Oral argument and amicus curiae /:
"Members of the Supreme Court are supposed to base decisions on the law, but often their choices are better explained by political ideology and party loyalty. Roberts sheds light on this problem by looking at a part of the Court's life that has never been systematically studied. Most cases...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
El Paso :
LFB Scholarly Pub.,
2012.
|
Schriftenreihe: | Law and society (New York, N.Y.)
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | "Members of the Supreme Court are supposed to base decisions on the law, but often their choices are better explained by political ideology and party loyalty. Roberts sheds light on this problem by looking at a part of the Court's life that has never been systematically studied. Most cases feature extra briefs written by third parties known as amici curiae. He examines the rare occasions on which the Court allows these extra groups to participate not just by filing briefs but by appearing before the Court during oral arguments. By tracing how these groups influence the justices' behavior, Roberts presents a strong case that the Court is driven by more than politics"--Provided by publisher. |
Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (xi, 170 pages) |
Bibliographie: | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
ISBN: | 9781593325046 1593325045 1593324669 9781593324667 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000cam a2200000Ma 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn787842717 | ||
003 | OCoLC | ||
005 | 20241004212047.0 | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr cn||||||||| | ||
008 | 110831s2012 txu ob 001 0 eng d | ||
010 | |a 2011036551 | ||
040 | |a E7B |b eng |e pn |c E7B |d OCLCQ |d YDXCP |d EBLCP |d OCLCQ |d N$T |d DKDLA |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d DEBSZ |d OCLCF |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d AZK |d LOA |d AGLDB |d MOR |d PIFAG |d ZCU |d MERUC |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d U3W |d STF |d WRM |d VTS |d NRAMU |d ICG |d INT |d VT2 |d AU@ |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d WYU |d TKN |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d U3G |d DKC |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d AJS |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCL |d SXB |d OCLCQ | ||
019 | |a 961525154 |a 962705478 |a 1055374791 |a 1058075455 |a 1066596540 |a 1081241641 |a 1228526254 | ||
020 | |a 9781593325046 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
020 | |a 1593325045 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
020 | |a 1593324669 | ||
020 | |a 9781593324667 | ||
020 | |z 9781593324667 |q (hardcover ; |q alk. paper) | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)787842717 |z (OCoLC)961525154 |z (OCoLC)962705478 |z (OCoLC)1055374791 |z (OCoLC)1058075455 |z (OCoLC)1066596540 |z (OCoLC)1081241641 |z (OCoLC)1228526254 | ||
043 | |a n-us--- | ||
050 | 4 | |a KF8748 |b .R63 2012eb | |
072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 039000 |2 bisacsh | |
082 | 7 | |a 347.73/26 |2 23 | |
049 | |a MAIN | ||
100 | 1 | |a Roberts, Matthew M.C., |d 1976- |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCjCMtVHxRV4d4WKByWp4G3 |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2011059912 | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Oral argument and amicus curiae / |c Matthew M.C. Roberts. |
260 | |a El Paso : |b LFB Scholarly Pub., |c 2012. | ||
300 | |a 1 online resource (xi, 170 pages) | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
347 | |a data file |2 rda | ||
490 | 1 | |a Law & society : recent scholarship | |
504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index. | ||
505 | 0 | |a Listening to friends -- Amici : who and when -- Influence on case outcomes -- Conclusions and implications. | |
520 | |a "Members of the Supreme Court are supposed to base decisions on the law, but often their choices are better explained by political ideology and party loyalty. Roberts sheds light on this problem by looking at a part of the Court's life that has never been systematically studied. Most cases feature extra briefs written by third parties known as amici curiae. He examines the rare occasions on which the Court allows these extra groups to participate not just by filing briefs but by appearing before the Court during oral arguments. By tracing how these groups influence the justices' behavior, Roberts presents a strong case that the Court is driven by more than politics"--Provided by publisher. | ||
610 | 1 | 0 | |a United States. |b Supreme Court |x Decision making. |
610 | 1 | 6 | |a États-Unis. |b Supreme Court |x Prise de décision. |
610 | 1 | 7 | |a United States. |b Supreme Court |2 fast |
650 | 0 | |a Amici curiae |z United States. | |
650 | 0 | |a Forensic orations |z United States. | |
650 | 0 | |a Political questions and judicial power |z United States. | |
650 | 0 | |a Public interest law |z United States. | |
650 | 6 | |a Débats judiciaires |z États-Unis. | |
650 | 6 | |a Politique et pouvoir judiciaire |z États-Unis. | |
650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Government |x Federal. |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a Amici curiae |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Decision making |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Forensic orations |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Political questions and judicial power |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Public interest law |2 fast | |
651 | 7 | |a United States |2 fast |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq | |
758 | |i has work: |a Oral argument and amicus curiae (Text) |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCFx69vHBfHFmbvy9vgjFqP |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork | ||
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |a Roberts, Matthew M.C., 1976- |t Oral argument and amicus curiae. |d El Paso : LFB Scholarly Pub., 2012 |w (DLC) 2011036551 |
830 | 0 | |a Law and society (New York, N.Y.) |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2002101262 | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |l FWS01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FWS_PDA_EBA |u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=520564 |3 Volltext |
938 | |a EBL - Ebook Library |b EBLB |n EBL1057848 | ||
938 | |a ebrary |b EBRY |n ebr10511652 | ||
938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 520564 | ||
938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 7586888 | ||
994 | |a 92 |b GEBAY | ||
912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
049 | |a DE-863 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
DE-BY-FWS_katkey | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn787842717 |
---|---|
_version_ | 1816881792405209089 |
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
author | Roberts, Matthew M.C., 1976- |
author_GND | http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2011059912 |
author_facet | Roberts, Matthew M.C., 1976- |
author_role | |
author_sort | Roberts, Matthew M.C., 1976- |
author_variant | m m r mm mmr |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | localFWS |
callnumber-first | K - Law |
callnumber-label | KF8748 |
callnumber-raw | KF8748 .R63 2012eb |
callnumber-search | KF8748 .R63 2012eb |
callnumber-sort | KF 48748 R63 42012EB |
callnumber-subject | KF - United States |
collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
contents | Listening to friends -- Amici : who and when -- Influence on case outcomes -- Conclusions and implications. |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)787842717 |
dewey-full | 347.73/26 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 347 - Procedure and courts |
dewey-raw | 347.73/26 |
dewey-search | 347.73/26 |
dewey-sort | 3347.73 226 |
dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04271cam a2200709Ma 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-4-EBA-ocn787842717</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">OCoLC</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241004212047.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr cn|||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">110831s2012 txu ob 001 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a"> 2011036551</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">E7B</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">E7B</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">YDXCP</subfield><subfield code="d">EBLCP</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">N$T</subfield><subfield code="d">DKDLA</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">DEBSZ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCF</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">AZK</subfield><subfield code="d">LOA</subfield><subfield code="d">AGLDB</subfield><subfield code="d">MOR</subfield><subfield code="d">PIFAG</subfield><subfield code="d">ZCU</subfield><subfield code="d">MERUC</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">U3W</subfield><subfield code="d">STF</subfield><subfield code="d">WRM</subfield><subfield code="d">VTS</subfield><subfield code="d">NRAMU</subfield><subfield code="d">ICG</subfield><subfield code="d">INT</subfield><subfield code="d">VT2</subfield><subfield code="d">AU@</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">WYU</subfield><subfield code="d">TKN</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">U3G</subfield><subfield code="d">DKC</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">AJS</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCO</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCL</subfield><subfield code="d">SXB</subfield><subfield code="d">OCLCQ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="019" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">961525154</subfield><subfield code="a">962705478</subfield><subfield code="a">1055374791</subfield><subfield code="a">1058075455</subfield><subfield code="a">1066596540</subfield><subfield code="a">1081241641</subfield><subfield code="a">1228526254</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781593325046</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1593325045</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1593324669</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781593324667</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9781593324667</subfield><subfield code="q">(hardcover ;</subfield><subfield code="q">alk. paper)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)787842717</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)961525154</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)962705478</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1055374791</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1058075455</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1066596540</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1081241641</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1228526254</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">n-us---</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">KF8748</subfield><subfield code="b">.R63 2012eb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">039000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.73/26</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Roberts, Matthew M.C.,</subfield><subfield code="d">1976-</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCjCMtVHxRV4d4WKByWp4G3</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2011059912</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Oral argument and amicus curiae /</subfield><subfield code="c">Matthew M.C. Roberts.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">El Paso :</subfield><subfield code="b">LFB Scholarly Pub.,</subfield><subfield code="c">2012.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (xi, 170 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="347" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">data file</subfield><subfield code="2">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Law & society : recent scholarship</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Listening to friends -- Amici : who and when -- Influence on case outcomes -- Conclusions and implications.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Members of the Supreme Court are supposed to base decisions on the law, but often their choices are better explained by political ideology and party loyalty. Roberts sheds light on this problem by looking at a part of the Court's life that has never been systematically studied. Most cases feature extra briefs written by third parties known as amici curiae. He examines the rare occasions on which the Court allows these extra groups to participate not just by filing briefs but by appearing before the Court during oral arguments. By tracing how these groups influence the justices' behavior, Roberts presents a strong case that the Court is driven by more than politics"--Provided by publisher.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">United States.</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="x">Decision making.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="6"><subfield code="a">États-Unis.</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="x">Prise de décision.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">United States.</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Amici curiae</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Forensic orations</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political questions and judicial power</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Public interest law</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Débats judiciaires</subfield><subfield code="z">États-Unis.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Politique et pouvoir judiciaire</subfield><subfield code="z">États-Unis.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">Government</subfield><subfield code="x">Federal.</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Amici curiae</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Decision making</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Forensic orations</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Political questions and judicial power</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Public interest law</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="758" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">has work:</subfield><subfield code="a">Oral argument and amicus curiae (Text)</subfield><subfield code="1">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCFx69vHBfHFmbvy9vgjFqP</subfield><subfield code="4">https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="a">Roberts, Matthew M.C., 1976-</subfield><subfield code="t">Oral argument and amicus curiae.</subfield><subfield code="d">El Paso : LFB Scholarly Pub., 2012</subfield><subfield code="w">(DLC) 2011036551</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Law and society (New York, N.Y.)</subfield><subfield code="0">http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2002101262</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">FWS01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FWS_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="u">https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=520564</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBL - Ebook Library</subfield><subfield code="b">EBLB</subfield><subfield code="n">EBL1057848</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ebrary</subfield><subfield code="b">EBRY</subfield><subfield code="n">ebr10511652</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBSCOhost</subfield><subfield code="b">EBSC</subfield><subfield code="n">520564</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">YBP Library Services</subfield><subfield code="b">YANK</subfield><subfield code="n">7586888</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="994" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">92</subfield><subfield code="b">GEBAY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | United States fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq |
geographic_facet | United States |
id | ZDB-4-EBA-ocn787842717 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-11-27T13:18:21Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9781593325046 1593325045 1593324669 9781593324667 |
language | English |
lccn | 2011036551 |
oclc_num | 787842717 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
owner_facet | MAIN DE-863 DE-BY-FWS |
physical | 1 online resource (xi, 170 pages) |
psigel | ZDB-4-EBA |
publishDate | 2012 |
publishDateSearch | 2012 |
publishDateSort | 2012 |
publisher | LFB Scholarly Pub., |
record_format | marc |
series | Law and society (New York, N.Y.) |
series2 | Law & society : recent scholarship |
spelling | Roberts, Matthew M.C., 1976- https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCjCMtVHxRV4d4WKByWp4G3 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2011059912 Oral argument and amicus curiae / Matthew M.C. Roberts. El Paso : LFB Scholarly Pub., 2012. 1 online resource (xi, 170 pages) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier data file rda Law & society : recent scholarship Includes bibliographical references and index. Listening to friends -- Amici : who and when -- Influence on case outcomes -- Conclusions and implications. "Members of the Supreme Court are supposed to base decisions on the law, but often their choices are better explained by political ideology and party loyalty. Roberts sheds light on this problem by looking at a part of the Court's life that has never been systematically studied. Most cases feature extra briefs written by third parties known as amici curiae. He examines the rare occasions on which the Court allows these extra groups to participate not just by filing briefs but by appearing before the Court during oral arguments. By tracing how these groups influence the justices' behavior, Roberts presents a strong case that the Court is driven by more than politics"--Provided by publisher. United States. Supreme Court Decision making. États-Unis. Supreme Court Prise de décision. United States. Supreme Court fast Amici curiae United States. Forensic orations United States. Political questions and judicial power United States. Public interest law United States. Débats judiciaires États-Unis. Politique et pouvoir judiciaire États-Unis. LAW Government Federal. bisacsh Amici curiae fast Decision making fast Forensic orations fast Political questions and judicial power fast Public interest law fast United States fast https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq has work: Oral argument and amicus curiae (Text) https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCFx69vHBfHFmbvy9vgjFqP https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork Print version: Roberts, Matthew M.C., 1976- Oral argument and amicus curiae. El Paso : LFB Scholarly Pub., 2012 (DLC) 2011036551 Law and society (New York, N.Y.) http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2002101262 FWS01 ZDB-4-EBA FWS_PDA_EBA https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=520564 Volltext |
spellingShingle | Roberts, Matthew M.C., 1976- Oral argument and amicus curiae / Law and society (New York, N.Y.) Listening to friends -- Amici : who and when -- Influence on case outcomes -- Conclusions and implications. United States. Supreme Court Decision making. États-Unis. Supreme Court Prise de décision. United States. Supreme Court fast Amici curiae United States. Forensic orations United States. Political questions and judicial power United States. Public interest law United States. Débats judiciaires États-Unis. Politique et pouvoir judiciaire États-Unis. LAW Government Federal. bisacsh Amici curiae fast Decision making fast Forensic orations fast Political questions and judicial power fast Public interest law fast |
title | Oral argument and amicus curiae / |
title_auth | Oral argument and amicus curiae / |
title_exact_search | Oral argument and amicus curiae / |
title_full | Oral argument and amicus curiae / Matthew M.C. Roberts. |
title_fullStr | Oral argument and amicus curiae / Matthew M.C. Roberts. |
title_full_unstemmed | Oral argument and amicus curiae / Matthew M.C. Roberts. |
title_short | Oral argument and amicus curiae / |
title_sort | oral argument and amicus curiae |
topic | United States. Supreme Court Decision making. États-Unis. Supreme Court Prise de décision. United States. Supreme Court fast Amici curiae United States. Forensic orations United States. Political questions and judicial power United States. Public interest law United States. Débats judiciaires États-Unis. Politique et pouvoir judiciaire États-Unis. LAW Government Federal. bisacsh Amici curiae fast Decision making fast Forensic orations fast Political questions and judicial power fast Public interest law fast |
topic_facet | United States. Supreme Court Decision making. États-Unis. Supreme Court Prise de décision. United States. Supreme Court Amici curiae United States. Forensic orations United States. Political questions and judicial power United States. Public interest law United States. Débats judiciaires États-Unis. Politique et pouvoir judiciaire États-Unis. LAW Government Federal. Amici curiae Decision making Forensic orations Political questions and judicial power Public interest law United States |
url | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=520564 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT robertsmatthewmc oralargumentandamicuscuriae |