An essay on philosophical method:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford
Clarendon
1950
|
| Ausgabe: | Repr. |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | NST: Philosophical method |
| Beschreibung: | XII,226 S. |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV008934109 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20050915 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 940206s1950 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)10427399 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV008934109 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-29 |a DE-19 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a BD241 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 112 | |
| 084 | |a CC 1000 |0 (DE-625)17602: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a CI 6396 |0 (DE-625)18523:11798 |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Collingwood, Robin G. |d 1889-1943 |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)118676636 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a An essay on philosophical method |c by R. G. Collingwood |
| 250 | |a Repr. | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Oxford |b Clarendon |c 1950 | |
| 300 | |a XII,226 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a NST: Philosophical method | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Filosofia |2 larpcal | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Filosofie |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Methodologie |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Methode | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Philosophie | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Methodology | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Philosophie |0 (DE-588)4045791-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Methode |0 (DE-588)4038971-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Philosophie |0 (DE-588)4045791-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Methode |0 (DE-588)4038971-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m SWB Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=005892090&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-005892090 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804123263584960512 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | IMAGE 1
C O N T E N TS
I. I N T R O D U C T I ON
THE PROBLEM
1. PHILOSOPHY MUST RAISE THE QUESTION WHAT PHILOSOPHY IS . I 2. THREE
SUGGESTED WAYS OF APPROACHING THIS QUESTION . 2
3. THE WAY TO BE FOLLOWED HERE: AN ACCOUNT OF PHILOSOPHICAL METHOD . . .
. .. 3
4. IMPORTANCE OF THIS SUBJECT AT THE PRESENT TIME . . 4
THE METHOD
5. NECESSITY OF RESTRICTING THE SUBJECT UNDER DISCUSSION . 7 6.
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE COMPARISON BETWEEN PHILOSOPHICAL AND SCIENTIFIC
THOUGHT . . . . * 9
HISTORICAL ILLUSTRATIONS
7. SOCRATES
8. PLATO .
9. DESCARTES
10. KANT .
10
11 16 19
II. T HE O V E R L AP OF C L A S S ES
THE THEORY OF CLASSIFICATION IN FORMAL LOGIC
1. THE TRADITIONAL THEORY OF CLASSIFICATION . . . 26
2. ITS APPLICATION IN EXACT (MATHEMATICAL) SCIENCE . . 29
3. ITS APPLICATION IN EMPIRICAL SCIENCE . . 30
THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF A P P L Y I NG IT RIGIDLY TO P H I L O SOPHICAL
CONCEPTS
4. SPECIFIC CLASSES HERE OVERLAP ONE ANOTHER . 31
5. THIS FACT LONG RECOGNIZED IN CERTAIN CASES . - 32
6. THE CASE OF CONCEPTS HAVING A PHILOSOPHICAL AND A NONPHILOSOPHICAL
PHASE . . - 33
7. THE OVERLAP OF CLASSES IN LOGIC . . - 36
8. THE.OVERLAP OF CLASSES IN ETHICS . . » 41
9. SIGNIFICANCE OF THESE FACTS: THE READER INVITED TO ADMIT THEIR
GENUINENESS FOR THE SAKE OF ARGUMENT . . 43
IMAGE 2
C O N T E N TS
CONSEQUENCES FOR PHILOSOPHICAL METHOD
10. METHODS PROPER TO SCIENCE (EXACT OR EMPIRICAL) INAPPLI CABLE IN
PHILOSOPHY, OWING TO THE OVERLAP OF CLASSES . 46 11 . T HE FALLACY OF
PRECARIOUS MARGINS . . » 47
12. THE FALLACY OF IDENTIFIED COINCIDENTS . . . 48
13. THEIR COMMON GROUND: THE FALLACY OF FALSE DISJUNCTION . 49 14. THE
FIRST RULE OF PHILOSOPHICAL METHOD: ! M FIEV TO O UR 6 ... A
DISTINCTION WITHOUT A DIFFERENCE* . - 49
15. COROLLARIES OF THIS RULE, ( A) THE OBJECT OF PHILOSOPHICAL THOUGHT
CANNOT BE A CLASSIFICATORY SYSTEM . . 50
16. ( B) NOR YET AN AGGREGATE, I.E. A WHOLE OF SEPARABLE PARTS. 51 17.
THESE COROLLARIES TO BE UNDERSTOOD ONLY AS WARNINGS AGAINST UNADVISEDLY
ASSUMING THE OPPOSITE . - 52
III. T HE S C A LE OF F O R MS
§ I. PRELIMINARY SKETCH OF THE IDEA
1 . THE SPECIES OF A PHILOSOPHICAL GENUS DO NOT DIFTER MERELY IN DEGREE
. . . . . 54
2. NOR MERELY IN KIND . . . . 55
3. PHILOSOPHY IS INTERESTED IN CASES WHERE THESE TWO ARE COMBINED . . .
. 56
4. T HE SCALE OF FORMS: ITS PLACE IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY 57 5.
SUCH SCALES OCCUR BOTH IN PHILOSOPHY AND ELSEWHERE . 59 6. BUT IN A
PHILOSOPHICAL SCALE OF FORMS THE VARIABLE IS IDENTICAL WITH THE GENERIC
ESSENCE . . . 60
§ 2. TWO DIFFICULTIES 7. (I) THIS IDENTIFICATION SEEMS NONSENSICAL . .
61
8. (II) T HE SCALE, AS HITHERTO DESCRIBED, ACCOUNTS ONLY FOR AN OVERLAP
BETWEEN OPPOSITES, NOT DISTINCTS . . 63
9. IT WOULD FOLLOW THAT PHILOSOPHICAL SPECIFICATION IS BY OPPOSITION,
NON-PHILOSOPHICAL BY DISTINCTION . . 64
10. CONSEQUENCES OF THIS. IT DISINTEGRATES A PHILOSOPHICAL SCALE OF
FORMS, REQUIRING US TO JETTISON ALL INTERMEDIATE TERMS AND KEEP ONLY THE
EXTREMES . . » 65
11. IT REQUIRES US TO JETTISON ALL DISTINCTIONS BETWEEN ONE
PHILOSOPHICAL CONCEPT AND ANOTHER . . . 66
12. IT DISINTEGRATES A NON-PHILOSOPHICAL SCALE OF FORMS, AND CLAIMS ITS
EXTREMES FOR PHILOSOPHY . . » 67
13. FINALLY IT LEADS TO A FATAL DILEMMA CONCERNING THE RELATION BETWEEN
OPPOSITION AND DISTINCTION . . . 68
VI
§3-
IMAGE 3
C O N T E N TS VII
§ 3. DEGREE AND K I N D: OPPOSITION AND DISTINCTION 14. IN PHILOSOPHY
THERE ARE DIFFERENCES OF DEGREE, BUT WE CAN NOT MEASURE THEM . . . . .
69
15. THIS IS BECAUSE THEY ARE FUSED IN A PECULIAR WAY WITH DIFFERENCES OF
KIND . . . 71
16. SUCH A FUSION FOLLOWS FROM THE PRINCIPLE OF OVERLAPPING CLASSES . .
.. . . 74
17. THERE IS A SIMILAR FUSION OF OPPOSITION AND DISTINCTION . 74 18.
THIS ALSO FOLLOWS FROM THE OVERLAP OF CLASSES . . 76
19. SUMMARY: IN PHILOSOPHY THERE IS A FUSION (A) OF DIFFERENCES IN
DEGREE WITH DIFFERENCES IN KIND, (B) OF RELATIONS OF OPPOSITION WITH
RELATIONS OF DISTINCTION . . 76
§ 4. DEGREE AND KIND IN THE SCALE OF FORMS 20. THE FUSION OF DEGREE AND
KIND REMOVES THE FIRST OF THE TWO DIFFICULTIES (§ 2.7) . . . . 77
21. EXAMPLE OF BEAUTY . . . - 77
22. EXAMPLE OF GOODNESS . . . » 78
23. EXAMPLE OF PLEASURE . . . - 79
24. THE FALLACY OF CALCULATION AND THE FALLACY OF EQUIVALENCE . 80
§ 5. OPPOSITION AND DISTINCTION IN THE SCALE OF FORMS 25. THE SCALE
BEGINS NOT WITH ZERO, BUT WITH UNITY . . 81
26. I.E. WITH A MINIMUM REALIZATION OF THE GENERIC ESSENCE . 82 27.
RELATIVELY TO HIGHER TERMS, THIS IS A NEGATION OF THAT ESSENCE . . . . .
. 82
28. THE SAME RELATION SUBSISTS BETWEEN ANY TWO ADJACENT TERMS IN THE
SCALE . . . . . . 84
29. THE FALLACY OF THE FALSE POSITIVE AND THE FALLACY OF NULL OPPOSITION
. . . * $5
§ 6. THE SCALE OF FORMS AND THE OVERLAP OF CLASSES 30. EACH TERM
SURPASSES THE NEXT BELOW, NOT ONLY GENERICALLY BUT SPECIFICALLY . . . .
86
31. IT THEREFORE SUMS UP THE WHOLE SCALE TO THAT POINT . 89
32. THUS IT BOTH NEGATES AND REAFFIRMS THE NEXT BELOW, AND THIS EXPLAINS
THE OVERLAP OF CLASSES . 90
33. A ND MAKES THE CONCEPTION OF OVERLAP MORE PRECISE . 91
IV. D E F I N I T I ON A ND D E S C R I P T I ON 1. THE VIEW THAT
PHILOSOPHICAL CONCEPTS ARE DEFINABLE. ITS DIFFICULTIES . . . . . . 92
2. THE VIEW THAT THEY ARE NOT. ITS DANGERS . . 92
IMAGE 4
VIII C O N T E N TS
§2-
3. IN EXACT SCIENCE, DEFINITION IMPLIES (A) SEPARATION OF ESSENCE
(EXPOUNDED IN DEFINITIONS) FROM PROPERTIES (EXPOUNDED IN THEOREMS) . . .
. . - 94
4. IN PHILOSOPHY THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE ; HERE THEREFORE THE DEFINI TION OF
A CONCEPT IS COEXTENSIVE WITH ITS ENTIRE EXPOSITION 95 5. (B) AN
ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN KNOWING THE ESSENCE OF A CONCEPT AND NOT
KNOWING IT . . 96
6. THIS TOO IS IMPOSSIBLE IN PHILOSOPHY, WHERE COMING TO KNOW MEANS
COMING TO KNOW BETTER . . . 96
7. THE TRADITIONAL RULES OF DEFINITION MUST THEREFORE BE MODIFIED IN THE
CASE OF PHILOSOPHICAL DEFINITION . 98
8. DESCRIPTION OF AN EMPIRICAL CONCEPT. ITS LIKENESS AND UNLIKENESS TO
PHILOSOPHICAL DEFINITION . . . 98
9. THE PRINCIPLES OF PHILOSOPHICAL DEFINITION. ILLUSTRATIONS FROM PLATO
AND ARISTOTLE . . . . 1 00
10. ILLUSTRATION FROM KANT . . . . . 1 02
V. T HE P H I L O S O P H I C AL J U D G E M E N T: Q U A L I TY A ND Q
U A N T I TY 1. DIVISION OF THE SUBJECT . . . . . 1 04
AFFIRMATION AND DENIAL
2. IN PHILOSOPHY WE CANNOT DENY WITHOUT MAKING A CORRE SPONDING
AFFIRMATION . . . . 1 04
3. PROOF OF THE PRINCIPLE OF CONCRETE NEGATION . . 1 05
4. FALLACY OF ABSTRACT NEGATION . . 1 06
5. FALLACY OF ABSTRACT AFFIRMATION . . . . 1 06
6. PROOF OF THE PRINCIPLE OF CONCRETE AFFIRMATION . 1 07
7. APPLICATIONS OF THE PRINCIPLE . . . . 1 08
8. THE TWO PRINCIPLES COMBINED . . . . 1 10
THE UNIVERSALITY OF THE PHILOSOPHICAL JUDGEMENT
9. THERE ARE THREE ELEMENTS IN ALL UNIVERSAL JUDGEMENTS . IN 10. THERE
ARE THREE TYPES OF THOUGHT ACCORDING AS ONE OR OTHER TAKES PRECEDENCE OF
THE REST . . . 1 11
11. IN PHILOSOPHY EACH TYPE BY ITSELF IS FALLACIOUS . 113
12. IN A PHILOSOPHICAL JUDGEMENT ALL THREE FORMS OF STRUCTURE COEXIST .
. . . * 5
VI. P H I L O S O P HY AS C A T E G O R I C AL T H I N K I NG
§ I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF THE PRINCIPLE 1. THE JUDGEMENTS COMPOSING
THE BODY OF MATHEMATICS ARE HYPOTHETICAL . . . . . . 117
IMAGE 5
C O N T E N TS IX
2. SO ARE THOSE OF EMPIRICAL SCIENCE . . . 1 18
3. BUT IN PHILOSOPHY THE BODY OF KNOWLEDGE CONSISTS OF JUDGEMENTS ABOUT
A SUBJECT-MATTER CONCEIVED AS REAL (I.E. CATEGORICAL JUDGEMENTS) . . . .
1 21
§2. THE EVIDENCE OF TRADITIONAL PHILOSOPHY 4. QUOTATIONS FROM
PHILOSOPHERS EXPRESSING THEIR RECOGNITION OF THE PRINCIPLE . . . . . 1
23
5. THE ONTOLOGICAL PROOF, ITS ORIGIN AND HISTORY . . 1 24
6. ITS SIGNIFICANCE. THE OBJECT OF PHILOSOPHICAL THOUGHT CAN NOT BE
CONCEIVED EXCEPT AS EXISTING . . . 1 26
7. THE PRINCIPLE FURTHER SUPPORTED BY EXAMINATION (A) OF LOGIC . . . .
.. 128
8. (B) OF MORAL PHILOSOPHY . . . 131
§ 3. FINAL STATEMENT AND PROOF OF THE PRINCIPLE 9. CONCLUSION FROM THE
EVIDENCE CITED: THE BODY OF PHILO SOPHICAL THOUGHT IS ESSENTIALLY
CATEGORICAL, THOUGH IT CONTAINS HYPOTHETICAL ELEMENTS . . 133
10. PROOF OF THIS FROM THE PRINCIPLE OF OVERLAPPING CLASSES . 134 11.
EXCLUSION OF FURTHER PROBLEMS . . . 135
VII. T WO S C E P T I C AL POSITIONS 1. SCEPTICISM AS TO WHETHER A
PHILOSOPHICAL PROPOSITION CAN BE ESTABLISHED BY CONSTRUCTIVE REASONING .
137
§ I. CRITICAL PHILOSOPHY 2. PHILOSOPHY AS THE CRITICAL DESTRUCTION OF
FALSE VIEWS WITH OUT ASSERTING OR IMPLYING TRUE ONES . . . 1 38
3. THIS INDUCES A SUPERFICIAL, BECAUSE MERELY FORMAL, VALUA TION OF THE
VIEWS CRITICIZED . . . . 139
4. IT IMPLIES CONSTRUCTIVE DOCTRINES ON WHICH ITS WORK IS BASED, BUT
NEGLECTS TO FORMULATE THEM . . 140
§ 2. ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY
5. PHILOSOPHY AS THE ANALYSIS OF PROPOSITIONS DRAWN FROM
NON-PHILOSOPHICAL SOURCES . . .. 141
6. ANALYSIS OF THIS PHILOSOPHY INTO THREE PARTS, ONLY ONE OF WHICH IS
INDUBITABLY PHILOSOPHICAL . . . 1 42
7. THIS, HOWEVER, IT NEGLECTS TO WORK OUT . . . 145
8. BUT IS NOT ENTITLED TO TAKE IT FOR GRANTED . . 1 46
9. BOTH THESE PHILOSOPHIES SHARE THE FAULT THAT THEY ASSUME CONSTRUCTIVE
DOCTRINES WHILE PROFESSING NOT TO DO SO . 147 10. BOTH AIRE INCONSISTENT
WITH THE FIRST PRINCIPLES OF PHILO SOPHICAL METHOD AS LAID DOWN IN THIS
ESSAY . . 147
IMAGE 6
X C O N T E N TS
V I IL D E D U C T I ON A ND I N D U C T I ON
§ I. THE IDEA OF DEDUCTIVE DEMONSTRATION 1. DEMONSTRATION IN EXACT
SCIENCE . . . . 1 51
2. IT IMPLIES (A) LOGICAL PRINCIPLES EXTERNAL TO THE SCIENCE, (B)
PRINCIPLES BELONGING TO THE SCIENCE ITSELF . - 1 51
3. IT NEVER CHECKS OR CRITICIZES, AND CANNOT CONFIRM, THESE PRINCIPLES,
I.E. IT IS IRREVERSIBLE IN DIRECTION . . 153
§ 2. PHILOSOPHY DOES NOT CONFORM TO THAT IDEA
4. THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN TWO KINDS OF PRINCIPLES DISAPPEARS 154 5. IS
ITS DIRECTION IRREVERSIBLE ? . . . » 1 55
6. IN SPITE OF HIS THEORY, DESCARTES IN PRACTICE REALIZED THAT IT IS NOT
. . . . . . 155
7. SO DID SPINOZA AND LEIBNIZ . . . . 1 58
8. THEREFORE HEGEL S DEMAND THAT PHILOSOPHY SHOULD JUSTIFY ITS
STARTING-POINT IS NOT NEW . . . 159
§ 3. PHILOSOPHY AND ITS STARTING-POINT 9. DOES THIS IMPLY A VICIOUS
CIRCLE? . . . 1 60
10. NO, BECAUSE ITS AIM IS NOT TO CREATE KNOWLEDGE E NIHILO . 161 11.
THE DEMONSTRANDUM IS SOMETHING WHICH WE IN SOME SENSE ALREADY KNOW . . .
. . 1 62
12. OUR DEMONSTRATION IS VERIFIED BY APPEAL TO THIS PREVIOUS KNOWLEDGE,
AND THIS SERVES TO CHECK THE STARTING-POINT OF THE ARGUMENT . . . . . 1
63
§ 4. PHILOSOPHY AND INDUCTION 13. INDUCTION IN EMPIRICAL SCIENCE . . . .
1 64
14. ITS TWO KINDS OF PRINCIPLES, AND ITS IRREVERSIBILITY . 166
15. IN PHILOSOPHY OUR INITIAL KNOWLEDGE DIFFERS IN THREE WAYS FROM THE
DATA OF INDUCTIVE THOUGHT . . . 1 67
16. THE PROCESS TO WHICH THE DATA ARE SUBJECTED IS DIFFERENT IN THE TWO
CASES . . . .. 169
17. THE RESULT OF THE PROCESS IS DIFFERENT . . . 1 70
§ 5. PHILOSOPHY AND EXPERIENCE 18. THE CONTINUITY OF PHILOSOPHY WITH THE
EXPERIENCE IN WHICH IT BEGINS . . . . .. 170
19. THIS IMPLIES THEIR HOMOGENEITY. . . 1 71
20. THEY ARE RELATED AS TERMS IN A SCALE OF FORMS . . 1 72
21. PHILOSOPHICAL THEORY AND PHILOSOPHICAL EXPERIENCE . 173 22. SUMMARY
AND CONCLUSION . . . . 173
IMAGE 7
C O N T E N TS XI
IX. T HE I D EA OF S Y S T EM
OBJECTIONS AND REPLIES
1. REASONS FOR THE COMMON PREJUDICE AGAINST SYSTEM . 176 2. THIS
PREJUDICE AS THE EXPRESSION OF A LEGITIMATE DEMAND . 178 3. (A) NO
SYSTEM CAN BE FINAL . . . . 179
4. (B) NO SINGLE PHILOSOPHER CAN DO ALL THE WORK REQUIRED TO CONSTRUCT A
SYSTEM . . . . . 1 81
5. (C) ANY SYSTEM IS MERELY PERSONAL . . . 1 82
6. (D) ANY SYSTEM DOES VIOLENCE TO THE DIVERSITY OF PHILO SOPHICAL
PROBLEMS . . . . . 1 84
EXPOSITION OF THE IDEA
7. THE IDEA OF SYSTEM IS INDISPENSABLE TO PHILOSOPHY . 185 8. THE
DIVISIONS OF ITS SUBJECT-MATTER FORM OVERLAPPING CLASSES . . . . .. 188
9. AND FALL INTO A SCALE OF FORMS. SYSTEMATIC PHILOSOPHY AS A SCALE OF
PHILOSOPHIES . . . . 1 89
10. THIS CONCEPTION CLEARS UP THE DIFFICULTIES STATED IN § 1 . 190
EXAMPLES OF ITS PARTIAL REALIZATION
11. THE IDEA CONSTANTLY TENDS TO REALIZE ITSELF : E.G. . 193
12. (A) IN THE RELATION BETWEEN THE PHILOSOPHICAL SCIENCES . 194 13. (6)
IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY . . . 194
14. (C) IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF A SINGLE AGE . . 195
15. (D) IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF A SINGLE MAN . . . 197
PHILOSOPHY AS A B R A N CH OF L I T E R A T U RE
PROSE AND POETRY
1. THE TWO ELEMENTS IN PROSE 2. THE RELATION BETWEEN THEM 3. IN POETRY
THERE IS ONLY ONE 4. PROSE IS POETRY WITH A DIFFERENCE
5. PROSE AND VERSE
PHILOSOPHICAL PROSE AND SCIENTIFIC PROSE
6. TECHNICAL TERMS ARE SOUGHT IN SCIENCE AND AVOIDED IN PHILOSOPHY . . .
. . . 2 01
7. WHAT THEY ARE. SYMBOLISM AND LANGUAGE . . 203
8. WHY THEY ARE NEEDED IN SCIENCE AND NOT IN PHILOSOPHY . 205 9. THE
NEEDS OF PHILOSOPHY CAN ONLY BE MET BY ORDINARY (LITERARY OR
NON-TECHNICAL) LANGUAGE . . . 206
199 199 200 200 201
IMAGE 8
XII C O N T E N TS
§ 3. PHILOSOPHICAL STYLE AND HISTORICAL STYLE 10. HISTORICAL STYLE IS
DIDACTIC . . .. 208
11. PHILOSOPHICAL STYLE IS THE OPPOSITE . . 209
12. WE CONSULT HISTORIANS, BUT FOLLOW* PHILOSOPHERS . 211
§ 4. PHILOSOPHY AND POETRY 13. THEY ARE ALIKE IN THE INTIMATE RELATION
BETWEEN WRITER AND READER . . . . .. 212
14. PHILOSOPHY AS THE POINT AT WHICH PROSE COMES NEAREST TO BEING
POETRY. . . . .. 213
15. THE PHILOSOPHER USES LANGUAGE AS THE POETS USE IT, BUT WHAT HE
WRITES MUST BE PROSE . . . 2 13
§ 5. THE READER S RELATION TO THE WRITER 16. (A) AS UNDERSTANDING HIM.
THE READER MUST (I) READ PHILOSOPHY AS PURE LITERATURE . . . . 2 15
17. (II) COME TO IT PREPARED FOR THE SPECIAL PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEM OF
THAT SPECIAL WORK . . . 2 15
18. (B) AS CRITICIZING HIM. THIS IS NECESSARY TO COMPREHEN SION, BUT
LOGICALLY POSTERIOR TO IT . . . 2 17
19. IT HAS A POSITIVE AND A NEGATIVE SIDE . . 218
20. THE CRITIC AS PUPIL . . . . . 2 19
X I. C O N C L U S I ON
1. DOES THE VIEW HITHERTO STATED AGREE WITH EXPERIENCE ? . 221 2. THIS
QUESTION HAS BEEN ALREADY ASKED PIECEMEAL AS THE ARGUMENT PROCEEDED.
JUSTIFICATION OF THIS METHOD . 222 3. WHOSE EXPERIENCE? THAT OF ALL
PHILOSOPHERS, OURSELVES
INCLUDED . . . . .. 223
4. DOES THIS NOT REST ON AN UNPROVED ASSUMPTION ?. . 224
5. IF IT IS AN ASSUMPTION, IT IS ONE OF THOSE ASSUMPTIONS WHICH ARE NOT
ONLY LEGITIMATE BUT OBLIGATORY . . 225
I N D EX 2 37
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Collingwood, Robin G. 1889-1943 |
| author_GND | (DE-588)118676636 |
| author_facet | Collingwood, Robin G. 1889-1943 |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Collingwood, Robin G. 1889-1943 |
| author_variant | r g c rg rgc |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV008934109 |
| callnumber-first | B - Philosophy, Psychology, Religion |
| callnumber-label | BD241 |
| callnumber-raw | BD241 |
| callnumber-search | BD241 |
| callnumber-sort | BD 3241 |
| callnumber-subject | BD - Speculative Philosophy |
| classification_rvk | CC 1000 CI 6396 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)10427399 (DE-599)BVBBV008934109 |
| dewey-full | 112 |
| dewey-hundreds | 100 - Philosophy & psychology |
| dewey-ones | 112 - [Unassigned] |
| dewey-raw | 112 |
| dewey-search | 112 |
| dewey-sort | 3112 |
| dewey-tens | 110 - Metaphysics |
| discipline | Philosophie |
| edition | Repr. |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01556nam a2200457 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV008934109</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20050915 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">940206s1950 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)10427399</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV008934109</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">BD241</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CC 1000</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)17602:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CI 6396</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)18523:11798</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Collingwood, Robin G.</subfield><subfield code="d">1889-1943</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)118676636</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">An essay on philosophical method</subfield><subfield code="c">by R. G. Collingwood</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Repr.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford</subfield><subfield code="b">Clarendon</subfield><subfield code="c">1950</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XII,226 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">NST: Philosophical method</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Filosofia</subfield><subfield code="2">larpcal</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Filosofie</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Methodologie</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Methode</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Philosophie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Methodology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Philosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4045791-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Methode</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4038971-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Philosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4045791-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Methode</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4038971-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">SWB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=005892090&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-005892090</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV008934109 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T17:27:00Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-005892090 |
| oclc_num | 10427399 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-29 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| owner_facet | DE-29 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| physical | XII,226 S. |
| publishDate | 1950 |
| publishDateSearch | 1950 |
| publishDateSort | 1950 |
| publisher | Clarendon |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Collingwood, Robin G. 1889-1943 Verfasser (DE-588)118676636 aut An essay on philosophical method by R. G. Collingwood Repr. Oxford Clarendon 1950 XII,226 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier NST: Philosophical method Filosofia larpcal Filosofie gtt Methodologie gtt Methode Philosophie Methodology Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 gnd rswk-swf Methode (DE-588)4038971-6 gnd rswk-swf Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 s Methode (DE-588)4038971-6 s DE-604 SWB Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=005892090&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Collingwood, Robin G. 1889-1943 An essay on philosophical method Filosofia larpcal Filosofie gtt Methodologie gtt Methode Philosophie Methodology Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 gnd Methode (DE-588)4038971-6 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4045791-6 (DE-588)4038971-6 |
| title | An essay on philosophical method |
| title_auth | An essay on philosophical method |
| title_exact_search | An essay on philosophical method |
| title_full | An essay on philosophical method by R. G. Collingwood |
| title_fullStr | An essay on philosophical method by R. G. Collingwood |
| title_full_unstemmed | An essay on philosophical method by R. G. Collingwood |
| title_short | An essay on philosophical method |
| title_sort | an essay on philosophical method |
| topic | Filosofia larpcal Filosofie gtt Methodologie gtt Methode Philosophie Methodology Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 gnd Methode (DE-588)4038971-6 gnd |
| topic_facet | Filosofia Filosofie Methodologie Methode Philosophie Methodology |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=005892090&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT collingwoodrobing anessayonphilosophicalmethod |