Risk and blame: essays in cultural theory
The idea of risk has recently risen to prominence in political debate and in matters of public policy. Cognitive psychology treats decision-making as a private personal act. But in real life dangers are presented in standardized forms which pre-code the individual's choices. This collection fol...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
London u.a.
Routledge
1992
|
Ausgabe: | 1. publ. |
Schriftenreihe: | Anthropology, social policy
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Zusammenfassung: | The idea of risk has recently risen to prominence in political debate and in matters of public policy. Cognitive psychology treats decision-making as a private personal act. But in real life dangers are presented in standardized forms which pre-code the individual's choices. This collection follows on from the programme for studying risk and blame that was implied in Purity and Danger and has been developed in subsequent publications. Its first six essays argue that any analysis of risk perception that ignores cultural and political bias is worthless. For the sake of a mistaken idea of objectivity, research on risk perception tries to avoid politics, but the idea of nature is inherently politicized. The study of risk needs a systematic framework of political and cultural comparison. The next five essays range over questions in cultural theory. A culture is viewed as a way of life which standardizes concepts and values. It is held steady by the institutions in which it is articulated. Questions of autonomy, credibility and gullibility, the social origins of wants, and the recognition of distinctive thought styles are at present only beginning to be treated systematically in a framework of cultural analysis. Now that risk is moving centre-stage as the dominant idiom of policy analysis, many other key topics, such as the notion of the self, will need to be radically revised. In Risk and Blame, Mary Douglas argues that the prominence of risk discourse will force upon the social sciences a programme of rethinking and consolidation which will include the anthropological approaches studied in these pages. |
Beschreibung: | XII, 323 S. |
ISBN: | 0415062802 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV005877589 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 19940202 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 921130s1992 |||| 00||| engod | ||
020 | |a 0415062802 |9 0-415-06280-2 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)24590430 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV005877589 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-M347 |a DE-703 |a DE-19 |a DE-11 |a DE-188 | ||
050 | 0 | |a HM201 | |
082 | 0 | |a 302/.12 |2 20 | |
084 | |a CP 4000 |0 (DE-625)18984: |2 rvk | ||
084 | |a LB 15000 |0 (DE-625)90509:772 |2 rvk | ||
084 | |a MR 7100 |0 (DE-625)123539: |2 rvk | ||
084 | |a MS 1290 |0 (DE-625)123589: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Douglas, Mary |d 1921-2007 |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)121127060 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Risk and blame |b essays in cultural theory |c Mary Douglas |
250 | |a 1. publ. | ||
264 | 1 | |a London u.a. |b Routledge |c 1992 | |
300 | |a XII, 323 S. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Anthropology, social policy | |
520 | 3 | |a The idea of risk has recently risen to prominence in political debate and in matters of public policy. Cognitive psychology treats decision-making as a private personal act. But in real life dangers are presented in standardized forms which pre-code the individual's choices. This collection follows on from the programme for studying risk and blame that was implied in Purity and Danger and has been developed in subsequent publications. Its first six essays argue that any analysis of risk perception that ignores cultural and political bias is worthless. For the sake of a mistaken idea of objectivity, research on risk perception tries to avoid politics, but the idea of nature is inherently politicized. The study of risk needs a systematic framework of political and cultural comparison. The next five essays range over questions in cultural theory. A culture is viewed as a way of life which standardizes concepts and values. It is held steady by the institutions in which it is articulated. Questions of autonomy, credibility and gullibility, the social origins of wants, and the recognition of distinctive thought styles are at present only beginning to be treated systematically in a framework of cultural analysis. Now that risk is moving centre-stage as the dominant idiom of policy analysis, many other key topics, such as the notion of the self, will need to be radically revised. In Risk and Blame, Mary Douglas argues that the prominence of risk discourse will force upon the social sciences a programme of rethinking and consolidation which will include the anthropological approaches studied in these pages. | |
650 | 4 | |a Culture | |
650 | 7 | |a Cultuur |2 gtt | |
650 | 4 | |a Incertidumbre | |
650 | 4 | |a Perception du risque | |
650 | 4 | |a Riesgo - Aspectos sociológicos | |
650 | 7 | |a Risico's |2 gtt | |
650 | 4 | |a Risque - Aspect sociologique | |
650 | 4 | |a Tecnología y civilización | |
650 | 4 | |a Évaluation du risque | |
650 | 4 | |a Kultur | |
650 | 4 | |a Culture | |
650 | 4 | |a Risk assessment | |
650 | 4 | |a Risk perception | |
650 | 4 | |a Risk |x Sociological aspects | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Risiko |0 (DE-588)4050129-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Sozialanthropologie |0 (DE-588)4129436-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Gesellschaftliches Bewusstsein |0 (DE-588)4020630-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4143413-4 |a Aufsatzsammlung |2 gnd-content | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Risiko |0 (DE-588)4050129-2 |D s |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Gesellschaftliches Bewusstsein |0 (DE-588)4020630-0 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Sozialanthropologie |0 (DE-588)4129436-1 |D s |
689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m SWBplus Fremddatenuebernahme |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=003679826&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-003679826 | ||
883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804120066405433344 |
---|---|
adam_text | CONTENTS INTRODUCTION IX PART I RISK AND BLAME 1 RISK AND BLAME 3 2 RISK
AND JUSTICE 22 3 RISK AND DANGER 38 4 MUFFLED EARS 55 5 WITCHCRAFT AND
LEPROSY: TWO STRATEGIES FOR REJECTION 83 6 THE SELF AS RISK-TAKER: A
CULTURAL THEORY OF CONTAGION IN RELATION TO AIDS 102 PART II WANTS AND
INSTITUTIONS 7 THE NORMATIVE DEBATE AND THE ORIGINS OF CULTURE 125 8
WANTS 149 9 NO FREE GIFTS: INTRODUCTION TO MAUSS S ESSAY ON THE GIFT 155
10 INSTITUTIONS OF THE THIRD KIND: BRITISH AND SWEDISH LABOUR MARKETS
COMPARED 167 11 AUTONOMY AND OPPORTUNISM 187 RISK AND BLAME PART HI
BELIEVING AND THINKING 12 THOUGHT STYLE EXEMPLIFIED: THE IDEA OF THE
SELF 211 13 CREDIBILITY 235 14 A CREDIBLE BIOSPHERE 255 15 THE DEBATE ON
WOMEN PRIESTS 271 16 THE HOTEL KWILU: A MODEL OF MODELS 295 NAME INDEX
314 SUBJECT INDEX 318
|
any_adam_object | 1 |
author | Douglas, Mary 1921-2007 |
author_GND | (DE-588)121127060 |
author_facet | Douglas, Mary 1921-2007 |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Douglas, Mary 1921-2007 |
author_variant | m d md |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV005877589 |
callnumber-first | H - Social Science |
callnumber-label | HM201 |
callnumber-raw | HM201 |
callnumber-search | HM201 |
callnumber-sort | HM 3201 |
callnumber-subject | HM - Sociology |
classification_rvk | CP 4000 LB 15000 MR 7100 MS 1290 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)24590430 (DE-599)BVBBV005877589 |
dewey-full | 302/.12 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 302 - Social interaction |
dewey-raw | 302/.12 |
dewey-search | 302/.12 |
dewey-sort | 3302 212 |
dewey-tens | 300 - Social sciences |
discipline | Soziologie Psychologie Sozial-/Kulturanthropologie / Empirische Kulturwissenschaft |
edition | 1. publ. |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03999nam a2200649 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV005877589</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">19940202 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">921130s1992 |||| 00||| engod</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0415062802</subfield><subfield code="9">0-415-06280-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)24590430</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV005877589</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M347</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-11</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HM201</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">302/.12</subfield><subfield code="2">20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CP 4000</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)18984:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LB 15000</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)90509:772</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MR 7100</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)123539:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MS 1290</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)123589:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Douglas, Mary</subfield><subfield code="d">1921-2007</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)121127060</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Risk and blame</subfield><subfield code="b">essays in cultural theory</subfield><subfield code="c">Mary Douglas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1. publ.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">London u.a.</subfield><subfield code="b">Routledge</subfield><subfield code="c">1992</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XII, 323 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Anthropology, social policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The idea of risk has recently risen to prominence in political debate and in matters of public policy. Cognitive psychology treats decision-making as a private personal act. But in real life dangers are presented in standardized forms which pre-code the individual's choices. This collection follows on from the programme for studying risk and blame that was implied in Purity and Danger and has been developed in subsequent publications. Its first six essays argue that any analysis of risk perception that ignores cultural and political bias is worthless. For the sake of a mistaken idea of objectivity, research on risk perception tries to avoid politics, but the idea of nature is inherently politicized. The study of risk needs a systematic framework of political and cultural comparison. The next five essays range over questions in cultural theory. A culture is viewed as a way of life which standardizes concepts and values. It is held steady by the institutions in which it is articulated. Questions of autonomy, credibility and gullibility, the social origins of wants, and the recognition of distinctive thought styles are at present only beginning to be treated systematically in a framework of cultural analysis. Now that risk is moving centre-stage as the dominant idiom of policy analysis, many other key topics, such as the notion of the self, will need to be radically revised. In Risk and Blame, Mary Douglas argues that the prominence of risk discourse will force upon the social sciences a programme of rethinking and consolidation which will include the anthropological approaches studied in these pages.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Culture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Cultuur</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Incertidumbre</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Perception du risque</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Riesgo - Aspectos sociológicos</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Risico's</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Risque - Aspect sociologique</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Tecnología y civilización</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Évaluation du risque</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Kultur</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Culture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Risk assessment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Risk perception</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Risk</subfield><subfield code="x">Sociological aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Risiko</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4050129-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sozialanthropologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4129436-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gesellschaftliches Bewusstsein</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020630-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4143413-4</subfield><subfield code="a">Aufsatzsammlung</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Risiko</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4050129-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Gesellschaftliches Bewusstsein</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020630-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Sozialanthropologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4129436-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">SWBplus Fremddatenuebernahme</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=003679826&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-003679826</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
genre | (DE-588)4143413-4 Aufsatzsammlung gnd-content |
genre_facet | Aufsatzsammlung |
id | DE-604.BV005877589 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T16:36:11Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 0415062802 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-003679826 |
oclc_num | 24590430 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 DE-M347 DE-703 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-11 DE-188 |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-M347 DE-703 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-11 DE-188 |
physical | XII, 323 S. |
publishDate | 1992 |
publishDateSearch | 1992 |
publishDateSort | 1992 |
publisher | Routledge |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Anthropology, social policy |
spelling | Douglas, Mary 1921-2007 Verfasser (DE-588)121127060 aut Risk and blame essays in cultural theory Mary Douglas 1. publ. London u.a. Routledge 1992 XII, 323 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Anthropology, social policy The idea of risk has recently risen to prominence in political debate and in matters of public policy. Cognitive psychology treats decision-making as a private personal act. But in real life dangers are presented in standardized forms which pre-code the individual's choices. This collection follows on from the programme for studying risk and blame that was implied in Purity and Danger and has been developed in subsequent publications. Its first six essays argue that any analysis of risk perception that ignores cultural and political bias is worthless. For the sake of a mistaken idea of objectivity, research on risk perception tries to avoid politics, but the idea of nature is inherently politicized. The study of risk needs a systematic framework of political and cultural comparison. The next five essays range over questions in cultural theory. A culture is viewed as a way of life which standardizes concepts and values. It is held steady by the institutions in which it is articulated. Questions of autonomy, credibility and gullibility, the social origins of wants, and the recognition of distinctive thought styles are at present only beginning to be treated systematically in a framework of cultural analysis. Now that risk is moving centre-stage as the dominant idiom of policy analysis, many other key topics, such as the notion of the self, will need to be radically revised. In Risk and Blame, Mary Douglas argues that the prominence of risk discourse will force upon the social sciences a programme of rethinking and consolidation which will include the anthropological approaches studied in these pages. Culture Cultuur gtt Incertidumbre Perception du risque Riesgo - Aspectos sociológicos Risico's gtt Risque - Aspect sociologique Tecnología y civilización Évaluation du risque Kultur Risk assessment Risk perception Risk Sociological aspects Risiko (DE-588)4050129-2 gnd rswk-swf Sozialanthropologie (DE-588)4129436-1 gnd rswk-swf Gesellschaftliches Bewusstsein (DE-588)4020630-0 gnd rswk-swf (DE-588)4143413-4 Aufsatzsammlung gnd-content Risiko (DE-588)4050129-2 s Gesellschaftliches Bewusstsein (DE-588)4020630-0 s Sozialanthropologie (DE-588)4129436-1 s 1\p DE-604 SWBplus Fremddatenuebernahme application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=003679826&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
spellingShingle | Douglas, Mary 1921-2007 Risk and blame essays in cultural theory Culture Cultuur gtt Incertidumbre Perception du risque Riesgo - Aspectos sociológicos Risico's gtt Risque - Aspect sociologique Tecnología y civilización Évaluation du risque Kultur Risk assessment Risk perception Risk Sociological aspects Risiko (DE-588)4050129-2 gnd Sozialanthropologie (DE-588)4129436-1 gnd Gesellschaftliches Bewusstsein (DE-588)4020630-0 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4050129-2 (DE-588)4129436-1 (DE-588)4020630-0 (DE-588)4143413-4 |
title | Risk and blame essays in cultural theory |
title_auth | Risk and blame essays in cultural theory |
title_exact_search | Risk and blame essays in cultural theory |
title_full | Risk and blame essays in cultural theory Mary Douglas |
title_fullStr | Risk and blame essays in cultural theory Mary Douglas |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk and blame essays in cultural theory Mary Douglas |
title_short | Risk and blame |
title_sort | risk and blame essays in cultural theory |
title_sub | essays in cultural theory |
topic | Culture Cultuur gtt Incertidumbre Perception du risque Riesgo - Aspectos sociológicos Risico's gtt Risque - Aspect sociologique Tecnología y civilización Évaluation du risque Kultur Risk assessment Risk perception Risk Sociological aspects Risiko (DE-588)4050129-2 gnd Sozialanthropologie (DE-588)4129436-1 gnd Gesellschaftliches Bewusstsein (DE-588)4020630-0 gnd |
topic_facet | Culture Cultuur Incertidumbre Perception du risque Riesgo - Aspectos sociológicos Risico's Risque - Aspect sociologique Tecnología y civilización Évaluation du risque Kultur Risk assessment Risk perception Risk Sociological aspects Risiko Sozialanthropologie Gesellschaftliches Bewusstsein Aufsatzsammlung |
url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=003679826&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT douglasmary riskandblameessaysinculturaltheory |