIES 7.2.2.5.2
THE JUDGMENT FALLS TO BE RECOGNISED UNDER THE TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS
SET OUT IN SECTION 7.2.2.3 7.2.2.5.3 SUBSTANTIVE DEFENCES TO
RECOGNITION: ARTICLE 27 7.2.2.6 WHERE RECOGNITION WOULD BE CONTRARY TO
PUBLIC POLICY 7.2.2.6.1 CERTAIN CASES OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT 7.2.2.6.2
CONTRACTING STATE JUDGMENT IRRECONCILABLE WITH JUDGMENT IN STATE IN
WHICH RECOGNITION IS SOUGHT 7.2.2.6.3 THE ADJUDICATING COURT HAS
ANSWERED A PRELIMINARY QUESTION WITHIN ARTICLE 1(1) IN A WAY
INCONSISTENT WITH THE LAW OF THE COURT IN WHICH RECOGNITION IS SOUGHT
7.2.2.6.4 THE CONTRACTING STATE JUDGMENT IS IRRECONCILABLE WITH A PRIOR
NON-CONTRACTING STATE JUDGMENT WHICH INVOLVES THE SAME CAUSE OF ACTION,
IS BETWEEN THE SAME PARTIES, AND WHICH IS ENTITLED TO BE RECOGNISED
7.2.2.6.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENFORCING A JUDGMENT ENTITLED TO RECOGNITION
7.2.3 APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION 7.2.3.1 AFTER THE INITIAL APPLICATION
FOR REGISTRATION HAS BEEN DETERMINED 7.2.3.2 AFTER THE FINAL
DETERMINATION OF ANY APPEAL(S) 7.2.3.3 MISCELLANEOUS FURTHER POINTS
7.2.3.4 RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT UNDER THE LUGANO CONVENTION 7.3
RECOGNITION, AND ENFORCEMENT BY ACTION, OF JUDGMENTS UNDER THE COMMON
LAW (AND BY REGISTRATION UNDER THE STATUTES OF 1920 AND 1933) 7.4
GENERAL 7.4.1 ENTITLEMENT TO RECOGNITION: THE JURISDICTIONAL COMPETENCE
OF THE FOREIGN COURT: JUDGMENTS IN PERSONAM 7.4.2 DEFENDANT PRESENT
WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE COURT 7.4.2.1 DEFENDANT SUBMITTED TO THE
JURISDICTION 7.4.2.2 SUBMISSION BY VOLUNTARY APPEARANCE 7.4.2.2.1
SUBMISSION BY AGREEMENT 7.4.2.2.2 SUBMISSION (TO A COUNTERCLAIM) BY
BEING PLAINTIFF 7.4.2.2.3 NO OTHER BASIS OF JURISDICTION IS YET
RECOGNISED AT COMMON LAW 7.4.2.3 ENTITLEMENT TO RECOGNITION:
JURISDICTIONAL COMPETENCE OF THE FOREIGN COURT: ACTIONS IN REM 7.4.3
DEFENCES TO RECOGNITION (OTHER THAN LACK OF JURISDICTION) 7.4.4 BREACH
OF AN ARBITRATION/CHOICE OF COURT CLAUSE 7.4.4.1 JUDGMENT OBTAINED BY
FRAUD 7.4.4.2 JUDGMENT CONTRARY TO NATURAL (OR SUBSTANTIAL?) JUSTICE
7.4.4.3 RECOGNITION CONTRARY TO PUBLIC POLICY 7.4.4.4 JUDGMENT
INCONSISTENT WITH A PRIOR ENGLISH JUDGMENT 7.4.4.5 NO OTHER DEFENCES TO
RECOGNITION? 7.4.4.6 ACTUAL RECOGNITION FOR THE DEFENDANT, ENFORCEMENT
FOR THE PLAINTIFF 7.4.5 ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS AT THE SUIT OF THE
PLAINTIFF 7.4.5.1 FINAL AND CONCLUSIVE UPON THE MERITS 7.4.5.1.1
JUDGMENT FOR A FIXED SUM OF MONEY 7.4.5.1.2 NOT TO ENFORCE A FOREIGN
PENAL/REVENUE/PUBLIC LAW 7.4.5.1.3 JUDGMENT CONTRARY TO PROTECTION OF
TRADING INTERESTS ACT 1980 7.4.5.1.4 ACTUAL RECOGNITION OF JUDGMENTS FOR
THE DEFENDANT 7.4.5.2 PROCEDURE FOR ENFORCEMENT OR RECOGNITION AT COMMON
LAW 7.4.5.3 ENFORCEMENT BY REGISTRATION UNDER STATUTE: THE 1920 AND 1933
ACTS 7.4.6 JUDGMENTS COVERED BY THE 1920 ACT 7.4.6.1 GENERAL SCOPE
7.4.6.1.1 JURISDICTIONAL COMPETENCE 7.4.6.1.2 SUBSTANTIVE DEFENCES
7.4.6.1.3 REGISTRATION MAY BE OBTAINED EX PARTE 7.4.6.1.4 JUDGMENTS
COVERED BY THE 1933 ACT 7.4.6.2 GENERAL SCOPE 7.4.6.2.1 JURISDICTIONAL
COMPETENCE 7.4.6.2.2 SUBSTANTIVE DEFENCES 7.4.6.2.3 PROCEDURE 7.4.6.2.4
XVIII TABLE OF CONTENTS UNITED KINGDOM JUDGMENTS 7.5 MISCELLANEOUS FINAL
POINTS RELATING TO THE RECOGNITION OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS 7.6 SOVEREIGN
IMMUNITY 7.6.1 COMMUNITY JUDGMENTS 7.6.2 OTHER CONVENTIONS 7.6.3 8
ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION: AN OUTLINE INTRODUCTION 8.1 ACTIONS IN PERSONAM
AND ACTIONS IN REM 8.2 THE ACTION IN REM IS BROUGHT AGAINST A RES 8.2.1
THE DEFINITION OF A RES 8.2.2 THE MANNER OF SERVICE 8.2.3 SERVICE IS
SUFFICIENT TO FOUND JURISDICTION 8.2.4 ARRESTING THE RES 8.2.5
INTERNATIONAL MARITIME CONVENTIONS 8. 3 THE ARREST CONVENTION 8.3.1
JURISDICTION BASED UPON ARREST 8.3.1.1 MARITIME CLAIMS 8.3.1.2 THE
COLLISION CONVENTION 8.3.2 THE EFFECT OF THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION 8.4 THE
BRUSSELS CONVENTION AND THE ADMIRALTY ACTION IN REM 8.5 THE FIRST ISSUE:
DEFENDANT DOMICILED IN A BRUSSELS CONVENTION STATE 8.5.1 THE SECOND
ISSUE: PROCEEDINGS FIRST COMMENCED IN ANOTHER CON TRACING STATE 8.5.2
THE THIRD ISSUE: THE MEANING OF FIRST SEISED 8.5.3 INTERIM RELIEF IF
AN ACTION IS STAYED 8.6 9 CIVIL AVIATION JURISDICTION: AN OUTLINE
INTRODUCTION 9.1 DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE BY AIR 9.2 TABLE OF
CONTENTS BACKGROUND 9,2.1 APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTIONS 9.2.2
INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE 9.2.2.1 THE CONVENTIONS AND THEIR APPLICATION IN
UNITED KINGDOM LAW 9.2.2.2 THE CARRIAGE BY AIR ACT (APPLICATION OF
PROVISIONS) ORDER 1967 (THE 1967 ORDER ) 9.2.2.3 JURISDICTION UNDER
WARSAW AND WARSAW/HAGUE 9.2.3 JURISDICTION UNDER THE UNITED KINGDOM
DOMESTIC RULES 9.2.4 CARRIAGE BY AIR AND THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION 9.2.5
ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION 9.2.6 AVIATION INSURANCE 9.3 NAVIGATION SERVICE
CHARGES 9.4 ACTION TO ENFORCE CHARGES 9.4.1 FOREIGN JUDGMENTS 9.4.2
DETENTION OF AIRCRAFT 9.4.3 CIVIL AVIATION REGULATION 9.5 AVIATION
SECURITY 9.6 PAGE APPENDIX I TEXT OF THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION AS AMENDED
UPON THE ACCESSION OF GREECE, AND SPAIN AND PORTUGAL ( THE POST-SAN
SEBASTIAN CONVENTION ) 305 APPENDIX II CONVENTION COMMENCEMENT DATES 333
APPENDIX III FIGURES 335 FIGURE 1: WHETHER THE ENGLISH COURT HAS
JURISDICTION TO DETERMINE A MATTER SOUGHT TO BE BROUGHT BEFORE IT 336
FIGURE 2: WHETHER A FOREIGN JUDGMENT MAY BE RECOGNISED AND ENFORCED IN
ENGLAND 337 INDEX 339
|
any_adam_object | 1 |
author | Briggs, Adrian |
author_facet | Briggs, Adrian |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Briggs, Adrian |
author_variant | a b ab |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV009806180 |
callnumber-first | K - Law |
callnumber-label | KD7121 |
callnumber-raw | KD7121.5 |
callnumber-search | KD7121.5 |
callnumber-sort | KD 47121.5 |
callnumber-subject | KD - United Kingdom and Ireland |
classification_rvk | PT 425 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)29329937 (DE-599)BVBBV009806180 |
dewey-full | 341.78026 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 341 - Law of nations |
dewey-raw | 341.78026 |
dewey-search | 341.78026 |
dewey-sort | 3341.78026 |
dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02047nam a2200493 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV009806180</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20190709 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">940916s1993 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1850445001</subfield><subfield code="9">1-85044-500-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)29329937</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV009806180</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KD7121.5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">341.78026</subfield><subfield code="2">20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PT 425</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139896:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Briggs, Adrian</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Norton Rose on civil jurisdiction and judgments</subfield><subfield code="c">by Adrian Briggs</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">London u.a.</subfield><subfield code="b">Lloyd's of London Press</subfield><subfield code="c">1993</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XXXIV, 349 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Common law</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europees bevoegdheids- en executieverdrag</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verdrag betreffende de rechterlijke bevoegdheid en de tenuitvoerlegging van beslissingen in burgerlijke en handelszaken van 1988</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judgments, Foreign</subfield><subfield code="z">European Economic Community countries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judgments, Foreign</subfield><subfield code="z">Great Britain</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judicial assistance</subfield><subfield code="z">European Economic Community countries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judicial assistance</subfield><subfield code="z">Great Britain</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Jurisdiction</subfield><subfield code="z">European Economic Community countries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Jurisdiction</subfield><subfield code="z">Great Britain</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internationales Zivilprozessrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4114041-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Europäische Gemeinschaften. Mitgliedsstaaten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Großbritannien</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">England</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4014770-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">England</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4014770-8</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Internationales Zivilprozessrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4114041-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">GBV Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=006489439&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-006489439</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | Europäische Gemeinschaften. Mitgliedsstaaten Großbritannien England (DE-588)4014770-8 gnd |
geographic_facet | Europäische Gemeinschaften. Mitgliedsstaaten Großbritannien England |
id | DE-604.BV009806180 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T17:41:12Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 1850445001 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-006489439 |
oclc_num | 29329937 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-20 |
owner_facet | DE-20 |
physical | XXXIV, 349 S. |
publishDate | 1993 |
publishDateSearch | 1993 |
publishDateSort | 1993 |
publisher | Lloyd's of London Press |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Briggs, Adrian Verfasser aut Norton Rose on civil jurisdiction and judgments by Adrian Briggs London u.a. Lloyd's of London Press 1993 XXXIV, 349 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Common law gtt Europees bevoegdheids- en executieverdrag gtt Verdrag betreffende de rechterlijke bevoegdheid en de tenuitvoerlegging van beslissingen in burgerlijke en handelszaken van 1988 gtt Judgments, Foreign European Economic Community countries Judgments, Foreign Great Britain Judicial assistance European Economic Community countries Judicial assistance Great Britain Jurisdiction European Economic Community countries Jurisdiction Great Britain Internationales Zivilprozessrecht (DE-588)4114041-2 gnd rswk-swf Europäische Gemeinschaften. Mitgliedsstaaten Großbritannien England (DE-588)4014770-8 gnd rswk-swf England (DE-588)4014770-8 g Internationales Zivilprozessrecht (DE-588)4114041-2 s DE-604 GBV Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=006489439&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
spellingShingle | Briggs, Adrian Norton Rose on civil jurisdiction and judgments Common law gtt Europees bevoegdheids- en executieverdrag gtt Verdrag betreffende de rechterlijke bevoegdheid en de tenuitvoerlegging van beslissingen in burgerlijke en handelszaken van 1988 gtt Judgments, Foreign European Economic Community countries Judgments, Foreign Great Britain Judicial assistance European Economic Community countries Judicial assistance Great Britain Jurisdiction European Economic Community countries Jurisdiction Great Britain Internationales Zivilprozessrecht (DE-588)4114041-2 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4114041-2 (DE-588)4014770-8 |
title | Norton Rose on civil jurisdiction and judgments |
title_auth | Norton Rose on civil jurisdiction and judgments |
title_exact_search | Norton Rose on civil jurisdiction and judgments |
title_full | Norton Rose on civil jurisdiction and judgments by Adrian Briggs |
title_fullStr | Norton Rose on civil jurisdiction and judgments by Adrian Briggs |
title_full_unstemmed | Norton Rose on civil jurisdiction and judgments by Adrian Briggs |
title_short | Norton Rose on civil jurisdiction and judgments |
title_sort | norton rose on civil jurisdiction and judgments |
topic | Common law gtt Europees bevoegdheids- en executieverdrag gtt Verdrag betreffende de rechterlijke bevoegdheid en de tenuitvoerlegging van beslissingen in burgerlijke en handelszaken van 1988 gtt Judgments, Foreign European Economic Community countries Judgments, Foreign Great Britain Judicial assistance European Economic Community countries Judicial assistance Great Britain Jurisdiction European Economic Community countries Jurisdiction Great Britain Internationales Zivilprozessrecht (DE-588)4114041-2 gnd |
topic_facet | Common law Europees bevoegdheids- en executieverdrag Verdrag betreffende de rechterlijke bevoegdheid en de tenuitvoerlegging van beslissingen in burgerlijke en handelszaken van 1988 Judgments, Foreign European Economic Community countries Judgments, Foreign Great Britain Judicial assistance European Economic Community countries Judicial assistance Great Britain Jurisdiction European Economic Community countries Jurisdiction Great Britain Internationales Zivilprozessrecht Europäische Gemeinschaften. Mitgliedsstaaten Großbritannien England |
url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=006489439&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT briggsadrian nortonroseonciviljurisdictionandjudgments |