To whom belong the Diaoyu / Senkaku Islands under public international law?:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Abschlussarbeit Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Berlin
Logos
2009
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | 288 S. graph. Darst., Kt. |
| ISBN: | 9783832522124 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV040672635 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20231219 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 130115s2009 bd|| m||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9783832522124 |9 978-3-8325-2212-4 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)612427759 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV040672635 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-19 |a DE-706 |a DE-521 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 341.26095229 |2 22//ger | |
| 084 | |a PR 2739 |0 (DE-625)139705: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Lohmeyer, Martin |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a To whom belong the Diaoyu / Senkaku Islands under public international law? |c Martin Lohmeyer |
| 264 | 1 | |a Berlin |b Logos |c 2009 | |
| 300 | |a 288 S. |b graph. Darst., Kt. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 502 | |a Zugl.: Frankfurt, Main, Univ., Diss., 2009 | ||
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsstellung |0 (DE-588)4134078-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Territorialer Anspruch |0 (DE-588)4353957-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Internationaler Konflikt |0 (DE-588)4162071-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Senkaku-gunto |0 (DE-588)4621938-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Senkaku-gunto |0 (DE-588)4621938-9 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Rechtsstellung |0 (DE-588)4134078-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Territorialer Anspruch |0 (DE-588)4353957-9 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Internationaler Konflikt |0 (DE-588)4162071-9 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m DNB Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025499168&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-025499168 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804149801146646528 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | IMAGE 1
CONTENT
CONTENT 3
1. INTRODUCTION 13
1.1. EMERGENCE OF THE NAME OF THE ISLANDS 17
1.2. LOCATION, TOPOGRAPHY, GEOLOGICAL FEATURES AND VEGETATION, 19
1.3. LEGAL QUESTION ARISING FROM THIS DISPUTE 23
1.3.1. DOMESTIC MARITIME LEGISLATION 24
1.3.2. LEGAL EFFECT ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION OF THE PARTIES OF DISPUTE 24
2. POLITICAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE CONFLICT 27
2.1. DIAOYU/SENKAKU RELATION TO OIL 27
2.2. DIAOYU ISLANDS AS A SYMBOL FOR SINO-JAPANESE RELATIONS 31
2.2.1. DIAOYU/SENKAKU ISLANDS AS A PROXY CONFLICT 31
2.2.2. HISTORICAL RISE OF NATIONALISM IN THE COUNTRIES 31
2.2.3. CHINESE NATIONALISM 32
2.2.4. JAPAN S NATIONALISM 38
2.2.5. TAIWANESE NATIONALISM 40
23. IMPACT ON DISPUTES OVER OTHER ISLANDS
.............*...._.................*....._....*....._....*...._..........*.....*....*....*
43
2.3.1. OKINOTORISHIMA 43
2.3.2. KURILE ISLANDS DISPUTE 44
2.3.3. TAKESHIMA / DOKDO / LIANCOURTS ROCK ISLANDS 44
2.3.4. TORISHIMA/DANJO GUNTO 45
2.3.5. SPRATLY- PARACEL- PRATAS- MACCLESFIELD ISLANDS / REEFS 45
2.4. MUTUAL ECONOMIC DEPENDENCE . * 46
2.4.1. TAIWAN - MAINLAND CHINA TRADE RELATION 47
2.4.2. JAPAN - MAINLAND CHINA TRADE RELATION 48
2.4.3. TAIWANESE/JAPANESE TRADE RELATION 49
2.5. VS. INTERESTS IN THE DISPUTE
....._...........*..................................._...._....._....._....*....*...._......*...._.........._
49
3. HISTORY OF THE CONFLICT FROM 1372 TO TODAY 51
3.1. MISSIONS OF THE MING DYNASTY TO THE RYUKYU KINGDOM
*..*._**.**_.*_.*.*...*_*_.***_..*._...._ 51 3.1.1. CHEN KAN MISSION IN
1532 53
3.1.2. KUO JU LIN MISSION IN 1561 53
3.1.3. XIAO CHONG MISSION IN 1576 54
3.1.4. XIA ZIYANG MISSION IN 1606 54
3.1 5. SHUNFENG XIANGSONG LOGBOOK OF 1403 55
3.1.6. DEFENCE MANUALS 56
3.1.6.1. ZHENG RUOZHENG MANUAL OF 1561 56
3.1.6.2. MILITARY RELATION BETWEEN CHINA AND THE RYUKYU 56
3.2. MISSIONS TO THE RYUKYU KINGDOM IN QING DYNASTY
........................*.._......................................_...........
57
3.2.1. RECORDS OF ZHANG XUELI MISSION IN 1663 57
3.2.2. RECORDS OF WANG CHI IN 1683 57
3.2.3. XU BAOGUANG MISSION IN 1709 58
3.2.4. ZHOU HUANG MISSION IN 1755 59
BIBLIOGRAFISCHE INFORMATIONEN HTTP://D-NB.INFO/997726652
DIGITALISIERT DURCH
IMAGE 2
3.2.5. GEOGRAPHER S POINT OF VIEW 60
3.2.5.1. HAYASHI SHIFEI 60
3.2.5.2. CHENG SHUNTSE IN 1708 60
3.2.5.3. LIN TZU-PING IN 1785 60
3.2.6. LOCATION FOR GATHERING HERBS AND FISHING 60
3.3. JAPAN S DISCOVERY OF THE SENKAKU
ISLANDS......................................................
....................................... 61
3.3.1. JAPAN S INVASION TO THE RYUKYU KINGDOM 61
3.3.2. CHINA S - JAPANESE MEDIATION AS A SUITE TO JAPAN S INVASION 61
3.3.3. JAPAN S DISCOVERY OF THE ISLANDS IN 1884 62
3.3.4. JAPAN S ACQUISITION OF THE SENKAKU ISLANDS 62
3.3.4.1. BACKGROUND OF JAPAN S TARDINESS 62
3.3.4.2. FIRST LETTER OF OKINAWA PREFECTURE MAGISTRATE IN 1885 63
3.3.4.3. LETTER OF THE FOREIGN SECRETARY IN 1885 64
3.3.4.4. SECOND OKINAWA MAGISTRATE S LETTER IN 1885 65
3.3.4.5. RESPONSE OF THE HOME SECRETARY 65
3.3.4.6. FURTHER LETTERS OF REQUEST OF OKINAWA S MAGISTRATE 65
3.3.4.7. DECREE OF EMPRESS DOWAGER CIXI OF 1893 66
3.3.4.8. INFORMATION OF OKINAWA PREFECTURE IN 1894 67
3.3.4.9. SINO JAPANESE WAR 1894 /1895 67
3.3.4.10. JAPANESE CABINET DECISION ON JANUARY 14 TB, 1895 68
3.3.4.11. TREATY OFSHIMONOSEKI OF APRIL 17*. 1895 68
3.3.4.12. IMPERIAL DECREE NO. 13 ON MARCH 5 A, 1896 69
3.3.4.13. TAIWANESE CONSUL GENERAL IN NAGASAKI 1920 70
3.3.4.14. KOGA RAN JAPANESE BUSINESS ON THE ISLAND UNTIL 1920S 70
3.3.4.15. TOKYO COURT RULING 1941-44 71
3.4. THE ISLANDS STATUS IN THE POST-WAR ERA . 71
3.4.1. CAIRO DECLARATION 1943 71
3.4.2. YALTA CONFERENCE 1945 72
3.4.3. POTSDAM DECLARATION IN 1945 : 72
3.4.4. JAPANESE SURRENDER AUGUST 15*, 1945 73
3.4.5. DECREE 667 OF THE U.N 73
3.4.6. AMERICAN OCCUPATION 73
3.4.6.1. AMERICAN MAPS 73
3.4.6.2. ORDINANCE NO. 22 IN 1950 74
3.4.7. SEPARATE TOKYO- AND TAIPEI TREATY 74
3.4.7.1. SAN FRANCISCO TREATY IN 1951 75
3.4.7.2. TREATY OF TAIPEI 1952 77
3.4.8. U.S. TRUSTEESHIP OVER OKINAWA/AMAMI AND SENKAKU ISLANDS 78
3.4.9. USCAP 27 - OF 25* DECEMBER 1953 79
3.4.10.1954 ROC-US MUTUAL DEFENCE TREATY 80
3.4.11. DOMESTIC CONFUSIONS ABOUT THE ISLANDS SOVEREIGNTY 80
3.4.11.1. YEARBOOKS 1951 - 1975 80
3.4.11.2. OTHER TAIWANESE PUBLICATIONS EXCLUDING THE TIAOYU-TAI 81
3.4.11.3. CHINESE PUBLICATIONS 81
3.4.11.4. SIMILARITIES OF CHINESE AND TAIWANESE PUBLICATIONS 82
3.4.11.5. JAPANESE TEXTBOOKS 82
3.4.11.6. TAIWANESE LABOURERS 82
3.4.12. CONCLUSION 83
3.5. THE YEAR 1969 - THE OIL DISCOVERY 83
3 J . I. VALUABLE RESOURCES NEXT TO THE ISLANDS 83
3.5.2. JAPAN S NATIONAL GOVERNMENT S ACTION 83
3.5.3. TAIWANESE ACTION 84
3.5.4. PEOPLE S REPUBLIC OF CHINA ACTION 85
3.5.5. OTHER COUNTRIES SWITCH OF RECOGNITION 1972/79 85
3.5.6. JAPAN REGAINS FULL SOVEREIGNTY OVER OKINAWA IN 1972 86
3.5.7. SINO-JAPANESE PEACE AND FRIENDSHIP TREATY IN 1978 88
3.5.8. THE DIAOYU ISLANDS TODAY 89
IMAGE 3
3.5.8.1. THE BEGINNING OF THE 1990S 89
3.5.8.2. THE MID-1990S 89
3.5.8.3. TODAY AND NEAR FUTURE 90
4. MODES OF ACQUIRING AND LOSING TERRITORY 93
4.1. SUBJECTS IN PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW 93
4.2. SOVEREIGNTY 93
4.3. THE ACCESSORY MARITIME RIGHTS 95
4.4. MODES OF ACQUIRING THE
TITLE.......*................*..*..*.*......M....M....*...M............
H....H..............M.*...M**.. 95
4.4.1. OCCUPATION 96
4.4.1.1. TERRA NULLIUS 96
4.4.1.2. OCCUPATION ON BEHALF OF A STATE 97
4.4.1.3. ACTUAL TAKING POSSESSION AND THE WILL TO POSSESS AS A SOVEREIGN
98
4.4.1.4. LIMITATION OF PHYSICAL PRESENCE 99
4.4.1.4.1. NETHERLANDS VERSA U.S.A. (ISLANDS OF PALMAS CASE OF 1928) 99
4.4.1.4.2. CLIPPERTON ISLAND CASE OF 1932 100
4.4.1.4.3. EASTERN GREENLAND CASE OF 1933 101
4.4.1.4.4. WESTERN SAHARA ADVISORY OPINION OF 1975 102
4.4.1.4.5. MINQUIERS AND ECREHOS CASE OF 1953 102
4.4.1.4.6. GULF OF FONSECA CASE 103
4.4.1.4.7. SUMMARY 103
4.4.2. ACQUISITIVE PRESCRIPTION 104
4.4.2.1. BACKGROUND OF PRESCRIPTION 104
A, A 22. DEFINITION OF PRESCRIPTION 104
4.4.2.3. PREREQUISITES OF PROTEST 105
4.4.2.4. VALUE OF A POSSIBLE CLAIM BASED ON PRESCRIPTION , 106
4.4.3. CONQUEST / ANNEXATION 106
4.4.4. CESSION 108
4.4 5. ACCRETION AND AVULSION 108
4.4.6. ADJUDICATION 109
4.4.7. DISCOVERY 109
4.4.8. CONTIGUITY 110
4.5. LOSS OF
TERRITORY......................................,.........................-._....
I LL
4.5.1. SIX MODES I LL
4.5.2. DERELICTION HI
4.6. RELATIVITY OF TITLE 112
4.7. APPLICABILITY OF THESE PRINCIPLES TO THE DIAOYU / SENKAKU ISLANDS
_.*........_.,.._....*.*..**...*.......*.-.... 113 4.7.1. PRINCIPLE OF
OCCUPATION 113
4.7.2. EXTENT OF OCCUPATION 114
4.7.3. SUMMARY 114
5. IMPORTANT LEGAL ISSUES 115
5.1. INTRODUCTION TO INTERTEMPORAL LAW
......._..*...,._.._............_.......*._................._...._...,..........................
115
5.1.1 TWO-WAY APPLICATION OF THIS DOCTRINE 115
5.1.2. THE CRITICAL DATE QUESTION _ 116
5.13. PROVISIONS OF THE VIENNA CONVENTION OF THE LAWS OF TREATIES 116
5.1.4. RELEVANCE TO THE DIAOYU /SENKAKU ISLANDS 116
5.2. OTHER IMPORTANT PRINCIPLES ......... ~~. . 117
5.2.1. RECOGNITION _ _ 117
IMAGE 4
5.2.2. ACQUIESCENCE 117
5.2.3. ESTOPPEL 117
5.2.4. LEGAL DEVICE OF HISTORICAL WATERS 118
5.2.4.1. EMERGENCE 118
5.2.4.2. ANGLO-NORWEGIAN FISHERY CASE 119
5.2.4.3. RELEVANCE FOR THE DIAOYU / SENKAKU DISPUTE 120
5.3. THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA UNCLOS 121
5.3.1. THE UN CONVENTION ON THE CONTINENTAL SHELF 1958 121
5.3.2. RATIFYING THE UNCLOS 1982 IN 1996 123
5.3.3. ISLANDS UNDER ART. 121 UNCLOS 126
5.3.4. ARCHIPELAGOS ACCORDING TO ART. 46 (B) UNCLOS 128
6. COMPARISON TO THE RELATED ISLANDS CONFLICT 131
6.1. SPRATLY AND PARACEL ISLANDS IN THE SOUTH CHINA SEA .. 131
6.2. CONTENTIONS OF THE PARTIES...................... 132
6.3. COMPARISON TO THE DIAOYU / SENKAKU CONFLICT
........................................................................................
134
6.4. COMPARISON TO THE DOKDO / TAKESHIMA CONFLICT 137
6.4.1. JAPANESE AND SOUTH KOREAN CONTENTIONS 137
6.4.2. ISLANDS EFFECT ON THE BOUNDARY ISSUE 138
6.4.3. COMPARISON TO THE DIAOYU / SENKAKU ISLANDS 138
6.5. CONCLUSION
.......M...............................................................................................................................
139
7. EVALUATION OF THE ISLANDS SOVEREIGNTY 141
7.1. CRITICAL DATE FOR THE LEGAL
ANALYSIS............................................................................................................
141
7.2. CAN WESTERN INFLUENCED LAW BE APPLIED IN ANCIENT EAST ASIA? . . 143
7.2.1 CHINESE RECEPTION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 143
7.2.2. JAPANESE RECEPTION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 144
7.3. DOES CHINESE DISCOVERY GRANT A TITLE?
....................................................................................M.........
144
7.4. CHINESE EFFECTIVE OCCUPATION BEFORE
LSSS...*.................*.........................................................................
145
7.4.1. CHINESE ARGUMENTS CONCERNING THE INVESTITURE MISSIONS 145
7.4.2. TAIWANESE REFUTATION TO THE TIME PRIOR TO 1895 146
7.4.3. GENERAL JAPANESE REFUTATIONS OVER THE ISLANDS 147
7.4.4. TRANSFORMATION OF CHINESE NOTION OF SOVEREIGNTY 148
7.4.4.1. IMPORTANCE AND IMPACT OF THIS DECISION 148
7.4.4.2. TRANSFORMATION OF THE SINO-CENTRIC IDEA OF SOVEREIGNTY 148
7.5. CHINESE SYMBOLIC ACTS GRANT SOVEREIGNTY TO CHINA? . .. 151
7.5.1. CHINESE CORPUS OCCUPANDI 151
7.5.1.1. CHINESE LACK OF SETTLEMENT ON THE ISLANDS 151
7.5.1.2. CHINESE IRREGULAR MANIFESTATION OF POSSIBLE EFFECTIVE
OCCUPATION 152
7.5.1.3. DISPLAY OF SOVEREIGNTY ON BEHALF OF THE STATE 153
7.5.1.3.1. INVESTITURE MISSIONS AND DEFENCE SYSTEM 153
7.5.1.3.2. DOWAGER EMPRESS DECREE 1893 154
75.1.4. CHINESE EXERCISE OF SOVEREIGNTY WAS PEACEFUL 155
7.5.1.5. CHINESE LACK OF DISEMBARKATION ON THE ISLANDS 155
7.5.1.6. CHINESE LACK OF POSSESSING A INCORPORATION CEREMONY 156
7.5.1.7. CHINESE FAILURE TO NOTIFY OTHER STATES 158
7.5.2. CHINESE ANIMUS OCCUPANDI 158
IMAGE 5
7.5.3. CONFERRAI OF CHINESE TITLE OF SOVEREIGNTY? 159
7.5.4. LOSS OF TITLE BY JAPANESE SURVEYS? 159
7.5.5. VALUE OF JAPANESE DISCOVERY IN 1884 160
7.6. LEGAL EVALUATION OF THE JAPANESE OCCUPATION IN
1895.........................................................................
161
7.6.1. CHINESE VIEW OF ACQUISITION OF TITLE BY THE 1895 PEACE TREATY 161
7.6.2.1 JAPANESE VIEW OF THE INCORPORATION BY THE CABINET DECISION 161
7.6.2.2. JAPANESE VIEW: ISLANDS NOT PART OF THE TREATY OF SHIMONOSEKI
162
7.6.2.3. JAPANESE ARGUMENT OF TIMING 162
7.6.2.4. JAPANESE ARGUMENT OF WORDING OF THE TREATY 162
7.6.3. ASSESSMENT OF JAPANESE CABINET DECISION JANUARY 14 TO, 1895 163
7.6.3.1. CABINET INTERNAL AUTHORITY 164
7.6.3.1.1. RELEVANCE OF CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY 165
7.6.3.1.2. CONSTITUTIONAL RELEVANCE THEORY 166
7.6.3.1.3. CONSTITIONAL IRRELEVANCE THEORY 167
7.6.3.1.4. CONCLUSION 167
7.6.3.2. IMPERIAL ASSENT REQUIRED 167
7.6.3.2.1 QUESTIONS ARSING FROM THE IMPERIAL DECREE 168
7.6.3.2.2. VALIDATION OF THE JAPANESE CABINET DECISION? 169
7.6.3.2.3. FINAL ASSESSMENT OF THE AUTHOR 170
7.7. JAPANESE ACQUISITION BY THE TREATY OF SHIMONOSEKI
1895......................-......-.. 170 7.7.1.
TEXTUAL INTERPRETATION 172
7.7.1.1. HISTORICAL / POLITICAL BELONGING TO TAIWAN 173
7.7.1.2. ECONOMIC / MILITARY APPURTENANCE TO TAIWAN 173
7.7.1.3. GEOGRAPHICAL APPURTENANCE TO TAIWAN 174
7.7.1.4. RELATIVELY CLOSER TO TAIWAN THAN CHINA 174
7.7.1.5. CONCLUSION OF TEXTUAL INTERPRETATION 175
7.7.2. CONTEXT AND PURPOSE INTERPRETATION 175
7.7.2.1. CONTEXTUAL INTERPRETATION: MENTIONING OF THE PESCADORES ISLANDS
175
7.7.2.2. INTERPRETATION OF PURPOSE 176
7.7.3. PRINCIPLE OF GOOD FAITH 177
7.7.4. SUBSEQUENT CONDUCT OF THE PARTIES (ART. 31 NI) 178
1.15. FINAL CONCLUSION 180
7.8. COMPLEMENTARY DOCUMENT
......................................................................................................................
180
7.8.1. CHINESE CONSUL S LETTER OF 1920 180
7.8.2. TOKYO COURT RULING 1941-44 181
7.9. WAR TIME
DECLARATIONS................................................,...................
181 7.9.1. CHINESE VIEW OF THE DECLARATION OF POTSDAM AND CAIRO 181
7.9.2. JAPANESE VIEW OF THE DECLARATIONS 182
7.9.3. AMERICAN VIEW ABOUT THE DECLARATIONS 182
7.9.4. LEGAL VALUE OF THE DECLARATIONS 183
7.9.5. NO TRANSFER OF JAPANESE SOVEREIGNTY OVER STOLEN TERRITORIES 183
7.9.6. CONCLUSION ABOUT THE DECLARATIONS 185
7.10. ANALYSIS OF THE SAN FRANCISCO PEACE TREATY OF 1952 .* . 185
7.10.1. THE TAIWANESE REFUTATIONS 185
7.10.2. JAPANESE VIEW OF THE SAN FRANCISCO TREATY OF 1952 186
7.10.3. CHINESE VIEW OF THE SAN FRANCISCO TREATY OF 1952 186
7.10.4. CHINESE AUXILIARY INTERPRETATION OF THE 1952 TREATY 187
7.10.5. LEGAL ASSESSMENT OF THE TREATY OF SAN FRANCISCO 187
7.10.5.1. SUBJECTIVE THIRD PARTY S RIGHT OF THE CHINESE? 187
7.10.5.2. PROVISION FOR U.N. TRUSTEESHIP IN ART. 3 OF THE TREATY 189
7.10.5.3. DOES ART. 3 CAUSE AN IMMEDIATE CESSION OF (PARTIAL)
SOVEREIGNTY? 189
7.10.5.4. STANDPOINT OF ART. 3 CAUSES A TRANSFER OF SOVEREIGNTY 190
7.10.5.5. STANDPOINT SOVEREIGNTY REMAINED JAPANESE 190
7.10.5.6. AUTHOR S POINT OF VIEW 191
7.10.6. OTHER POSSIBLE LEGAL DEVICES 191
IMAGE 6
7.10.6.1. CONFERRAI OF CONTINGENT RIGHT IN ART. 3 191
7.10.6.2. OPTIONAL CLAUSE 192
7.10.6.3. FINAL CONCLUSION AND SUMMARY 192
7.11. LEGAL SITUATION UNDER THE TRUSTEESHIP 193
7.11.1 CHINESE POSITION TOWARDS RESIDUAL SOVEREIGNTY 194
7.11.2. TAIWANESE POSITION TOWARDS RESIDUAL SOVEREIGNTY 194
7.11.3. JAPAN S STANCE ABOUT JAPANESE RESIDUAL SOVEREIGNTY 194
7.11.4. LEGAL CONSTRUCTION OF THE U.N. TRUSTEESHIP :.... 196
7.11.4.1. ALLIES AND ASSOCIATED POWERS SOVEREIGNTY 197
7.11.4.2. UNITED NATIONS SOVEREIGNTY 197
7.11.4.3. JOINT SOVEREIGNTY 197
7.11.4.4. ADMINISTERING AGENT HAS SOVEREIGNTY 198
7.11.4.5. THE INHABITANTS OF TRUST TERRITORIES RETAIN RESIDUAL
SOVEREIGNTY 198
7.11.4.6. AUTHOR S CONCLUSION 199
7.12. EVALUATION OF THE US. DECREE NO. 27 OF 1953 199
7.12.1. CHINESE POSITION ON THE U.S. DECREE NO. 27 199
7.12.2. JAPANESE POSITION ON USCAP NO. 27 200
7.12.3. LEGAL ASSESSMENT OF USCAP NO. 27 200
7.13. ANALYSIS OF THE TAIPEI TREATY OF 1952
**.*.*....*...*.._.....**............._......................
201 7.13.1. TAIWANESE VIEW OF THE TREATY OF TAIPEI 201
7.13.2. PRC S VIEW OF THE TREATY OF TAIPEI OF 1952 201
7.13.3. JAPAN S VIEW OF THE TREATY OF TAIPEI 202
7.13.4.1 THINA IS THE RECIPIENT OF THE DIAOYU ISLANDS 202
7.13.4.2. WHICH CHINA IS THE RECIPIENT? 203
7.14. U.S. TAIWANESE MUTUAL DEFENCE TREATY
1954........................................................................................
204
7.15. LEGAL SITUATION AFTER CREATION OF THE CONTINENTAL SHELF 1958 204
7.15.1. CHINESE GEOLOGICAL ARGUMENT 204
7.15.2. JAPANESE POSITION: EQUIDISTANCE PRINCIPLE 205
7.15.3. TAIWANESE RATIFICATION OF THE CONTINENTAL SHELF CONVENTION OF
1958 .-. 206
7.15.4. LEGAL ASSESSMENT OF THE 1958 CONTINENTAL SHELF DOCTRINE 206
7.16. ESTOPPEL BY HISTORICAL
RECORDS..............................
. 207 7.16.1. JAPANESE POSITION TOWARDS CHINESE TEXTBOOKS AND MAPS 207
7.16.2. CHINESE POSITION OF JAPANESE HISTORICAL DOCUMENTS 207
7.16.3. LEGAL ASSESSMENT OF THE GEOGRAPHIC MAPS , 208
7.16.3.1. COMPARISON TO THE PREAHVIHEAR CASE 208
7.16.3.2. COMPARISON TO THE NUCLEAR TEST CASE 208
7.17. LEGAL SITUATION AFTER THE 1972 REVERSION AGREEMENT 209
7.17.1. CHINESE POSITION TOWARDS THE OKINAWA REVERSION AGREEMENT 209
7.17.2. JAPANESE REFUTATION ABOUT THE REVERSION AGREEMENT 209
7.17.3. LEGAL ASSESSMENT OF THE REVERSION AGREEMENT 209
7.18. JAPANESE PRESCRIPTION OF THE TITLE OF SOVEREIGNTY
...................................................................................
210
7.18.1. CHINESE EXPLANATION OF FAILURE OF PROTEST 211
7.18.2. JAPANESE STANCE TO CHINESE FAILURE OF PROTEST 212
7.18.3. LEGAL ASSESSMENT OF A JAPANESE PRESCRIPTION 212
7.19. CONCLUSION OF THE SOVEREIGNTY QUESTION
...........................* 213
8. SUGGESTIONS FOR A RESOLUTION OF THE ISLANDS DISPUTE 215
8.1. DIPLOMATIC METHODS
.......-....-....*..........._..........-....-................*...._...........-.....-.......................*...._..
215
8.1.1. CLAIMANTS STANDPOINTS TOWARDS NEGOTIATION 215
IMAGE 7
8.1.2. DIPLOMATIC RESOLUTION OF THE CONFLICT 216
8.1.2.1. NEGOTIATIONS 217
8.1.2.2. MEDIATION 217
8.1.2.3. CONCILIATION _ 217
8.1.2.4. INQUIRY 218
8.1.3. REASONS AGAINST A DIPLOMATIC SETTLEMENT IN THESE DAYS 218
8.2. INSTITUTIONALISED MEANS FOR A RESOLUTION OF THE
CONFLICT.................. ................... .................. .. 219
8.2.1. SOLUTION BY THE SECURITY COUNCIL OF THE UNITED NATIONS 219
8.2.1.1. CHAPTER VII OF THE U.N. CHARTER 219
8.2.1.2. CHAPTER VI OF THE U.N. CHARTER 220
8.2.1.3. NO LEGAL COGNISANCE OF THE U.N. SECURITY COUNCIL 221
8.2.1.4. MEDIATION BY SECRETARY GENERAL OF THE UNITED NATIONS 221
8.2.2. INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE (ICI) 222
8.2.2.1. COMPULSORY JURISDICTION OF THE ICJ (ART. 36II STATUTE) 222
8.2.2.2. THE CONSENSUAL BASIS OF JURISDICTION ON ART. 36 (I) ICJ STATUTE
223
8.2.2.3. ADVISORY OPINIONS OF THE ICI 224
8.2.3. JURISDICTION OF THE JTLOS 225
8.2.4. ARBITRATION 227
8.2.5. ASEAN 227
8.2.5.1.1992 MANILA DECLARATION 228
8.2.5.2. REGIONAL FORUM (ARF) 228
8 3. OBSTACLES OF A FORMAL RESOLUTION BASED ON MARITIME DELIMITATION...
..................... 229 8.3.1. CHINA / TAIWAN QUESTION
OVERSHADOWS THE ISLANDS DISPUTE 229
8.3.2. ASIAN MENTALITY AIMS TO SAVE FACE 230
8.3.3. SUMMARY WHY ALL METHODS POSSIBLY WILL FAIL 230
8.4 JOINT DEVELOPMENT.............. .
......-..........._..-....*._._._..._.*....... 231 8.4.1.
DIFFERENT CONCEPTIONS OF THE CLAIMANTS 231
8.4.2. HOW MUCH TERRITORIAL EFFECT IS GRANTED TO THE ISLANDS? 232
8.4.3. EFFECT GRANTED TO THE DIAOYU SENKAKU ISLANDS? 233
8.4.4. VALUE OF THE CHINESE CONTINENTAL SHELF ARGUMENT 234
* 8.4.5. THE TAIWANESE MUST RENOUNCE THEIR CLAIMS 235
8.4.6. EXTRA- TERRITORIALIZITION OF THE CONFLICT 236
8.4.7. SINO-JAPANESE FISHING AGREEMENT A MODEL FOR SOLUTION? 236
8.4.8. KOREAN-JAPANESE JOINT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 237
8.4.9. KOREAN - JAPANESE 1999 FISHING AGREEMENT 238
8.4.10. FINAL PROPOSAL FOR THE MARITIME SPACE REPARTITION 238
8.4.10.1 PROPOSAL OF A MEDIAN LINE IN THE NORTHERN ZONE 238
8.4.10.2. ASSESSMENT OF THE MEDIAN LINE PROPOSAL 239
8.4.10.3. THIRD LINE ADJUSTMENT / EQUITY 240
8.4.10.4. FINAL PROPOSAL FOR THE NORTHERN ZONE 240
8.4.10.5. DELIMITATION IN SOUTHERN ZONE IMPOSSIBLE 241
8.4.11. POLITICAL BACKGROUND OF A JDZ 241
8.4.11.1. MODES OF SHARING RESOURCES ALREADY IN EXISTANCE 242
8.4.11.1.1. PURE GEOGRAPHICAL DELIMITATION 242
8.4.11.1.2. TECHNICAL COMMISSION 243
8.4.11.1.3. EQUAL SHARING OF REVENUES 243
8.4.11.1.4. MIXED SCHEME 243
8.4.11.1.5. CONDOMINIUM 244
8.4.11.2. AUTHOR S POINT OF VIEW: MOST MODES MUST BE RULED OUT 244
8.4.11.3. ONLY CONCEIVABLE SOLUTION: SUBZONES 245
8.4.11.4. PROBABILITY OF IMPLEMENTATION 246
9. CONCLUSION 249
BIBLIOGRAPHY:- *__ _* ****. **__ 251
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Lohmeyer, Martin |
| author_facet | Lohmeyer, Martin |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Lohmeyer, Martin |
| author_variant | m l ml |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV040672635 |
| classification_rvk | PR 2739 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)612427759 (DE-599)BVBBV040672635 |
| dewey-full | 341.26095229 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 341 - Law of nations |
| dewey-raw | 341.26095229 |
| dewey-search | 341.26095229 |
| dewey-sort | 3341.26095229 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Thesis Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01742nam a2200421 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV040672635</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231219 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">130115s2009 bd|| m||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783832522124</subfield><subfield code="9">978-3-8325-2212-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)612427759</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV040672635</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-706</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">341.26095229</subfield><subfield code="2">22//ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PR 2739</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139705:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lohmeyer, Martin</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">To whom belong the Diaoyu / Senkaku Islands under public international law?</subfield><subfield code="c">Martin Lohmeyer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Berlin</subfield><subfield code="b">Logos</subfield><subfield code="c">2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">288 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">graph. Darst., Kt.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zugl.: Frankfurt, Main, Univ., Diss., 2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsstellung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4134078-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Territorialer Anspruch</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4353957-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internationaler Konflikt</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4162071-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Senkaku-gunto</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4621938-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Senkaku-gunto</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4621938-9</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Rechtsstellung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4134078-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Territorialer Anspruch</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4353957-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Internationaler Konflikt</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4162071-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">DNB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025499168&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-025499168</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Hochschulschrift |
| geographic | Senkaku-gunto (DE-588)4621938-9 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Senkaku-gunto |
| id | DE-604.BV040672635 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T00:28:48Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9783832522124 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-025499168 |
| oclc_num | 612427759 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-706 DE-521 |
| owner_facet | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-706 DE-521 |
| physical | 288 S. graph. Darst., Kt. |
| publishDate | 2009 |
| publishDateSearch | 2009 |
| publishDateSort | 2009 |
| publisher | Logos |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Lohmeyer, Martin Verfasser aut To whom belong the Diaoyu / Senkaku Islands under public international law? Martin Lohmeyer Berlin Logos 2009 288 S. graph. Darst., Kt. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Zugl.: Frankfurt, Main, Univ., Diss., 2009 Rechtsstellung (DE-588)4134078-4 gnd rswk-swf Territorialer Anspruch (DE-588)4353957-9 gnd rswk-swf Internationaler Konflikt (DE-588)4162071-9 gnd rswk-swf Senkaku-gunto (DE-588)4621938-9 gnd rswk-swf (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content Senkaku-gunto (DE-588)4621938-9 g Rechtsstellung (DE-588)4134078-4 s Territorialer Anspruch (DE-588)4353957-9 s Internationaler Konflikt (DE-588)4162071-9 s DE-604 DNB Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025499168&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Lohmeyer, Martin To whom belong the Diaoyu / Senkaku Islands under public international law? Rechtsstellung (DE-588)4134078-4 gnd Territorialer Anspruch (DE-588)4353957-9 gnd Internationaler Konflikt (DE-588)4162071-9 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4134078-4 (DE-588)4353957-9 (DE-588)4162071-9 (DE-588)4621938-9 (DE-588)4113937-9 |
| title | To whom belong the Diaoyu / Senkaku Islands under public international law? |
| title_auth | To whom belong the Diaoyu / Senkaku Islands under public international law? |
| title_exact_search | To whom belong the Diaoyu / Senkaku Islands under public international law? |
| title_full | To whom belong the Diaoyu / Senkaku Islands under public international law? Martin Lohmeyer |
| title_fullStr | To whom belong the Diaoyu / Senkaku Islands under public international law? Martin Lohmeyer |
| title_full_unstemmed | To whom belong the Diaoyu / Senkaku Islands under public international law? Martin Lohmeyer |
| title_short | To whom belong the Diaoyu / Senkaku Islands under public international law? |
| title_sort | to whom belong the diaoyu senkaku islands under public international law |
| topic | Rechtsstellung (DE-588)4134078-4 gnd Territorialer Anspruch (DE-588)4353957-9 gnd Internationaler Konflikt (DE-588)4162071-9 gnd |
| topic_facet | Rechtsstellung Territorialer Anspruch Internationaler Konflikt Senkaku-gunto Hochschulschrift |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025499168&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lohmeyermartin towhombelongthediaoyusenkakuislandsunderpublicinternationallaw |