Experiencing intrusion: smashed windows as violations of privacy in the University Town of Helmstedt, 1684–1706
This article argues that much of what we refer to as privacy in present-day society was materialised, experienced, instrumentalised, and also, to some extent, protected before the 19th century, when it was broadly conceptualised as a value and a right. In a social-architectural approach, windows and...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch Artikel |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2023-12-16
|
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | This article argues that much of what we refer to as privacy in present-day society was materialised, experienced, instrumentalised, and also, to some extent, protected before the 19th century, when it was broadly conceptualised as a value and a right. In a social-architectural approach, windows and facades of the private house are shown to have had an important regulatory function, mediating between the house and the neighbourhood, the open and the closed, and the public and the private. First ,we extract evidence from On the Art of Building in Ten Books by Leon Battista Alberti (1404– 1572) as well as from other architectural treatises of the period and region, in particular those by Joseph Furttenbach (1591–1667) and Leonhard Christoph Sturm (1669–1719), who cites Nicolaus Goldmann (1611–1665). Then, we combine the architectural insights with an in-depth reading of two well-documented but not yet analysed court cases of nocturnal window smashing in the university town of Helmstedt involving Professor Johann Barthold Niemeyer (1644–1708) in the opposing roles of both victim and instigator. The combination of these court cases and architectural treatises allows us to show how experiences of intrusions via broken windows share qualities with today’s conceptualisation of intrusions of privacy and thus point to the presence of notions of privacy in early modern societies. |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (27 Seiten) Illustrationen, Karten |
| ISSN: | 2050-5833 |
| DOI: | 10.16995/ah.9241 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nma a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV049487576 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240105s2023 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.16995/ah.9241 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV049487576 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-255 |a DE-Y3 |a DE-Y7 |a DE-Y2 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Körner, Natalie P. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Experiencing intrusion |b smashed windows as violations of privacy in the University Town of Helmstedt, 1684–1706 |c Natalie P. Körner (Royal Danish Academy for Architecture, Design and Conservation), Johannes Ljungberg (University of Copenhagen) |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023-12-16 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (27 Seiten) |b Illustrationen, Karten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a This article argues that much of what we refer to as privacy in present-day society was materialised, experienced, instrumentalised, and also, to some extent, protected before the 19th century, when it was broadly conceptualised as a value and a right. In a social-architectural approach, windows and facades of the private house are shown to have had an important regulatory function, mediating between the house and the neighbourhood, the open and the closed, and the public and the private. First ,we extract evidence from On the Art of Building in Ten Books by Leon Battista Alberti (1404– 1572) as well as from other architectural treatises of the period and region, in particular those by Joseph Furttenbach (1591–1667) and Leonhard Christoph Sturm (1669–1719), who cites Nicolaus Goldmann (1611–1665). Then, we combine the architectural insights with an in-depth reading of two well-documented but not yet analysed court cases of nocturnal window smashing in the university town of Helmstedt involving Professor Johann Barthold Niemeyer (1644–1708) in the opposing roles of both victim and instigator. The combination of these court cases and architectural treatises allows us to show how experiences of intrusions via broken windows share qualities with today’s conceptualisation of intrusions of privacy and thus point to the presence of notions of privacy in early modern societies. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ljungberg, Johannes |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1180320026 |4 aut | |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g number:1 |g year:2023 |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |t Architectural histories / European Architectural History Network, EAHN |d London, 2023 |g Band 11, Heft 1 (2023) |w (DE-604)BV041185030 |x 2050-5833 |o (DE-600)2726365-4 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |q text/html |u https://doi.org/10.16995/ah.9241 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034832958 | ||
| 941 | |b 11 |h 1 |j 2023 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804186283164041216 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| article_link | (DE-604)BV041185030 |
| author | Körner, Natalie P. Ljungberg, Johannes |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1180320026 |
| author_facet | Körner, Natalie P. Ljungberg, Johannes |
| author_role | aut aut |
| author_sort | Körner, Natalie P. |
| author_variant | n p k np npk j l jl |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV049487576 |
| ctrlnum | (DE-599)BVBBV049487576 |
| doi_str_mv | 10.16995/ah.9241 |
| format | Electronic Article |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02742nma a2200313 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049487576</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240105s2023 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.16995/ah.9241</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV049487576</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-255</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-Y3</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-Y7</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-Y2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Körner, Natalie P.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Experiencing intrusion</subfield><subfield code="b">smashed windows as violations of privacy in the University Town of Helmstedt, 1684–1706</subfield><subfield code="c">Natalie P. Körner (Royal Danish Academy for Architecture, Design and Conservation), Johannes Ljungberg (University of Copenhagen)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023-12-16</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (27 Seiten)</subfield><subfield code="b">Illustrationen, Karten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This article argues that much of what we refer to as privacy in present-day society was materialised, experienced, instrumentalised, and also, to some extent, protected before the 19th century, when it was broadly conceptualised as a value and a right. In a social-architectural approach, windows and facades of the private house are shown to have had an important regulatory function, mediating between the house and the neighbourhood, the open and the closed, and the public and the private. First ,we extract evidence from On the Art of Building in Ten Books by Leon Battista Alberti (1404– 1572) as well as from other architectural treatises of the period and region, in particular those by Joseph Furttenbach (1591–1667) and Leonhard Christoph Sturm (1669–1719), who cites Nicolaus Goldmann (1611–1665). Then, we combine the architectural insights with an in-depth reading of two well-documented but not yet analysed court cases of nocturnal window smashing in the university town of Helmstedt involving Professor Johann Barthold Niemeyer (1644–1708) in the opposing roles of both victim and instigator. The combination of these court cases and architectural treatises allows us to show how experiences of intrusions via broken windows share qualities with today’s conceptualisation of intrusions of privacy and thus point to the presence of notions of privacy in early modern societies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ljungberg, Johannes</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1180320026</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:11</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="t">Architectural histories / European Architectural History Network, EAHN</subfield><subfield code="d">London, 2023</subfield><subfield code="g">Band 11, Heft 1 (2023)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV041185030</subfield><subfield code="x">2050-5833</subfield><subfield code="o">(DE-600)2726365-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.16995/ah.9241</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034832958</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="941" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">11</subfield><subfield code="h">1</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV049487576 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T23:19:08Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T10:08:40Z |
| institution | BVB |
| issn | 2050-5833 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034832958 |
| open_access_boolean | 1 |
| owner | DE-255 DE-Y3 DE-Y7 DE-Y2 |
| owner_facet | DE-255 DE-Y3 DE-Y7 DE-Y2 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (27 Seiten) Illustrationen, Karten |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| publishDateSearch | 2023 |
| publishDateSort | 2023 |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Körner, Natalie P. Verfasser aut Experiencing intrusion smashed windows as violations of privacy in the University Town of Helmstedt, 1684–1706 Natalie P. Körner (Royal Danish Academy for Architecture, Design and Conservation), Johannes Ljungberg (University of Copenhagen) 2023-12-16 1 Online-Ressource (27 Seiten) Illustrationen, Karten txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier This article argues that much of what we refer to as privacy in present-day society was materialised, experienced, instrumentalised, and also, to some extent, protected before the 19th century, when it was broadly conceptualised as a value and a right. In a social-architectural approach, windows and facades of the private house are shown to have had an important regulatory function, mediating between the house and the neighbourhood, the open and the closed, and the public and the private. First ,we extract evidence from On the Art of Building in Ten Books by Leon Battista Alberti (1404– 1572) as well as from other architectural treatises of the period and region, in particular those by Joseph Furttenbach (1591–1667) and Leonhard Christoph Sturm (1669–1719), who cites Nicolaus Goldmann (1611–1665). Then, we combine the architectural insights with an in-depth reading of two well-documented but not yet analysed court cases of nocturnal window smashing in the university town of Helmstedt involving Professor Johann Barthold Niemeyer (1644–1708) in the opposing roles of both victim and instigator. The combination of these court cases and architectural treatises allows us to show how experiences of intrusions via broken windows share qualities with today’s conceptualisation of intrusions of privacy and thus point to the presence of notions of privacy in early modern societies. Ljungberg, Johannes Verfasser (DE-588)1180320026 aut volume:11 number:1 year:2023 Architectural histories / European Architectural History Network, EAHN London, 2023 Band 11, Heft 1 (2023) (DE-604)BV041185030 2050-5833 (DE-600)2726365-4 text/html https://doi.org/10.16995/ah.9241 Verlag kostenfrei Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Körner, Natalie P. Ljungberg, Johannes Experiencing intrusion smashed windows as violations of privacy in the University Town of Helmstedt, 1684–1706 |
| title | Experiencing intrusion smashed windows as violations of privacy in the University Town of Helmstedt, 1684–1706 |
| title_auth | Experiencing intrusion smashed windows as violations of privacy in the University Town of Helmstedt, 1684–1706 |
| title_exact_search | Experiencing intrusion smashed windows as violations of privacy in the University Town of Helmstedt, 1684–1706 |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Experiencing intrusion smashed windows as violations of privacy in the University Town of Helmstedt, 1684–1706 |
| title_full | Experiencing intrusion smashed windows as violations of privacy in the University Town of Helmstedt, 1684–1706 Natalie P. Körner (Royal Danish Academy for Architecture, Design and Conservation), Johannes Ljungberg (University of Copenhagen) |
| title_fullStr | Experiencing intrusion smashed windows as violations of privacy in the University Town of Helmstedt, 1684–1706 Natalie P. Körner (Royal Danish Academy for Architecture, Design and Conservation), Johannes Ljungberg (University of Copenhagen) |
| title_full_unstemmed | Experiencing intrusion smashed windows as violations of privacy in the University Town of Helmstedt, 1684–1706 Natalie P. Körner (Royal Danish Academy for Architecture, Design and Conservation), Johannes Ljungberg (University of Copenhagen) |
| title_short | Experiencing intrusion |
| title_sort | experiencing intrusion smashed windows as violations of privacy in the university town of helmstedt 1684 1706 |
| title_sub | smashed windows as violations of privacy in the University Town of Helmstedt, 1684–1706 |
| url | https://doi.org/10.16995/ah.9241 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kornernataliep experiencingintrusionsmashedwindowsasviolationsofprivacyintheuniversitytownofhelmstedt16841706 AT ljungbergjohannes experiencingintrusionsmashedwindowsasviolationsofprivacyintheuniversitytownofhelmstedt16841706 |