Verfügbarkeit: Lietuvos metropoliniai regionai

Lietuvos metropoliniai regionai: gyventojų erdvinė diferenciacija XXI a. pradžioje : kolektyvinė monografija = The Metropolitan regions of Lithuania. Residential differentiation in the XXI century

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser:	Burneika, Donatas 1970- (VerfasserIn), Ubarevičienė, Rūta (VerfasserIn), Valatka, Vytautas (VerfasserIn), Baranauskaitė, Aušra (VerfasserIn), Pociūtė-Sereikienė, Gintarė 1984- (VerfasserIn), Daugirdas, Vidmantas (VerfasserIn), Krupickaitė, Dovilė (VerfasserIn)
Format:	Buch
Sprache:	Lithuanian
Veröffentlicht:	Vilnius Lietuvos socialinių tyrimų centras 2017
Schlagworte:	Geschichte 2001-2011 Sozialer Wandel Sozialstruktur Siedlung Segregation > Soziologie Stadt Litauen
Online-Zugang:	Inhaltsverzeichnis Literaturverzeichnis Abstract
Beschreibung:	151 Seiten Illustrationen, Karten, Diagramme 25 cm
ISBN:	9789955531593

Internformat

MARC


LEADER	00000nam a2200000 c 4500
001	BV047299485
003	DE-604
005	20210902
007	t
008	210527s2017 a\|\|\| \|\|\|\| 00\|\|\| lit d
020			\|a 9789955531593 \|9 978-9955-531-59-3
020			\|z 9955531592 \|9 9955531592
035			\|a (OCoLC)1268198219
035			\|a (DE-599)BVBBV047299485
040			\|a DE-604 \|b ger \|e rda
041	0		\|a lit
049			\|a DE-12
084			\|a OST \|q DE-12 \|2 fid
100	1		\|a Burneika, Donatas \|d 1970- \|e Verfasser \|0 (DE-588)1170898343 \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Lietuvos metropoliniai regionai \|b gyventojų erdvinė diferenciacija XXI a. pradžioje : kolektyvinė monografija = The Metropolitan regions of Lithuania. Residential differentiation in the XXI century \|c D. Burneika, R. Ubarevičienė, V. Valatka, A. Baranauskaitė, G. Pociūtė-Sereikienė, V. Daugirdas, D. Krupickaitė
246	1	1	\|a The Metropolitan regions of Lithuania. Residential differentiation in the XXI century
264		1	\|a Vilnius \|b Lietuvos socialinių tyrimų centras \|c 2017
300			\|a 151 Seiten \|b Illustrationen, Karten, Diagramme \|c 25 cm
336			\|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|b n \|2 rdamedia
338			\|b nc \|2 rdacarrier
505	8		\|a Englische Zusammenfassung
648		7	\|a Geschichte 2001-2011 \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
650	0	7	\|a Sozialer Wandel \|0 (DE-588)4077587-2 \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
650	0	7	\|a Sozialstruktur \|0 (DE-588)4055898-8 \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
650	0	7	\|a Siedlung \|0 (DE-588)4054858-2 \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
650	0	7	\|a Segregation \|g Soziologie \|0 (DE-588)4055731-5 \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
650	0	7	\|a Stadt \|0 (DE-588)4056723-0 \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
651		7	\|a Litauen \|0 (DE-588)4074266-0 \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
689	0	0	\|a Litauen \|0 (DE-588)4074266-0 \|D g
689	0	1	\|a Stadt \|0 (DE-588)4056723-0 \|D s
689	0	2	\|a Siedlung \|0 (DE-588)4054858-2 \|D s
689	0	3	\|a Sozialstruktur \|0 (DE-588)4055898-8 \|D s
689	0	4	\|a Segregation \|g Soziologie \|0 (DE-588)4055731-5 \|D s
689	0	5	\|a Sozialer Wandel \|0 (DE-588)4077587-2 \|D s
689	0	6	\|a Geschichte 2001-2011 \|A z
689	0		\|5 DE-604
700	1		\|a Ubarevičienė, Rūta \|e Verfasser \|0 (DE-588)1170899056 \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Valatka, Vytautas \|e Verfasser \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Baranauskaitė, Aušra \|e Verfasser \|0 (DE-588)1170898785 \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Pociūtė-Sereikienė, Gintarė \|d 1984- \|e Verfasser \|0 (DE-588)1160962294 \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Daugirdas, Vidmantas \|e Verfasser \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Krupickaitė, Dovilė \|e Verfasser \|4 aut
856	4	2	\|m Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment \|q application/pdf \|u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032702666&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA \|3 Inhaltsverzeichnis
856	4	2	\|m Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment \|q application/pdf \|u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032702666&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA \|3 Literaturverzeichnis
856	4	2	\|m Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment \|q application/pdf \|u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032702666&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA \|3 Abstract
940	1		\|n oe
940	1		\|q BSB_NED_20210902
999			\|a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032702666
942	1	1	\|c 306.09 \|e 22/bsb \|f 090512 \|g 4793
942	1	1	\|c 306.09 \|e 22/bsb \|f 090511 \|g 4793

Datensatz im Suchindex

_version_	1804182478551777280
adam_text	TURINYS ĮVADAS......................................................................................................................... 5 METODOLOGIJA...................................................................................................... 7 1. GYVENTOJŲ SEGREGACIJOS TYRIMŲ METROPOLINIUOSE REGIONUOSE APŽVALGA.............................................................................. 16 1.1. MIESTŲ REGIONŲ TYRIMAI................................................................... 18 1.2. SEGREGACIJOS ARBA ERDVINĖS REZIDENCINĖS DIFERENCIACIJOS PROBLEMA............................................................... 19 1.3. ERDVINĖS SEGREGACIJOS PROBLEMA MOKSLO TYRIMUOSE LIETUVOJE......................................................................... 22 2. LIETUVOS METROPOLINIŲ REGIONŲ RAIDA MIESTŲ SISTEMOS TRANSFORMACIJOS KONTEKSTE........................................ 25 2.1. LIETUVA POKOMUNISTINIŲ ŠALIŲ KONTEKSTE............................. 25 2.2. LIETUVOS MIESTŲ SISTEMOS TRANSFORMACIJA BALTIJOS ŠALIŲ KONTEKSTE................................................................ 27 2.3. METROPOLINIAI REGIONAI GYVENVIEČIŲ SISTEMOS TRANSFORMACIJŲ KONTEKSTE 2001-2011 M.....................................28 2.4. VIDAUS MIGRACIJA IR JOS ĮTAKA APGYVENDINIMO SISTEMOS KAITAI.................................................. 32 2.5. VIDAUS MIGRACIJA IR METROPOLINIŲ REGIONŲ RAIDA...........................................................................................................34 3. SOCIALINĖ SEGREGACIJA LIETUVOS METROPOLINIUOSE REGIONUOSE..................................................................................................... 39 3.1. METROPOLINIŲ REGIONŲ SOCIALINĖS STRUKTŪROS KAITA - ŠALIES METROPOLIZACIJOS PASEKMĖ..............................40 3.2. SOCIOERDVINĖS SEGREGACIJOS LAIPSNIS METROPOLINIUOSE REGIONUOSE....................................................... 42 3.3. TERITORINĖS SEGREGACIJOS DIMENSIJOS KARTOGRAFINĖS ANALIZĖS REZULTATAI....................................... 47 3.4. SOCIOEKONOMINĖS SEGREGACIJOS KAITA VILNIAUS MIESTE..................................................................................... 55 3.5. SOCIALINĖS SEGREGACIJOS DEMOGRAFINĖ DIMENSIJA............. 61 4. GYVENTOJŲ TAUTINĖ TERITORINĖ DIFERENCIACIJA.....................69 4.1. 4.2. 4.3. 4.4. TAUTINĖ SUDĖTIS IR JOS KAITA.......................................................... 70 TAUTINĖ DIFERENCIACIJA 2011 M.........................................................76 KIEKYBINĖ ETNINĖS DIFERENCIACIJOS ANALIZĖ.........................78 RELIGINIŲ BENDRUOMENIŲ KONCENTRACIJOS SKIRTUMAI................................................................................................. 79 5. ELEKTORINĖ REZIDENCINĖ DIFERENCIACIJA LIETUVOS METROPOLINIUOSE REGIONUOSE............................................................ 82 5.1. GYVENTOJŲ POLITINĖ DIFERENCIACIJA STATISTINĖS ANALIZĖS REZULTATAI.................................................87 5.2. POLITINĖ REZIDENCINĖ DIFERENCIACIJA ֊ KARTOGRAFINĖS ANALIZĖS REZULTATAI....................................... 91 6. DAUGIADIMENSINIAI SEGREGACIJOS ASPEKTAI LIETUVOS METROPOLINIUOSE REGIONUOSE......................................... 104 6.1. SOCIOETNINĖS SEGREGACIJOS DIMENSIJOS................................... 104 6.2. POLITINĖS SOCIOETNINĖS SEGREGACIJOS DIMENSIJOS............. 110 7. UŽDAROSIOS GYVENVIETĖS - IŠSKIRTINĖS TERITORINĖS SEGREGACIJOS METROPOLINIUOSE REGIONUOSE PAVYZDYS...............................................................................116 7.1. UŽDAROSIOS GYVENVIETĖS PASAULYJE......................................... 120 7.2. UŽDAROSIOS GYVENVIETĖS LIETUVOJE......................................... 123 7.3. UŽDARŲJŲ GYVENVIEČIŲ SOCIALINIS VAIDMUO LIETUVOS METROPOLINIUOSE REGIONUOSE................................. 126 IŠVADOS IR APIBENDRINIMAI......................................................................... 131 SUMMARY............................................................................................................... 134 LITERATŪRA........................................................................................................ 136 4 LITERATURA Åberg, M. (2005). Baltic orientations: Globalization, regionalization, or “EU-izolation”? Hamilton, F. W. I., Andrews, K. D., Pichler-Milanovic, N. (red.) Transformation of Cities in Central and Eastern Europe — Towards Globalization. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, p. 399^127. Abreu, A. (2012). The new economics of labor migration: beware of Neoclassical bearing gifts. Forum for social economics, 41(1), 46-67. Adell, G. (1999). Theories and models of the peri-urban interface: a changing conceptual landscape. Strategic Environmental Planning and Management for the Periurban Interface. Research Project. Adlys, P. G. (2012). Lietuvos gyventojų tautinė sudėtis. Mokslas ir gyvenimas, 11-12, p. 2-А. Aidukaitė, J. (2014). Housing policy regime in Lithuania: towards liberalization and marketization. GeoJournal, 79(4), p. 421—432. Andrusz, G. (1996). Structural change and boundary instability. Andrusz, G., Harloe, M., Szelenyi, I. (red.) Cities after socialism: Urban and regional change and conflict in post-socialist societies. Malden: Blackwell, p. 30-69. Arango, J. (2000). Explaining migration: a critical view. International Social Science Journal, 52(165), p. 283-296. Armen, G. (1972). A classification of cities and city regions in England and Wales, 1966. Regional studies, 6(2), p. 149-182. Baldassare, M. (1992). Suburban Communities. Annual review ofSociology, 18, p. 475^194. Baranauskaitė, A. (2015). Vilniaus miesto teritorijos elektorinės struktūros raida. Magistro darbas. Vilniaus universitetas, Vilnius. Baranauskaitė, A., Bumeika, D., Tučas, R. (2015). Elektorinių struktūrų erdvinė diferenciacija Lietuvos miestų regionuose. Geografijos metraštis, 48, p. 3-23. Baranauskaitė, A., Tučas, R. (2014). Vilniaus miesto elektoriné struktūra 2008 m. ir 2012 m. Seimo rinkimų duomenimis. Geografijos metraštis, Al, p. 37-54. Bater, J. H. (1980). The Soviet City. London: Edward Arnold. Berger, P., Luckman, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology ofKnowledge. New York: Garden City. Bertaud A. (2006). The spatial structures of Central and Eastern European cities. S. Tsenkova, Z. Nedovic-Budic (red.) The Urban Mosaic ofPost-Socialist Europe. New York: PhysicaVerlag Heidelberg, p. 91-110. Bertaud, A., Renaud, В. (1997). Socialist cities without land markets. Journal of urban Economics, 41(1), p. 137-151. Bērziņš A., Zvidriņš P. (2011). Depopulation in the Baltic States. Lithuanian Journal of Statistics, 50(1), p. 39-48. Bible, D.S. (2001). Gated communities and residential property values. Appraisal Journal, 69(2), p. 140-148. Bilodeau, A. (2009). Residential Segregation and the Electoral Participation of Immigrants in Australia. International Migration Review, 43, p. 134-159. 136 Bitusikova. A., Luther, D. (2010). Sustainable diversity and public space in the city of Bratislava, Slovakia. Anthropological notebooks, 16(2), p. 5-18. Björklund, T. (2007). The 1987 Norwegian Local Elections: A Protest Election with a Swing to the Right. Scandinavian Political Studies, 11(3), p. 211-234. Blandy, S., Parsons, D. (2003). Gated Communities in England: rules and rhetoric of urban planning, Geographica Helvetica, 58, p. 314-324. Blakely, E. J., Snyder, M. G. (1997). Fortress America: Gated Communities in the United States. Washington, DC and Cambridge, MA: Brookings Institution Press and Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. Blinnikov, M., Shanin, A., Sobolev, N., Volkova, L. (2006). Gated communities of the Moscow green belt: newly segregated landscapes and the suburban Russian environment. GeoJournal, 66(1-2), p. 65-81. Bodnar, J. (2001). Fin de Millénaire Budapest: Metamorphoses ofurban life. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Bodnar, J., Molnar, V. (2010). Reconfiguring private and public: State, capital and new housing developments in Berlin and Budapest. Urban Studies, 47(2), p. 789-812. Boentje, J., Blinnikov, M. (2007). Post-Soviet forest fragmentation and loss of the Green Belt around Moscow, Russia (1991-2001): A remote sensing perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 82(4), p. 208-221. Boyle, R, Halfacree, K., Robinson, V. (1998). Exploring contemporary migration. New York: Addison Wesley Longman. Bolt, G., van Kempen, R. (2010). Ethnic segregation and residential mobility: Relocations of minority ethnic groups in the Netherlands. Journal ofEthnic and Migration Studies, 36 (2), p. 333-354. Borén, T., Gentile, M. (2007). Metropolitan processes in post-communist states: An introduction. Geografiska Annaler: Series В, Human Geography, 89(2), p. 95-110. Boschman, S. (2015). Selective mobility, segregation and neighbourhood effects. Daktaro disertacija. Delft University of technology, Delft. Brade, L, Herfert, G., Wiest, К. (2009). Recent trends and future prospects of socio-spatial differentiation in urban regions of Central and Eastern Europe: A lull before the storm? Cities, 26 (5), p. 233-244. Brazienė, R. (2002). Socialinių sluoksniųjormavimasis nepriklausomoje Lietuvoje. Kauno technologijos universitetas, Kaunas. Briggs, X. N. D. S., William, J. W. (2005). The geography of opportunity: Race and housing choice in metropolitan America. Washington: Brookings Institution Press. Brown D. L., Schafft К. A. (2002). Population déconcentration in Hungary during the post socialist transformation. Journal ofRural Studies, 18, p. 233-244. Brown, D. L., Kulcsár, L. K. (2001). Household economic behavior in post-socialist rural Hungary. Rural Sociology, 66(2), p. 157-180. Burke, M., Sebally, C. (2001): Looking in the pedestrian? The privatised streets of gated communities. World Transport Policy Practice, 11(4), p. 67-74. Bumeika D. (2014). Regioninė politika Europoje. Mokomoji knyga. Vilniaus universitetas, Vilnius. 137 Bumeika D., Ubarevičienė, R., Pociūtė, G., Kriaučiūnas, E. (2013). The Impact of Vilnius city on the transformation trends of the sparsely populated EU East border region. Etniškumo studijos, 2, p. 49-68. Bumeika, D., Daugirdas, V, Ubarevičienė, R. (2014). Migration as a factor of development of the depopulating areas in East EU countries - The case of Lithuania, Europa XXL, 27, p. 79-94. Bumeika, D., Ubarevičienė, R. (2011). The sprawl ofVilnius city-some consequences of rural-urban transformations. Annales Geographicae, 43-44, p. 108-115. Bumeika, D., Ubarevičienė, R. (2013). Metropolitan regions in Lithuania - Trends of transformation of the Soviet urban system. Kyiv geographic almanac, 8, p. 107-113. Ukrainian geographic society, Kyiv National University. Bumeika, D., Ubarevičienė, R., Valatka, V. (2015). Socio-economic segregation in growing urban regions of Lithuania. Filosofija. Sociologija, 26(4), p. 277-292. Butkus, A. (2015). Lietuvos gyventojai tautybės požiūriu, http://alkas.lt/2015/12/16/abutkus-lietuvos-gyventojai-tautybes-poziuriu/[žiūrėta 2016 11 18]. Caldeira, T. P. do R. (2000). City of Walls. Crime, Segregation, and Citizenship in Sao Paulo. Berkeley: University of California. Capello, R. (2009). Regional Growth and Local Development Theories: Conceptual Evolution over Fifty Years of Regional Science. Géographie, économie, société, 11(1), p. 9-21. Charter of the New Urbanism. (1996). Congress for the New Urbanism, http://www.cnu. org/charter Cirtautas, M. (2010). Šiuolaikinė priemiestinės zonos samprata. Mokslas - Lietuvos ateitis, 2(3), p. 11-17. Cirtautas, M. (2013). Baltijos šalių miestų ekstensyvios plėtros ypatumai, Konferencijos „VI Lietuvos urbanistinis forumas: Lietuvos miestai ir miesteliai“ pranešimas (Vilnius, 2012 m. lapkričio 15 d.), mokslinių straipsnių rinkinys. VGTU, Vilnius. Cirtautas, M. (2013). Urban sprawl of major cities in the Baltic States. Architecture and Urban Planning, 7, p. 72-79. Civinskas, R., Genys, D., Kuzmickaitė, D., Tretjakova, V. (2011). The Dynamics of demographic decline and its consequences for Lithuania / Viewpoints from liberal perspective. Bmil, C., van Schie, P. van de Velde, M. (red.) The dynamics of demographic decline. The Hague: Oranje/Van Loon, p. 105-115. Cohen, C., Dawson, M. (1993). Neighborhood Poverty and African American Politics. American Political Science Review, 87, p. 286-302. Crowley, D., Reid, S. (2002). Socialist spaces: Sites of everyday life in the Eastern Bloc. Oxford: Berg. Cséfalvay, Z. (2009). The Demystification of Gating, Debate February 2009, European journal of spatial development. http://www.nordregio.se/Global/EJSD/Debate/ debate200902.pdf [žiūrėta 2016 01 12]. Cséfalvay, Z., Webster, C. (2012). Gates or No Gates? A Cross-European Enquiry into the Driving Forces behind Gated Communities. Regional Studies, 46(3), p. 293-308. Čepas, S. (2015). Lietuvos gyventojų tautinės sudėties kaitos teritorinės ypatybės. Bakalauro darbas. Vilniaus universitetas, Vilnius. 138 Česnavičius D. (1999). Didžiųjų Lietuvos miestųpriemiestiniųzonųžemės naudojimo geogra finiai ypatumai. Daktaro disertacijos santrauka. Vilniaus pedagoginis universitetas, Vilnius. Daugirdas, V, Bumeika, D., Kriaučiūnas, E., Ribokas, G., Stanaitis, S., Ubarevičienė, R. (2013). Lietuvos retai apgyventos teritorijos. Lietuvos socialinių tyrimų centras, Vilnius. Daugirdas, V, Paltanavičiūtė, G. (2005). Ignalinos AE regiono gyventojų tautinės sudėties kaita. Ignalinos AE regionas: permainų erdvė. Vilnius, p. 72-87. Daugirdas, V, Paltanavičiūtė, G. (2008). Dynamics ofthe national composition in North-East Lithuania. Problem regions in Lithuania (sociogeographical aspects). Vilnius, p. 45-58. Davis, M. (1990). City of Quartz: excavating the future ofLos Angeles. London: Verso. Davoudi, S. (2008). Conception of the city-region: a critical review. Urban Design and Planning, 161(2), p. 51-60. Dawkins, C. J. (2003). Regional Development Theory: Conceptual Foundations, Classic Works, and Recent Developments. Journal ofPlanning Literature, 18(2), p. 131-172. Dillion, D. (1994). Fortress America: more and more of us are living behind locked gates. Planning, 60, p. 2-8. Eberhardt, P. (2011). Political migrations on Polish territories (1939-1950). Polska akademia nauk, Warszawa. Eberstadt, N. (1994). Demographic shocks after communism: Eastern Germany, 1989-93. Population and Development Review, 20(1), p. 137-152. Enyedi, G. (1998). Transformation in central European postsocialist cities. Enyedi, G. (red.) Social Change and Urban Restructuring in Central Europe. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, p. 109-136. EPSON (2013). Thefunctional urban areas database. Technical report. http://www.espon. eu/export/sites/default/Documents/ToolsandMaps/ESPON2013Database/3.7_TRFUAs.pdf [žiūrėta 2016 10 03]. Erlingsson, G. O., Persson, M. (2011). The Swedish Pirate Party and the 2009 European Parliament Election: Protest or Issue Voting? Politics, 31(3), p. 121-128. Eurostato duomenų bazė (2016). http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/ [žiūrėta 2016 09 20]. Eurostat (2015). Gini coefficient of equivalised disposable income http://ec.europa.eu/ eurostat/ [žiūrėta 2015 09 08]. Florida, R. (2010). Who‘s your city?: How the creative economy is making where to live the most important decision ofyour life. Basic Books: New York. Frantz, K. (2006). Private gated neighborhoods: a progressive trend in US urban development. Glasze, G., Webster, C., Frantz, K. (red.) Private Cities: Global and local perspectives. London and New York: Routledge, p. 64—75. Fratesi, U., Percoco, M. (2014). Selective migration, regional growth and convergence: evidence from Italy. Regional Studies, 48(10), p. 1650-1668. Gadecki, J., Śmigiel, C. (2009). A paradise behind gates and walls. Gated Communities in Eastern Europe and the Promise of Happiness. Bartrtzky, A., Schalenberg, M. (red.) Urban Planning and the Pursuit ofHappiness. Berlin: Jovis Verlag, p. 199-217. Gaidys, V. (2004). Viešoji nuomonė ir politika. Krupavičius A., Lukošaitis A. (sud.) Lietuvos politinė sistema: sandara ir raida. Kaunas: Poligrafija ir Informatika. 139 Gaidys, V. (2014). Socialinių demografinių parametrų įtaka gyventojų partinėms preferen cijoms ir politiniam aktyvumui: jungtinių duomenų masyvų analizė, Lietuvos gyvento jai XXI a. pradžioje: Sociodemografiniai aspektai. Lietuvos socialinė raida, 3, p. 7-24. LSTC. Vilnius. Gainsborough, J.F. (2001). Fenced Off: The Suburbanization of American Politics. Washington: Georgetown University Press. Gentile, M., Tammaru, T. (2006). Ethnicity and housing in the post-Soviet city: UsťKamenogorsk, Kazakstan. Urban Studies, 43, p. 1757-1778. Gentile, M., Tammaru, T., van Kempen, R. (2012). Heteropolitanization: Social and spatial change in Central and East European Cities. Cities, 29(5), p. 291-350. Ghent Urban Studies Team (2002). Post Ex Sub Dis. — Urban Fragmentations and Constructions. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers. Gimpel, J. G., Dyck, J. J., Shaw, D. R. (2004). Registrants, Voters and Turnout Variability Across Neighborhoods. Political Behavior, 26(4), p. 343-375. Glassner, В. 1999. The Culture of Fear. Why Americans are Afraid of the Wrong Things. New York: Basic. Glasze, G. (2005). Some Reflections on the Economic and Political Organisation of Private Neighbourhoods. Housing Studies, 20(2), p. 221-233. Glasze, Ģ., Alkhayyal, A. (2002). Gated housing estates in the Arab world: case studies in Lebanon and Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29(3), p. 321-336. Grant, J. (2005). Planning responses to gated communities in Canada. Housing Studies, 20(2), p. 273-285. Gregory, D. (1981). Human agency and human geography. Transactions of the institute of British geographers, 6(1), p. 1-18. Gregory, D., Johnston, R., Pratt, G., Watts, M., Whatmore, S. (2011). The Dictionary of Human Geography. John Wiley Sons. Gruževskis, В. (2004). Labour migration in Lithuania // New Patterns of Labour Migration in CEE. CEPNO Volume Cluj - Napoca (Romania), Open Society Foundation, p. 70-78. Gudelis, D. (2015). Lietuvos didžiųjų miestų gyventojų struktūros ypatumai. Mokslo studija. Vilniaus universitetas: Vilnius. Haase, A., Athanasopoulou, A., Rink, D. (2016). Urban shrinkage as an emerging concern for European policymaking. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(1), p. 103-107. Haase, A., Bernt, M., Großmann, К., Mykhnenko, V, Rink, D. (2013). Varieties of shrinkage in European cities. European Urban and Regional Studies (Doi: 10. 1177/0969776413481985). Hall, R, Hay, D. (1980). Growth centres in the European Urban system. Heynemann educational books: Norwich. Hall, M., Crowder, K.D., Tolnay, S. (2010). Immigration and Native Residential Mobility in Established, New, and Nongateway Metropolitan Destinations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, USA. Hall, P. (2002). Cities of Tomorrow: an intellectual history of urban planning and design in the twentieth century. Wiley-Blackwell. 140 Hall, T. (1998). Urban geography. London: Routledge, p. 16-28. Hamilton, F. W. I., Andrews, K. D., Pichler-Milanovic, N. (2005). Transformation of Cities in Central and Eastern Europe - Towards Globalization. Tokyo: United Nations University Press. Hamnett, Ch. (1996). Social geography. A Reader. Arnold: London, p. 7-26. Hamnett, Ch. (2001). Social segregations and social polarisation. In Handbook of urban studies. Ed. R. Paddison. p. 162 - 176. London: Sage Publiacations. Handley, J. (2002). After Terrorist Attacks, Different Opinions Form about Gated Communities, Chicago Tribune (IL), 8, p. 12-19. Harding, A. (2007). Taking City Regions Seriously? Response to Debate on ‘City-Regions: New Geographies of Governance, Democracy and Social Reproduction’. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(2), p. 443^-58. Harrison, J. (2007). From competitive regions to competitive city-regions: a new orthodoxy, but some old mistakes. Journal ofEconomic Geography, 7(3), p. 311-332. Harvey, D. (1972). Revolutionary and counter-revolutionary theory in geography and problem of ghetto formalion. Antipode, 4(2), p. 1-13. Harvey, D. (2009). Social Justice and the City: Revised Edition. Georgia, USA: University of Georgia Press. Havel, V. (1992). Summer meditations (P. Wilson vertimas). New York: Alfred Knopf. Hegedűs, G. (2007). The review of the effects of the gated communities caused on the space use of their area and surroundings. Kovács, Cs. Szerk: From villages to cyberspace, SZEGED: Department of Economic and Social Geography, p. 207-218. Hay Group. (2015). http://www.haygroup.com/lt/Press/Details.aspx?ID=44410 [žiūrėta 2015 11 05]. Hess, D. B., Tammaru, T., Leetmaa, K. (2012). Ethnic differences in housing in post-Soviet Tartu, Estonia. Cities, 29(5), p. 327-333. Hiebert, D. (2009). Segregation. Gregory, D., Johnston, R., Pratt, G., Watts, M., Whatmore, S. (red.) The Dictionary ofHuman Geography (5 ed.). Singapore: Wiley-Blackwell, p. 673. Hirsch, H. (1968). Suburban Voting and National Trends: A Research Note. The Western Political Quartely, 21(3), p. 508-514. Hirt S., Petrovič M. (2010). The Gates of Belgrade. Safety, Privacy, and New Housing Pattern in the Post-Communist City. Problems ofPost-Communism, 57(5), p. 3-19. Hirt, S., Petrovič, M. (2011). The Belgrade Wall: The Proliferation of Gated Housing in the Serbian Capital after Socialism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(4), p. 753-777. Hirt, S. (2006). Post-socialist urban forms: Notes from Sofia. Urban Geography, 27(5), p. 464-488. Hirt, S. (2012). Iron curtains: Gates, suburbs andprivatization ofspace in the postsocialist city. Malden and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Hirt, S. (2013). Whatever happened to the (post)socialist city? Cities, 32, p. 29-38. Hirt, S., Stanilov, K. (2009). Twenty years of transition: The evolution of urban planning in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union, 1989-2009. Nairobi: UNHABITAT. 141 Hodkinson, S. (2012). The new urban enclosures. City, 16(5), p. 500-518. Hospers, G. J. (2012). Coping with shrinkage in Europe’s cities and towns. Urban design international, 18, p. 78-89. Huckfeldt, R. (1979). Political Participation and the Neighborhoods Social Context. American Journal ofpolitical Science, 23(3), p. 579-592. Huckfeldt, R., Sprague, J. (1995). Citizens, Politics and Social Communication. New York: Cambridge University Press. Huzinec, G.A. (1978). The impact of industrial decision-making upon the Soviet urban hierarchy. Urban Studies, 15, p. 139-148. International Labour Organisation (2012). International Standard Classiti cation of Occupations, http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—dgreports/—dcomm/—publ/ documents/publication/wcms_172572.pdf [žiūrėta 2016 05 09]. Youssef, K. W. F. (2015). Gated-ness, income segregation and neighbourhood cohesion in two Western Canadian metropolises. Daktaro disertacija. University of Calgary, Calgary. Janoschka, M., Borsdorf, A. (2006). Condominios fechados and barrios privados. The rise of private residential neighbourdoods in Latin America. Glasze, G., Webster, C., Frantz, K. (red.) Private Cities: Global and local perspectives. London and New York: Routledge, p. 92-108. Jastramskis, M. (2015). Arturo Zuoko vieta Lietuvos politinės konkurencijos lauke: sociologinė analizė. Parlamento studijos, 18, p. 123-149. Johnston, RJ. (1973). Possible extensions to the factorial ecology method: a note. Environment and planning, 5(6), p. 719-734. Johnston, R., Pattie, C. (2006). Putting Voters in their Place. Geography and Elections in Great Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Johnston, R., Jones, K. (2010). Measuring segregation - a cautionary tale. Environment and Planning A, 42, 1264—1270. Jonas, E.G., Ward, K. (2007). Introduction to a debate on city-gegions: New geographies of governance, democracy and social reproduction. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(1), p. 169-178. Jungens, U., Landman, K. (2006). Gated communities in South Africa. Glasze, G., Webster, C., Frantz, K. (red.) Private Cities: Global and local perspectives. London and New York: Routledge, p. 109-126. Juškevičius, (2015). Miestų sistemos raida Lietuvoje. Acta Academiae Artium Vilnensis, 76, p. 11-13. Kahanec, M., Zaiceva, A., Zimmermann, K.F. (2010). Lessons from migration after EU enlargement. Kahanec, M., Zimmermann, K.F. (red.) EU labour markets after postenlargement migration. Bonn: Springer, p. 3—45. Kanbur R., Rappaport, H. (2005). Migration selectivity and the evolution of spatial inequality. Journal ofEconomic Geography, 5(1), 43-57. Karalius, A. (1995). Vilnius ir vilniečiai: gyvenimo kokybės vertinimas. Filosofijos, sociologijos ir teisės institutas, Vilnius. Karlsson, C., Olsson, M. (2006). The identification of functional regions: theory, methods, and applications. The annals of regional science, 40(1), p. 1-18. 142 Kartanaitė, A. (2014). Lietuvos-Latvijos pasienio regiono gyventojų tautinės ir religinės sudėties kaitos ypatybės. Bakalauro darbas. Vilniaus universitetas, Vilnius. Kaufmann, K.M. (2004). The Urban Voter: Group Conflict and Mayoral Voting Behavior in American Cities (The Politics of Race and Ethnicity). JAV: University of Michigan Press. Kavaliauskas, P., Grigužauskaitė, S. (2014). Geosocialinių struktūrų sampratos metodolo gija. Geografija, 50(2), p. 63-75, Kavaliauskas P., Jakutis M. (2015). Tautos ir nacijos sampratos problema. Geologija. Geografija, 1 (1), 45-55. Kok, H., Kovács, Z. (1999). The process of suburbanization in the agglomeration ofBudapest. Netherlands Journal ofHousing and the Built Environment, 14(2), p. 119-141. Kovács, Z., Hegedűs, G. (2014). Gated communities as new form of segregation in post socialist Budapest. Cities, 36, p. 200-209. Krišjāne, Z., Bērziņš M. (2012). Post-socialist Urban trends: new Patterns and Motivations for Migration in the Suburban areas of Rīga, Latvia. Urban Studies, 49(2), p. 289-306. Krišjāne, Z., Bērziņš, M. (2009). Commuting and the Déconcentration of the PostSocialist Urban Population: The Case of the Rīga Agglomeration. Folia Geographica/ Ģeogrāfiski Raksti, XIV, p. 56-74. Krišjāne, Z., Bērziņš, M., Kratovitš, R. (2016). Occupation and ethnicity: patterns of residential segregation in Riga two decades after socialism. Tammaru, T., Marcińczak, S., van Ham, M., Musterd, S. (red.) Socio-economic segregation in European Capital cities: East meets West. London and New York: Routledge, p. 333-358. Kroll, F., Kabisch, N. (2012). The relation of diverging urban growth processes and demographic change along an urban-rural gradient. Population, Space and Place, 18(3), p. 260-276. Krupickaitė, D., Peciukonytė, L., Pociūtė, G. (2010-2011). Aptvertos ir saugomos gyven vietės Lietuvoje - naujos gyvensenos išraiška ar būtinybė. Annales Geographicae, 4344(1-2), p. 3-15. Krupickaitė, D., Pociūtė, G., Peciukonytė, L. (2014). In the middle of nowhere: Gated neighbourhoods in Vilnius region as a new lifestyle? Hungarian geographical bulletin, 63(3), p. 271-286. Krupickaitė, D. (2011 (2014)). Vilnius - between persistence and socio spatial change. Europa regional, 19, 3—4, p. 21-31. Krupickaitė, D., Pociūtė, G. (2009). Gated and guarded housing in Lithuania, Forum lfl, Helfli, p. 75-81. Kulu, H. (2003). Housing differences in the late Soviet city: The case of Tartu, Estonia. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(4), p. 897-911. Kulu, H., Tammaru, T. (2003). Housing and ethnicity in Soviet Tartu. Yearbook of Population Research in Finland, 39, p. 119-140. Landman, K. (2006). Privatising public space in post-apartheid South African cities through neighbourhood enclosures. GeoJournal, 66, p. 133-146. Latour, В. (2005). Reasembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 143 Le Goix, R., Webster, C. J. (2008). Gated Communities. Geography Compass, 2/4, p. 1189-1214. Le Goix, R. (2005). Gated communities: sprawl and social segregation in Southern California. Housing Studies, 20(2), p. 323-343. Le Goix, R. (2006). Gated communities as predators of public resources: the outcomes of fading boundaries between private management and public authorities in southern California. Glasze, G., Webster, C., Frantz, K. (red.) Private Cities: Global and local perspectives. London and New York: Routledge, p. 76-91. Le Goix, R., Vesselinov, E. (2012). From picket fences to iron gates: suburbanization and gated communities in Phoenix, Las Vegas and Seattle. GeoJournal, 77(2), p. 203-222. Leetmaa, K., Tammaru, T., Anniste, K. (2009). From priority-led to market-led suburbanization in a post-communist metropolis. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 100(4), p. 436—453. Leetmaa, К., Tammaru, T. (2007). Suburbanization in Countries in Transition: Destinations of suburbanisers in the Tallinn metropolitan area. Geografiska Annaler: Series В Human Geography, 89(2), p. 127—46. Legeby, A. (2010). Urban segregation and urban form. From residential segregation to segregation in public space. Stockholm: Licentiate thesis, KTH. Leighley, J. E., Vedlitz, A. (1999). Race, Ethnicity and Political Participation: Competing Models and Contrasting Explanations. Journal ofPolitics, 61(4), p. 1092-1114. Lemański, C. (2006). Spaces of exclusivity, or connection? Linkages between a security village and its poorer neighbour in a Cape Town master plan development. Dark Roat Occasional Paper Series 21. Lentz, S. (2006). More gates, less community? Guarded housing in Russia. Glasze, G., Webster, C., Frantz, K. (red.) Private Cities: Global and localperspectives. London and New York: Routledge, p. 206-221. Lentz, S., Lindner, P. (2003). Privatisierung des öff entliehen Raumes - soziale Segregation und geschlossene Wohnviertel Moskaus. Geographische Rundschau, 55(12), p. 50-57. Lewis, W.A. (1954). Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labour. The Manchester school, 22(2), p. 139-191. Lietuvos Respublikos vyriausiosios rinkimų komisijos elektorinių duomenų bazė (http:// www.vrk.lt/). Lietuvos statistikos departamentas (2002). Gyventojai pagal lytį, amžių, tautybę ir tikybą. Vilnius. Lietuvos statistikos departamentas (2011). Duomenys gauti pagal užklausą. Lietuvos statistikos departamentas (2012). Lietuvos Respublikos 2011 metų gyventojų ir būstų surašymo rezultatai. Vilnius. Lietuvos statistikos departamentas (2013). Gyventojai pagal tautybę, gimtąją kalbą ir tikybą: Lietuvos Respublikos 2011 metų visuotinio gyventojų ir būstų surašymo rezultatai. Vilnius. orvos statistikos departamentas (2015). 2001 ir 2011 m. visuotinių gyventojų surašymų duomenys apie gyventojų tautinę ir religinę sudėtį. Vilnius. 144 Lietuvos statistikos departamentas (2016a). Lietuvos gyventojų tautinė sudėtis: skaičius. http://osp.stat.gov.lt/analysis-portlet/print-servlet [žiūrėta 2016 11 18]. Lietuvos statistikos departamentas (2016Ե). Lietuvos gyventojų tautinė sudėtis: dalis. http://osp.stat.gov.lt/analysis-portlet/print/load_lt.html [žiūrėta 2016 11 18]. Lietuvos statistikos departamentas (2016). http://osp.stat.gov.lt/en/web/guest/horne Low, S. (2004). Behind the gates: life, security, and the pursuit of happiness in fortress America. New York and London: Routledge. Maes, M., Loopmans, M., Kesteloot, C. (2012). Urban Shrinkage and Everyday Life in Post-Socialist Cities: Living with Diversity in Hrušov, Ostrava, Czech Republic. Built Environment, 38(2), p. 229-243. Manis, J. G., Stone, L.C. (1958-1959). Suburban Residence and Political Bahaviour. The public Opinion Quarterly 22(4), p. 483—489. Manzi, T., Smith-Bowers, B. (2005). Gated communities as club goods: segregation or social cohesion? Housing Studies, 20(2), p. 345-359. Marcińczak, S., Musterd, S., Stępniak, M. (2012). Where the grass is greener: Social segregation in three major Polish cities at the beginning of the 21st century. European Urban and Regional Studies, 19(4), p. 383—403. Marcińczak, S., Tammaru, T., Novák, L, Gentile, M., Kovács, Z., Temelová, J., Valatka, V, Kährik, A., Szabó, В. (2015). Patterns of socioeconomic segregation in the capital cities of fast-track reforming postsocialist countries. Annals of the Association ofAmerican Geographers 105(1), p. 183-202. Martí-Henneberg, J. (2005). Empirical evidence of regional population concentration in Europe, 1870-2000.Population, Space and Place, 11(4), p. 269-281. Masiulis, К. (1997). Lietuvos elitas: Ekonominės vertybės, Politinės orientacijos, Progno zės. Pradai: Vilnius. Massey, D. S., Denton, N. A. (1988). The dimensions of residential segregation. Social Forces, 67(2), p. 281-315. Massey, D. S, Denton, N. A. (1998). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Matulionis, A. (2005). Lietuvos socialinė struktūra. Firidas: Vilnius. McCann, P. (2001). Urban and regional economics. New York: Oxford University Press. McKenzie, E. (1994). Privatopia: homeowner associations and the rise of residential private government. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Milstead, T.M. (2008). Housing and urban development in a post-soviet city: a case study of Vilnius, Lithuania. Daktaro disertacija. Florida State University. Morkevičius, V, Norkus, Z. (2012). Šiuolaikinės Lietuvos klasinė struktūra: neovėberiška analizė. Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas, 31(2), p. 75-152. Musil, J. (1993). Changing urban systems in post-communist societies in Central Europe analysis and prediction. Urban Studies, 30(6), p. 899-905. Musil, J. (2005). City development in Central and Eastern Europe before 1990: Historical context and socialist legacies. Hamilton, F.W.I., Andrews, K.D., Pichler-Milanovic, N. (red.) Transformation ofCities in Central and Eastern Europe-Towards Globalization. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, p. 22M-3. 145 Negura, О. (2009). Residential ensembles in „hypermodern times“. A case study of their aspirations in Bucharest. Schmigiel, C. (red.) Gated and Guarded Housing in Eastern Europe. Forum IFL 11. Leibniz Institut für Länderkunde. Leipzig, p. 59-67. Ni Laoire, C. (2000). Conceptualising Irish rural youth migration: A biographical approach. International Journal ofPopulation Geography, 6(3), p. 229-243. Nissen, S. (2008). Urban Transformation from public and private space to spaces of hybrid character. Czech Sociological Review, 44(6), p. 1129-1149. Novák, J., Sýkora, L. (2007). A city in motion: time-space activity and mobility patterns of suburban inhabitants and the structuration of the spatial organization of the Prague metropolitan area. Geografiska Annaler: Series В, Human Geography, 89(2), p. 147-168. Nuissl, H., Rink, D. (2005). The production of urban sprawl in Eastern Germany as a phenomenon of post socialist transformation. Cities, 22(2), p. 123-134. Oliver, J.E., Ha, S.E. (2007). Vote Choice in Suburban Elections. American Political Science Review, 101(3), p. 393^108. Openshaw, S. (1977). A geographical solution to scale and aggregation problems in region-building, partitioning and spatial modelling. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 2, p. 459^172. Ouředníček, M. (2007). Differential Suburban Development in the Prague urban Region. Geografiska Annaler: Series В Human Geography, 89(2), p. 111-126. Pahl R. E. (1970). Whose City? London: Longman. Paltanavičiūtė, G. (2005). Etninių įtampų tyrimo problema socialiniame lauke. Geografija, 41(1), p. 17-22. Paltanavičiūtė, G. (2006). Etninių ir religinių Rampų teritorinė struktūra Lietuvoje. Daktaro disertacija. Vilniaus universitetas, Vilnius. Park, E., Burgess, E., McKenzie, R. (1925). The City: Suggestions for Investigation of Human Behavior in the Urban Environment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Parr, J. (2005). Perspectives on the city-region. Regional Studies, 39(5), p. 555-566. Parsons, W. (2001). Viešojipolitika: Politikos analizės teorijos ir praktikos įvadas. Vilnius: Eugrimas. Petrulis, V. (2009). Lietuvos politinio lauko teritorinė struktūra (elektorinio metodo pagrindu). Daktaro disertacija. Vilniaus universitetas, Vikius. Pichler-Milanovic, N., Gutry-Korycka, M., Rink, D. (2008). Sprawl in the postsocialist city: The changing economic and institutional context of Central and Eastern European cities. Couch, C., Leontidou, L., Petschel-Held, G. (red.) Urban Sprawl in Europe: Landscapes, land-use change policy. Malden and Oxford: WileyBlackwell, p. 102-135. Pociūtė, G., Krupickaitė, D. (2007). Gated communities in Lithuania: tendencies and peculiarities (a case ofVilnius and its environs). Annales Geographicae, 40 (2), p. 14—27. Pociūtė-Sereikienė, G., Krupickaitė, D. (2016). Uždaros gyvenvietės kaip teritorinės segregacijos veiksnys. Filosofija. Sociologija, 27 (2), p. 161-172. Polanska, D. V. (2010). Gated Communities and the Construction of Social Class Markers in Postsocialist Societies: The Case of Poland. Space and Culture, 13(4), p. 421 —435. 146 Pow, C.P. (2009). “Good” and “real” places: a geographical - moral critique to territorial place-making. Geografsika Annaler, Series В, Human Geography, 91(2), p. 91-105. Purcell, M. (2007). City-Regions, Neoliberal Globalization and Democracy: A Research Agenda. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(1), p. 197-206. Quigley, M. J. (2013). Agglomeration, regional growth, and economic development. Klaesson, J., Johansson, B., Karlsson (red.) Metropolitan Regions, Advances in Spatial Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, p. 29-46. Ramonaitė, A. (2007). Posovietinės Lietuvos politinė anatomija. Versus Aureus: Vilnius. Ramonaitė, A., Jastramskis, M., Kavaliauskaitė, J., Nevinskaitė, L., Žiliukaitė, R. (2014). Kaip renkasi Lietuvos rinkėjai? Idėjos, interesai ir įvaizdžiai politikoje. Vilniaus universiteto leidykla: Vilnius. Raposo, R. (2003). New landscapes: Gated housing estates in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area. Geographica Helvetica, 4, p. 293—301. Rappaport, J. (2003). US urban decline and growth, 1950 to 2000. Economic Review (Third Quarter), p. 15—44. Renski, H. (2008). New firm entry, survival, and growth in the United States: A comparison of urban, suburban, and rural areas. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(1), p. 60-77. Rybakovskiy, L. L., Tarasova, N.V. (1991). Contemporary problems of migration of the population of the USSR. Soviet geography, 32(7), p. 458-473. Rychtaříková, J. (1999). Is Eastern Europe experiencing a second demographic transition? Acta Universitatis Carolinae - Geographica, 34, p. 19—44. Robinson, T., Noriega, S. (2010). Voting Migration as a Source of Electoral Change in the Rocky Mountain West. Political Geography, 29(1), p. 28-39. Roitman, S., Phelps, N. (2011). Do Gates Negate the City? Gated Communities’ Contribution to the Urbanisation of Suburbia in Pilar, Argentina. Urban Studies, 48(16), p. 3487-3509. Rudokaitė, J. (2014). Lietuvos Žiemgalos regiono elektoriné struktūra. Magistro darbas. Vilniaus universitetas, Vilnius. Rudolph, R., Brade, I. (2005). Moscow: Processes of restructuring in the post-Soviet metropolitan periphery. Cities, 22(2), p. 135-150. Ruoppila, S., Kährik, A. (2003). Socio-economic residential differentiation in postsocialist Tallinn. Journal ofHousing and the Built Environment, 18(1), p. 49-73. Ruoppila, S. (2004). Processes of residential differentiation in socialist cities. Literature review on the cases of Budapest, Prague, Tallinn and Warsaw. European Journal of Spatial Development 9. http://www.nordregio.se/EJSD/ Salcedo, R., Torres, A. (2004). Gated Communities in Santiago: Wall or Frontier? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1, p. 27֊44. Savickaitė, L, Krupickaitė, D., Tucas, R. (2013). Gyventojų rinkiminės elgsenos kaita Vilniaus suburbanizacijos zonoje. Geografijos metraštis, 46, p. 72-94. Schmigiel, Ch. (2009). Gated and Guarded Housing in Eastern Europe. Forum IfL 11. Leipzig: Leibnitz-Institut för Länderkunde. 147 LIETUVOS METROPOLINIAI REGIONAI Scott, A. J., Agnew, J., Soja, E. W., Storper, M. (2001). Global City-Regions: An Overview. Scott, AJ. (red). Global City-Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 11-32. Scott, A. J., Storper, M. (2007). Regions, globalization, development. Regional Studies, 37(6-7), p. 579-593. Semyonov, M., Glikman, A. (2009). Ethnic residential segregation, social contacts, and anti-minority attitudes in European societies. European Sociological Review, 25(6), p. 693-708. Sjaastad, L.A. (1962). The costs and returns of human migration. Journal of Political Economy, 70 (5), p. 80-93. Sklar, П. (2000). Booming Economic Inequality, Falling Voter Turnout. Z Magazine. Smith, A., Timár, J. (2010). Uneven transformations: Space, economy and society 20 years after the collapse of state socialism. European Urban and Regional Studies, 17(2), p. 115-125. Sobotka, T., Zeman, К., Kantorova, V. (2003). Demographic shifts in the Czech Republic after 1989: A second demographic transition view. European Journal of Population, 19(3), p. 249-277. Stanaitis, S., Cesnavičius, D. (2010). Dynamics of National Composition of Vilnius Population in the 2nd Half of the 20th Century. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic series, 13, p. 31—44. Stark, O., Bloom, D.E. (1985). The new economics of labour migration. The American Economic Review, 75(2), p. 173-178. Stein, R. M., Ulbig, S. G., Post, S. S. (2005). Voting for Minority Candidates in Multiracial/ Multiethnic Communities. Urban Affairs Review, 41(2), p. 157-181. Steinführer, A., Haase, A. (2007). Demographic change as a future challenge for cities in East Central Europe. Geografiska Annaler: Series В Human Geography, 89(2), p. 183-195. Stoyanov, P, Frantz, K. (2006). Gated communities in Bulgaria: interpreting a new trend in post-communist urban development. GeoJournal, 66, p. 67-63. Stryj aki ewicz, T., Ciesiołka, R, Jaroszewska, E. (2012). Urban shrinkage and the post socialist transformation: The case of Poland. Built Environment, 38(2), p. 196-213. Sýkora, L. (1999a). Changes in the internal spatial structure of post-communist Prague. GeoJournal, 49, p. 79-89. Sýkora, L. (1999b). Processes of socio-spatial differentiation in post-communist Prague. Housing Studies, 14(5), p. 679-701. Sýkora, L. (2009). Post-Socialist Cities. Kitchin, R., Thrift, N. (red.) International Encyclopedia ofHuman Geography, 8. Oxford: Elsevier, p. 387-395. Sýkora, L., Čermák, Z. (1998). City growth and migration patterns in the context of ‘communist’ and ‘transitory’ periods in Prague’s urban development. Space, Populations, Societies, 16(3), p. 405—416. Sýkora, L., Ouředníček, M. (2007). Sprawling post-communist metropolis: Commercial and residential suburbanization in Prague and Bmo, the Czech Republic. Razin, E., Dijst, M., 148 Vázquez, C. (red.) Employment Déconcentration in European Metropolitan Areas: market forces versus planning regulations. Netherlands: Springer, p. 209-233. Szelenyi, 1. (1996). Cities under socialism - and after. Andrusz, G., Harloe, M., Szelenyi, I. (red.) Cities after socialism: Urban and regional change and conflict in post-socialist societies. Malden: Blackwell, p. 287-317. Šešelgis, К. (1996). Teritorijų planavimo raida Lietuvoje. Urbanistika ir architektūra, 1(21), p. 4-19. Tammaru, T. (2001). Suburban Growth and Suburbanisation under Central Planning: The Case of Soviet Estonia. Urban Studies, 38(8), p. 1341-1357. Tammaru, T., Kährik, A., Magi, K., Novák, J., Leetmaa, K. (2016a). The ‘market experiment’ : increasing socio-economic segregation in the inherited bi-ethnic context of Tallinn. Tammaru, T, Marcińczak, S„ van Ham, M., Musterd, S. (red.) Socio economic segregation in European Capital cities: East meets West. London and New York: Routledge, p. 333-358. Tammaru, T., Kontuly, T. (2011). Selectivity and destinations of ethnic minorities leaving the main gateway cities of Estonia. Population, Space and Place, 17(5), p. 674-688. Tammaru, T, Van Ham, M., Leetmaa, K., Kährik, A., Kamenik, К. (2013). Ethnic dimensions of suburbanisation in Estonia. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(5), p. 845-862. Tammaru, T, Marcińczak, S., van Ham, M., Musterd, S. (2016b). Socio-Economic Segregation in European Capital Cities: East Meets West. London and New York: Routledge. Tereškinas, A., Žilys, A., Indriliūnaitė, R. (2013). Emocijos ir socioerdvinė segregacija Lietuvos didmiesčiuose: ar aš galiu ką nors pakeisti? Kultūra ir visuomenė, 4(2), p. 2029-4573. Tereškinas, A., Žilys, A., Indriliūnaitė, R. (2013). Pilietiškumas ir tapatumas šiuolaikinėje visuomenėje: socialinė atskirtis ir socialinė segregacija Lietuvos didmiesčiuose. Vytauto Didžiojo universiteto mokslo klasteriai, 2, p. 171-185. Thaut, L. (2009). EU Integration Emigration Consequences: The Case of Lithuania. International Migration, 47(1), p. 191-233. Thrift, N. (2007). Non representational theory. Space, Politics, Affect. London: Routledge. Tímár, J., Váradi M. M. (2001). The Uneven Development of Suburbanization during Transition in Hungary. European Urban and Regional Studies, 8(4), p. 349-360. Timms, D. (1975). The urban mosaic: towards a theory of residential differentiation. CUPArchive. (Cit. p. 33, 61, 62, 78). Ubarevičienė, R. (2014). Lietuvos teritorijos apgyvendinimo kaita 21 a.: miestų-regionų formavimasis. Lietuvos socialinė raida, 3, p. 92-112. LSTC. Vilnius. Ubarevičienė, R. (2016). Lietuvos gyventojų vidaus migracijų teritoriniai ypatumai 21 a. Lietuvos socialinė raida: teritorinis aspektas, 5, p. 9-24. LSTC. Vilnius. Ubarevičienė, R., Bumeika, D. and van Ham, M. (2015). Ethno-political effects of suburbanization in the Vilnius urban region. An analysis of voting behaviour. Journal ofBaltic Studies, 46(2), p. 217-242 149 LIETUVOS METROPOLINJAI REGIONAI Ubarevičienė, R., Bumeika, D., Kriaučiūnas, E. (2011). The sprawl of Vilnius city establishment and analysis of growing urban region. Annales Geographicae, 43^44, p. 96-107. Ubarevičienė, R., van Ham, M., Bumeika, D. (2016). Shrinking regions in a shrinking country: The geography of population decline in Lithuania 2001-2011. Urban Studies Research. United Nations (2013). World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision. CD-ROM Edition. Vaitekūnas, S., (2006). Lietuvos gyventojai: per du tūkstantmečius. Vilnius: Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidybos centras, p. 186-192. Valatka V. (2015). Rezidencinė diferenciacija Lietuvoje posovietmečiu (gyventojų surašy mų duomenų mažose teritorijose pagrindu). Daktaro disertacija. Vilniaus universitetas: Vilnius. Valatka, V, Bumeika, D., Ubarevičienė, R. (2016). Large social inequalities and low levels of socio-economic segregation in Vilnius. Tammam, T, Marcińczak, S., van Ham, M., Musterd, S. (red.) Socio-economic segregation in European Capital cities: East meets West. London and New York: Routledge, p. 313-332. Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija (2014). Archyvas, http://www.vmi.lt/cms/en/ataskaituarchyvas [žiūrėta 2016 09 22]. van den Berg L., Drewett R., Klaassen L. H., Rossi A., Vijverberg C. H. T. (1982). Urban Europe: A Study of Growth and Decline. Oxford: Pergamon. van Kempen, R., Özüekren, A. S. (1998). Ethnic Segregation in Cities: New Forms and Explanations in a Dynamic World. Urban Studies, 35(10), p. 1631-1656. Vanagas, J. (1992). Miesto gyvenamosios aplinkos formavimas: sociologinis aspektas. Technika: Vilnius. Vanagas, J., Krišjane, Z., Noorkoiv, R., Staniūnas, A. (2002). Planning urban systems in Soviet times and in the era of transition: The case of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Geographia Polonica, 75(2), p. 75-100. Vanagas, J., Staniūnas, E. (2000). The Lithuanian urban system. Working paper. Urban system and urban networking in the Baltic Sea region. Gdansk, p. 145-167. Vaughan, L., Griffiths, S., Haklay, M., Jones, C. E. (2009). Do the suburbs exist? Discovering complexity and specificity in suburban built form. Transactions of the Institute ofBritish Geographers, 34, p. 475—488. Vesselinov, E. (2012). Segregation by Design. Urban Affairs Review, 48(3), p. 417—454. Vickers, D. (2006). Multi-level integrated classifications based on the 2001 census. Daktaro disertacija. University of Leeds, Leeds. Vyriausioji rinkimų komisija (2016) http://www.vrk.lt [žiūrėta 2016 12 10]. Walks, R. A. (2005). City - Suburban Electoral Polarization in Great Britain, 1950-2001. Transactions of the Institute ofBritish Geographers, 30(4), p. 500-517. Walks, R. A. (2006). The Cause of City - Suburban Political Polarization? A Canadian Case study. Annales of the Association ofAmerican Geographers, 96(2), p. 390-414. 150 Webster C., Glasze G. (2006). Dynamic urban order and the rise of residential clubs. Glasze, G., Webster, C., Frantz, K. (red.) Private Cities: Global and localperspectives. London and New York: Routledge, p. 222-237. Webster, C. J. (2002). Property rights and the public realm: gates, green belts, and gemeinschaft. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29(3), p. 397-412. Weclawowicz, G. (1979). The structure of socio-economic space in Warsaw in 1931 and 1970. A study in factorial ecology. French, R. A., Flamilton, F. WI. (red.) The socialist city. Chichester: John Wiley. Wei, F., Knox, P. L. (2014). Neighborhood change in metropolitan America, 1990 to 2010. Urban Affairs Review, 50(4), p. 459-489. Wolfinger, R.E. (1965). The Development and Persistence of Ethnic Voting. The American Political Science Review, 59(4), p. 896-908. Wolfinger, R. E., Rosenstone, S. J. (1980). Who Votes? New Flaven, CT: Yale University Press. Zaninetti, J. M. (2009). A Suburban Nation, in Sustainable Development in the USA. London, UK. Žilys, A. (2013). Rezidencinė diferenciacija ir skirtumai Lietuvos modemiąjame mieste: (po) sovietinis ar Vakarų miestas? Kultūra ir visuomenė, Socialinių tyrimų žurnalas, 4, p. 67-101. Žilys, A. (2015). Modernios visuomenės miesto plėtra: Rezidencinė diferenciacija Lietuvos didmiesčiuose. Daktaro disertacija. Vytauto Didžiojo Universitetas: Kaunas. Heywood, I. D., Cornelius, S., Carver, S. (1998). An introduction to geographical information systems. New York: Addison Wesley Longman. http://www.delfi.lt/verslas/nekilnojamas-turtas/vilniaus-rajonai- kuriuose-busto-kainosissove.d?id=69069468. 151 LIETUVOS METROPOLINIAI REGIONAI THE METROPOLITAN REGIONS OF LITHUANIA. RESIDENTIAL DIFFERENTIATION IN THE XXI CENTURY SUMMARY This research analyses social segregation in three metropolitan areas of Lithuania. The aim of this research is to examine the patterns of spatial segregation of various so cial groups. The first stage of our study includes the design of the research methodology, data collection and identification of the research object (boundaries and structure of the metropolitan areas). The research is mainly based on quantitative analysis of popula tion census data from 2001 and 2011. We use aggregated data at the lowest spatial level (census tracts) as well as individual-level data. The metropolitan (urban) areas are the complex systems that stretch far beyond the municipal limits. Their limits, which illus trate the dispersion of suburbanisation processes, were determined at the level of LAU2 regions and three indicators were taken into account: a change in the population, the number of new single-family houses, and in-migration (the number and the origin of the newcomers). Field research was carried out in the city sprawl zones - areas of the most intense socio-spatial changes. This qualitative approach helped us to reveal some specific processes of segregation, which cannot be monitored using quantitative data. This namely concerns the formation of gated communities. Based on the theory and lit erature review, the most suitable indicators of socioeconomic residential differentiation were selected and indexes of segregation, dissimilarity and isolation were calculated. These measurements helped to re-weal different aspects of socio-spatial segregation in the metropolitan areas. We used occupational status of the residents as a proxy for their socioeconomic status. We analysed the patterns of segregation and their change during 2001 and 2011, and we focused into the urban cores and suburbs. Notwithstand ing the major economic and social changes of post-communist society, most of the measured indexes indicated low levels of spatial segregation and quite modest change. However, the index of isolation, which reveals spatial separation of certain groups (the actual segregation), showed high and increasing levels of isolation for the higher-status groups, especially in the suburban areas. The results showed that the sharpest increase in segregation was in the capital city of Vilnius. It was also revealed that the higheststatus groups are the most segregated and there is increasing separation between the highest- and the lowest-occupational groups in all three metropolitan regions. One of the specific features of many post-Soviet cities is their multi-ethnic struc ture, which was strongly influenced by internal migrations within the Soviet Union. Political and economic reforms in the 1990s led to changes in ethnic composition and the processes of ethnic-segregation have started to increase. The ethnic landscape is very different in different metropolitan areas. Our results showed that the greatest spa tial fragmentation and segregation levels can be found in the Vilnius metropolitan area. 134 SUMMARY Lithuanians are increasingly concentrated in the urban core zones and the closest sub urbs, while the concentration of Poles and Russians is increasing in the less attractive housing estates and industrial neighbourhoods. The results show a clear relationship between the socioeconomic and ethnic status of the residents of metropolitan areas and, therefore, suggest that ethnic segregation is strongly linked to the general processes of social segregation. The findings also show that the higher the proportion of a certain ethnic minority group in an area is, the higher the proportion of lower (social) status residents in this group. In addition ethnic minorities often tend to concentrate in the less attractive and more industrialised areas within the cities. In Vilnius, the correla tions between the residents’ ethnic and social status suggest that the increase in the socioeconomic segregation leads to the increase in the ethnic segregation. Meanwhile the ethnic segregation tends to decrease in the metropolitan regions of Kaunas and Klaipėda. The social and ethnic segregation results in high levels of spatial differentia tion in the political field as well. The residents of the urban cores and suburbs tend to support right-wing parties, while the residents of more peripheral and industrial areas are more likely to vote for non-traditional political parties. The analysis of two interrelated fields - socioeconomic and political residential dif ferentiation -showed that there is increasing spatial distance between the highest-status and lowest-status groups. Different social groups have different political preferences. The relations between socioeconomic and political segregation are strong in the met ropolitan areas. Due to the urban sprawl the processes of residential differentiation extend far beyond the city municipalities. Urban sprawl results in the growing social tensions in the political field, and it is illustrated by the opposite political preferences between the residents of the central and peripheral parts of the regions. Our findings suggest that socioeconomic dimension is no less important factor determining political preferences than the ethnic differences. Planning and governing of such multi-munici pal regions is extremely complicated. The findings of the research were presented in numerous international conferences and peer reviewed papers. The collective monograph “The metropolitan regions of Lithuania. Residential differentiation in the 21st century” is the final result of collab orative work of group of authors, where the most important findings of the research project were synthetized. 135
adam_txt	TURINYS ĮVADAS. 5 METODOLOGIJA. 7 1. GYVENTOJŲ SEGREGACIJOS TYRIMŲ METROPOLINIUOSE REGIONUOSE APŽVALGA. 16 1.1. MIESTŲ REGIONŲ TYRIMAI. 18 1.2. SEGREGACIJOS ARBA ERDVINĖS REZIDENCINĖS DIFERENCIACIJOS PROBLEMA. 19 1.3. ERDVINĖS SEGREGACIJOS PROBLEMA MOKSLO TYRIMUOSE LIETUVOJE. 22 2. LIETUVOS METROPOLINIŲ REGIONŲ RAIDA MIESTŲ SISTEMOS TRANSFORMACIJOS KONTEKSTE. 25 2.1. LIETUVA POKOMUNISTINIŲ ŠALIŲ KONTEKSTE. 25 2.2. LIETUVOS MIESTŲ SISTEMOS TRANSFORMACIJA BALTIJOS ŠALIŲ KONTEKSTE. 27 2.3. METROPOLINIAI REGIONAI GYVENVIEČIŲ SISTEMOS TRANSFORMACIJŲ KONTEKSTE 2001-2011 M.28 2.4. VIDAUS MIGRACIJA IR JOS ĮTAKA APGYVENDINIMO SISTEMOS KAITAI. 32 2.5. VIDAUS MIGRACIJA IR METROPOLINIŲ REGIONŲ RAIDA.34 3. SOCIALINĖ SEGREGACIJA LIETUVOS METROPOLINIUOSE REGIONUOSE. 39 3.1. METROPOLINIŲ REGIONŲ SOCIALINĖS STRUKTŪROS KAITA - ŠALIES METROPOLIZACIJOS PASEKMĖ.40 3.2. SOCIOERDVINĖS SEGREGACIJOS LAIPSNIS METROPOLINIUOSE REGIONUOSE. 42 3.3. TERITORINĖS SEGREGACIJOS DIMENSIJOS KARTOGRAFINĖS ANALIZĖS REZULTATAI. 47 3.4. SOCIOEKONOMINĖS SEGREGACIJOS KAITA VILNIAUS MIESTE. 55 3.5. SOCIALINĖS SEGREGACIJOS DEMOGRAFINĖ DIMENSIJA. 61 4. GYVENTOJŲ TAUTINĖ TERITORINĖ DIFERENCIACIJA.69 4.1. 4.2. 4.3. 4.4. TAUTINĖ SUDĖTIS IR JOS KAITA. 70 TAUTINĖ DIFERENCIACIJA 2011 M.76 KIEKYBINĖ ETNINĖS DIFERENCIACIJOS ANALIZĖ.78 RELIGINIŲ BENDRUOMENIŲ KONCENTRACIJOS SKIRTUMAI. 79 5. ELEKTORINĖ REZIDENCINĖ DIFERENCIACIJA LIETUVOS METROPOLINIUOSE REGIONUOSE. 82 5.1. GYVENTOJŲ POLITINĖ DIFERENCIACIJA STATISTINĖS ANALIZĖS REZULTATAI.87 5.2. POLITINĖ REZIDENCINĖ DIFERENCIACIJA ֊ KARTOGRAFINĖS ANALIZĖS REZULTATAI. 91 6. DAUGIADIMENSINIAI SEGREGACIJOS ASPEKTAI LIETUVOS METROPOLINIUOSE REGIONUOSE. 104 6.1. SOCIOETNINĖS SEGREGACIJOS DIMENSIJOS. 104 6.2. POLITINĖS SOCIOETNINĖS SEGREGACIJOS DIMENSIJOS. 110 7. UŽDAROSIOS GYVENVIETĖS - IŠSKIRTINĖS TERITORINĖS SEGREGACIJOS METROPOLINIUOSE REGIONUOSE PAVYZDYS.116 7.1. UŽDAROSIOS GYVENVIETĖS PASAULYJE. 120 7.2. UŽDAROSIOS GYVENVIETĖS LIETUVOJE. 123 7.3. UŽDARŲJŲ GYVENVIEČIŲ SOCIALINIS VAIDMUO LIETUVOS METROPOLINIUOSE REGIONUOSE. 126 IŠVADOS IR APIBENDRINIMAI. 131 SUMMARY. 134 LITERATŪRA. 136 4 LITERATURA Åberg, M. (2005). Baltic orientations: Globalization, regionalization, or “EU-izolation”? Hamilton, F. W. I., Andrews, K. D., Pichler-Milanovic, N. (red.) Transformation of Cities in Central and Eastern Europe — Towards Globalization. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, p. 399^127. Abreu, A. (2012). The new economics of labor migration: beware of Neoclassical bearing gifts. Forum for social economics, 41(1), 46-67. Adell, G. (1999). Theories and models of the peri-urban interface: a changing conceptual landscape. Strategic Environmental Planning and Management for the Periurban Interface. Research Project. Adlys, P. G. (2012). Lietuvos gyventojų tautinė sudėtis. Mokslas ir gyvenimas, 11-12, p. 2-А. Aidukaitė, J. (2014). Housing policy regime in Lithuania: towards liberalization and marketization. GeoJournal, 79(4), p. 421—432. Andrusz, G. (1996). Structural change and boundary instability. Andrusz, G., Harloe, M., Szelenyi, I. (red.) Cities after socialism: Urban and regional change and conflict in post-socialist societies. Malden: Blackwell, p. 30-69. Arango, J. (2000). Explaining migration: a critical view. International Social Science Journal, 52(165), p. 283-296. Armen, G. (1972). A classification of cities and city regions in England and Wales, 1966. Regional studies, 6(2), p. 149-182. Baldassare, M. (1992). Suburban Communities. Annual review ofSociology, 18, p. 475^194. Baranauskaitė, A. (2015). Vilniaus miesto teritorijos elektorinės struktūros raida. Magistro darbas. Vilniaus universitetas, Vilnius. Baranauskaitė, A., Bumeika, D., Tučas, R. (2015). Elektorinių struktūrų erdvinė diferenciacija Lietuvos miestų regionuose. Geografijos metraštis, 48, p. 3-23. Baranauskaitė, A., Tučas, R. (2014). Vilniaus miesto elektoriné struktūra 2008 m. ir 2012 m. Seimo rinkimų duomenimis. Geografijos metraštis, Al, p. 37-54. Bater, J. H. (1980). The Soviet City. London: Edward Arnold. Berger, P., Luckman, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology ofKnowledge. New York: Garden City. Bertaud A. (2006). The spatial structures of Central and Eastern European cities. S. Tsenkova, Z. Nedovic-Budic (red.) The Urban Mosaic ofPost-Socialist Europe. New York: PhysicaVerlag Heidelberg, p. 91-110. Bertaud, A., Renaud, В. (1997). Socialist cities without land markets. Journal of urban Economics, 41(1), p. 137-151. Bērziņš A., Zvidriņš P. (2011). Depopulation in the Baltic States. Lithuanian Journal of Statistics, 50(1), p. 39-48. Bible, D.S. (2001). Gated communities and residential property values. Appraisal Journal, 69(2), p. 140-148. Bilodeau, A. (2009). Residential Segregation and the Electoral Participation of Immigrants in Australia. International Migration Review, 43, p. 134-159. 136 Bitusikova. A., Luther, D. (2010). Sustainable diversity and public space in the city of Bratislava, Slovakia. Anthropological notebooks, 16(2), p. 5-18. Björklund, T. (2007). The 1987 Norwegian Local Elections: A Protest Election with a Swing to the Right. Scandinavian Political Studies, 11(3), p. 211-234. Blandy, S., Parsons, D. (2003). Gated Communities in England: rules and rhetoric of urban planning, Geographica Helvetica, 58, p. 314-324. Blakely, E. J., Snyder, M. G. (1997). Fortress America: Gated Communities in the United States. Washington, DC and Cambridge, MA: Brookings Institution Press and Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. Blinnikov, M., Shanin, A., Sobolev, N., Volkova, L. (2006). Gated communities of the Moscow green belt: newly segregated landscapes and the suburban Russian environment. GeoJournal, 66(1-2), p. 65-81. Bodnar, J. (2001). Fin de Millénaire Budapest: Metamorphoses ofurban life. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Bodnar, J., Molnar, V. (2010). Reconfiguring private and public: State, capital and new housing developments in Berlin and Budapest. Urban Studies, 47(2), p. 789-812. Boentje, J., Blinnikov, M. (2007). Post-Soviet forest fragmentation and loss of the Green Belt around Moscow, Russia (1991-2001): A remote sensing perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 82(4), p. 208-221. Boyle, R, Halfacree, K., Robinson, V. (1998). Exploring contemporary migration. New York: Addison Wesley Longman. Bolt, G., van Kempen, R. (2010). Ethnic segregation and residential mobility: Relocations of minority ethnic groups in the Netherlands. Journal ofEthnic and Migration Studies, 36 (2), p. 333-354. Borén, T., Gentile, M. (2007). Metropolitan processes in post-communist states: An introduction. Geografiska Annaler: Series В, Human Geography, 89(2), p. 95-110. Boschman, S. (2015). Selective mobility, segregation and neighbourhood effects. Daktaro disertacija. Delft University of technology, Delft. Brade, L, Herfert, G., Wiest, К. (2009). Recent trends and future prospects of socio-spatial differentiation in urban regions of Central and Eastern Europe: A lull before the storm? Cities, 26 (5), p. 233-244. Brazienė, R. (2002). Socialinių sluoksniųjormavimasis nepriklausomoje Lietuvoje. Kauno technologijos universitetas, Kaunas. Briggs, X. N. D. S., William, J. W. (2005). The geography of opportunity: Race and housing choice in metropolitan America. Washington: Brookings Institution Press. Brown D. L., Schafft К. A. (2002). Population déconcentration in Hungary during the post socialist transformation. Journal ofRural Studies, 18, p. 233-244. Brown, D. L., Kulcsár, L. K. (2001). Household economic behavior in post-socialist rural Hungary. Rural Sociology, 66(2), p. 157-180. Burke, M., Sebally, C. (2001): Looking in the pedestrian? The privatised streets of gated communities. World Transport Policy Practice, 11(4), p. 67-74. Bumeika D. (2014). Regioninė politika Europoje. Mokomoji knyga. Vilniaus universitetas, Vilnius. 137 Bumeika D., Ubarevičienė, R., Pociūtė, G., Kriaučiūnas, E. (2013). The Impact of Vilnius city on the transformation trends of the sparsely populated EU East border region. Etniškumo studijos, 2, p. 49-68. Bumeika, D., Daugirdas, V, Ubarevičienė, R. (2014). Migration as a factor of development of the depopulating areas in East EU countries - The case of Lithuania, Europa XXL, 27, p. 79-94. Bumeika, D., Ubarevičienė, R. (2011). The sprawl ofVilnius city-some consequences of rural-urban transformations. Annales Geographicae, 43-44, p. 108-115. Bumeika, D., Ubarevičienė, R. (2013). Metropolitan regions in Lithuania - Trends of transformation of the Soviet urban system. Kyiv geographic almanac, 8, p. 107-113. Ukrainian geographic society, Kyiv National University. Bumeika, D., Ubarevičienė, R., Valatka, V. (2015). Socio-economic segregation in growing urban regions of Lithuania. Filosofija. Sociologija, 26(4), p. 277-292. Butkus, A. (2015). Lietuvos gyventojai tautybės požiūriu, http://alkas.lt/2015/12/16/abutkus-lietuvos-gyventojai-tautybes-poziuriu/[žiūrėta 2016 11 18]. Caldeira, T. P. do R. (2000). City of Walls. Crime, Segregation, and Citizenship in Sao Paulo. Berkeley: University of California. Capello, R. (2009). Regional Growth and Local Development Theories: Conceptual Evolution over Fifty Years of Regional Science. Géographie, économie, société, 11(1), p. 9-21. Charter of the New Urbanism. (1996). Congress for the New Urbanism, http://www.cnu. org/charter Cirtautas, M. (2010). Šiuolaikinė priemiestinės zonos samprata. Mokslas - Lietuvos ateitis, 2(3), p. 11-17. Cirtautas, M. (2013). Baltijos šalių miestų ekstensyvios plėtros ypatumai, Konferencijos „VI Lietuvos urbanistinis forumas: Lietuvos miestai ir miesteliai“ pranešimas (Vilnius, 2012 m. lapkričio 15 d.), mokslinių straipsnių rinkinys. VGTU, Vilnius. Cirtautas, M. (2013). Urban sprawl of major cities in the Baltic States. Architecture and Urban Planning, 7, p. 72-79. Civinskas, R., Genys, D., Kuzmickaitė, D., Tretjakova, V. (2011). The Dynamics of demographic decline and its consequences for Lithuania / Viewpoints from liberal perspective. Bmil, C., van Schie, P. van de Velde, M. (red.) The dynamics of demographic decline. The Hague: Oranje/Van Loon, p. 105-115. Cohen, C., Dawson, M. (1993). Neighborhood Poverty and African American Politics. American Political Science Review, 87, p. 286-302. Crowley, D., Reid, S. (2002). Socialist spaces: Sites of everyday life in the Eastern Bloc. Oxford: Berg. Cséfalvay, Z. (2009). The Demystification of Gating, Debate February 2009, European journal of spatial development. http://www.nordregio.se/Global/EJSD/Debate/ debate200902.pdf [žiūrėta 2016 01 12]. Cséfalvay, Z., Webster, C. (2012). Gates or No Gates? A Cross-European Enquiry into the Driving Forces behind Gated Communities. Regional Studies, 46(3), p. 293-308. Čepas, S. (2015). Lietuvos gyventojų tautinės sudėties kaitos teritorinės ypatybės. Bakalauro darbas. Vilniaus universitetas, Vilnius. 138 Česnavičius D. (1999). Didžiųjų Lietuvos miestųpriemiestiniųzonųžemės naudojimo geogra finiai ypatumai. Daktaro disertacijos santrauka. Vilniaus pedagoginis universitetas, Vilnius. Daugirdas, V, Bumeika, D., Kriaučiūnas, E., Ribokas, G., Stanaitis, S., Ubarevičienė, R. (2013). Lietuvos retai apgyventos teritorijos. Lietuvos socialinių tyrimų centras, Vilnius. Daugirdas, V, Paltanavičiūtė, G. (2005). Ignalinos AE regiono gyventojų tautinės sudėties kaita. Ignalinos AE regionas: permainų erdvė. Vilnius, p. 72-87. Daugirdas, V, Paltanavičiūtė, G. (2008). Dynamics ofthe national composition in North-East Lithuania. Problem regions in Lithuania (sociogeographical aspects). Vilnius, p. 45-58. Davis, M. (1990). City of Quartz: excavating the future ofLos Angeles. London: Verso. Davoudi, S. (2008). Conception of the city-region: a critical review. Urban Design and Planning, 161(2), p. 51-60. Dawkins, C. J. (2003). Regional Development Theory: Conceptual Foundations, Classic Works, and Recent Developments. Journal ofPlanning Literature, 18(2), p. 131-172. Dillion, D. (1994). Fortress America: more and more of us are living behind locked gates. Planning, 60, p. 2-8. Eberhardt, P. (2011). Political migrations on Polish territories (1939-1950). Polska akademia nauk, Warszawa. Eberstadt, N. (1994). Demographic shocks after communism: Eastern Germany, 1989-93. Population and Development Review, 20(1), p. 137-152. Enyedi, G. (1998). Transformation in central European postsocialist cities. Enyedi, G. (red.) Social Change and Urban Restructuring in Central Europe. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, p. 109-136. EPSON (2013). Thefunctional urban areas database. Technical report. http://www.espon. eu/export/sites/default/Documents/ToolsandMaps/ESPON2013Database/3.7_TRFUAs.pdf [žiūrėta 2016 10 03]. Erlingsson, G. O., Persson, M. (2011). The Swedish Pirate Party and the 2009 European Parliament Election: Protest or Issue Voting? Politics, 31(3), p. 121-128. Eurostato duomenų bazė (2016). http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/ [žiūrėta 2016 09 20]. Eurostat (2015). Gini coefficient of equivalised disposable income http://ec.europa.eu/ eurostat/ [žiūrėta 2015 09 08]. Florida, R. (2010). Who‘s your city?: How the creative economy is making where to live the most important decision ofyour life. Basic Books: New York. Frantz, K. (2006). Private gated neighborhoods: a progressive trend in US urban development. Glasze, G., Webster, C., Frantz, K. (red.) Private Cities: Global and local perspectives. London and New York: Routledge, p. 64—75. Fratesi, U., Percoco, M. (2014). Selective migration, regional growth and convergence: evidence from Italy. Regional Studies, 48(10), p. 1650-1668. Gadecki, J., Śmigiel, C. (2009). A paradise behind gates and walls. Gated Communities in Eastern Europe and the Promise of Happiness. Bartrtzky, A., Schalenberg, M. (red.) Urban Planning and the Pursuit ofHappiness. Berlin: Jovis Verlag, p. 199-217. Gaidys, V. (2004). Viešoji nuomonė ir politika. Krupavičius A., Lukošaitis A. (sud.) Lietuvos politinė sistema: sandara ir raida. Kaunas: Poligrafija ir Informatika. 139 Gaidys, V. (2014). Socialinių demografinių parametrų įtaka gyventojų partinėms preferen cijoms ir politiniam aktyvumui: jungtinių duomenų masyvų analizė, Lietuvos gyvento jai XXI a. pradžioje: Sociodemografiniai aspektai. Lietuvos socialinė raida, 3, p. 7-24. LSTC. Vilnius. Gainsborough, J.F. (2001). Fenced Off: The Suburbanization of American Politics. Washington: Georgetown University Press. Gentile, M., Tammaru, T. (2006). Ethnicity and housing in the post-Soviet city: UsťKamenogorsk, Kazakstan. Urban Studies, 43, p. 1757-1778. Gentile, M., Tammaru, T., van Kempen, R. (2012). Heteropolitanization: Social and spatial change in Central and East European Cities. Cities, 29(5), p. 291-350. Ghent Urban Studies Team (2002). Post Ex Sub Dis. — Urban Fragmentations and Constructions. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers. Gimpel, J. G., Dyck, J. J., Shaw, D. R. (2004). Registrants, Voters and Turnout Variability Across Neighborhoods. Political Behavior, 26(4), p. 343-375. Glassner, В. 1999. The Culture of Fear. Why Americans are Afraid of the Wrong Things. New York: Basic. Glasze, G. (2005). Some Reflections on the Economic and Political Organisation of Private Neighbourhoods. Housing Studies, 20(2), p. 221-233. Glasze, Ģ., Alkhayyal, A. (2002). Gated housing estates in the Arab world: case studies in Lebanon and Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29(3), p. 321-336. Grant, J. (2005). Planning responses to gated communities in Canada. Housing Studies, 20(2), p. 273-285. Gregory, D. (1981). Human agency and human geography. Transactions of the institute of British geographers, 6(1), p. 1-18. Gregory, D., Johnston, R., Pratt, G., Watts, M., Whatmore, S. (2011). The Dictionary of Human Geography. John Wiley Sons. Gruževskis, В. (2004). Labour migration in Lithuania // New Patterns of Labour Migration in CEE. CEPNO Volume Cluj - Napoca (Romania), Open Society Foundation, p. 70-78. Gudelis, D. (2015). Lietuvos didžiųjų miestų gyventojų struktūros ypatumai. Mokslo studija. Vilniaus universitetas: Vilnius. Haase, A., Athanasopoulou, A., Rink, D. (2016). Urban shrinkage as an emerging concern for European policymaking. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(1), p. 103-107. Haase, A., Bernt, M., Großmann, К., Mykhnenko, V, Rink, D. (2013). Varieties of shrinkage in European cities. European Urban and Regional Studies (Doi: 10. 1177/0969776413481985). Hall, R, Hay, D. (1980). Growth centres in the European Urban system. Heynemann educational books: Norwich. Hall, M., Crowder, K.D., Tolnay, S. (2010). Immigration and Native Residential Mobility in Established, New, and Nongateway Metropolitan Destinations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, USA. Hall, P. (2002). Cities of Tomorrow: an intellectual history of urban planning and design in the twentieth century. Wiley-Blackwell. 140 Hall, T. (1998). Urban geography. London: Routledge, p. 16-28. Hamilton, F. W. I., Andrews, K. D., Pichler-Milanovic, N. (2005). Transformation of Cities in Central and Eastern Europe - Towards Globalization. Tokyo: United Nations University Press. Hamnett, Ch. (1996). Social geography. A Reader. Arnold: London, p. 7-26. Hamnett, Ch. (2001). Social segregations and social polarisation. In Handbook of urban studies. Ed. R. Paddison. p. 162 - 176. London: Sage Publiacations. Handley, J. (2002). After Terrorist Attacks, Different Opinions Form about Gated Communities, Chicago Tribune (IL), 8, p. 12-19. Harding, A. (2007). Taking City Regions Seriously? Response to Debate on ‘City-Regions: New Geographies of Governance, Democracy and Social Reproduction’. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(2), p. 443^-58. Harrison, J. (2007). From competitive regions to competitive city-regions: a new orthodoxy, but some old mistakes. Journal ofEconomic Geography, 7(3), p. 311-332. Harvey, D. (1972). Revolutionary and counter-revolutionary theory in geography and problem of ghetto formalion. Antipode, 4(2), p. 1-13. Harvey, D. (2009). Social Justice and the City: Revised Edition. Georgia, USA: University of Georgia Press. Havel, V. (1992). Summer meditations (P. Wilson vertimas). New York: Alfred Knopf. Hegedűs, G. (2007). The review of the effects of the gated communities caused on the space use of their area and surroundings. Kovács, Cs. Szerk: From villages to cyberspace, SZEGED: Department of Economic and Social Geography, p. 207-218. Hay Group. (2015). http://www.haygroup.com/lt/Press/Details.aspx?ID=44410 [žiūrėta 2015 11 05]. Hess, D. B., Tammaru, T., Leetmaa, K. (2012). Ethnic differences in housing in post-Soviet Tartu, Estonia. Cities, 29(5), p. 327-333. Hiebert, D. (2009). Segregation. Gregory, D., Johnston, R., Pratt, G., Watts, M., Whatmore, S. (red.) The Dictionary ofHuman Geography (5 ed.). Singapore: Wiley-Blackwell, p. 673. Hirsch, H. (1968). Suburban Voting and National Trends: A Research Note. The Western Political Quartely, 21(3), p. 508-514. Hirt S., Petrovič M. (2010). The Gates of Belgrade. Safety, Privacy, and New Housing Pattern in the Post-Communist City. Problems ofPost-Communism, 57(5), p. 3-19. Hirt, S., Petrovič, M. (2011). The Belgrade Wall: The Proliferation of Gated Housing in the Serbian Capital after Socialism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(4), p. 753-777. Hirt, S. (2006). Post-socialist urban forms: Notes from Sofia. Urban Geography, 27(5), p. 464-488. Hirt, S. (2012). Iron curtains: Gates, suburbs andprivatization ofspace in the postsocialist city. Malden and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Hirt, S. (2013). Whatever happened to the (post)socialist city? Cities, 32, p. 29-38. Hirt, S., Stanilov, K. (2009). Twenty years of transition: The evolution of urban planning in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union, 1989-2009. Nairobi: UNHABITAT. 141 Hodkinson, S. (2012). The new urban enclosures. City, 16(5), p. 500-518. Hospers, G. J. (2012). Coping with shrinkage in Europe’s cities and towns. Urban design international, 18, p. 78-89. Huckfeldt, R. (1979). Political Participation and the Neighborhoods Social Context. American Journal ofpolitical Science, 23(3), p. 579-592. Huckfeldt, R., Sprague, J. (1995). Citizens, Politics and Social Communication. New York: Cambridge University Press. Huzinec, G.A. (1978). The impact of industrial decision-making upon the Soviet urban hierarchy. Urban Studies, 15, p. 139-148. International Labour Organisation (2012). International Standard Classiti cation of Occupations, http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—dgreports/—dcomm/—publ/ documents/publication/wcms_172572.pdf [žiūrėta 2016 05 09]. Youssef, K. W. F. (2015). Gated-ness, income segregation and neighbourhood cohesion in two Western Canadian metropolises. Daktaro disertacija. University of Calgary, Calgary. Janoschka, M., Borsdorf, A. (2006). Condominios fechados and barrios privados. The rise of private residential neighbourdoods in Latin America. Glasze, G., Webster, C., Frantz, K. (red.) Private Cities: Global and local perspectives. London and New York: Routledge, p. 92-108. Jastramskis, M. (2015). Arturo Zuoko vieta Lietuvos politinės konkurencijos lauke: sociologinė analizė. Parlamento studijos, 18, p. 123-149. Johnston, RJ. (1973). Possible extensions to the factorial ecology method: a note. Environment and planning, 5(6), p. 719-734. Johnston, R., Pattie, C. (2006). Putting Voters in their Place. Geography and Elections in Great Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Johnston, R., Jones, K. (2010). Measuring segregation - a cautionary tale. Environment and Planning A, 42, 1264—1270. Jonas, E.G., Ward, K. (2007). Introduction to a debate on city-gegions: New geographies of governance, democracy and social reproduction. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(1), p. 169-178. Jungens, U., Landman, K. (2006). Gated communities in South Africa. Glasze, G., Webster, C., Frantz, K. (red.) Private Cities: Global and local perspectives. London and New York: Routledge, p. 109-126. Juškevičius, (2015). Miestų sistemos raida Lietuvoje. Acta Academiae Artium Vilnensis, 76, p. 11-13. Kahanec, M., Zaiceva, A., Zimmermann, K.F. (2010). Lessons from migration after EU enlargement. Kahanec, M., Zimmermann, K.F. (red.) EU labour markets after postenlargement migration. Bonn: Springer, p. 3—45. Kanbur R., Rappaport, H. (2005). Migration selectivity and the evolution of spatial inequality. Journal ofEconomic Geography, 5(1), 43-57. Karalius, A. (1995). Vilnius ir vilniečiai: gyvenimo kokybės vertinimas. Filosofijos, sociologijos ir teisės institutas, Vilnius. Karlsson, C., Olsson, M. (2006). The identification of functional regions: theory, methods, and applications. The annals of regional science, 40(1), p. 1-18. 142 Kartanaitė, A. (2014). Lietuvos-Latvijos pasienio regiono gyventojų tautinės ir religinės sudėties kaitos ypatybės. Bakalauro darbas. Vilniaus universitetas, Vilnius. Kaufmann, K.M. (2004). The Urban Voter: Group Conflict and Mayoral Voting Behavior in American Cities (The Politics of Race and Ethnicity). JAV: University of Michigan Press. Kavaliauskas, P., Grigužauskaitė, S. (2014). Geosocialinių struktūrų sampratos metodolo gija. Geografija, 50(2), p. 63-75, Kavaliauskas P., Jakutis M. (2015). Tautos ir nacijos sampratos problema. Geologija. Geografija, 1 (1), 45-55. Kok, H., Kovács, Z. (1999). The process of suburbanization in the agglomeration ofBudapest. Netherlands Journal ofHousing and the Built Environment, 14(2), p. 119-141. Kovács, Z., Hegedűs, G. (2014). Gated communities as new form of segregation in post socialist Budapest. Cities, 36, p. 200-209. Krišjāne, Z., Bērziņš M. (2012). Post-socialist Urban trends: new Patterns and Motivations for Migration in the Suburban areas of Rīga, Latvia. Urban Studies, 49(2), p. 289-306. Krišjāne, Z., Bērziņš, M. (2009). Commuting and the Déconcentration of the PostSocialist Urban Population: The Case of the Rīga Agglomeration. Folia Geographica/ Ģeogrāfiski Raksti, XIV, p. 56-74. Krišjāne, Z., Bērziņš, M., Kratovitš, R. (2016). Occupation and ethnicity: patterns of residential segregation in Riga two decades after socialism. Tammaru, T., Marcińczak, S., van Ham, M., Musterd, S. (red.) Socio-economic segregation in European Capital cities: East meets West. London and New York: Routledge, p. 333-358. Kroll, F., Kabisch, N. (2012). The relation of diverging urban growth processes and demographic change along an urban-rural gradient. Population, Space and Place, 18(3), p. 260-276. Krupickaitė, D., Peciukonytė, L., Pociūtė, G. (2010-2011). Aptvertos ir saugomos gyven vietės Lietuvoje - naujos gyvensenos išraiška ar būtinybė. Annales Geographicae, 4344(1-2), p. 3-15. Krupickaitė, D., Pociūtė, G., Peciukonytė, L. (2014). In the middle of nowhere: Gated neighbourhoods in Vilnius region as a new lifestyle? Hungarian geographical bulletin, 63(3), p. 271-286. Krupickaitė, D. (2011 (2014)). Vilnius - between persistence and socio spatial change. Europa regional, 19, 3—4, p. 21-31. Krupickaitė, D., Pociūtė, G. (2009). Gated and guarded housing in Lithuania, Forum lfl, Helfli, p. 75-81. Kulu, H. (2003). Housing differences in the late Soviet city: The case of Tartu, Estonia. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(4), p. 897-911. Kulu, H., Tammaru, T. (2003). Housing and ethnicity in Soviet Tartu. Yearbook of Population Research in Finland, 39, p. 119-140. Landman, K. (2006). Privatising public space in post-apartheid South African cities through neighbourhood enclosures. GeoJournal, 66, p. 133-146. Latour, В. (2005). Reasembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 143 Le Goix, R., Webster, C. J. (2008). Gated Communities. Geography Compass, 2/4, p. 1189-1214. Le Goix, R. (2005). Gated communities: sprawl and social segregation in Southern California. Housing Studies, 20(2), p. 323-343. Le Goix, R. (2006). Gated communities as predators of public resources: the outcomes of fading boundaries between private management and public authorities in southern California. Glasze, G., Webster, C., Frantz, K. (red.) Private Cities: Global and local perspectives. London and New York: Routledge, p. 76-91. Le Goix, R., Vesselinov, E. (2012). From picket fences to iron gates: suburbanization and gated communities in Phoenix, Las Vegas and Seattle. GeoJournal, 77(2), p. 203-222. Leetmaa, K., Tammaru, T., Anniste, K. (2009). From priority-led to market-led suburbanization in a post-communist metropolis. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 100(4), p. 436—453. Leetmaa, К., Tammaru, T. (2007). Suburbanization in Countries in Transition: Destinations of suburbanisers in the Tallinn metropolitan area. Geografiska Annaler: Series В Human Geography, 89(2), p. 127—46. Legeby, A. (2010). Urban segregation and urban form. From residential segregation to segregation in public space. Stockholm: Licentiate thesis, KTH. Leighley, J. E., Vedlitz, A. (1999). Race, Ethnicity and Political Participation: Competing Models and Contrasting Explanations. Journal ofPolitics, 61(4), p. 1092-1114. Lemański, C. (2006). Spaces of exclusivity, or connection? Linkages between a security village and its poorer neighbour in a Cape Town master plan development. Dark Roat Occasional Paper Series 21. Lentz, S. (2006). More gates, less community? Guarded housing in Russia. Glasze, G., Webster, C., Frantz, K. (red.) Private Cities: Global and localperspectives. London and New York: Routledge, p. 206-221. Lentz, S., Lindner, P. (2003). Privatisierung des öff entliehen Raumes - soziale Segregation und geschlossene Wohnviertel Moskaus. Geographische Rundschau, 55(12), p. 50-57. Lewis, W.A. (1954). Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labour. The Manchester school, 22(2), p. 139-191. Lietuvos Respublikos vyriausiosios rinkimų komisijos elektorinių duomenų bazė (http:// www.vrk.lt/). Lietuvos statistikos departamentas (2002). Gyventojai pagal lytį, amžių, tautybę ir tikybą. Vilnius. Lietuvos statistikos departamentas (2011). Duomenys gauti pagal užklausą. Lietuvos statistikos departamentas (2012). Lietuvos Respublikos 2011 metų gyventojų ir būstų surašymo rezultatai. Vilnius. Lietuvos statistikos departamentas (2013). Gyventojai pagal tautybę, gimtąją kalbą ir tikybą: Lietuvos Respublikos 2011 metų visuotinio gyventojų ir būstų surašymo rezultatai. Vilnius. orvos statistikos departamentas (2015). 2001 ir 2011 m. visuotinių gyventojų surašymų duomenys apie gyventojų tautinę ir religinę sudėtį. Vilnius. 144 Lietuvos statistikos departamentas (2016a). Lietuvos gyventojų tautinė sudėtis: skaičius. http://osp.stat.gov.lt/analysis-portlet/print-servlet [žiūrėta 2016 11 18]. Lietuvos statistikos departamentas (2016Ե). Lietuvos gyventojų tautinė sudėtis: dalis. http://osp.stat.gov.lt/analysis-portlet/print/load_lt.html [žiūrėta 2016 11 18]. Lietuvos statistikos departamentas (2016). http://osp.stat.gov.lt/en/web/guest/horne Low, S. (2004). Behind the gates: life, security, and the pursuit of happiness in fortress America. New York and London: Routledge. Maes, M., Loopmans, M., Kesteloot, C. (2012). Urban Shrinkage and Everyday Life in Post-Socialist Cities: Living with Diversity in Hrušov, Ostrava, Czech Republic. Built Environment, 38(2), p. 229-243. Manis, J. G., Stone, L.C. (1958-1959). Suburban Residence and Political Bahaviour. The public Opinion Quarterly 22(4), p. 483—489. Manzi, T., Smith-Bowers, B. (2005). Gated communities as club goods: segregation or social cohesion? Housing Studies, 20(2), p. 345-359. Marcińczak, S., Musterd, S., Stępniak, M. (2012). Where the grass is greener: Social segregation in three major Polish cities at the beginning of the 21st century. European Urban and Regional Studies, 19(4), p. 383—403. Marcińczak, S., Tammaru, T., Novák, L, Gentile, M., Kovács, Z., Temelová, J., Valatka, V, Kährik, A., Szabó, В. (2015). Patterns of socioeconomic segregation in the capital cities of fast-track reforming postsocialist countries. Annals of the Association ofAmerican Geographers 105(1), p. 183-202. Martí-Henneberg, J. (2005). Empirical evidence of regional population concentration in Europe, 1870-2000.Population, Space and Place, 11(4), p. 269-281. Masiulis, К. (1997). Lietuvos elitas: Ekonominės vertybės, Politinės orientacijos, Progno zės. Pradai: Vilnius. Massey, D. S., Denton, N. A. (1988). The dimensions of residential segregation. Social Forces, 67(2), p. 281-315. Massey, D. S, Denton, N. A. (1998). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Matulionis, A. (2005). Lietuvos socialinė struktūra. Firidas: Vilnius. McCann, P. (2001). Urban and regional economics. New York: Oxford University Press. McKenzie, E. (1994). Privatopia: homeowner associations and the rise of residential private government. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Milstead, T.M. (2008). Housing and urban development in a post-soviet city: a case study of Vilnius, Lithuania. Daktaro disertacija. Florida State University. Morkevičius, V, Norkus, Z. (2012). Šiuolaikinės Lietuvos klasinė struktūra: neovėberiška analizė. Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas, 31(2), p. 75-152. Musil, J. (1993). Changing urban systems in post-communist societies in Central Europe analysis and prediction. Urban Studies, 30(6), p. 899-905. Musil, J. (2005). City development in Central and Eastern Europe before 1990: Historical context and socialist legacies. Hamilton, F.W.I., Andrews, K.D., Pichler-Milanovic, N. (red.) Transformation ofCities in Central and Eastern Europe-Towards Globalization. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, p. 22M-3. 145 Negura, О. (2009). Residential ensembles in „hypermodern times“. A case study of their aspirations in Bucharest. Schmigiel, C. (red.) Gated and Guarded Housing in Eastern Europe. Forum IFL 11. Leibniz Institut für Länderkunde. Leipzig, p. 59-67. Ni Laoire, C. (2000). Conceptualising Irish rural youth migration: A biographical approach. International Journal ofPopulation Geography, 6(3), p. 229-243. Nissen, S. (2008). Urban Transformation from public and private space to spaces of hybrid character. Czech Sociological Review, 44(6), p. 1129-1149. Novák, J., Sýkora, L. (2007). A city in motion: time-space activity and mobility patterns of suburban inhabitants and the structuration of the spatial organization of the Prague metropolitan area. Geografiska Annaler: Series В, Human Geography, 89(2), p. 147-168. Nuissl, H., Rink, D. (2005). The production of urban sprawl in Eastern Germany as a phenomenon of post socialist transformation. Cities, 22(2), p. 123-134. Oliver, J.E., Ha, S.E. (2007). Vote Choice in Suburban Elections. American Political Science Review, 101(3), p. 393^108. Openshaw, S. (1977). A geographical solution to scale and aggregation problems in region-building, partitioning and spatial modelling. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 2, p. 459^172. Ouředníček, M. (2007). Differential Suburban Development in the Prague urban Region. Geografiska Annaler: Series В Human Geography, 89(2), p. 111-126. Pahl R. E. (1970). Whose City? London: Longman. Paltanavičiūtė, G. (2005). Etninių įtampų tyrimo problema socialiniame lauke. Geografija, 41(1), p. 17-22. Paltanavičiūtė, G. (2006). Etninių ir religinių Rampų teritorinė struktūra Lietuvoje. Daktaro disertacija. Vilniaus universitetas, Vilnius. Park, E., Burgess, E., McKenzie, R. (1925). The City: Suggestions for Investigation of Human Behavior in the Urban Environment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Parr, J. (2005). Perspectives on the city-region. Regional Studies, 39(5), p. 555-566. Parsons, W. (2001). Viešojipolitika: Politikos analizės teorijos ir praktikos įvadas. Vilnius: Eugrimas. Petrulis, V. (2009). Lietuvos politinio lauko teritorinė struktūra (elektorinio metodo pagrindu). Daktaro disertacija. Vilniaus universitetas, Vikius. Pichler-Milanovic, N., Gutry-Korycka, M., Rink, D. (2008). Sprawl in the postsocialist city: The changing economic and institutional context of Central and Eastern European cities. Couch, C., Leontidou, L., Petschel-Held, G. (red.) Urban Sprawl in Europe: Landscapes, land-use change policy. Malden and Oxford: WileyBlackwell, p. 102-135. Pociūtė, G., Krupickaitė, D. (2007). Gated communities in Lithuania: tendencies and peculiarities (a case ofVilnius and its environs). Annales Geographicae, 40 (2), p. 14—27. Pociūtė-Sereikienė, G., Krupickaitė, D. (2016). Uždaros gyvenvietės kaip teritorinės segregacijos veiksnys. Filosofija. Sociologija, 27 (2), p. 161-172. Polanska, D. V. (2010). Gated Communities and the Construction of Social Class Markers in Postsocialist Societies: The Case of Poland. Space and Culture, 13(4), p. 421 —435. 146 Pow, C.P. (2009). “Good” and “real” places: a geographical - moral critique to territorial place-making. Geografsika Annaler, Series В, Human Geography, 91(2), p. 91-105. Purcell, M. (2007). City-Regions, Neoliberal Globalization and Democracy: A Research Agenda. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(1), p. 197-206. Quigley, M. J. (2013). Agglomeration, regional growth, and economic development. Klaesson, J., Johansson, B., Karlsson (red.) Metropolitan Regions, Advances in Spatial Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, p. 29-46. Ramonaitė, A. (2007). Posovietinės Lietuvos politinė anatomija. Versus Aureus: Vilnius. Ramonaitė, A., Jastramskis, M., Kavaliauskaitė, J., Nevinskaitė, L., Žiliukaitė, R. (2014). Kaip renkasi Lietuvos rinkėjai? Idėjos, interesai ir įvaizdžiai politikoje. Vilniaus universiteto leidykla: Vilnius. Raposo, R. (2003). New landscapes: Gated housing estates in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area. Geographica Helvetica, 4, p. 293—301. Rappaport, J. (2003). US urban decline and growth, 1950 to 2000. Economic Review (Third Quarter), p. 15—44. Renski, H. (2008). New firm entry, survival, and growth in the United States: A comparison of urban, suburban, and rural areas. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(1), p. 60-77. Rybakovskiy, L. L., Tarasova, N.V. (1991). Contemporary problems of migration of the population of the USSR. Soviet geography, 32(7), p. 458-473. Rychtaříková, J. (1999). Is Eastern Europe experiencing a second demographic transition? Acta Universitatis Carolinae - Geographica, 34, p. 19—44. Robinson, T., Noriega, S. (2010). Voting Migration as a Source of Electoral Change in the Rocky Mountain West. Political Geography, 29(1), p. 28-39. Roitman, S., Phelps, N. (2011). Do Gates Negate the City? Gated Communities’ Contribution to the Urbanisation of Suburbia in Pilar, Argentina. Urban Studies, 48(16), p. 3487-3509. Rudokaitė, J. (2014). Lietuvos Žiemgalos regiono elektoriné struktūra. Magistro darbas. Vilniaus universitetas, Vilnius. Rudolph, R., Brade, I. (2005). Moscow: Processes of restructuring in the post-Soviet metropolitan periphery. Cities, 22(2), p. 135-150. Ruoppila, S., Kährik, A. (2003). Socio-economic residential differentiation in postsocialist Tallinn. Journal ofHousing and the Built Environment, 18(1), p. 49-73. Ruoppila, S. (2004). Processes of residential differentiation in socialist cities. Literature review on the cases of Budapest, Prague, Tallinn and Warsaw. European Journal of Spatial Development 9. http://www.nordregio.se/EJSD/ Salcedo, R., Torres, A. (2004). Gated Communities in Santiago: Wall or Frontier? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1, p. 27֊44. Savickaitė, L, Krupickaitė, D., Tucas, R. (2013). Gyventojų rinkiminės elgsenos kaita Vilniaus suburbanizacijos zonoje. Geografijos metraštis, 46, p. 72-94. Schmigiel, Ch. (2009). Gated and Guarded Housing in Eastern Europe. Forum IfL 11. Leipzig: Leibnitz-Institut för Länderkunde. 147 LIETUVOS METROPOLINIAI REGIONAI Scott, A. J., Agnew, J., Soja, E. W., Storper, M. (2001). Global City-Regions: An Overview. Scott, AJ. (red). Global City-Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 11-32. Scott, A. J., Storper, M. (2007). Regions, globalization, development. Regional Studies, 37(6-7), p. 579-593. Semyonov, M., Glikman, A. (2009). Ethnic residential segregation, social contacts, and anti-minority attitudes in European societies. European Sociological Review, 25(6), p. 693-708. Sjaastad, L.A. (1962). The costs and returns of human migration. Journal of Political Economy, 70 (5), p. 80-93. Sklar, П. (2000). Booming Economic Inequality, Falling Voter Turnout. Z Magazine. Smith, A., Timár, J. (2010). Uneven transformations: Space, economy and society 20 years after the collapse of state socialism. European Urban and Regional Studies, 17(2), p. 115-125. Sobotka, T., Zeman, К., Kantorova, V. (2003). Demographic shifts in the Czech Republic after 1989: A second demographic transition view. European Journal of Population, 19(3), p. 249-277. Stanaitis, S., Cesnavičius, D. (2010). Dynamics of National Composition of Vilnius Population in the 2nd Half of the 20th Century. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic series, 13, p. 31—44. Stark, O., Bloom, D.E. (1985). The new economics of labour migration. The American Economic Review, 75(2), p. 173-178. Stein, R. M., Ulbig, S. G., Post, S. S. (2005). Voting for Minority Candidates in Multiracial/ Multiethnic Communities. Urban Affairs Review, 41(2), p. 157-181. Steinführer, A., Haase, A. (2007). Demographic change as a future challenge for cities in East Central Europe. Geografiska Annaler: Series В Human Geography, 89(2), p. 183-195. Stoyanov, P, Frantz, K. (2006). Gated communities in Bulgaria: interpreting a new trend in post-communist urban development. GeoJournal, 66, p. 67-63. Stryj aki ewicz, T., Ciesiołka, R, Jaroszewska, E. (2012). Urban shrinkage and the post socialist transformation: The case of Poland. Built Environment, 38(2), p. 196-213. Sýkora, L. (1999a). Changes in the internal spatial structure of post-communist Prague. GeoJournal, 49, p. 79-89. Sýkora, L. (1999b). Processes of socio-spatial differentiation in post-communist Prague. Housing Studies, 14(5), p. 679-701. Sýkora, L. (2009). Post-Socialist Cities. Kitchin, R., Thrift, N. (red.) International Encyclopedia ofHuman Geography, 8. Oxford: Elsevier, p. 387-395. Sýkora, L., Čermák, Z. (1998). City growth and migration patterns in the context of ‘communist’ and ‘transitory’ periods in Prague’s urban development. Space, Populations, Societies, 16(3), p. 405—416. Sýkora, L., Ouředníček, M. (2007). Sprawling post-communist metropolis: Commercial and residential suburbanization in Prague and Bmo, the Czech Republic. Razin, E., Dijst, M., 148 Vázquez, C. (red.) Employment Déconcentration in European Metropolitan Areas: market forces versus planning regulations. Netherlands: Springer, p. 209-233. Szelenyi, 1. (1996). Cities under socialism - and after. Andrusz, G., Harloe, M., Szelenyi, I. (red.) Cities after socialism: Urban and regional change and conflict in post-socialist societies. Malden: Blackwell, p. 287-317. Šešelgis, К. (1996). Teritorijų planavimo raida Lietuvoje. Urbanistika ir architektūra, 1(21), p. 4-19. Tammaru, T. (2001). Suburban Growth and Suburbanisation under Central Planning: The Case of Soviet Estonia. Urban Studies, 38(8), p. 1341-1357. Tammaru, T., Kährik, A., Magi, K., Novák, J., Leetmaa, K. (2016a). The ‘market experiment’ : increasing socio-economic segregation in the inherited bi-ethnic context of Tallinn. Tammaru, T, Marcińczak, S„ van Ham, M., Musterd, S. (red.) Socio economic segregation in European Capital cities: East meets West. London and New York: Routledge, p. 333-358. Tammaru, T., Kontuly, T. (2011). Selectivity and destinations of ethnic minorities leaving the main gateway cities of Estonia. Population, Space and Place, 17(5), p. 674-688. Tammaru, T, Van Ham, M., Leetmaa, K., Kährik, A., Kamenik, К. (2013). Ethnic dimensions of suburbanisation in Estonia. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(5), p. 845-862. Tammaru, T, Marcińczak, S., van Ham, M., Musterd, S. (2016b). Socio-Economic Segregation in European Capital Cities: East Meets West. London and New York: Routledge. Tereškinas, A., Žilys, A., Indriliūnaitė, R. (2013). Emocijos ir socioerdvinė segregacija Lietuvos didmiesčiuose: ar aš galiu ką nors pakeisti? Kultūra ir visuomenė, 4(2), p. 2029-4573. Tereškinas, A., Žilys, A., Indriliūnaitė, R. (2013). Pilietiškumas ir tapatumas šiuolaikinėje visuomenėje: socialinė atskirtis ir socialinė segregacija Lietuvos didmiesčiuose. Vytauto Didžiojo universiteto mokslo klasteriai, 2, p. 171-185. Thaut, L. (2009). EU Integration Emigration Consequences: The Case of Lithuania. International Migration, 47(1), p. 191-233. Thrift, N. (2007). Non representational theory. Space, Politics, Affect. London: Routledge. Tímár, J., Váradi M. M. (2001). The Uneven Development of Suburbanization during Transition in Hungary. European Urban and Regional Studies, 8(4), p. 349-360. Timms, D. (1975). The urban mosaic: towards a theory of residential differentiation. CUPArchive. (Cit. p. 33, 61, 62, 78). Ubarevičienė, R. (2014). Lietuvos teritorijos apgyvendinimo kaita 21 a.: miestų-regionų formavimasis. Lietuvos socialinė raida, 3, p. 92-112. LSTC. Vilnius. Ubarevičienė, R. (2016). Lietuvos gyventojų vidaus migracijų teritoriniai ypatumai 21 a. Lietuvos socialinė raida: teritorinis aspektas, 5, p. 9-24. LSTC. Vilnius. Ubarevičienė, R., Bumeika, D. and van Ham, M. (2015). Ethno-political effects of suburbanization in the Vilnius urban region. An analysis of voting behaviour. Journal ofBaltic Studies, 46(2), p. 217-242 149 LIETUVOS METROPOLINJAI REGIONAI Ubarevičienė, R., Bumeika, D., Kriaučiūnas, E. (2011). The sprawl of Vilnius city establishment and analysis of growing urban region. Annales Geographicae, 43^44, p. 96-107. Ubarevičienė, R., van Ham, M., Bumeika, D. (2016). Shrinking regions in a shrinking country: The geography of population decline in Lithuania 2001-2011. Urban Studies Research. United Nations (2013). World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision. CD-ROM Edition. Vaitekūnas, S., (2006). Lietuvos gyventojai: per du tūkstantmečius. Vilnius: Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidybos centras, p. 186-192. Valatka V. (2015). Rezidencinė diferenciacija Lietuvoje posovietmečiu (gyventojų surašy mų duomenų mažose teritorijose pagrindu). Daktaro disertacija. Vilniaus universitetas: Vilnius. Valatka, V, Bumeika, D., Ubarevičienė, R. (2016). Large social inequalities and low levels of socio-economic segregation in Vilnius. Tammam, T, Marcińczak, S., van Ham, M., Musterd, S. (red.) Socio-economic segregation in European Capital cities: East meets West. London and New York: Routledge, p. 313-332. Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija (2014). Archyvas, http://www.vmi.lt/cms/en/ataskaituarchyvas [žiūrėta 2016 09 22]. van den Berg L., Drewett R., Klaassen L. H., Rossi A., Vijverberg C. H. T. (1982). Urban Europe: A Study of Growth and Decline. Oxford: Pergamon. van Kempen, R., Özüekren, A. S. (1998). Ethnic Segregation in Cities: New Forms and Explanations in a Dynamic World. Urban Studies, 35(10), p. 1631-1656. Vanagas, J. (1992). Miesto gyvenamosios aplinkos formavimas: sociologinis aspektas. Technika: Vilnius. Vanagas, J., Krišjane, Z., Noorkoiv, R., Staniūnas, A. (2002). Planning urban systems in Soviet times and in the era of transition: The case of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Geographia Polonica, 75(2), p. 75-100. Vanagas, J., Staniūnas, E. (2000). The Lithuanian urban system. Working paper. Urban system and urban networking in the Baltic Sea region. Gdansk, p. 145-167. Vaughan, L., Griffiths, S., Haklay, M., Jones, C. E. (2009). Do the suburbs exist? Discovering complexity and specificity in suburban built form. Transactions of the Institute ofBritish Geographers, 34, p. 475—488. Vesselinov, E. (2012). Segregation by Design. Urban Affairs Review, 48(3), p. 417—454. Vickers, D. (2006). Multi-level integrated classifications based on the 2001 census. Daktaro disertacija. University of Leeds, Leeds. Vyriausioji rinkimų komisija (2016) http://www.vrk.lt [žiūrėta 2016 12 10]. Walks, R. A. (2005). City - Suburban Electoral Polarization in Great Britain, 1950-2001. Transactions of the Institute ofBritish Geographers, 30(4), p. 500-517. Walks, R. A. (2006). The Cause of City - Suburban Political Polarization? A Canadian Case study. Annales of the Association ofAmerican Geographers, 96(2), p. 390-414. 150 Webster C., Glasze G. (2006). Dynamic urban order and the rise of residential clubs. Glasze, G., Webster, C., Frantz, K. (red.) Private Cities: Global and localperspectives. London and New York: Routledge, p. 222-237. Webster, C. J. (2002). Property rights and the public realm: gates, green belts, and gemeinschaft. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29(3), p. 397-412. Weclawowicz, G. (1979). The structure of socio-economic space in Warsaw in 1931 and 1970. A study in factorial ecology. French, R. A., Flamilton, F. WI. (red.) The socialist city. Chichester: John Wiley. Wei, F., Knox, P. L. (2014). Neighborhood change in metropolitan America, 1990 to 2010. Urban Affairs Review, 50(4), p. 459-489. Wolfinger, R.E. (1965). The Development and Persistence of Ethnic Voting. The American Political Science Review, 59(4), p. 896-908. Wolfinger, R. E., Rosenstone, S. J. (1980). Who Votes? New Flaven, CT: Yale University Press. Zaninetti, J. M. (2009). A Suburban Nation, in Sustainable Development in the USA. London, UK. Žilys, A. (2013). Rezidencinė diferenciacija ir skirtumai Lietuvos modemiąjame mieste: (po) sovietinis ar Vakarų miestas? Kultūra ir visuomenė, Socialinių tyrimų žurnalas, 4, p. 67-101. Žilys, A. (2015). Modernios visuomenės miesto plėtra: Rezidencinė diferenciacija Lietuvos didmiesčiuose. Daktaro disertacija. Vytauto Didžiojo Universitetas: Kaunas. Heywood, I. D., Cornelius, S., Carver, S. (1998). An introduction to geographical information systems. New York: Addison Wesley Longman. http://www.delfi.lt/verslas/nekilnojamas-turtas/vilniaus-rajonai- kuriuose-busto-kainosissove.d?id=69069468. 151 LIETUVOS METROPOLINIAI REGIONAI THE METROPOLITAN REGIONS OF LITHUANIA. RESIDENTIAL DIFFERENTIATION IN THE XXI CENTURY SUMMARY This research analyses social segregation in three metropolitan areas of Lithuania. The aim of this research is to examine the patterns of spatial segregation of various so cial groups. The first stage of our study includes the design of the research methodology, data collection and identification of the research object (boundaries and structure of the metropolitan areas). The research is mainly based on quantitative analysis of popula tion census data from 2001 and 2011. We use aggregated data at the lowest spatial level (census tracts) as well as individual-level data. The metropolitan (urban) areas are the complex systems that stretch far beyond the municipal limits. Their limits, which illus trate the dispersion of suburbanisation processes, were determined at the level of LAU2 regions and three indicators were taken into account: a change in the population, the number of new single-family houses, and in-migration (the number and the origin of the newcomers). Field research was carried out in the city sprawl zones - areas of the most intense socio-spatial changes. This qualitative approach helped us to reveal some specific processes of segregation, which cannot be monitored using quantitative data. This namely concerns the formation of gated communities. Based on the theory and lit erature review, the most suitable indicators of socioeconomic residential differentiation were selected and indexes of segregation, dissimilarity and isolation were calculated. These measurements helped to re-weal different aspects of socio-spatial segregation in the metropolitan areas. We used occupational status of the residents as a proxy for their socioeconomic status. We analysed the patterns of segregation and their change during 2001 and 2011, and we focused into the urban cores and suburbs. Notwithstand ing the major economic and social changes of post-communist society, most of the measured indexes indicated low levels of spatial segregation and quite modest change. However, the index of isolation, which reveals spatial separation of certain groups (the actual segregation), showed high and increasing levels of isolation for the higher-status groups, especially in the suburban areas. The results showed that the sharpest increase in segregation was in the capital city of Vilnius. It was also revealed that the higheststatus groups are the most segregated and there is increasing separation between the highest- and the lowest-occupational groups in all three metropolitan regions. One of the specific features of many post-Soviet cities is their multi-ethnic struc ture, which was strongly influenced by internal migrations within the Soviet Union. Political and economic reforms in the 1990s led to changes in ethnic composition and the processes of ethnic-segregation have started to increase. The ethnic landscape is very different in different metropolitan areas. Our results showed that the greatest spa tial fragmentation and segregation levels can be found in the Vilnius metropolitan area. 134 SUMMARY Lithuanians are increasingly concentrated in the urban core zones and the closest sub urbs, while the concentration of Poles and Russians is increasing in the less attractive housing estates and industrial neighbourhoods. The results show a clear relationship between the socioeconomic and ethnic status of the residents of metropolitan areas and, therefore, suggest that ethnic segregation is strongly linked to the general processes of social segregation. The findings also show that the higher the proportion of a certain ethnic minority group in an area is, the higher the proportion of lower (social) status residents in this group. In addition ethnic minorities often tend to concentrate in the less attractive and more industrialised areas within the cities. In Vilnius, the correla tions between the residents’ ethnic and social status suggest that the increase in the socioeconomic segregation leads to the increase in the ethnic segregation. Meanwhile the ethnic segregation tends to decrease in the metropolitan regions of Kaunas and Klaipėda. The social and ethnic segregation results in high levels of spatial differentia tion in the political field as well. The residents of the urban cores and suburbs tend to support right-wing parties, while the residents of more peripheral and industrial areas are more likely to vote for non-traditional political parties. The analysis of two interrelated fields - socioeconomic and political residential dif ferentiation -showed that there is increasing spatial distance between the highest-status and lowest-status groups. Different social groups have different political preferences. The relations between socioeconomic and political segregation are strong in the met ropolitan areas. Due to the urban sprawl the processes of residential differentiation extend far beyond the city municipalities. Urban sprawl results in the growing social tensions in the political field, and it is illustrated by the opposite political preferences between the residents of the central and peripheral parts of the regions. Our findings suggest that socioeconomic dimension is no less important factor determining political preferences than the ethnic differences. Planning and governing of such multi-munici pal regions is extremely complicated. The findings of the research were presented in numerous international conferences and peer reviewed papers. The collective monograph “The metropolitan regions of Lithuania. Residential differentiation in the 21st century” is the final result of collab orative work of group of authors, where the most important findings of the research project were synthetized. 135
any_adam_object	1
any_adam_object_boolean	1
author	Burneika, Donatas 1970- Ubarevičienė, Rūta Valatka, Vytautas Baranauskaitė, Aušra Pociūtė-Sereikienė, Gintarė 1984- Daugirdas, Vidmantas Krupickaitė, Dovilė
author_GND	(DE-588)1170898343 (DE-588)1170899056 (DE-588)1170898785 (DE-588)1160962294
author_facet	Burneika, Donatas 1970- Ubarevičienė, Rūta Valatka, Vytautas Baranauskaitė, Aušra Pociūtė-Sereikienė, Gintarė 1984- Daugirdas, Vidmantas Krupickaitė, Dovilė
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut aut
author_sort	Burneika, Donatas 1970-
author_variant	d b db r u ru v v vv a b ab g p s gps v d vd d k dk
building	Verbundindex
bvnumber	BV047299485
contents	Englische Zusammenfassung
ctrlnum	(OCoLC)1268198219 (DE-599)BVBBV047299485
era	Geschichte 2001-2011 gnd
era_facet	Geschichte 2001-2011
format	Book
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03468nam a2200637 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047299485</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210902 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210527s2017 a\|\|\| \|\|\|\| 00\|\|\| lit d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789955531593</subfield><subfield code="9">978-9955-531-59-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9955531592</subfield><subfield code="9">9955531592</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1268198219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047299485</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">lit</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Burneika, Donatas</subfield><subfield code="d">1970-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1170898343</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Lietuvos metropoliniai regionai</subfield><subfield code="b">gyventojų erdvinė diferenciacija XXI a. pradžioje : kolektyvinė monografija = The Metropolitan regions of Lithuania. Residential differentiation in the XXI century</subfield><subfield code="c">D. Burneika, R. Ubarevičienė, V. Valatka, A. Baranauskaitė, G. Pociūtė-Sereikienė, V. Daugirdas, D. Krupickaitė</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">The Metropolitan regions of Lithuania. Residential differentiation in the XXI century</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Vilnius</subfield><subfield code="b">Lietuvos socialinių tyrimų centras</subfield><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">151 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Illustrationen, Karten, Diagramme</subfield><subfield code="c">25 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Englische Zusammenfassung</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 2001-2011</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sozialer Wandel</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4077587-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sozialstruktur</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4055898-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Siedlung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4054858-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Segregation</subfield><subfield code="g">Soziologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4055731-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Stadt</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4056723-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Litauen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4074266-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Litauen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4074266-0</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Stadt</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4056723-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Siedlung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4054858-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Sozialstruktur</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4055898-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Segregation</subfield><subfield code="g">Soziologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4055731-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="5"><subfield code="a">Sozialer Wandel</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4077587-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 2001-2011</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ubarevičienė, Rūta</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1170899056</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Valatka, Vytautas</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Baranauskaitė, Aušra</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1170898785</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pociūtė-Sereikienė, Gintarė</subfield><subfield code="d">1984-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1160962294</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Daugirdas, Vidmantas</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Krupickaitė, Dovilė</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032702666&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032702666&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Literaturverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032702666&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_NED_20210902</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032702666</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">306.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090512</subfield><subfield code="g">4793</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">306.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090511</subfield><subfield code="g">4793</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
geographic	Litauen (DE-588)4074266-0 gnd
geographic_facet	Litauen
id	DE-604.BV047299485
illustrated	Illustrated
index_date	2024-07-03T17:22:56Z
indexdate	2024-07-10T09:08:11Z
institution	BVB
isbn	9789955531593
language	Lithuanian
oai_aleph_id	oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032702666
oclc_num	1268198219
open_access_boolean
owner	DE-12
owner_facet	DE-12
physical	151 Seiten Illustrationen, Karten, Diagramme 25 cm
psigel	BSB_NED_20210902
publishDate	2017
publishDateSearch	2017
publishDateSort	2017
publisher	Lietuvos socialinių tyrimų centras
record_format	marc
spelling	Burneika, Donatas 1970- Verfasser (DE-588)1170898343 aut Lietuvos metropoliniai regionai gyventojų erdvinė diferenciacija XXI a. pradžioje : kolektyvinė monografija = The Metropolitan regions of Lithuania. Residential differentiation in the XXI century D. Burneika, R. Ubarevičienė, V. Valatka, A. Baranauskaitė, G. Pociūtė-Sereikienė, V. Daugirdas, D. Krupickaitė The Metropolitan regions of Lithuania. Residential differentiation in the XXI century Vilnius Lietuvos socialinių tyrimų centras 2017 151 Seiten Illustrationen, Karten, Diagramme 25 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Englische Zusammenfassung Geschichte 2001-2011 gnd rswk-swf Sozialer Wandel (DE-588)4077587-2 gnd rswk-swf Sozialstruktur (DE-588)4055898-8 gnd rswk-swf Siedlung (DE-588)4054858-2 gnd rswk-swf Segregation Soziologie (DE-588)4055731-5 gnd rswk-swf Stadt (DE-588)4056723-0 gnd rswk-swf Litauen (DE-588)4074266-0 gnd rswk-swf Litauen (DE-588)4074266-0 g Stadt (DE-588)4056723-0 s Siedlung (DE-588)4054858-2 s Sozialstruktur (DE-588)4055898-8 s Segregation Soziologie (DE-588)4055731-5 s Sozialer Wandel (DE-588)4077587-2 s Geschichte 2001-2011 z DE-604 Ubarevičienė, Rūta Verfasser (DE-588)1170899056 aut Valatka, Vytautas Verfasser aut Baranauskaitė, Aušra Verfasser (DE-588)1170898785 aut Pociūtė-Sereikienė, Gintarė 1984- Verfasser (DE-588)1160962294 aut Daugirdas, Vidmantas Verfasser aut Krupickaitė, Dovilė Verfasser aut Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032702666&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032702666&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Literaturverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032702666&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Abstract
spellingShingle	Burneika, Donatas 1970- Ubarevičienė, Rūta Valatka, Vytautas Baranauskaitė, Aušra Pociūtė-Sereikienė, Gintarė 1984- Daugirdas, Vidmantas Krupickaitė, Dovilė Lietuvos metropoliniai regionai gyventojų erdvinė diferenciacija XXI a. pradžioje : kolektyvinė monografija = The Metropolitan regions of Lithuania. Residential differentiation in the XXI century Englische Zusammenfassung Sozialer Wandel (DE-588)4077587-2 gnd Sozialstruktur (DE-588)4055898-8 gnd Siedlung (DE-588)4054858-2 gnd Segregation Soziologie (DE-588)4055731-5 gnd Stadt (DE-588)4056723-0 gnd
subject_GND	(DE-588)4077587-2 (DE-588)4055898-8 (DE-588)4054858-2 (DE-588)4055731-5 (DE-588)4056723-0 (DE-588)4074266-0
title	Lietuvos metropoliniai regionai gyventojų erdvinė diferenciacija XXI a. pradžioje : kolektyvinė monografija = The Metropolitan regions of Lithuania. Residential differentiation in the XXI century
title_alt	The Metropolitan regions of Lithuania. Residential differentiation in the XXI century
title_auth	Lietuvos metropoliniai regionai gyventojų erdvinė diferenciacija XXI a. pradžioje : kolektyvinė monografija = The Metropolitan regions of Lithuania. Residential differentiation in the XXI century
title_exact_search	Lietuvos metropoliniai regionai gyventojų erdvinė diferenciacija XXI a. pradžioje : kolektyvinė monografija = The Metropolitan regions of Lithuania. Residential differentiation in the XXI century
title_exact_search_txtP	Lietuvos metropoliniai regionai gyventojų erdvinė diferenciacija XXI a. pradžioje : kolektyvinė monografija = The Metropolitan regions of Lithuania. Residential differentiation in the XXI century
title_full	Lietuvos metropoliniai regionai gyventojų erdvinė diferenciacija XXI a. pradžioje : kolektyvinė monografija = The Metropolitan regions of Lithuania. Residential differentiation in the XXI century D. Burneika, R. Ubarevičienė, V. Valatka, A. Baranauskaitė, G. Pociūtė-Sereikienė, V. Daugirdas, D. Krupickaitė
title_fullStr	Lietuvos metropoliniai regionai gyventojų erdvinė diferenciacija XXI a. pradžioje : kolektyvinė monografija = The Metropolitan regions of Lithuania. Residential differentiation in the XXI century D. Burneika, R. Ubarevičienė, V. Valatka, A. Baranauskaitė, G. Pociūtė-Sereikienė, V. Daugirdas, D. Krupickaitė
title_full_unstemmed	Lietuvos metropoliniai regionai gyventojų erdvinė diferenciacija XXI a. pradžioje : kolektyvinė monografija = The Metropolitan regions of Lithuania. Residential differentiation in the XXI century D. Burneika, R. Ubarevičienė, V. Valatka, A. Baranauskaitė, G. Pociūtė-Sereikienė, V. Daugirdas, D. Krupickaitė
title_short	Lietuvos metropoliniai regionai
title_sort	lietuvos metropoliniai regionai gyventoju erdvine diferenciacija xxi a pradzioje kolektyvine monografija the metropolitan regions of lithuania residential differentiation in the xxi century
title_sub	gyventojų erdvinė diferenciacija XXI a. pradžioje : kolektyvinė monografija = The Metropolitan regions of Lithuania. Residential differentiation in the XXI century
topic	Sozialer Wandel (DE-588)4077587-2 gnd Sozialstruktur (DE-588)4055898-8 gnd Siedlung (DE-588)4054858-2 gnd Segregation Soziologie (DE-588)4055731-5 gnd Stadt (DE-588)4056723-0 gnd
topic_facet	Sozialer Wandel Sozialstruktur Siedlung Segregation Soziologie Stadt Litauen
url	http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032702666&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032702666&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032702666&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA
work_keys_str_mv	AT burneikadonatas lietuvosmetropoliniairegionaigyventojuerdvinediferenciacijaxxiapradziojekolektyvinemonografijathemetropolitanregionsoflithuaniaresidentialdifferentiationinthexxicentury AT ubarevicieneruta lietuvosmetropoliniairegionaigyventojuerdvinediferenciacijaxxiapradziojekolektyvinemonografijathemetropolitanregionsoflithuaniaresidentialdifferentiationinthexxicentury AT valatkavytautas lietuvosmetropoliniairegionaigyventojuerdvinediferenciacijaxxiapradziojekolektyvinemonografijathemetropolitanregionsoflithuaniaresidentialdifferentiationinthexxicentury AT baranauskaiteausra lietuvosmetropoliniairegionaigyventojuerdvinediferenciacijaxxiapradziojekolektyvinemonografijathemetropolitanregionsoflithuaniaresidentialdifferentiationinthexxicentury AT pociutesereikienegintare lietuvosmetropoliniairegionaigyventojuerdvinediferenciacijaxxiapradziojekolektyvinemonografijathemetropolitanregionsoflithuaniaresidentialdifferentiationinthexxicentury AT daugirdasvidmantas lietuvosmetropoliniairegionaigyventojuerdvinediferenciacijaxxiapradziojekolektyvinemonografijathemetropolitanregionsoflithuaniaresidentialdifferentiationinthexxicentury AT krupickaitedovile lietuvosmetropoliniairegionaigyventojuerdvinediferenciacijaxxiapradziojekolektyvinemonografijathemetropolitanregionsoflithuaniaresidentialdifferentiationinthexxicentury AT burneikadonatas themetropolitanregionsoflithuaniaresidentialdifferentiationinthexxicentury AT ubarevicieneruta themetropolitanregionsoflithuaniaresidentialdifferentiationinthexxicentury AT valatkavytautas themetropolitanregionsoflithuaniaresidentialdifferentiationinthexxicentury AT baranauskaiteausra themetropolitanregionsoflithuaniaresidentialdifferentiationinthexxicentury AT pociutesereikienegintare themetropolitanregionsoflithuaniaresidentialdifferentiationinthexxicentury AT daugirdasvidmantas themetropolitanregionsoflithuaniaresidentialdifferentiationinthexxicentury AT krupickaitedovile themetropolitanregionsoflithuaniaresidentialdifferentiationinthexxicentury

Verfügbarkeit

Es ist kein Print-Exemplar vorhanden.

Fernleihe Bestellen Achtung: Nicht im THWS-Bestand! Inhaltsverzeichnis

MARC

Datensatz im Suchindex

Es ist kein Print-Exemplar vorhanden.

Ähnliche Einträge