Using legislative history in American statutory interpretation:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
The Hague [u.a.]
Kluwer Law Internat.
2002
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | XI, 199 S. |
| ISBN: | 9041188797 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV014403275 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20021107 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 020603s2002 xxu |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 010 | |a 2002019999 | ||
| 020 | |a 9041188797 |9 90-411-8879-7 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)49225520 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV014403275 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a xxu |c US | ||
| 049 | |a DE-739 |a DE-188 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a KF425 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 348.73/1 |2 22 | |
| 084 | |a PL 734 |0 (DE-625)137270: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Mammen, Christian E. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Using legislative history in American statutory interpretation |c Christian E. Mammen |
| 264 | 1 | |a The Hague [u.a.] |b Kluwer Law Internat. |c 2002 | |
| 300 | |a XI, 199 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 610 | 1 | 4 | |a États-Unis - Supreme Court |
| 610 | 2 | 4 | |a United States. |b Supreme Court |
| 650 | 4 | |a Droit - États-Unis - Interprétation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Histoire législative - États-Unis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Recht | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Law |z United States |x Interpretation and construction | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Legislative histories |z United States | |
| 651 | 4 | |a USA | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m GBV Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=009855438&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-009855438 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804129267534004224 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | USING LEGISLATIVE HISTORY IN AMERICAN STATUTORY INTERPRETATION CHRISTIAN
E. MAMMEN KLUWER LAW INTERNATIONAL THE HAGUE / LONDON / NEW YORK
CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 2 STATUTORY INTERPRETATION IN
THE U.S. SUPREME COURT 9 I. WHAT IS A STATUTE? 9 II. HOW DOES THE U.S.
SUPREME COURT INTERPRET STATUTES? 10 A. WHAT EXTRATEXTUAL MATERIALS MAY
BE CONSULTEE!? 12 1. DICTIONARIES 15 2. AGENCY INTERPRETATIONS 18 3.
PRECEDENT 22 4. CANONS OF CONSTRUCTION 25 5. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY 26 B.
IN WHICH ORDER? 27 III. SUMMARY 29 CHAPTER 3 THRESHOLD CONDITIONS FOR
INVOKING LEGISLATIVE HISTORY 31 I. THRESHOLD CONDITIONS FOR INVOKING
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY 32 A. AMBIGUITY 33 B. TEXT PRODUCES ABSURD RESULTS
37 C. AMENDMENT AND PREEMPTION CASES 40 1. AMENDMENT CASES 41 2.
PREEMPTION CASES 42 II. TEXT-DEFERENTIAL BALANCING 43 VU VIII CONTENTS
CHAPTER 4 THE ROLE OF LEGISLATIVE HISTORY IN CASES OF JUDICIAL DEFERENCE
TO AGENCY INTERPRETATIONS 47 I. USE OF LEGISLATIVE HISTORY UNDER CHEVRON
STEP ONE 48 H. THE CHEVRON DOCTRINE SOMETIMES TOTALLY REPLACES
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY IN STATUTORY INTERPRETATION 52 III. USE OF
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY UNDER CHEVRON STEP TWO TO DETERMINE REASONABLENESS
54 IV. SUMMARY: LEGISLATIVE HISTORY BELONGS UNDER STEP TWO 57 A. USING
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY UNDER CHEVRON STEP ONE 58 B. AN ALTERNATIVE IS TO
PERMIT NO LEGISLATIVE HISTORY AT AU UNDER CHEVRON 59 C. USING
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY UNDER CHEVRON STEP TWO 59 CHAPTER 5 PERMISSIBLE
KINDS OF LEGISLATIVE HISTORY 61 I. COMMITTEE REPORTS 62 H. PRE-ENACTMENT
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY 64 III. FLOOR STATEMENTS, DEBATES AND THE LIKE 67 A.
WHY FLOOR STATEMENTS OUGHT NOT BE USED 67 B. HOW FLOOR STATEMENTS ARE
USEFUL 68 IV. POST-ENACTMENT LEGISLATIVE HISTORY 71 A. HAZARDOUS BASIS
71 B. JUSTICE SCALIA S ARGUMENT AGAINST SUBSEQUENT LEGISLATIVE HISTORY
72 C. WHEN THE COURT USES SUBSEQUENT LEGISLATIVE HISTORY 74 V. SUMMARY
74 CHAPTER 6 THE EARLY HISTORY OF USING LEGISLATIVE HISTORY 77 I. BEFORE
HOLY TRINITY CHURCH 78 II. HOLY TRINITY CHURCH 81 III. THE GENERATION
AFTER HOLY TRINITY CHURCH 82 A. TRANS-MISSOURI FREIGHT 82 B. OTHER CASES
FROM THE 1900 S 85 C. AFTER 1910 86 IV. SUMMARY 87 CHAPTER 7 A SUMMARY
OF THE UNITED KINGDOM S USE OF LEGISLATIVE HISTORY 89 I. PEPPER V. HART
89 H. HISTORICAL PRACTICES OF USING LEGISLATIVE HISTORY IN THE UNITED
KINGDOM 92 CONTENTS IX A. BEFORE PEPPER V. HART 92 1. CASES ALLOWING
CITATION OF LEGISLATIVE HISTORY 92 2. CASES EMPLOYING THE EXCLUSIONARY
RULE 95 III. AN OVERVIEW OF STATUTORY INTERPRETATION IN THE UNITED
KINGDOM .... 96 A. WHAT IS THE GENERAL INTERPRETIVE APPROACH? 96 1.
LEGISLATIVE INTENTION 96 2. STRICT TEXTUALISM 98 3. PURPOSIVISM 98 B.
CONCEPTS USED IN DETERMINING PURPOSE 99 1. THE MISCHIEF RULE 100 2. THE
GOLDEN RULE 101 C. WHAT INFORMATION IS SOUGHT IN LEGISLATIVE HISTORY?
101 1. GENERAL PURPOSES AND INTENTIONS 101 2. LINGUISTIC MEANING AND
INTENTIONS AS TO SPECIFIE CASES 102 3. CONTEXT OF ENACTMENT 102 IV.
ARGUMENTS AGAINST USING LEGISLATIVE HISTORY 103 A. THE COSTS AND BURDENS
OF RESEARCH 103 B. PARLIAMENTARY FREEDOM OF SPEECH 103 C. CONSTITUTIONAL
SEPARATION OF POWERS 104 V. SUMMARY 105 CHAPTER 8 RAZIAN AUTHORITY AND
LEGISLATIVE INTENTIONS 107 I. THE TAXONOMY OF LEGISLATIVE INTENTIONS 110
A. WHAT KINDS OF INTENTIONS? 110 B. WHOSE INTENTIONS? 117 1.
REPRESENTATIVE INDIVIDUAL INTENTIONS 118 2. GROUP INTENTIONS 119 3.
AGGREGATE INTENTIONS 120 II. RAZ S THEORY OF AUTHORITY PROVIDES A
FOUNDATION FOR AN ACCOUNT OF THE AUTHORITATIVNESS OF LEGISLATIVE
INTENTIONS, BUT IT ALSO HIGHLIGHTS AMBIGUITIES 122 A. JUSTIFICATORY
BASES FOR AUTHORITY. EXPERTISE AND COORDINATION ... 123 1. RAZ ON
EXPERTISE AS A BASIS FOR (MORAL) AUTHORITY 125 2. RAZ ON COORDINATION AS
A BASIS FOR (MORAL) AUTHORITY 125 3. FINNIS ON COORDINATION AS A BASIS
FOR (LEGAL) AUTHORITY 127 B. THE (LEGAL) AUTHORITY OF LAW*DISTINGUISHING
BETWEEN THE ENTITY AND ITS DIRECTIVES 128 IN. RAZ AND THE BASELINE OF
THE AUTHORITATIVE INTENTION THESIS 131 A. WHOSE INTENTIONS? 132 B. WHICH
INTENTIONS? 132 C. REFINING THE AUTHORITATIVE INTENTION THESIS 133 1. AN
AMBIGUITY*DOES THE AUTHORITATIVE INTENTION THESIS YIELD A SPECIFIE
INTENDED INTERPRETATION, OR MERELY AN INTENTION THAT THE INTERPRETER
EMPLOY A PARTICULAR METHODOLOGY? 133 CONTENTS 2. A POTENTIAL
CIRCULARITY*DOES LIMITING THE ANALYSIS TO GENERAL THEORY ALONE MASK A
CIRCULARITY THAT ARISES IN THE AUTHORITATIVE INTENTION THESIS WHEN LOCAL
CONVENTION REQUIRES DEFERENCE TO LEGISLATIVE INTENTIONS? 135 D. SUMMARY
136 IV. CONTRADICTING OR DETRACTING FROM THE BASELINE 137 A. RAZ S THREE
CIRCUMSTANCES FOR DISREGARDING THE BASIC CONSERVING INTERPRETATION 137
1. PURE COORDINATION 138 2. UNMATCHING FURTHER INTENTIONS 139 3. OLD
STATUTES 140 B. RAZ S THREE SITUATIONS AS EXAMPLES OF ABSURD RESULTS 141
V. MARMOR AND SUPPLEMENTING THE BASELINE 142 A. WHOSE INTENTIONS? 143 B.
WHICH INTENTIONS? 144 C. WHY EVER DEFER TO LEGISLATIVE INTENTIONS? 144
D. IN WHAT CASES CAN LEGISLATIVE INTENTIONS BE INQUIRED INTO? 147 E. HOW
AUTHORITATIVE ARE LEGISLATIVE INTENTIONS? 147 VI. CONVENTIONS AND
DEFERENCE TO LEGISLATIVE INTENTIONS 148 A. WHERE DO RAZ AND MARMOR ALLOW
FOR CONVENTIONS ABOUT LEGISLATIVE INTENTION? 148 B. AMERICAN CONVENTIONS
FOR USING LEGISLATIVE INTENTIONS 149 C. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR
THEIR GENERAL THEORY AS APPLIED TO THE UNITED STATES? 149 CHAPTER 9
CONCLUSION*JUSTICES SCALIA AND BREYER ON WHETHER OR NOT TO USE
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY 153 I. INTRODUCTION: SCALIA AND BREYER 154 H.
SCALIA: AGAINST USING LEGISLATIVE HISTORY 155 A. WHAT IS THE PREFERRED
GENERAL INTERPRETIVE APPROACH? 155 B. WHEN MAY LEGISLATIVE HISTORY BE
CONSULTED; THAT IS, WHAT THRESHOLD CONDITIONS MUST EXIST IN ORDER FOR
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY TO BE USABLE? 158 C. WHAT INFORMATION IS SOUGHT IN
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY? 159 D. HOW AUTHORITATIVE IS LEGISLATIVE HISTORY?
161 E. WHAT ARE THE SIGNIFICANT ARGUMENTS AGAINST USING LEGISLATIVE
HISTORY? 161 1. UNCONSTITUTIONAL 162 2. UNRELIABLE AS AN INDICATOR OF
LEGISLATIVE INTENT 163 3. UNRELIABLE BECAUSE JUDICIAL USE IS SPORADIC
AND UNPRINCIPLED 164 F. WHAT ARE THE ALTERNATIVES TO USING LEGISLATIVE
HISTORY? 165 G. SUMMARY 167 III. BREYER: IN FAVOR OF USING LEGISLATIVE
HISTORY 168 CONTENTS XI A. WHAT IS THE PREFERRED GENERAL INTERPRETIVE
APPROACH? 169 B. WHEN MAY LEGISLATIVE HISTORY BE CONSULTED; THAT IS,
WHAT THRESHOLD CONDITIONS MUST EXIST IN ORDER FOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY TO
BE USABLE? 169 C. WHAT INFORMATION IS SOUGHT IN LEGISLATIVE HISTORY? 170
1. AVOIDING ABSURD RESULTS 170 2. CORRECTING DRAFTING ERRORS 172 3.
FINDING SPECIALIZED MEANINGS 174 4. IDENTIFYING A REASONABLE PURPOSE
175 5. CHOOSING AMONG COMPETING INTERPRETATIONS 177 D. HOW AUTHORITATIVE
IS LEGISLATIVE HISTORY? 179 E. WHAT ARE THE SIGNIFICANT ARGUMENTS
AGAINST USING LEGISLATIVE HISTORY? 180 1. UNHELPFUL 181 2.
UNCONSTITUTIONAL 181 3. NO SUCH THING AS CONGRESSIONAL INTENT 182 F.
WHAT ARE THE ALTERNATIVES TO USING LEGISLATIVE HISTORY? 184 G. SUMMARY
184 IV. SUMMARY 185 EPILOGUE A RECAPITULATION OF THE EIGHT BASIC
QUESTIONS 187 I. WHAT IS LEGISLATION? 187 IL WHAT IS THE GENERAL
APPROACH TO INTERPRETING STATUTES? 187 III. WHEN MAY EXTRATEXTUAL
SOURCES, GENERALLY, BE CONSULTED? 188 IV. MORE SPECIFICALLY, WHEN MAY
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY BE CONSULTED? ... 188 V. WHAT IS LEGISLATIVE
HISTORY? 189 VI. WHAT INFORMATION IS SOUGHT IN LEGISLATIVE HISTORY? 189
VIL HOW AUTHORITATIVE IS LEGISLATIVE HISTORY? 189 VIN. ARE THERE
SIGNIFICANT ARGUMENTS AGAINST USING LEGISLATIVE HISTORY? IF SO, WHAT ARE
THEY? 190 BIBLIOGRAPHY 191 U.S. CASES 195 U.K. CASES 198 U.S.
CONSTITUTION, STATUTES, AND LEGISLATIVE HISTORY 198
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Mammen, Christian E. |
| author_facet | Mammen, Christian E. |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Mammen, Christian E. |
| author_variant | c e m ce cem |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV014403275 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | KF425 |
| callnumber-raw | KF425 |
| callnumber-search | KF425 |
| callnumber-sort | KF 3425 |
| callnumber-subject | KF - United States |
| classification_rvk | PL 734 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)49225520 (DE-599)BVBBV014403275 |
| dewey-full | 348.73/1 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 348 - Laws, regulations, cases |
| dewey-raw | 348.73/1 |
| dewey-search | 348.73/1 |
| dewey-sort | 3348.73 11 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01499nam a2200421zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV014403275</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20021107 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">020603s2002 xxu |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2002019999</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9041188797</subfield><subfield code="9">90-411-8879-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)49225520</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV014403275</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KF425</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">348.73/1</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PL 734</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)137270:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mammen, Christian E.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Using legislative history in American statutory interpretation</subfield><subfield code="c">Christian E. Mammen</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">The Hague [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Kluwer Law Internat.</subfield><subfield code="c">2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XI, 199 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">États-Unis - Supreme Court</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States.</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Droit - États-Unis - Interprétation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Histoire législative - États-Unis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">Interpretation and construction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Legislative histories</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">GBV Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=009855438&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-009855438</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | USA |
| geographic_facet | USA |
| id | DE-604.BV014403275 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T19:02:25Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9041188797 |
| language | English |
| lccn | 2002019999 |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-009855438 |
| oclc_num | 49225520 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-739 DE-188 |
| owner_facet | DE-739 DE-188 |
| physical | XI, 199 S. |
| publishDate | 2002 |
| publishDateSearch | 2002 |
| publishDateSort | 2002 |
| publisher | Kluwer Law Internat. |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Mammen, Christian E. Verfasser aut Using legislative history in American statutory interpretation Christian E. Mammen The Hague [u.a.] Kluwer Law Internat. 2002 XI, 199 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier États-Unis - Supreme Court United States. Supreme Court Droit - États-Unis - Interprétation Histoire législative - États-Unis Recht Law United States Interpretation and construction Legislative histories United States USA GBV Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=009855438&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Mammen, Christian E. Using legislative history in American statutory interpretation États-Unis - Supreme Court United States. Supreme Court Droit - États-Unis - Interprétation Histoire législative - États-Unis Recht Law United States Interpretation and construction Legislative histories United States |
| title | Using legislative history in American statutory interpretation |
| title_auth | Using legislative history in American statutory interpretation |
| title_exact_search | Using legislative history in American statutory interpretation |
| title_full | Using legislative history in American statutory interpretation Christian E. Mammen |
| title_fullStr | Using legislative history in American statutory interpretation Christian E. Mammen |
| title_full_unstemmed | Using legislative history in American statutory interpretation Christian E. Mammen |
| title_short | Using legislative history in American statutory interpretation |
| title_sort | using legislative history in american statutory interpretation |
| topic | États-Unis - Supreme Court United States. Supreme Court Droit - États-Unis - Interprétation Histoire législative - États-Unis Recht Law United States Interpretation and construction Legislative histories United States |
| topic_facet | États-Unis - Supreme Court United States. Supreme Court Droit - États-Unis - Interprétation Histoire législative - États-Unis Recht Law United States Interpretation and construction Legislative histories United States USA |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=009855438&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mammenchristiane usinglegislativehistoryinamericanstatutoryinterpretation |