Opseis ethnographikēs ereunas stis laographikes spudes: pheministikē ethnographia - diadiktyakē ethnographia
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | Greek |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Athēna
Ekdoseis Papazēsē
2017
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Literaturverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | In griechischer Schrift |
| Beschreibung: | 227 Seiten Illustrationen |
| ISBN: | 9789600233209 9600233209 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047057306 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20210426 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 201210s2017 a||| |||| 00||| gre d | ||
| 020 | |a 9789600233209 |9 978-960-02-3320-9 | ||
| 020 | |a 9600233209 |9 960-02-3320-9 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1249684270 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047057306 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a gre | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Gkasuka, Maria |d 1952- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)121295257X |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Opseis ethnographikēs ereunas stis laographikes spudes |b pheministikē ethnographia - diadiktyakē ethnographia |c Maria Gkasuka, Xanthippē Phulidē |
| 246 | 1 | 0 | |a ethnografikēs laografikes spoudes feministikē ethnografia |
| 264 | 1 | |a Athēna |b Ekdoseis Papazēsē |c 2017 | |
| 300 | |a 227 Seiten |b Illustrationen | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a In griechischer Schrift | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a Bibliografie S. 102-109 und 207-227 | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Feminismus |0 (DE-588)4222126-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Volkskunde |0 (DE-588)4078937-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Griechenland |0 (DE-588)4022047-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Folklore / Study and teaching | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Folklore / Greece / History | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Feminism | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Ethnology | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Folklore | |
| 653 | 2 | |a Greece | |
| 653 | 6 | |a History | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Griechenland |0 (DE-588)4022047-3 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Volkskunde |0 (DE-588)4078937-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Feminismus |0 (DE-588)4222126-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Phulidē, Xanthippē |d ca. 20./21. Jh. |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1223110729 |4 aut | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032464554&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032464554&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Literaturverzeichnis |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_NED_20210426 | |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 390 |e 22/bsb |g 495 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 305.309 |e 22/bsb |g 495 |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032464554 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1808862309229002752 |
|---|---|
| adam_text |
ΠΕΡΙΕΧΟΜΕΝΑ ΠΡΟΛΟΓΟΣ. 9 ΕΙΣΑΓΩΓΗ: Ο λόγος περί Εθνογραφίας. 11 ΜΕΡΟΣ ΠΡΩΤΟ ΦΕΜΙΝΙΣΤΙΚΗ ΕΘΝΟΓΡΑΦΙΑ: ΠΡΟΚΛΗΣΕΙΣ ΚΑΙ ΔΙΛΗΜΜΑΤΑ ΕΙΣΑΓΩΓΗ. 53 1. Το θηλυκό εθνογραφικό ταξίδι. 63 2 Μέθοδοι-κλειδιά. 66 3. Δυτική, φεμινιστική υπεροψία και «άλλες» γυναίκες. 73 4. Λαογραφικες Σπουδές και Φυλό. 77 5. Λαογραφικες Σπουδές και Εθνογραφία. 81 6. Συμπερασματικά. 97 ΒΙΒΛΙΟΓΡΑΦΙΑ Α' ΜΕΡΟΥΣ. 102 ΜΕΡΟΣ ΔΕΥΤΕΡΟ ΔΙΑΛΙΚΤΥΑΚΗ ΕΘΝΟΓΡΑΦΙΑ: ΔΙΕΡΕΥΝΩΝΤΑΣ ΚΥΒΕΡΝΟΠΟΛΙΤΙΣΜΟΥΣ ΕΙΣΑΓΩΓΗ: Για ένα πολιτισμό του μόντεμ. 115 1. Εθνογραφία στο Διαδίκτυο: Γιατί ακριβώς μιλάμε; . 123
8 'Chpetç Εθνογραφικής Έρευνας στιςΛαογραφικές Σπονδές 2. Παραδοσιακή Εθνογραφία-Διαδικτυακή Εθνογραφία: Συνεχείες και διαφοροποιήσεις. 127 3. Τεχνικές Υλοποίησης της Διαδικτυακής Εθνογραφίας . 143 3.α. Η επιτόπια έρευνα και παρατήρηση (online obser
vation). 147 3.β. Η υλοποίηση on line εθνογραφικών συζητήσεων, συνεντεύξεων. 150 3.γ. Η ηλεκτρονική συμπλήρωση ημερολογίου (Research
Diary). 153 4. Ψηφιακή Λαογραφία:Νέα Δεδομένα και προκλήσεις. 159 5. Διαδικτυακή εθνογραφική έρευνα σε ψηφιακούς τόπους λαογραφικής αναφοράς. 169 6.
Συμπερασματικά. 172 7. Μελέτη Περίπτωσης Διαδικτυακής Εθνογραφίας σε Τόπο Λαογραφικής Αναφοράς: έρευνα σε εικονική κοι νότητα . 176 7.1
Εισαγωγή. 176 7.2 Συνοπτική περιγραφή της διαδικτυακής Εθνογρα φίας. Σχεδιασμός και υλοποίηση της έρευνας στην εικονική κοινότητα Caledon Oxbridge University Moderate. 177 7.3
Η ερευνητική διαδικασία. 185 7.4. Ο ρόλος της εθνογράφου κατά την υλοποίηση της διαδικτυακής Εθνογραφίας. 194 7.5. Η επεξεργασία των εθνογραφικών
δεδομένων. 195 7.6. Δυσκολίες κατά την υλοποίηση της έρευνας - τρό ποι αντιμετώπισής τους. 200 7.7. Συμπεράσματα της διαδικτυακής Εθνογραφίας . 203 8. ΒΙΒΛΙΟΓΡΑΦΙΑ В'ΜΕΡΟΥΣ. 207
ΒΙΒΛΙΟΓΡΑΦΙΑ В' ΜΕΡΟΥΣ A. Ελληνόγλωσση Αθανασίου, А. (2004). «Εθνογραφία στο διαδίκτυο ή το δια δίκτυο ως εθνογραφία: δυνητική πραγματικότητα και πολι τισμική κριτική». Επιθεώρηση Κοινωνικών Ερευνών, 115. σσ. 49-74. Γκασούκα Μ., και Φουλίδη Ξ. (2012). Σύγχρονοι Ορίζοντες των Λαογραφιών Σπουδών-
Εννοιολογικό Πλαίσω, Έρευνα, Φύλο, Διαδίκτυο, Σχολείο. Αθήνα: Σιδέρης. Γκασούκα, Μ., Αρβανιτίδου, Ζ. (2013). «Netnography» στη Διδακτική Ενότητα: Ανάλυση ποιοτικών δεδομένων». Εκ παιδευτικό υλικό του μαθήματος «Μέθοδοι Ανάλυσης Ερευνητικών Δεδομένων στις Κοινωνικές Επιστήμες και τις Επιστήμες της
Αγωγής» του Προγράμματος Δια βίου Μάθη σης του Πανεπιστημίου Αιγαίου. Δερμιτζάκης, X. (2006). «Σύγχρονες μορφές λαϊκού πολιτι σμού». Εισήγηση erto Ιο Διεθνές Εκπαιδευτικό Συνέδριο με θέμα «Λαϊκός Πολιτισμός και Εκπαίδευση» που έλα βε χώρα στο Βόλο από 29 Σεπτεμβρίου έως 1 Οκτωβρίου 2006.
Ανακτήθηκε στις 1 Νοεμβρίου 2013 από www.eipe.gr/ praktika/praktika/dermitzakis.pdf Ιωσηφίδης, Θ. (2003). Ανάλυση ποιοτικών δεδομένων σας κοι νωνικές επιστήμες. Αθήνα: Κριτική.
208 Δ ίαδίκτυακή Εθνογραφία Κουντζέρης, Α. και Κωνσταντάτος, Μ. (2010). «Νέες τάσεις στη χρήση του διαδικτύου για επικοινωνία, πληροφόρηση και ψυχαγωγία». Αθήνα: Παρατηρητήριο για την Κοινωνία της Πληροφορίας, σσ. 4-8. Λιναρδής, Α., Παπαγιαννόπουλος, Κ., Καλησπεράτη, Ε. (2011). Η Διαδικτνακή έρευνα.
Πλεονεκτήματα, μειονεκτήματα και εργαλεία διεξαγωγής διαδικτυακών ερευνών. Αθήνα: ΕΚΚΕ. Λυδάκη, Α. (2011). Μέσα από την κάμερα. Κινηματογράφος και κοινωνική πραγματικότητα (β' έκδ.). Αθήνα: Ελληνικά Γράμματα. Μιχαήλ, Γ. (2009). «Homo internecticus ή λαογραφία και δια δίκτυο» περ. Λαογραφία, τ. 41°
(2007-2009). Αθήνα, σσ. 291-395. Μπεϊνά, Ε. (2011). Η καρπάθικη λύρα: μία εθνογραφική προ σέγγιση στην πολιτισμική οργανολογία: μουσικά όργανα και πολιτισμική ταυτότητα της Καρπάθου. Διδακτορική διατρι βή. Ιόνιο Πανεπιστήμιο (αδημ.). Παπάνης, Ε. (2011). Μεθοδολογία Έρευνας και Διαδίκτυο. Αθή να:
Σιδέρη. Πασχαλίδου, Ε. (2004). Η διδασκαλία του μαθήματος της λαο γραφίας στα προγράμματα των παιδαγωγικών ακαδημίών: Συμβολή των δασκάλων στην ανάπτυξη των Λασγραφικών Σπουδών. Διδακτορική διατριβή. Εθνικό και Καποδιστριακό Πανεπιστήμιο Αθηνών (αδημ.). Πετρίδης, Π.Α. (2011). «Ψηφιακά αρχεία και
πρακτικές ανταλ λαγής: μια ανθρωπολογική προσέγγιση των ομότιμων δικτύ ων». Διδακτορική διατριβή. Πάντειο Πανεπιστήμιο Κοινω νικών και Πολιτικών Επιστημών (αδημ.). Ράπτης, Α., Ράπτη, Α. (2001), Μάθηση και Διδασκαλία στην Εποχής της Πληροφορίας (τομ. Α' και Β'). Αθήνα: Αυτοέκ δοση. Τζάκης, Δ.
(2002). «Για την Ιστορία της Λαογραφίας» στο (επιμ.) Μιράσγεζη, Μ. Δημόσιος καί ιδιωτικός βίος στην
Βιβλιογραφία В ' Μέρους 209 Ελλάδα II: Օւ Νεότεροι χρόνοι - Ο Νεότερος Λαϊκός Βίος. Πάτρα: ΕΑΠ. σσ. 23-35. Τσιώλης, Γ. (2006). Ιστορίες ζωής και βιογραφικές αφηγήσεις. Η βιογραφική προσέγγιση στην κοινωνιολογική ποιοτική έρευνα. Αθήνα: Κριτική. Φουλίδη, Ξ. (2014). «Νέοι ορίζοντες στις ελληνικές
Λαογραφικές Σπουδές: Το διαδίκτυο ως πεδίο παραγωγής, διά δοσης και εκπαιδευτικής αξιοποίησης του Λαϊκού Πολιτισμού-Η ερευνητική μέθοδος της εικονικής εθνογραφίας» στο Θεοδωροπούλου, Ε., Καΐλα, Μ., Πολεμικός, Ν., Παπαδόπουλος, I., Καφούση, Σ., Φώκιαλη, Π., (επιμ.) Πρα κτικά της Διημερίδας με θέμα:
«Η διδακτορική έρευ να στο Τμήμα Επιστημών της Προσχολικής Αγωγής και του Εκπαιδευτικού Σχεδιασμού», που πραγματοποιήθη κε στη Ρόδο από τις 7 έως και τις 8 Μαί'ου 2012. Ανακτή θηκε στις 10/10/2014 από την ηλεκτρονική διεύθυνση http:// www.rhodes.aegean.gr/tepaes/docs/Publications/final
%20didaktorwn%281%29.pdf В. Ξενόγλωσση Androutsopoulos, J. (2008). “Potentials and limitations of dis course-centred online ethnography”. Language@Intemet 5, article 9 http://www.languageatintemet.org/articles/2008/ 1610/androutsopoulos.pdf (Last viewed 12 July, 2014). Appadurai A. (1991). “Global
ethnoscapes: notes and queries for a transnational anthropology”, in Fox RG (ed.), Recap turing Anthropology: Working in the Present, Santa Fe, NM: Sch. Am. Res. Press, pp. 191-210. Ardevol, E. (2005). “Cyberculture: Anthropological perspectives of the Internet”, workshop Loughborough, 9th
December, 2005. http://www.media-anthropology.net/lboro_ardevol.pdf
210 Διαδίκτνακή Εθνογραφία Arnould, E. J., Wallendorf, M., (1994). “Market-Oriented Ethnography: Interpretation Building and Marketing Strat egy Formulation”. Journal of Marketing Research, Voi. 31, Iss. 4. pp. 484-504. Bacon, J. (2011), The Digital Folklore Project: Tracking the Oral Tradition on the World Wide Web. A thesis presented to the Faculty of the Department of Literature and Language East Tennessee State University. Bagozzi, R., P. Dholakia, U., M. (2002). “Intentional Social Actions in Virtual Communities”. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16, 2. pp. 2-21. Baka, V Scott, S.V (2008). “From studying communities to focusing on temporary collectives: research-in-progress on Web 2.0 in the travel sector”. Information Systems and In novation Group. London: London School of Economics and Political Science. Bakardjieva, M. (2003). “Virtual Togetherness: an Every-day Life Perspective”. Media, Culture Society, 25,3. pp. 291-313. Bartle, R., A. (2010). “From MUDs to MMORPGs: The histo ry of virtual worlds”, in Hunsinger, J., Klastrup, L. Allen, M. (eds) International Handbook of Internet Research. Dor drecht: Springer. Bauer, M.W. Gaskell, G. (2000). “Towards public accountabili ty: Beyond sampling, reliability and validity”, in Bauer, M. W. Gaskell, G. (eds.) Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: a practical handbook. London: Sage. Beaulieu, A. (2004). “Mediating ethnography: Objectivity and the making of ethnographies of the internet”. Social Episte mology 18. pp. 139-163. Bell, D. (2001). An Infroduction to Cybercultures. London: Rou tledge.
Benfield, J. A., Szlemko, W. J. (2006). “Internet-based data collection: Promises and realities”. Journal of Research
Βιβλιογραφία В ' Μέρους 211 Practice, 2(2), Article Dl. Retrieved [date of access] from, http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/30/51 Biocca, F., Kim. T. Levy M. (1995). “The vision of virtual real ity”. In Biocca F. Levy M. (eds.). Communication in the age of virtual reality. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. pp. 3-14. Blank, T., J. (2009a). Folklore and the Internet: vernacular expres sion in a digital world. Logan, Utah: Utah State University Press. Blank, T., J. (2012). Folk Culture in the DigitalAge: The Emergent Dynamics ofHuman Interaction. Logan, UT: Utah State Uni versity Press. Blank, T, J. (2013). The Last Laugh: Folk Humor, Celebrity Cul ture, and Mass-Mediated Disasters in the Digital Age. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press. Boellstorff, T. (2008). Coming ofAge in Second Life: An Anthro pologist Explores the Virtually. Human Princeton: Princeton University Press. Boellstorff, T. (2010). ‘A Typology of Ethnographic Scales for Virtual Worlds”, in W.S. Bainbridge (ed.), Online Worlds: Convergence of the Real and the Virtual, pp. 123-133. Spring er London. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-l-84882-825-4_10 Boellstorff, T, Nardi, В., Pearce, C, Taylor, T. L. (2012). Eth nography and virtual world: A handbook of methods. Prince ton: Princeton University Press. Boyd, D. (2008). “How can qualitative internet researchers de fine the boundaries of their projects: A response to Christine Hine”, in Markham, A.N. Baum, N.K. (eds.) Internet inqui ry: Conversations about method. Los Angeles: Sage. pp. 26-32.
Boulos, M., N., K., Hetherington, L. Wheeler, S. (2007). “Sec ond Life: an overview of the potential of 3-D virtual worlds in
212 Αιαδίκτνακή Εθνογραφία medical and health education”. Health Information Library Journal, 24 (4). pp. 233-245. Brmseth, J. (2002). “Public Places. Private Activities?: Meth odological Approaches and Ethical Dilemmas in Research on Computer Mediated Communication Contexts”, in Mor rison, A. (ed.), Researching ICTs in Context, pp. 33-72. Bronner, S J. (2009). “Digitizing and Virtualizing Folklore”. In Blank, TJ. (ed.), Folklore and the Internet: Vernacular Expres sion in a Digital World. Logan: Utah State University Press. pp. 21-66. Bronner, S J. (2011). Explaining Traditions: Folk Behavior in Mo dem Culture. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky. Burrell, J. (2011). “User Agency in the Middle Range: Rumors and the Reinvention of the Internet in Accra, Ghana Sci ence”. Technology Human Values, 36(2). pp. 139-159. Carter, D. (2005). “Living in virtual communities: an ethnog raphy of human relationships in cyberspace”. Information Communication Society, 8. pp. 148-167. Castells, M. (2001). The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Inter net, Business, and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Castells, M. Catterall, B. (2001), The Making of the Network Society. London: ICA. Christensen, K. Levinson, D. (eds.) (2003). The encyclopedia of community: From the village to the virtual world. London: Sage. Couldry, N., Hepp, A. Kotz, Fr. (eds), (2009). Media Events in a Global Age. New York: Routledge Press. Creswell, J., W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Creswell, J., W. (2008).
Educational research: Planning, conduct ing, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Up per Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Βιβλιογραφία В ' Μέρους 213 Cruikshank, L. (2001). Avatar Dreams: Theorizing Desire for the Virtual Body. A thesis submitted to the Department of Sociolo gy in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Mas ter of Arts, Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cam bridge University Press. Delamont, S., Hamilton, D. (1993). “Revisiting Classroom Research: A continuing Cautionary Tale”, in Hammersley M.,(ed.) Controversies in Classroom Research. London: Open University Press. DiMaggio, P, Hargittai, E., Neuman, W., R. Robinson, J., P. (2001). “Social implications of the Internet”. Annual Review of Sociology, 27. pp. 307-336. Dirksen, V, Huizing, A., Smit, В. (2010). “Piling on layers of understanding: The use of connective ethnography for the study of (online) work practices”. New Media Society, 12(7). pp. 1045-1063. Dong, J. Blommaert, J. (2009). “Space, scale and accents: con structing migrant identity in Beijing”. Multilingua, 28(1): 1-24. Dorson, R., M. (1971). “Is There a Folk in the City?” The Ur ban Experience and Folk Tradition. Edited by A. Paredes and Stekert E. Austin, pp. 21-52. Dorson, R., M. (1976). Folklore andfakelore: Essays toward a dis cipline in folk studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press Dorst, J. (1990). «Tags and Burners, Cycles and Networks: Folk lore in the Telectronic Age». Journal of Folklore Research 27. pp. 179-190. Dresner, E. Herring S.C. (2010). “Functions of the Non-Ver bal in CMC: Emotions and illocutionary force”. Communi cation Theory, 20. pp. 249-268.
Driscoll, D. L. (2011). “Introduction to Primary Research: Ob servations, Surveys, and Interviews”. Writing Spaces: Read ings on Writing, Volume 2. pp. 153-174.
214 Διαόικτνακή Εθνογραφία Ducheneaut, N. Yee, N. Bellotti V. (2010). “The Best of Both (Virtual) Worlds: Using Ethnography and Computational Tools to Study Online Behavior”. Ethnographic Praxis in In dustry Conference Proceedings, pp. 136-148. Dundės, A. (1965). The Study of Folklore. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. Dundės, A. Pagter, C. (1992). Work hard and you shall be re warded: Urban folklore from the paperwork empire. Detroit: Wayne State University Press. Eberte, Th. Maeder, Ch. (2011). “Organizational Ethnogra phy”. in Silverman, D. (ed), Qualitative Research (3rd ed), London: Sage. pp. 54-73. Emerson, R.M., Fretz, R.I. Shaw, L.L. (1995). Writing Ethno graphic Fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Escobar, A. (1994). “Welcome To Cyberia: Notes on the Anthro pology of Cyberculture”. Current Anthropology, 35 (June), pp. 211-231. Escobar, A. (2000). “Notes on networks and anti-globalization social movements”, paper presented to the AAA Annual Meeting. San Francisco, US. November. Fetterman, D. M., (1998). Ethnography: step by step. (2ed.) s.l.: Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage. Fialková, L. Yelenevskaya, M. (2001). “Ghosts in the Cyber World: An Analysis of Folklore Sites on the Internet”. Fabu la 42 (1/2). pp. 64-89. Retrieved July 7, 2001, from http://dx. doi.org/10.1515/fabl.2001.011. Fielding, N. Lee, R., M. (2000). “Patterns and potentials in the adoption of qualitative software: the implications of user experiences and software training”. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Social Science Methodology. International
Sociological Association, Universität zu Köln. Flick, U. (1998). An introduction to qualitative research: theory, method and applications. London: Sage.
Βιβλιογραφία В ' Μέρους 215 Flick, U. (2006). Лw Introduction to Qualitative Research. Thou sand Oaks. CA.: Sage. Folkman-Curasi, C. (2001). “A critical exploration of face-to-face interviewing vs. computer - mediated interviewing”. Interna tional Journal of Market Research, Voi. 43 No. 4. pp. 361-375. Foote, M. (2007). “Userpicks: Cyber Folk Art in the Early 21st Century”. Folklore Forum 37. pp. 27-38. Fox, W., S. (2007). [1983], “Computerized Creation and Diffu sion of Folkloric Materials”. Folklore Forum 37(1). pp. 5-14. Retrieved February 8, 2009, from https://scholarworks. iu.edu/dspace/handle/2022/3235. Originally published in Fol klore Forum 16 (1). pp. 5-20. Gajjala, R. (2009). “Response to Shani Orgad” in Markham, A., M., Baym, N., K. (eds.), Internet inquiry: Conversations about method, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. pp. 61-67. Garcia, A., Standler, A., Bechkoff, J. Cui, Y. (2009). “Ethno graphic Approaches to the Internet and Computer-Mediat ed Communication”. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 38(52), 52-84. Gasouka, M., Foulidi, X. Arvanitidou, Z. (2017). “Feminist’s Ethnography Use in the Teaching of Folk Studies in High er Education. The Experience of Women’s Storytelling Ar chive of University of the Aegean”. Conference Proceedings New Perspectives in Science Education: Florence, Italy 16-17 March 2017, http://conference.pixel-online.net/NPSE/conferenceproceedings.php Gatson, S. N. (2011). “The Methods, Ethics, and Politics of Re presentation in Online Ethnography”, in Denzin, N. Lin coln, Y. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. 4th Edi tion.
London: Sage. pp. 513-527. Geertz, C. (1993). The interpretation of Culture. London: Fontana. Geertz, C. (2000b [1983]). Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
216 Δ ιαόίκτνακή Εθνογραφία Gerth, Η., (2009). “Zoroastrians on the Internet. A quiet social movement: Ethnography of a virtual community”. UNLV The ses, Dissertations, Professional Papers and Capstones, 49. Gupta, A. Ferguson, J. (1997). “Discipline and Practice: “The Field” as Site, Method, and Location in Anthropology”. In Ferguson J. and Gupta A. (eds). Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Hallett, R. E., Barber, K. (2014). “Ethnographic Research in a Cyber Era”. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 2014, Voi. 43(3). pp. 306-330. Hammersley, M. Atkinson, P. (1983). Ethnography:principles in practice. 2nd edition. London: Tavistock. Hammersley, M. Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Routledge. Hanna, R. C., Weinberg, B., Dant, R. P. Berger, P. D. (2005). “Do internet-based surveys increase personal self-disclosu re?”. Database Marketing Customer Strategy Manage ment, Voi. 12 No. 4. pp. 342-356. Hansen, Gr., (2009). “Public Folklore in Cyberspace”. In Blank, Tr., J. (ed), Folklore and the Internet: Vernacular Expression in a Digital World. Logan: Utah State University Press, pp. 194-212. Hartmann, M. (2004). Technologies and Utopias: the cyberflaneur and the experience of being online. Munich: Verlag Reinhard Fischer. Hauben, M. (1995). “The Net and netizens: the impact the Net has on people’s lives”. Preface from http:// www.cs.columbia. edu/л hauben/netbook/ Herring, S., C. (2001). “Computer-Mediated Discourse”, in Tannen, D., Schiffrin D. Hamilton, H. (eds.).
Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 1-24.
Βιβλιογραφία В ' Μέρους 217 Hetland, P. Mordi, А. (2016). “Ethnography for Investigating the Internet”. Seminar.net - International Journal of Media, Technology and Lifelong Learning, Voi. 12 - Issue 1. pp. 1-14. Hewson, C. (2007). “Gathering data on the Internet: qualitative approaches and possibilities for mixed methods research”, in A. Joinson, K. McKenna, U. Reips T. Postmes (eds), Ox ford Handbook of Internet Psychology. Oxford: Oxford Uni versity Press. Hewson, C. Laurent, D. (2008). “Research Design and Tools for Internet Research”, in Fielding N., Lee R. Blank G. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Online Research Methods. Lon don: Sage. Hewson, C. (2010). “Internet-mediated research and its po tential role in facilitating mixed methods research”, in Hesse-Biber S. N. Leavy P. (eds.). Handbook of emergent me thods. New York: Guilford, pp. 543-570. Hine, C. (2000). Virtual Ethnography. London: Sage. Hine, C. (2005). Virtual Methods: Issues in Social Research on the Internet. Oxford: Berg. Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, Em bodied and Everyday. London: Bloomsbury. Hodge, E., Collins, S. Giordano, Tr. (2011). The virtual worlds: How to use Second life and other 3D virtual Environments. East Carolina University: Jones and Bartlett Publisher. Howard, P. N. (2002). “Network ethnography and the hyperme dia organization: New media, new organizations, new me thods”. New Media Society, 4(4). pp. 550-574. Howard, R., G., (2008). “Electronic Hybridity: The Persistent Processes of the Vernacular Web”. Journal of American Folklore 121 (480). pp. 192-218.
Howard, R., G. (2005). “A theory of Vernacular Rhetoric: The case of the ‘Sinner’s Prayer’ online”. Folklore 116(2). pp. 172-188.
218 Δίαόικτυακή Εθνογραφία Howard, R., G. (2013). “Vernacular Authority: Critically Enga ging Tradition”, in Blank Tr. J. Howard R. GI. (eds), Tra dition in the 21st Century: Locating the Role of the Past in the Present. Logan, Utah: Utah State University Press, pp. 72-99. Huang, J., S. (2011). “An examination of the business strategies in the second life virtual market”. Journal of Media Business Studies, 8(2). pp. 1-17. Joinson, A. N. (2001). “Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: the role of self awareness and visual ano nymity”. European Journal of Social Psychology, ѴЫ. 31. pp. 177-192. Jones S. (ed), (1999). Doing internet research. London: Sage. Jordan, R., A. (1997), “Computer Mediated Folklore” in Green, Th., A. (ed.) Folklore, an encyclopedia ofbeliefs, customs, tales, music and art. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-Clio. pp. 140-141. Jupp, V. (2006). (ed.). The sage dictionary of social research me thods. London: Sage. Fernback, J. (1999). “There is a There There”, in S Jones (ed.). Doing Internet Research: Critical issues and methods for exam ining the Net. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Fialkova, L. Yelenevskaya, M., (2001). “Ghosts in the Cyber World: An Analysis of Folklore Sites on the Internet”. Fabula 42 (1/2). pp. 64-89. http://dx.doi. org/10.1515/fabl.2001.011. Kadriye, U., Aydin, C. H. (2012). “The use of virtual ethnog raphy”. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13(2). pp. 212-225. Kafai, Y., B., Feldon, D., Fields, D., A., Giang, M. Quintero, M. (2007). “Life in the time of Whypox: A virtual epidemic as a community event”, in Steinfield
C., Pentland B., Acker man, M. Contractor, N. (eds.). Communities and technolo gies. New York: Springer, pp. 171-190. Kaplan, M. (2013). “Curation and Tradition on Web 2.0”. in Blank, Tr., J. Howard, R., G. (eds) Tradition in the Twenty-
Βιβλιογραφία В ' Μέρους 219 First Century: Locating the Role of the Past in the Present. Lo gan, UT: Utah State University Press. Kanayama, T. (2003). “Ethnographic research on the experience of japanese elderly people online”. New Media Society, 5(2). pp. 267-288. Kanuka, H., Anderson, T. (2007). “Ethical issues in qualita tive e-learning research”. International Journal of Qualita tive Methods, 6(2). pp. 20-39. Kim, A., J. (2000). Community building on the Web. Berkeley, CA: Peachpit. King, S. (1996). “Researching internet communities: Proposed ethical guidelines for the reporting of results”. The Informa tion Society, Volume 12, (2). pp. 119-127. Kitchin, R. (1998). “Towards geographies of cyberspace”. Pro gress in Human Geography 22,3. pp. 148-406. Kolko, В. Reid, E. (1998). “Dissolution and fragmentation: Problems in on-line communities”, in Jones, S.G. (ed.). Cy bersociety 2.0: Revisiting Computer-mediated Communication and Community. New Media Cultures, Voi. 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. pp. 212-229. Kozinets, R., V. (2002). “The Field Behind the Screen: Using Netnography for Marketing Research in Online Communi ties”. Journal of Market Research, 39(1). pp. 61-72. Kozinets, R., V. (2006). “Netnography”. In Jupp, V. (ed.), The sage dictionary of social research methods. London: Sage. pp. 135-147. Kozinets, R., V. (2010). “Netnography: The Marketer’s Secret Weapon-How Social Media Understanding Drives Innova tion”. Retrieved March 6, 2011, from http://www.qualitativemind.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/NetBase_Netnography_Paper.pdf Kowch, E. Schwier, R., A.
(1997). “Considerations in the construction of technology - based virtual learning commu-
220 Δίαδικτνακή Εθνογραφία nities”. Canadian Journal of Education Communication, 26(1). pp. 1-12. Langer, R. (2003). “Skin two: (un)-covering the skin in fetish carnival”. Proceedings of the European Association for Con sumer Research Conference (EACR). Dublin, 5-7 June. Langer, R. Beckman, S., C. (2005). “Sensitive research topics: Netography revisited”. Qualitative Market Research, 8(2). pp. 189-203. Leander, K.M. Mekim, K.K. (2003). “Tracing the Everyday “Sitings” of Adolescents on the Internet: A Strategic Adap tation of Ethnography Across Online and Offline Spaces”. Education, Communication Information 3(2). pp. 211-40. Leimeister, J., M., Schweizer, К., Leimeister, S. Kremar, H. (2008).”Do virtual communities matter for the social sup port of patients? Antecedents and effects of virtual relation ships in online communities”. Information Technology People, Voi. 21 Iss 4. pp. 350-374. Lévy, P. (2000). Cibercultura. Lisboa: Instituo Piaget. Lister, M., Dovey, J., Giddings, S., Grant, I. Kelly, К., (2003), New Media: A Critical Introduction. London, New York: Routledge. Lolland, J. Lolland, L., H. (1995). Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. California: Wadsworth Publishing. Lombard, M. Ditton, T. (1997). “At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Com munication, 3(2). pp. 82-91. Luedicke, M. K. (2006). “Brand Community under Fire: The Role of Social Environments for the Hummer Brand Commu nity”. Advances in Consumer Research, 33 (1). pp. 486-493. Lysloff, R., T.A. (2003). “Musical Community
on the Internet: An On-Line Ethnography”. Cultural Anthropology 18(2). pp. 233-263.
Βιβλιογραφία В ' Μέρους 221 Madden, R. (2010). Being Ethnographic: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Magnet, S. (2007). “Feminist sexualities, race and the Internet: An investigation of suicidegirls.com”. New Media Society, 9 (4). pp. 577-602. Mann, C. Stewart, F. (2000). Internet Communication and Qualitative Research: A Handbook for Researching Online. London: Sage. Manovich, L. (2002.) The Language of New Media. Cambridge: MIT Press. Marcus, G., E. (1995). “Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography”. Annual Re view of Anthropology, Voi. 24. pp. 95-117. Marshall, J., P. (2007). Living on cybermind: Categories, commu nication, and control. New York: Peter Lang Publishing. Martin, E. (1996). “Citadels, Rhizomes, and String Figures”, in Aronowitz, S., Martinsons B., Menser, M. (eds) Science, Technology and Cyberculture. London: Routledge. Martey, R. M. Shiflett, K. (2012). “Reconsidering site and self: Methodological frameworks for virtual-world research”. International Journal of Communication, 6. pp. 105-126. http://www.ijoc.org/ojs/index.php/ijoc/article/viewDownloadInterstitial/971/686 Mason, B. (1996). “Moving toward Virtual Ethnography”. Ame rican Folklore Society News. 25(2). pp. 4-5. McClelland, Br. (2000). “Online Orality: The Internet, Folklore, and Culture in Russia”. In Lengel L. B. (ed), Culture and Te chnology in New Europe: Civic Discourse in Transformation in Post-Communist Nations Stamford. CT: Ablex. pp. 179-191. McConnell, D. (2000). Implementing Computer Supported Coop
erative Learning. London: Kogan Page. McNeill, L. S. (2009). “The End of the Internet: A Folk Respon se to the Provision of Infinite Choice”. In Blank Tr. J., Folk-
222 Διαδικτυακή Εθνογραφία lore and the Internet: Vernacular Expression in a Digital World. Logan, Utah: Utah State University Press, pp. 80-97. Meadows, M., S. (2008). Լ Avatar: The Culture and Consequences of Having a Second Life. New York: New Riders. Menser, M. Aronowitz, S. (1996). “On Cultural Studies, Sci ence, and Technology”, in Aronowitz S., Martinsons B. Menser M. (eds) Science, Technology and Cyberculture. Lon don: Routledge. Miller, D., Slater, D. (2000). The Internet: an Ethnographic Approach. Oxford/New York: Berg. Miller, D., Slater, D. (2001). The Internet: An Ethnographic Approach. Paris: Berg Publishers. Miller, M. (2012), “Face-to-Face with the Digital Folk - The Ethics of Fieldwork on Facebook” in Blank, Tr., J. (ed.) Folk lore and the Internet: Vernacular Expression in a Digital World, Logan: Utah State University Press, pp. 1-20. Morton, H. (2001). “Computer-Mediated Communication in Australian Anthropology and Sociology”. Social Analysis Journal of Cultural and Social Practices, 45(1). pp. 3-11. Mulder, I., Kort, J. (2008). “Mixed emotions, mixed methods: The role of emergent technologies in studying user experi ence in context”, in Nagy Hesse-Biber S. Leavy P. (eds.). Handbook of emergent methods New York, NY: Guilford Press, pp. 601-612. Murgado-Armenteros, E., Torres-Ruiz, E, Vega-Zamora, M. (2012). “Differences between online and face-to-face focus group, viewed through two approaches”. Journal of Theo retical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 7(2). pp. 73-86. Murthy, D. (2008). “Digital Ethnography: An Examination of the Use of New
Technologies for Social Research”. Sociolo gy, 42 (5). pp. 837-855.
Βιβλιογραφία В ' Μέρους 223 Nguyen, L., Toriina, L., Peszynski, К. Corbitt В., J. (2006). “Power Relations in Cyber Communities”. Electronic Com merce Research 6.1. pp. 21-37. Nikolaou, A. Tsolakidis, C. (2012). “Three Dimensional Vir tual Environments as a Tool for Development of Personal Learning Networks”. International Journal of Emerging Te chnologies in Learning (iJET), 8. Kassel, Germany: Kassel University Press, GmbH. pp. 79-88. Ondrejka, C. (2004). “Escaping the Gilded Cage: User Created Content and Building the Metaverse”. New York Law School Law Review, 49 (1). pp. 81-101. O’ Reilly, K. (2009). Key Concepts in Ethnography. London: Sage. Oring, E. (1986). Folk Groups and Folklore Genres: An Introduc tion. Logan, Utah: Utah State University Press. Oring, E. (2013). “Thinking through Tradition”, in Blank; Tr., J., Howard, R., GI. (eds). Tradition in the Twenty-First Century: Locating the Role of the Past in the Present. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press. Paccagnella, L. (1997). “Getting the seat of your pants dirty: Strategies for ethnographic research on virtual communi ties”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(1). pp. 267-288. Paolillo, J. Zelen-Kauskaite, A., (2013). “Real-time chat”, in Herring, S.C., Stein, D. Virtanen, T. (eds.), Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 109-133. Papacharissi, Z. (2012). “Without you, I’m nothing: Performanc es of the self on Twitter”. International Journal of Communi cation, 6. pp. 1989-2006. Paterson, B., L., Bottorff, J., L. Hewat, R. (2003). “Blend ing observational
methods: Possibilities, strategies, and chal lenges”. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(1). pp. 1-19.
224 Διαδικτυακή Εθνογραφία Patton, Μ., Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Meth ods. London: Sage. Pearce, C. (2009). Communities of Play. Massachusetts: Massa chusetts Institute of Technology. Pohl, E, Bender, M. Lachmann, G. (2002). “Hindsight bias around the world”. Experimental Psychology, 49 (4). pp. 270282. Postili, J. Pink S. (2012). “Social media ethnography: The dig ital researcher in a messy web”. Media International Aus tralia, Incorporating Culture and Policy, no. 145. http://blogs. bournemouth.ac.uk/research/files/2013/04/Postill-Pink-socialmedia- ethnography.pdf (Last viewed 12 July, 2014) Prensky, M. (2001). “Digital natives, digital immigrants”. On the Horizon, Voi. 9 Issue: 5. pp. 1-6. Pfeil, U., Zaphiris, P. (2010). “Applying qualitative content analysis to study online support communities”. Universal Ac cess in the Information Society, 9(1). pp. 16-31. Puri, A. (2007). “The Web of Insights: The art and Practice of Webnography”. International Journal of Market Research, 49(3). pp. 387-408. Raymond, E.S. (2001). The cathedral and the bazaar: musings on Linux and Open Source from an accidental revolutionary. Sebastapol, CA: O’Reilly and Associates. Rheingold, H. (2000). The virtual community (2nd ed.), Cam bridge, MA: MIT Press. Robinson, L. (2007). “The Cyberself: the selling project goes on line, symbolic interaction in the digital age”. New Media and Society, 9 (1). pp. 93-110. Rosenberg, A. (2010). “Virtual World Research Ethics and the Private/Public Distinction”. International Journal of Internet Research Ethics, ѴЫ. 3. pp. 26-40.
Rybas, N. Gajjala, R. (2007), “Developing Cyberethnographic Research Methods for understanding Digitally Mediated
Βιβλιογραφία В' Μέρους 225 Identities”. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum Qua litative Social Research 8(3). pp. 216-233. Rufer-Bach, K. (2009). “The Second Life Grid” The officiai guide to communication, collaboration, and community engagementberly. New York: Wiley Publishing. Sade-Beck, L. (2004). “Internet ethnography: Online and of fline”. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 3(2). pp. 45-51. Salmons, J., E. (2010). Online interviews in real time. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Salmons, J., E. (ed.). (2012). Cases in online interview research. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Shields, R. (2003). The Virtual. London and New York: Routledge. Silver, D. (2002). “Looking backward, looking forward: Cyber culture 1999-2000”. in Gauntlett D. (ed.), Wrd Studies: Re writing media studies for the Digital Age. London: Arnold, pp. 19-30. Silver, D. (2006). “Introduction: Where Is Internet Studies?” in Silver, D., Massanari, Ad. Jones, St. (eds.), Critical Cyber culture Studies. New York: NYU Press, pp. 1-14. Sims, M. Stephens, M. (2005). Living Folklore: An introduction to the Study of People and their Traditions. (1st ed), Logan: Utah State University Press. Stair, R. Reynolds, G. (2010). Principles of Information Sys tems. A Managerial Approach, (9th edition). Boston, MA: Course Technology, Cengage Learning. Sudweeks, F. Simoff, S. (1999). “The Reconciliation of Quan titative and Qualitative Principles”, in Jones, S. (ed.), Doing Internet Research: Critical issues and methods for examining the Net. Thousand Oaks: Sage. pp. 29-55. Thompson, C., J. (1997). “Interpreting
Consumers: A Herme neutical Framework for Deriving Marketing Insights from
226 Δ ιαδικτυακή Εθνογραφία the Texts of Consumers’ Consumption Stories”. Journal of Marketing Research, 34 (November), pp. 438-455. Thornberg, R. Charmaz, K. (2013). “Ground Theory and Theoretical Coding”, in The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage. pp. 153-169. Thornton, R., J. (1988). “The rhetoric of ethnographic holism”. Cultural Anthropology 3(3). pp. 285-303. Underberg, N. M., Zorn, E. (2013). Digital Ethnography: An thropology, narrative, and new media. Austin: University of Te xas Press. Van Maanen, J. (ed). (1995). Representation in ethnography. Lon don: Sage. Walther, J. D’ Addano, К. (2001). “The Impacts of Emoti cons on Message Interpretation”, in Computer-Mediated Com munication. Social Science Computer Review, Volume: 19,3. pp. 324-347. Webb, E., Campbell, D., Schwartz, R. Sechrest, L. (1966). Un obtrusive measures: Nonreactive research in the social sciences Chicago, IL: Rand McNally. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Williams, M. (2007). “Avatar Watching: Participant Observation in Graphical Online Environments”. Qualitative Research 7(1). pp. 5-24. Wilmot, A. (2008). Designing sampling strategies for qualitative social research. Newport, UK: Office for National Statistics. Wittel, A. (2000). “Ethnography on the move: from field to net to Internet”. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(1). pp. 21-28. Yee, N., Bailenson, J. N. (2007). “The Proteus effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior”. Hu man Communication Research, 33. pp.
271-290.
227 Βφλωγραφία В' Μέρους Yoshida, А. Kakuta, J. (1993). “People Who Live in an OnLine Virtual World”. Kyoto: Kyoto Institute of Technology. Department of Information Technology. ľi Bayerische Staatsbibliothek München |
| adam_txt |
ΠΕΡΙΕΧΟΜΕΝΑ ΠΡΟΛΟΓΟΣ. 9 ΕΙΣΑΓΩΓΗ: Ο λόγος περί Εθνογραφίας. 11 ΜΕΡΟΣ ΠΡΩΤΟ ΦΕΜΙΝΙΣΤΙΚΗ ΕΘΝΟΓΡΑΦΙΑ: ΠΡΟΚΛΗΣΕΙΣ ΚΑΙ ΔΙΛΗΜΜΑΤΑ ΕΙΣΑΓΩΓΗ. 53 1. Το θηλυκό εθνογραφικό ταξίδι. 63 2 Μέθοδοι-κλειδιά. 66 3. Δυτική, φεμινιστική υπεροψία και «άλλες» γυναίκες. 73 4. Λαογραφικες Σπουδές και Φυλό. 77 5. Λαογραφικες Σπουδές και Εθνογραφία. 81 6. Συμπερασματικά. 97 ΒΙΒΛΙΟΓΡΑΦΙΑ Α' ΜΕΡΟΥΣ. 102 ΜΕΡΟΣ ΔΕΥΤΕΡΟ ΔΙΑΛΙΚΤΥΑΚΗ ΕΘΝΟΓΡΑΦΙΑ: ΔΙΕΡΕΥΝΩΝΤΑΣ ΚΥΒΕΡΝΟΠΟΛΙΤΙΣΜΟΥΣ ΕΙΣΑΓΩΓΗ: Για ένα πολιτισμό του μόντεμ. 115 1. Εθνογραφία στο Διαδίκτυο: Γιατί ακριβώς μιλάμε; . 123
8 'Chpetç Εθνογραφικής Έρευνας στιςΛαογραφικές Σπονδές 2. Παραδοσιακή Εθνογραφία-Διαδικτυακή Εθνογραφία: Συνεχείες και διαφοροποιήσεις. 127 3. Τεχνικές Υλοποίησης της Διαδικτυακής Εθνογραφίας . 143 3.α. Η επιτόπια έρευνα και παρατήρηση (online obser
vation). 147 3.β. Η υλοποίηση on line εθνογραφικών συζητήσεων, συνεντεύξεων. 150 3.γ. Η ηλεκτρονική συμπλήρωση ημερολογίου (Research
Diary). 153 4. Ψηφιακή Λαογραφία:Νέα Δεδομένα και προκλήσεις. 159 5. Διαδικτυακή εθνογραφική έρευνα σε ψηφιακούς τόπους λαογραφικής αναφοράς. 169 6.
Συμπερασματικά. 172 7. Μελέτη Περίπτωσης Διαδικτυακής Εθνογραφίας σε Τόπο Λαογραφικής Αναφοράς: έρευνα σε εικονική κοι νότητα . 176 7.1
Εισαγωγή. 176 7.2 Συνοπτική περιγραφή της διαδικτυακής Εθνογρα φίας. Σχεδιασμός και υλοποίηση της έρευνας στην εικονική κοινότητα Caledon Oxbridge University Moderate. 177 7.3
Η ερευνητική διαδικασία. 185 7.4. Ο ρόλος της εθνογράφου κατά την υλοποίηση της διαδικτυακής Εθνογραφίας. 194 7.5. Η επεξεργασία των εθνογραφικών
δεδομένων. 195 7.6. Δυσκολίες κατά την υλοποίηση της έρευνας - τρό ποι αντιμετώπισής τους. 200 7.7. Συμπεράσματα της διαδικτυακής Εθνογραφίας . 203 8. ΒΙΒΛΙΟΓΡΑΦΙΑ В'ΜΕΡΟΥΣ. 207
ΒΙΒΛΙΟΓΡΑΦΙΑ В' ΜΕΡΟΥΣ A. Ελληνόγλωσση Αθανασίου, А. (2004). «Εθνογραφία στο διαδίκτυο ή το δια δίκτυο ως εθνογραφία: δυνητική πραγματικότητα και πολι τισμική κριτική». Επιθεώρηση Κοινωνικών Ερευνών, 115. σσ. 49-74. Γκασούκα Μ., και Φουλίδη Ξ. (2012). Σύγχρονοι Ορίζοντες των Λαογραφιών Σπουδών-
Εννοιολογικό Πλαίσω, Έρευνα, Φύλο, Διαδίκτυο, Σχολείο. Αθήνα: Σιδέρης. Γκασούκα, Μ., Αρβανιτίδου, Ζ. (2013). «Netnography» στη Διδακτική Ενότητα: Ανάλυση ποιοτικών δεδομένων». Εκ παιδευτικό υλικό του μαθήματος «Μέθοδοι Ανάλυσης Ερευνητικών Δεδομένων στις Κοινωνικές Επιστήμες και τις Επιστήμες της
Αγωγής» του Προγράμματος Δια βίου Μάθη σης του Πανεπιστημίου Αιγαίου. Δερμιτζάκης, X. (2006). «Σύγχρονες μορφές λαϊκού πολιτι σμού». Εισήγηση erto Ιο Διεθνές Εκπαιδευτικό Συνέδριο με θέμα «Λαϊκός Πολιτισμός και Εκπαίδευση» που έλα βε χώρα στο Βόλο από 29 Σεπτεμβρίου έως 1 Οκτωβρίου 2006.
Ανακτήθηκε στις 1 Νοεμβρίου 2013 από www.eipe.gr/ praktika/praktika/dermitzakis.pdf Ιωσηφίδης, Θ. (2003). Ανάλυση ποιοτικών δεδομένων σας κοι νωνικές επιστήμες. Αθήνα: Κριτική.
208 Δ ίαδίκτυακή Εθνογραφία Κουντζέρης, Α. και Κωνσταντάτος, Μ. (2010). «Νέες τάσεις στη χρήση του διαδικτύου για επικοινωνία, πληροφόρηση και ψυχαγωγία». Αθήνα: Παρατηρητήριο για την Κοινωνία της Πληροφορίας, σσ. 4-8. Λιναρδής, Α., Παπαγιαννόπουλος, Κ., Καλησπεράτη, Ε. (2011). Η Διαδικτνακή έρευνα.
Πλεονεκτήματα, μειονεκτήματα και εργαλεία διεξαγωγής διαδικτυακών ερευνών. Αθήνα: ΕΚΚΕ. Λυδάκη, Α. (2011). Μέσα από την κάμερα. Κινηματογράφος και κοινωνική πραγματικότητα (β' έκδ.). Αθήνα: Ελληνικά Γράμματα. Μιχαήλ, Γ. (2009). «Homo internecticus ή λαογραφία και δια δίκτυο» περ. Λαογραφία, τ. 41°
(2007-2009). Αθήνα, σσ. 291-395. Μπεϊνά, Ε. (2011). Η καρπάθικη λύρα: μία εθνογραφική προ σέγγιση στην πολιτισμική οργανολογία: μουσικά όργανα και πολιτισμική ταυτότητα της Καρπάθου. Διδακτορική διατρι βή. Ιόνιο Πανεπιστήμιο (αδημ.). Παπάνης, Ε. (2011). Μεθοδολογία Έρευνας και Διαδίκτυο. Αθή να:
Σιδέρη. Πασχαλίδου, Ε. (2004). Η διδασκαλία του μαθήματος της λαο γραφίας στα προγράμματα των παιδαγωγικών ακαδημίών: Συμβολή των δασκάλων στην ανάπτυξη των Λασγραφικών Σπουδών. Διδακτορική διατριβή. Εθνικό και Καποδιστριακό Πανεπιστήμιο Αθηνών (αδημ.). Πετρίδης, Π.Α. (2011). «Ψηφιακά αρχεία και
πρακτικές ανταλ λαγής: μια ανθρωπολογική προσέγγιση των ομότιμων δικτύ ων». Διδακτορική διατριβή. Πάντειο Πανεπιστήμιο Κοινω νικών και Πολιτικών Επιστημών (αδημ.). Ράπτης, Α., Ράπτη, Α. (2001), Μάθηση και Διδασκαλία στην Εποχής της Πληροφορίας (τομ. Α' και Β'). Αθήνα: Αυτοέκ δοση. Τζάκης, Δ.
(2002). «Για την Ιστορία της Λαογραφίας» στο (επιμ.) Μιράσγεζη, Μ. Δημόσιος καί ιδιωτικός βίος στην
Βιβλιογραφία В ' Μέρους 209 Ελλάδα II: Օւ Νεότεροι χρόνοι - Ο Νεότερος Λαϊκός Βίος. Πάτρα: ΕΑΠ. σσ. 23-35. Τσιώλης, Γ. (2006). Ιστορίες ζωής και βιογραφικές αφηγήσεις. Η βιογραφική προσέγγιση στην κοινωνιολογική ποιοτική έρευνα. Αθήνα: Κριτική. Φουλίδη, Ξ. (2014). «Νέοι ορίζοντες στις ελληνικές
Λαογραφικές Σπουδές: Το διαδίκτυο ως πεδίο παραγωγής, διά δοσης και εκπαιδευτικής αξιοποίησης του Λαϊκού Πολιτισμού-Η ερευνητική μέθοδος της εικονικής εθνογραφίας» στο Θεοδωροπούλου, Ε., Καΐλα, Μ., Πολεμικός, Ν., Παπαδόπουλος, I., Καφούση, Σ., Φώκιαλη, Π., (επιμ.) Πρα κτικά της Διημερίδας με θέμα:
«Η διδακτορική έρευ να στο Τμήμα Επιστημών της Προσχολικής Αγωγής και του Εκπαιδευτικού Σχεδιασμού», που πραγματοποιήθη κε στη Ρόδο από τις 7 έως και τις 8 Μαί'ου 2012. Ανακτή θηκε στις 10/10/2014 από την ηλεκτρονική διεύθυνση http:// www.rhodes.aegean.gr/tepaes/docs/Publications/final
%20didaktorwn%281%29.pdf В. Ξενόγλωσση Androutsopoulos, J. (2008). “Potentials and limitations of dis course-centred online ethnography”. Language@Intemet 5, article 9 http://www.languageatintemet.org/articles/2008/ 1610/androutsopoulos.pdf (Last viewed 12 July, 2014). Appadurai A. (1991). “Global
ethnoscapes: notes and queries for a transnational anthropology”, in Fox RG (ed.), Recap turing Anthropology: Working in the Present, Santa Fe, NM: Sch. Am. Res. Press, pp. 191-210. Ardevol, E. (2005). “Cyberculture: Anthropological perspectives of the Internet”, workshop Loughborough, 9th
December, 2005. http://www.media-anthropology.net/lboro_ardevol.pdf
210 Διαδίκτνακή Εθνογραφία Arnould, E. J., Wallendorf, M., (1994). “Market-Oriented Ethnography: Interpretation Building and Marketing Strat egy Formulation”. Journal of Marketing Research, Voi. 31, Iss. 4. pp. 484-504. Bacon, J. (2011), The Digital Folklore Project: Tracking the Oral Tradition on the World Wide Web. A thesis presented to the Faculty of the Department of Literature and Language East Tennessee State University. Bagozzi, R., P. Dholakia, U., M. (2002). “Intentional Social Actions in Virtual Communities”. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16, 2. pp. 2-21. Baka, V Scott, S.V (2008). “From studying communities to focusing on temporary collectives: research-in-progress on Web 2.0 in the travel sector”. Information Systems and In novation Group. London: London School of Economics and Political Science. Bakardjieva, M. (2003). “Virtual Togetherness: an Every-day Life Perspective”. Media, Culture Society, 25,3. pp. 291-313. Bartle, R., A. (2010). “From MUDs to MMORPGs: The histo ry of virtual worlds”, in Hunsinger, J., Klastrup, L. Allen, M. (eds) International Handbook of Internet Research. Dor drecht: Springer. Bauer, M.W. Gaskell, G. (2000). “Towards public accountabili ty: Beyond sampling, reliability and validity”, in Bauer, M. W. Gaskell, G. (eds.) Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: a practical handbook. London: Sage. Beaulieu, A. (2004). “Mediating ethnography: Objectivity and the making of ethnographies of the internet”. Social Episte mology 18. pp. 139-163. Bell, D. (2001). An Infroduction to Cybercultures. London: Rou tledge.
Benfield, J. A., Szlemko, W. J. (2006). “Internet-based data collection: Promises and realities”. Journal of Research
Βιβλιογραφία В ' Μέρους 211 Practice, 2(2), Article Dl. Retrieved [date of access] from, http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/30/51 Biocca, F., Kim. T. Levy M. (1995). “The vision of virtual real ity”. In Biocca F. Levy M. (eds.). Communication in the age of virtual reality. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. pp. 3-14. Blank, T., J. (2009a). Folklore and the Internet: vernacular expres sion in a digital world. Logan, Utah: Utah State University Press. Blank, T., J. (2012). Folk Culture in the DigitalAge: The Emergent Dynamics ofHuman Interaction. Logan, UT: Utah State Uni versity Press. Blank, T, J. (2013). The Last Laugh: Folk Humor, Celebrity Cul ture, and Mass-Mediated Disasters in the Digital Age. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press. Boellstorff, T. (2008). Coming ofAge in Second Life: An Anthro pologist Explores the Virtually. Human Princeton: Princeton University Press. Boellstorff, T. (2010). ‘A Typology of Ethnographic Scales for Virtual Worlds”, in W.S. Bainbridge (ed.), Online Worlds: Convergence of the Real and the Virtual, pp. 123-133. Spring er London. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-l-84882-825-4_10 Boellstorff, T, Nardi, В., Pearce, C, Taylor, T. L. (2012). Eth nography and virtual world: A handbook of methods. Prince ton: Princeton University Press. Boyd, D. (2008). “How can qualitative internet researchers de fine the boundaries of their projects: A response to Christine Hine”, in Markham, A.N. Baum, N.K. (eds.) Internet inqui ry: Conversations about method. Los Angeles: Sage. pp. 26-32.
Boulos, M., N., K., Hetherington, L. Wheeler, S. (2007). “Sec ond Life: an overview of the potential of 3-D virtual worlds in
212 Αιαδίκτνακή Εθνογραφία medical and health education”. Health Information Library Journal, 24 (4). pp. 233-245. Brmseth, J. (2002). “Public Places. Private Activities?: Meth odological Approaches and Ethical Dilemmas in Research on Computer Mediated Communication Contexts”, in Mor rison, A. (ed.), Researching ICTs in Context, pp. 33-72. Bronner, S J. (2009). “Digitizing and Virtualizing Folklore”. In Blank, TJ. (ed.), Folklore and the Internet: Vernacular Expres sion in a Digital World. Logan: Utah State University Press. pp. 21-66. Bronner, S J. (2011). Explaining Traditions: Folk Behavior in Mo dem Culture. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky. Burrell, J. (2011). “User Agency in the Middle Range: Rumors and the Reinvention of the Internet in Accra, Ghana Sci ence”. Technology Human Values, 36(2). pp. 139-159. Carter, D. (2005). “Living in virtual communities: an ethnog raphy of human relationships in cyberspace”. Information Communication Society, 8. pp. 148-167. Castells, M. (2001). The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Inter net, Business, and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Castells, M. Catterall, B. (2001), The Making of the Network Society. London: ICA. Christensen, K. Levinson, D. (eds.) (2003). The encyclopedia of community: From the village to the virtual world. London: Sage. Couldry, N., Hepp, A. Kotz, Fr. (eds), (2009). Media Events in a Global Age. New York: Routledge Press. Creswell, J., W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Creswell, J., W. (2008).
Educational research: Planning, conduct ing, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Up per Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Βιβλιογραφία В ' Μέρους 213 Cruikshank, L. (2001). Avatar Dreams: Theorizing Desire for the Virtual Body. A thesis submitted to the Department of Sociolo gy in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Mas ter of Arts, Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cam bridge University Press. Delamont, S., Hamilton, D. (1993). “Revisiting Classroom Research: A continuing Cautionary Tale”, in Hammersley M.,(ed.) Controversies in Classroom Research. London: Open University Press. DiMaggio, P, Hargittai, E., Neuman, W., R. Robinson, J., P. (2001). “Social implications of the Internet”. Annual Review of Sociology, 27. pp. 307-336. Dirksen, V, Huizing, A., Smit, В. (2010). “Piling on layers of understanding: The use of connective ethnography for the study of (online) work practices”. New Media Society, 12(7). pp. 1045-1063. Dong, J. Blommaert, J. (2009). “Space, scale and accents: con structing migrant identity in Beijing”. Multilingua, 28(1): 1-24. Dorson, R., M. (1971). “Is There a Folk in the City?” The Ur ban Experience and Folk Tradition. Edited by A. Paredes and Stekert E. Austin, pp. 21-52. Dorson, R., M. (1976). Folklore andfakelore: Essays toward a dis cipline in folk studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press Dorst, J. (1990). «Tags and Burners, Cycles and Networks: Folk lore in the Telectronic Age». Journal of Folklore Research 27. pp. 179-190. Dresner, E. Herring S.C. (2010). “Functions of the Non-Ver bal in CMC: Emotions and illocutionary force”. Communi cation Theory, 20. pp. 249-268.
Driscoll, D. L. (2011). “Introduction to Primary Research: Ob servations, Surveys, and Interviews”. Writing Spaces: Read ings on Writing, Volume 2. pp. 153-174.
214 Διαόικτνακή Εθνογραφία Ducheneaut, N. Yee, N. Bellotti V. (2010). “The Best of Both (Virtual) Worlds: Using Ethnography and Computational Tools to Study Online Behavior”. Ethnographic Praxis in In dustry Conference Proceedings, pp. 136-148. Dundės, A. (1965). The Study of Folklore. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. Dundės, A. Pagter, C. (1992). Work hard and you shall be re warded: Urban folklore from the paperwork empire. Detroit: Wayne State University Press. Eberte, Th. Maeder, Ch. (2011). “Organizational Ethnogra phy”. in Silverman, D. (ed), Qualitative Research (3rd ed), London: Sage. pp. 54-73. Emerson, R.M., Fretz, R.I. Shaw, L.L. (1995). Writing Ethno graphic Fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Escobar, A. (1994). “Welcome To Cyberia: Notes on the Anthro pology of Cyberculture”. Current Anthropology, 35 (June), pp. 211-231. Escobar, A. (2000). “Notes on networks and anti-globalization social movements”, paper presented to the AAA Annual Meeting. San Francisco, US. November. Fetterman, D. M., (1998). Ethnography: step by step. (2ed.) s.l.: Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage. Fialková, L. Yelenevskaya, M. (2001). “Ghosts in the Cyber World: An Analysis of Folklore Sites on the Internet”. Fabu la 42 (1/2). pp. 64-89. Retrieved July 7, 2001, from http://dx. doi.org/10.1515/fabl.2001.011. Fielding, N. Lee, R., M. (2000). “Patterns and potentials in the adoption of qualitative software: the implications of user experiences and software training”. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Social Science Methodology. International
Sociological Association, Universität zu Köln. Flick, U. (1998). An introduction to qualitative research: theory, method and applications. London: Sage.
Βιβλιογραφία В ' Μέρους 215 Flick, U. (2006). Лw Introduction to Qualitative Research. Thou sand Oaks. CA.: Sage. Folkman-Curasi, C. (2001). “A critical exploration of face-to-face interviewing vs. computer - mediated interviewing”. Interna tional Journal of Market Research, Voi. 43 No. 4. pp. 361-375. Foote, M. (2007). “Userpicks: Cyber Folk Art in the Early 21st Century”. Folklore Forum 37. pp. 27-38. Fox, W., S. (2007). [1983], “Computerized Creation and Diffu sion of Folkloric Materials”. Folklore Forum 37(1). pp. 5-14. Retrieved February 8, 2009, from https://scholarworks. iu.edu/dspace/handle/2022/3235. Originally published in Fol klore Forum 16 (1). pp. 5-20. Gajjala, R. (2009). “Response to Shani Orgad” in Markham, A., M., Baym, N., K. (eds.), Internet inquiry: Conversations about method, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. pp. 61-67. Garcia, A., Standler, A., Bechkoff, J. Cui, Y. (2009). “Ethno graphic Approaches to the Internet and Computer-Mediat ed Communication”. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 38(52), 52-84. Gasouka, M., Foulidi, X. Arvanitidou, Z. (2017). “Feminist’s Ethnography Use in the Teaching of Folk Studies in High er Education. The Experience of Women’s Storytelling Ar chive of University of the Aegean”. Conference Proceedings New Perspectives in Science Education: Florence, Italy 16-17 March 2017, http://conference.pixel-online.net/NPSE/conferenceproceedings.php Gatson, S. N. (2011). “The Methods, Ethics, and Politics of Re presentation in Online Ethnography”, in Denzin, N. Lin coln, Y. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. 4th Edi tion.
London: Sage. pp. 513-527. Geertz, C. (1993). The interpretation of Culture. London: Fontana. Geertz, C. (2000b [1983]). Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
216 Δ ιαόίκτνακή Εθνογραφία Gerth, Η., (2009). “Zoroastrians on the Internet. A quiet social movement: Ethnography of a virtual community”. UNLV The ses, Dissertations, Professional Papers and Capstones, 49. Gupta, A. Ferguson, J. (1997). “Discipline and Practice: “The Field” as Site, Method, and Location in Anthropology”. In Ferguson J. and Gupta A. (eds). Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Hallett, R. E., Barber, K. (2014). “Ethnographic Research in a Cyber Era”. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 2014, Voi. 43(3). pp. 306-330. Hammersley, M. Atkinson, P. (1983). Ethnography:principles in practice. 2nd edition. London: Tavistock. Hammersley, M. Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Routledge. Hanna, R. C., Weinberg, B., Dant, R. P. Berger, P. D. (2005). “Do internet-based surveys increase personal self-disclosu re?”. Database Marketing Customer Strategy Manage ment, Voi. 12 No. 4. pp. 342-356. Hansen, Gr., (2009). “Public Folklore in Cyberspace”. In Blank, Tr., J. (ed), Folklore and the Internet: Vernacular Expression in a Digital World. Logan: Utah State University Press, pp. 194-212. Hartmann, M. (2004). Technologies and Utopias: the cyberflaneur and the experience of being online. Munich: Verlag Reinhard Fischer. Hauben, M. (1995). “The Net and netizens: the impact the Net has on people’s lives”. Preface from http:// www.cs.columbia. edu/л hauben/netbook/ Herring, S., C. (2001). “Computer-Mediated Discourse”, in Tannen, D., Schiffrin D. Hamilton, H. (eds.).
Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 1-24.
Βιβλιογραφία В ' Μέρους 217 Hetland, P. Mordi, А. (2016). “Ethnography for Investigating the Internet”. Seminar.net - International Journal of Media, Technology and Lifelong Learning, Voi. 12 - Issue 1. pp. 1-14. Hewson, C. (2007). “Gathering data on the Internet: qualitative approaches and possibilities for mixed methods research”, in A. Joinson, K. McKenna, U. Reips T. Postmes (eds), Ox ford Handbook of Internet Psychology. Oxford: Oxford Uni versity Press. Hewson, C. Laurent, D. (2008). “Research Design and Tools for Internet Research”, in Fielding N., Lee R. Blank G. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Online Research Methods. Lon don: Sage. Hewson, C. (2010). “Internet-mediated research and its po tential role in facilitating mixed methods research”, in Hesse-Biber S. N. Leavy P. (eds.). Handbook of emergent me thods. New York: Guilford, pp. 543-570. Hine, C. (2000). Virtual Ethnography. London: Sage. Hine, C. (2005). Virtual Methods: Issues in Social Research on the Internet. Oxford: Berg. Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, Em bodied and Everyday. London: Bloomsbury. Hodge, E., Collins, S. Giordano, Tr. (2011). The virtual worlds: How to use Second life and other 3D virtual Environments. East Carolina University: Jones and Bartlett Publisher. Howard, P. N. (2002). “Network ethnography and the hyperme dia organization: New media, new organizations, new me thods”. New Media Society, 4(4). pp. 550-574. Howard, R., G., (2008). “Electronic Hybridity: The Persistent Processes of the Vernacular Web”. Journal of American Folklore 121 (480). pp. 192-218.
Howard, R., G. (2005). “A theory of Vernacular Rhetoric: The case of the ‘Sinner’s Prayer’ online”. Folklore 116(2). pp. 172-188.
218 Δίαόικτυακή Εθνογραφία Howard, R., G. (2013). “Vernacular Authority: Critically Enga ging Tradition”, in Blank Tr. J. Howard R. GI. (eds), Tra dition in the 21st Century: Locating the Role of the Past in the Present. Logan, Utah: Utah State University Press, pp. 72-99. Huang, J., S. (2011). “An examination of the business strategies in the second life virtual market”. Journal of Media Business Studies, 8(2). pp. 1-17. Joinson, A. N. (2001). “Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: the role of self awareness and visual ano nymity”. European Journal of Social Psychology, ѴЫ. 31. pp. 177-192. Jones S. (ed), (1999). Doing internet research. London: Sage. Jordan, R., A. (1997), “Computer Mediated Folklore” in Green, Th., A. (ed.) Folklore, an encyclopedia ofbeliefs, customs, tales, music and art. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-Clio. pp. 140-141. Jupp, V. (2006). (ed.). The sage dictionary of social research me thods. London: Sage. Fernback, J. (1999). “There is a There There”, in S Jones (ed.). Doing Internet Research: Critical issues and methods for exam ining the Net. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Fialkova, L. Yelenevskaya, M., (2001). “Ghosts in the Cyber World: An Analysis of Folklore Sites on the Internet”. Fabula 42 (1/2). pp. 64-89. http://dx.doi. org/10.1515/fabl.2001.011. Kadriye, U., Aydin, C. H. (2012). “The use of virtual ethnog raphy”. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13(2). pp. 212-225. Kafai, Y., B., Feldon, D., Fields, D., A., Giang, M. Quintero, M. (2007). “Life in the time of Whypox: A virtual epidemic as a community event”, in Steinfield
C., Pentland B., Acker man, M. Contractor, N. (eds.). Communities and technolo gies. New York: Springer, pp. 171-190. Kaplan, M. (2013). “Curation and Tradition on Web 2.0”. in Blank, Tr., J. Howard, R., G. (eds) Tradition in the Twenty-
Βιβλιογραφία В ' Μέρους 219 First Century: Locating the Role of the Past in the Present. Lo gan, UT: Utah State University Press. Kanayama, T. (2003). “Ethnographic research on the experience of japanese elderly people online”. New Media Society, 5(2). pp. 267-288. Kanuka, H., Anderson, T. (2007). “Ethical issues in qualita tive e-learning research”. International Journal of Qualita tive Methods, 6(2). pp. 20-39. Kim, A., J. (2000). Community building on the Web. Berkeley, CA: Peachpit. King, S. (1996). “Researching internet communities: Proposed ethical guidelines for the reporting of results”. The Informa tion Society, Volume 12, (2). pp. 119-127. Kitchin, R. (1998). “Towards geographies of cyberspace”. Pro gress in Human Geography 22,3. pp. 148-406. Kolko, В. Reid, E. (1998). “Dissolution and fragmentation: Problems in on-line communities”, in Jones, S.G. (ed.). Cy bersociety 2.0: Revisiting Computer-mediated Communication and Community. New Media Cultures, Voi. 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. pp. 212-229. Kozinets, R., V. (2002). “The Field Behind the Screen: Using Netnography for Marketing Research in Online Communi ties”. Journal of Market Research, 39(1). pp. 61-72. Kozinets, R., V. (2006). “Netnography”. In Jupp, V. (ed.), The sage dictionary of social research methods. London: Sage. pp. 135-147. Kozinets, R., V. (2010). “Netnography: The Marketer’s Secret Weapon-How Social Media Understanding Drives Innova tion”. Retrieved March 6, 2011, from http://www.qualitativemind.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/NetBase_Netnography_Paper.pdf Kowch, E. Schwier, R., A.
(1997). “Considerations in the construction of technology - based virtual learning commu-
220 Δίαδικτνακή Εθνογραφία nities”. Canadian Journal of Education Communication, 26(1). pp. 1-12. Langer, R. (2003). “Skin two: (un)-covering the skin in fetish carnival”. Proceedings of the European Association for Con sumer Research Conference (EACR). Dublin, 5-7 June. Langer, R. Beckman, S., C. (2005). “Sensitive research topics: Netography revisited”. Qualitative Market Research, 8(2). pp. 189-203. Leander, K.M. Mekim, K.K. (2003). “Tracing the Everyday “Sitings” of Adolescents on the Internet: A Strategic Adap tation of Ethnography Across Online and Offline Spaces”. Education, Communication Information 3(2). pp. 211-40. Leimeister, J., M., Schweizer, К., Leimeister, S. Kremar, H. (2008).”Do virtual communities matter for the social sup port of patients? Antecedents and effects of virtual relation ships in online communities”. Information Technology People, Voi. 21 Iss 4. pp. 350-374. Lévy, P. (2000). Cibercultura. Lisboa: Instituo Piaget. Lister, M., Dovey, J., Giddings, S., Grant, I. Kelly, К., (2003), New Media: A Critical Introduction. London, New York: Routledge. Lolland, J. Lolland, L., H. (1995). Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. California: Wadsworth Publishing. Lombard, M. Ditton, T. (1997). “At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Com munication, 3(2). pp. 82-91. Luedicke, M. K. (2006). “Brand Community under Fire: The Role of Social Environments for the Hummer Brand Commu nity”. Advances in Consumer Research, 33 (1). pp. 486-493. Lysloff, R., T.A. (2003). “Musical Community
on the Internet: An On-Line Ethnography”. Cultural Anthropology 18(2). pp. 233-263.
Βιβλιογραφία В ' Μέρους 221 Madden, R. (2010). Being Ethnographic: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Magnet, S. (2007). “Feminist sexualities, race and the Internet: An investigation of suicidegirls.com”. New Media Society, 9 (4). pp. 577-602. Mann, C. Stewart, F. (2000). Internet Communication and Qualitative Research: A Handbook for Researching Online. London: Sage. Manovich, L. (2002.) The Language of New Media. Cambridge: MIT Press. Marcus, G., E. (1995). “Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography”. Annual Re view of Anthropology, Voi. 24. pp. 95-117. Marshall, J., P. (2007). Living on cybermind: Categories, commu nication, and control. New York: Peter Lang Publishing. Martin, E. (1996). “Citadels, Rhizomes, and String Figures”, in Aronowitz, S., Martinsons B., Menser, M. (eds) Science, Technology and Cyberculture. London: Routledge. Martey, R. M. Shiflett, K. (2012). “Reconsidering site and self: Methodological frameworks for virtual-world research”. International Journal of Communication, 6. pp. 105-126. http://www.ijoc.org/ojs/index.php/ijoc/article/viewDownloadInterstitial/971/686 Mason, B. (1996). “Moving toward Virtual Ethnography”. Ame rican Folklore Society News. 25(2). pp. 4-5. McClelland, Br. (2000). “Online Orality: The Internet, Folklore, and Culture in Russia”. In Lengel L. B. (ed), Culture and Te chnology in New Europe: Civic Discourse in Transformation in Post-Communist Nations Stamford. CT: Ablex. pp. 179-191. McConnell, D. (2000). Implementing Computer Supported Coop
erative Learning. London: Kogan Page. McNeill, L. S. (2009). “The End of the Internet: A Folk Respon se to the Provision of Infinite Choice”. In Blank Tr. J., Folk-
222 Διαδικτυακή Εθνογραφία lore and the Internet: Vernacular Expression in a Digital World. Logan, Utah: Utah State University Press, pp. 80-97. Meadows, M., S. (2008). Լ Avatar: The Culture and Consequences of Having a Second Life. New York: New Riders. Menser, M. Aronowitz, S. (1996). “On Cultural Studies, Sci ence, and Technology”, in Aronowitz S., Martinsons B. Menser M. (eds) Science, Technology and Cyberculture. Lon don: Routledge. Miller, D., Slater, D. (2000). The Internet: an Ethnographic Approach. Oxford/New York: Berg. Miller, D., Slater, D. (2001). The Internet: An Ethnographic Approach. Paris: Berg Publishers. Miller, M. (2012), “Face-to-Face with the Digital Folk - The Ethics of Fieldwork on Facebook” in Blank, Tr., J. (ed.) Folk lore and the Internet: Vernacular Expression in a Digital World, Logan: Utah State University Press, pp. 1-20. Morton, H. (2001). “Computer-Mediated Communication in Australian Anthropology and Sociology”. Social Analysis Journal of Cultural and Social Practices, 45(1). pp. 3-11. Mulder, I., Kort, J. (2008). “Mixed emotions, mixed methods: The role of emergent technologies in studying user experi ence in context”, in Nagy Hesse-Biber S. Leavy P. (eds.). Handbook of emergent methods New York, NY: Guilford Press, pp. 601-612. Murgado-Armenteros, E., Torres-Ruiz, E, Vega-Zamora, M. (2012). “Differences between online and face-to-face focus group, viewed through two approaches”. Journal of Theo retical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 7(2). pp. 73-86. Murthy, D. (2008). “Digital Ethnography: An Examination of the Use of New
Technologies for Social Research”. Sociolo gy, 42 (5). pp. 837-855.
Βιβλιογραφία В ' Μέρους 223 Nguyen, L., Toriina, L., Peszynski, К. Corbitt В., J. (2006). “Power Relations in Cyber Communities”. Electronic Com merce Research 6.1. pp. 21-37. Nikolaou, A. Tsolakidis, C. (2012). “Three Dimensional Vir tual Environments as a Tool for Development of Personal Learning Networks”. International Journal of Emerging Te chnologies in Learning (iJET), 8. Kassel, Germany: Kassel University Press, GmbH. pp. 79-88. Ondrejka, C. (2004). “Escaping the Gilded Cage: User Created Content and Building the Metaverse”. New York Law School Law Review, 49 (1). pp. 81-101. O’ Reilly, K. (2009). Key Concepts in Ethnography. London: Sage. Oring, E. (1986). Folk Groups and Folklore Genres: An Introduc tion. Logan, Utah: Utah State University Press. Oring, E. (2013). “Thinking through Tradition”, in Blank; Tr., J., Howard, R., GI. (eds). Tradition in the Twenty-First Century: Locating the Role of the Past in the Present. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press. Paccagnella, L. (1997). “Getting the seat of your pants dirty: Strategies for ethnographic research on virtual communi ties”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(1). pp. 267-288. Paolillo, J. Zelen-Kauskaite, A., (2013). “Real-time chat”, in Herring, S.C., Stein, D. Virtanen, T. (eds.), Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 109-133. Papacharissi, Z. (2012). “Without you, I’m nothing: Performanc es of the self on Twitter”. International Journal of Communi cation, 6. pp. 1989-2006. Paterson, B., L., Bottorff, J., L. Hewat, R. (2003). “Blend ing observational
methods: Possibilities, strategies, and chal lenges”. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(1). pp. 1-19.
224 Διαδικτυακή Εθνογραφία Patton, Μ., Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Meth ods. London: Sage. Pearce, C. (2009). Communities of Play. Massachusetts: Massa chusetts Institute of Technology. Pohl, E, Bender, M. Lachmann, G. (2002). “Hindsight bias around the world”. Experimental Psychology, 49 (4). pp. 270282. Postili, J. Pink S. (2012). “Social media ethnography: The dig ital researcher in a messy web”. Media International Aus tralia, Incorporating Culture and Policy, no. 145. http://blogs. bournemouth.ac.uk/research/files/2013/04/Postill-Pink-socialmedia- ethnography.pdf (Last viewed 12 July, 2014) Prensky, M. (2001). “Digital natives, digital immigrants”. On the Horizon, Voi. 9 Issue: 5. pp. 1-6. Pfeil, U., Zaphiris, P. (2010). “Applying qualitative content analysis to study online support communities”. Universal Ac cess in the Information Society, 9(1). pp. 16-31. Puri, A. (2007). “The Web of Insights: The art and Practice of Webnography”. International Journal of Market Research, 49(3). pp. 387-408. Raymond, E.S. (2001). The cathedral and the bazaar: musings on Linux and Open Source from an accidental revolutionary. Sebastapol, CA: O’Reilly and Associates. Rheingold, H. (2000). The virtual community (2nd ed.), Cam bridge, MA: MIT Press. Robinson, L. (2007). “The Cyberself: the selling project goes on line, symbolic interaction in the digital age”. New Media and Society, 9 (1). pp. 93-110. Rosenberg, A. (2010). “Virtual World Research Ethics and the Private/Public Distinction”. International Journal of Internet Research Ethics, ѴЫ. 3. pp. 26-40.
Rybas, N. Gajjala, R. (2007), “Developing Cyberethnographic Research Methods for understanding Digitally Mediated
Βιβλιογραφία В' Μέρους 225 Identities”. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum Qua litative Social Research 8(3). pp. 216-233. Rufer-Bach, K. (2009). “The Second Life Grid” The officiai guide to communication, collaboration, and community engagementberly. New York: Wiley Publishing. Sade-Beck, L. (2004). “Internet ethnography: Online and of fline”. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 3(2). pp. 45-51. Salmons, J., E. (2010). Online interviews in real time. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Salmons, J., E. (ed.). (2012). Cases in online interview research. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Shields, R. (2003). The Virtual. London and New York: Routledge. Silver, D. (2002). “Looking backward, looking forward: Cyber culture 1999-2000”. in Gauntlett D. (ed.), Wrd Studies: Re writing media studies for the Digital Age. London: Arnold, pp. 19-30. Silver, D. (2006). “Introduction: Where Is Internet Studies?” in Silver, D., Massanari, Ad. Jones, St. (eds.), Critical Cyber culture Studies. New York: NYU Press, pp. 1-14. Sims, M. Stephens, M. (2005). Living Folklore: An introduction to the Study of People and their Traditions. (1st ed), Logan: Utah State University Press. Stair, R. Reynolds, G. (2010). Principles of Information Sys tems. A Managerial Approach, (9th edition). Boston, MA: Course Technology, Cengage Learning. Sudweeks, F. Simoff, S. (1999). “The Reconciliation of Quan titative and Qualitative Principles”, in Jones, S. (ed.), Doing Internet Research: Critical issues and methods for examining the Net. Thousand Oaks: Sage. pp. 29-55. Thompson, C., J. (1997). “Interpreting
Consumers: A Herme neutical Framework for Deriving Marketing Insights from
226 Δ ιαδικτυακή Εθνογραφία the Texts of Consumers’ Consumption Stories”. Journal of Marketing Research, 34 (November), pp. 438-455. Thornberg, R. Charmaz, K. (2013). “Ground Theory and Theoretical Coding”, in The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage. pp. 153-169. Thornton, R., J. (1988). “The rhetoric of ethnographic holism”. Cultural Anthropology 3(3). pp. 285-303. Underberg, N. M., Zorn, E. (2013). Digital Ethnography: An thropology, narrative, and new media. Austin: University of Te xas Press. Van Maanen, J. (ed). (1995). Representation in ethnography. Lon don: Sage. Walther, J. D’ Addano, К. (2001). “The Impacts of Emoti cons on Message Interpretation”, in Computer-Mediated Com munication. Social Science Computer Review, Volume: 19,3. pp. 324-347. Webb, E., Campbell, D., Schwartz, R. Sechrest, L. (1966). Un obtrusive measures: Nonreactive research in the social sciences Chicago, IL: Rand McNally. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Williams, M. (2007). “Avatar Watching: Participant Observation in Graphical Online Environments”. Qualitative Research 7(1). pp. 5-24. Wilmot, A. (2008). Designing sampling strategies for qualitative social research. Newport, UK: Office for National Statistics. Wittel, A. (2000). “Ethnography on the move: from field to net to Internet”. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(1). pp. 21-28. Yee, N., Bailenson, J. N. (2007). “The Proteus effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior”. Hu man Communication Research, 33. pp.
271-290.
227 Βφλωγραφία В' Μέρους Yoshida, А. Kakuta, J. (1993). “People Who Live in an OnLine Virtual World”. Kyoto: Kyoto Institute of Technology. Department of Information Technology. ľi Bayerische Staatsbibliothek München |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Gkasuka, Maria 1952- Phulidē, Xanthippē ca. 20./21. Jh |
| author_GND | (DE-588)121295257X (DE-588)1223110729 |
| author_facet | Gkasuka, Maria 1952- Phulidē, Xanthippē ca. 20./21. Jh |
| author_role | aut aut |
| author_sort | Gkasuka, Maria 1952- |
| author_variant | m g mg x p xp |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047057306 |
| contents | Bibliografie S. 102-109 und 207-227 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1249684270 (DE-599)BVBBV047057306 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047057306</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210426</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201210s2017 a||| |||| 00||| gre d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789600233209</subfield><subfield code="9">978-960-02-3320-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9600233209</subfield><subfield code="9">960-02-3320-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1249684270</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047057306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">gre</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gkasuka, Maria</subfield><subfield code="d">1952-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)121295257X</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Opseis ethnographikēs ereunas stis laographikes spudes</subfield><subfield code="b">pheministikē ethnographia - diadiktyakē ethnographia</subfield><subfield code="c">Maria Gkasuka, Xanthippē Phulidē</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">ethnografikēs laografikes spoudes feministikē ethnografia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Athēna</subfield><subfield code="b">Ekdoseis Papazēsē</subfield><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">227 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Illustrationen</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In griechischer Schrift</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bibliografie S. 102-109 und 207-227</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Feminismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4222126-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Volkskunde</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078937-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Griechenland</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4022047-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Folklore / Study and teaching</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Folklore / Greece / History</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Feminism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ethnology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Folklore</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Greece</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">History</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Griechenland</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4022047-3</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Volkskunde</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078937-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Feminismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4222126-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Phulidē, Xanthippē</subfield><subfield code="d">ca. 20./21. Jh.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1223110729</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032464554&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032464554&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Literaturverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_NED_20210426</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">390</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="g">495</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">305.309</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="g">495</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032464554</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Griechenland (DE-588)4022047-3 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Griechenland |
| id | DE-604.BV047057306 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T16:10:21Z |
| indexdate | 2024-08-31T00:52:05Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9789600233209 9600233209 |
| language | Greek |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032464554 |
| oclc_num | 1249684270 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 227 Seiten Illustrationen |
| psigel | BSB_NED_20210426 |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publishDateSearch | 2017 |
| publishDateSort | 2017 |
| publisher | Ekdoseis Papazēsē |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Gkasuka, Maria 1952- Verfasser (DE-588)121295257X aut Opseis ethnographikēs ereunas stis laographikes spudes pheministikē ethnographia - diadiktyakē ethnographia Maria Gkasuka, Xanthippē Phulidē ethnografikēs laografikes spoudes feministikē ethnografia Athēna Ekdoseis Papazēsē 2017 227 Seiten Illustrationen txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier In griechischer Schrift Bibliografie S. 102-109 und 207-227 Feminismus (DE-588)4222126-2 gnd rswk-swf Volkskunde (DE-588)4078937-8 gnd rswk-swf Griechenland (DE-588)4022047-3 gnd rswk-swf Folklore / Study and teaching Folklore / Greece / History Feminism Ethnology Folklore Greece History Griechenland (DE-588)4022047-3 g Volkskunde (DE-588)4078937-8 s Feminismus (DE-588)4222126-2 s DE-604 Phulidē, Xanthippē ca. 20./21. Jh. Verfasser (DE-588)1223110729 aut Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032464554&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032464554&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Literaturverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Gkasuka, Maria 1952- Phulidē, Xanthippē ca. 20./21. Jh Opseis ethnographikēs ereunas stis laographikes spudes pheministikē ethnographia - diadiktyakē ethnographia Bibliografie S. 102-109 und 207-227 Feminismus (DE-588)4222126-2 gnd Volkskunde (DE-588)4078937-8 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4222126-2 (DE-588)4078937-8 (DE-588)4022047-3 |
| title | Opseis ethnographikēs ereunas stis laographikes spudes pheministikē ethnographia - diadiktyakē ethnographia |
| title_alt | ethnografikēs laografikes spoudes feministikē ethnografia |
| title_auth | Opseis ethnographikēs ereunas stis laographikes spudes pheministikē ethnographia - diadiktyakē ethnographia |
| title_exact_search | Opseis ethnographikēs ereunas stis laographikes spudes pheministikē ethnographia - diadiktyakē ethnographia |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Opseis ethnographikēs ereunas stis laographikes spudes pheministikē ethnographia - diadiktyakē ethnographia |
| title_full | Opseis ethnographikēs ereunas stis laographikes spudes pheministikē ethnographia - diadiktyakē ethnographia Maria Gkasuka, Xanthippē Phulidē |
| title_fullStr | Opseis ethnographikēs ereunas stis laographikes spudes pheministikē ethnographia - diadiktyakē ethnographia Maria Gkasuka, Xanthippē Phulidē |
| title_full_unstemmed | Opseis ethnographikēs ereunas stis laographikes spudes pheministikē ethnographia - diadiktyakē ethnographia Maria Gkasuka, Xanthippē Phulidē |
| title_short | Opseis ethnographikēs ereunas stis laographikes spudes |
| title_sort | opseis ethnographikes ereunas stis laographikes spudes pheministike ethnographia diadiktyake ethnographia |
| title_sub | pheministikē ethnographia - diadiktyakē ethnographia |
| topic | Feminismus (DE-588)4222126-2 gnd Volkskunde (DE-588)4078937-8 gnd |
| topic_facet | Feminismus Volkskunde Griechenland |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032464554&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032464554&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gkasukamaria opseisethnographikesereunasstislaographikesspudespheministikeethnographiadiadiktyakeethnographia AT phulidexanthippe opseisethnographikesereunasstislaographikesspudespheministikeethnographiadiadiktyakeethnographia AT gkasukamaria ethnografikeslaografikesspoudesfeministikeethnografia AT phulidexanthippe ethnografikeslaografikesspoudesfeministikeethnografia |