Mechanizing proof theory: resource-aware logics and proof-transformations to extract implicit information
Abstract: "Few systems for mechanical proof-checking have been used so far to transform formal proofs rather than to formalize informal arguments and to verify correctness. The unwinding of proofs, namely, the process of applying lemmata and extracting explicit values for the parameters within...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Stanford, Calif.
1990
|
Schriftenreihe: | Stanford University / Computer Science Department: Report STAN CS
1319 |
Schlagworte: | |
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract: "Few systems for mechanical proof-checking have been used so far to transform formal proofs rather than to formalize informal arguments and to verify correctness. The unwinding of proofs, namely, the process of applying lemmata and extracting explicit values for the parameters within a proof, is an obvious candidate for mechanization. It corresponds to the procedures of Cut-elimination and functional interpretation in proof-theory and allows the extraction of the constructive content of a proof, sometimes yielding information useful in mathematics and in computing Resource-aware logics restrict the number of times an assumption may be used in a proof and are of interest for proof-checking not only in relation to their decidability or computational complexity, but also because they efficiently solve the practical problem of representing the structure of relevance in a derivation. In particular, in Direct Logic only one subformula-occurrence of the input is allowed, and the connections established during a successful proof-verification can be represented on the input without altering it. In addition, the values for the parameters obtained from unwinding are read off directly In Linear Logic, where classical logic is regarded as the limit of a resource-aware logic, long-standing issues in proof-theory have been successfully attacked. We are particularly interested in the system of proof-nets as a multiple-conclusion Natural Deduction system for Linear Logic. In Part I of this thesis we present a new set of tools that provide a systematic and uniform approach to different resource-aware logics. In particular, we obtain uniqueness of the normal form for Multiplicative and Additive Linear Logic (sections 3 and 4) and an extension of Direct Logic of interest for nonmonotonic reasoning (section 8) |
Beschreibung: | Zugl.: Stanford, Calif., Univ., Diss. |
Beschreibung: | 231 S. |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV008950012 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 940206s1990 m||| 00||| eng d | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)24022996 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV008950012 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
100 | 1 | |a Bellin, Gianluigi |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Mechanizing proof theory |b resource-aware logics and proof-transformations to extract implicit information |
264 | 1 | |a Stanford, Calif. |c 1990 | |
300 | |a 231 S. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a Stanford University / Computer Science Department: Report STAN CS |v 1319 | |
500 | |a Zugl.: Stanford, Calif., Univ., Diss. | ||
520 | 3 | |a Abstract: "Few systems for mechanical proof-checking have been used so far to transform formal proofs rather than to formalize informal arguments and to verify correctness. The unwinding of proofs, namely, the process of applying lemmata and extracting explicit values for the parameters within a proof, is an obvious candidate for mechanization. It corresponds to the procedures of Cut-elimination and functional interpretation in proof-theory and allows the extraction of the constructive content of a proof, sometimes yielding information useful in mathematics and in computing | |
520 | 3 | |a Resource-aware logics restrict the number of times an assumption may be used in a proof and are of interest for proof-checking not only in relation to their decidability or computational complexity, but also because they efficiently solve the practical problem of representing the structure of relevance in a derivation. In particular, in Direct Logic only one subformula-occurrence of the input is allowed, and the connections established during a successful proof-verification can be represented on the input without altering it. In addition, the values for the parameters obtained from unwinding are read off directly | |
520 | 3 | |a In Linear Logic, where classical logic is regarded as the limit of a resource-aware logic, long-standing issues in proof-theory have been successfully attacked. We are particularly interested in the system of proof-nets as a multiple-conclusion Natural Deduction system for Linear Logic. In Part I of this thesis we present a new set of tools that provide a systematic and uniform approach to different resource-aware logics. In particular, we obtain uniqueness of the normal form for Multiplicative and Additive Linear Logic (sections 3 and 4) and an extension of Direct Logic of interest for nonmonotonic reasoning (section 8) | |
650 | 4 | |a Logic, Symbolic and mathematical | |
650 | 4 | |a Proof theory | |
655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
810 | 2 | |a Computer Science Department: Report STAN CS |t Stanford University |v 1319 |w (DE-604)BV008928280 |9 1319 | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-005905616 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804123283235274752 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Bellin, Gianluigi |
author_facet | Bellin, Gianluigi |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Bellin, Gianluigi |
author_variant | g b gb |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV008950012 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)24022996 (DE-599)BVBBV008950012 |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02948nam a2200337 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV008950012</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">940206s1990 m||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)24022996</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV008950012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bellin, Gianluigi</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Mechanizing proof theory</subfield><subfield code="b">resource-aware logics and proof-transformations to extract implicit information</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Stanford, Calif.</subfield><subfield code="c">1990</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">231 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stanford University / Computer Science Department: Report STAN CS</subfield><subfield code="v">1319</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zugl.: Stanford, Calif., Univ., Diss.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract: "Few systems for mechanical proof-checking have been used so far to transform formal proofs rather than to formalize informal arguments and to verify correctness. The unwinding of proofs, namely, the process of applying lemmata and extracting explicit values for the parameters within a proof, is an obvious candidate for mechanization. It corresponds to the procedures of Cut-elimination and functional interpretation in proof-theory and allows the extraction of the constructive content of a proof, sometimes yielding information useful in mathematics and in computing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Resource-aware logics restrict the number of times an assumption may be used in a proof and are of interest for proof-checking not only in relation to their decidability or computational complexity, but also because they efficiently solve the practical problem of representing the structure of relevance in a derivation. In particular, in Direct Logic only one subformula-occurrence of the input is allowed, and the connections established during a successful proof-verification can be represented on the input without altering it. In addition, the values for the parameters obtained from unwinding are read off directly</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In Linear Logic, where classical logic is regarded as the limit of a resource-aware logic, long-standing issues in proof-theory have been successfully attacked. We are particularly interested in the system of proof-nets as a multiple-conclusion Natural Deduction system for Linear Logic. In Part I of this thesis we present a new set of tools that provide a systematic and uniform approach to different resource-aware logics. In particular, we obtain uniqueness of the normal form for Multiplicative and Additive Linear Logic (sections 3 and 4) and an extension of Direct Logic of interest for nonmonotonic reasoning (section 8)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Logic, Symbolic and mathematical</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Proof theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="810" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computer Science Department: Report STAN CS</subfield><subfield code="t">Stanford University</subfield><subfield code="v">1319</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV008928280</subfield><subfield code="9">1319</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-005905616</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
genre | (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content |
genre_facet | Hochschulschrift |
id | DE-604.BV008950012 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T17:27:18Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-005905616 |
oclc_num | 24022996 |
open_access_boolean | |
physical | 231 S. |
publishDate | 1990 |
publishDateSearch | 1990 |
publishDateSort | 1990 |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Stanford University / Computer Science Department: Report STAN CS |
spelling | Bellin, Gianluigi Verfasser aut Mechanizing proof theory resource-aware logics and proof-transformations to extract implicit information Stanford, Calif. 1990 231 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Stanford University / Computer Science Department: Report STAN CS 1319 Zugl.: Stanford, Calif., Univ., Diss. Abstract: "Few systems for mechanical proof-checking have been used so far to transform formal proofs rather than to formalize informal arguments and to verify correctness. The unwinding of proofs, namely, the process of applying lemmata and extracting explicit values for the parameters within a proof, is an obvious candidate for mechanization. It corresponds to the procedures of Cut-elimination and functional interpretation in proof-theory and allows the extraction of the constructive content of a proof, sometimes yielding information useful in mathematics and in computing Resource-aware logics restrict the number of times an assumption may be used in a proof and are of interest for proof-checking not only in relation to their decidability or computational complexity, but also because they efficiently solve the practical problem of representing the structure of relevance in a derivation. In particular, in Direct Logic only one subformula-occurrence of the input is allowed, and the connections established during a successful proof-verification can be represented on the input without altering it. In addition, the values for the parameters obtained from unwinding are read off directly In Linear Logic, where classical logic is regarded as the limit of a resource-aware logic, long-standing issues in proof-theory have been successfully attacked. We are particularly interested in the system of proof-nets as a multiple-conclusion Natural Deduction system for Linear Logic. In Part I of this thesis we present a new set of tools that provide a systematic and uniform approach to different resource-aware logics. In particular, we obtain uniqueness of the normal form for Multiplicative and Additive Linear Logic (sections 3 and 4) and an extension of Direct Logic of interest for nonmonotonic reasoning (section 8) Logic, Symbolic and mathematical Proof theory (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content Computer Science Department: Report STAN CS Stanford University 1319 (DE-604)BV008928280 1319 |
spellingShingle | Bellin, Gianluigi Mechanizing proof theory resource-aware logics and proof-transformations to extract implicit information Logic, Symbolic and mathematical Proof theory |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4113937-9 |
title | Mechanizing proof theory resource-aware logics and proof-transformations to extract implicit information |
title_auth | Mechanizing proof theory resource-aware logics and proof-transformations to extract implicit information |
title_exact_search | Mechanizing proof theory resource-aware logics and proof-transformations to extract implicit information |
title_full | Mechanizing proof theory resource-aware logics and proof-transformations to extract implicit information |
title_fullStr | Mechanizing proof theory resource-aware logics and proof-transformations to extract implicit information |
title_full_unstemmed | Mechanizing proof theory resource-aware logics and proof-transformations to extract implicit information |
title_short | Mechanizing proof theory |
title_sort | mechanizing proof theory resource aware logics and proof transformations to extract implicit information |
title_sub | resource-aware logics and proof-transformations to extract implicit information |
topic | Logic, Symbolic and mathematical Proof theory |
topic_facet | Logic, Symbolic and mathematical Proof theory Hochschulschrift |
volume_link | (DE-604)BV008928280 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bellingianluigi mechanizingprooftheoryresourceawarelogicsandprooftransformationstoextractimplicitinformation |