International investment law and the pandemic:
"At the dawn of the most serious and challenging global health emergency of contemporary times, the investment regime, with its Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) mechanism, was already facing its own 'crisis'. In 2019, the number of treaty terminations were exceeding the number...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Weitere Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Leiden ; Boston
Brill
[2025]
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Nijhoff international investment law series
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Zusammenfassung: | "At the dawn of the most serious and challenging global health emergency of contemporary times, the investment regime, with its Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) mechanism, was already facing its own 'crisis'. In 2019, the number of treaty terminations were exceeding the number of new treaties entering into force, with the Energy Charter Treaty experiencing a veritable exodus. The ISDS was undergoing a reform, which aimed to dismantle the system based on ad hoc arbitration in favour of a multilateral court. States began to enact laws to review FDI in strategic sectors, concerned that foreign investors could undermine national security. Some commentators argued that the investment regime, and ISDS in particular, was 'shrinking', or even 'dead'. Despite this, three years after the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) a public health emergency of international concern, the number of ISDS claims has continued to rise, even though only a few of them relate to measures taken by states during the pandemic. States have continued to negotiate a new generation of investment treaties, including provisions aimed at limiting the discretion of arbitral tribunals' and avoiding excessive restrictions on states' regulatory powers for health purposes. Overall, screening measures have not deterred FDI flows. However, it is undeniable that the pandemic may influence the changes already underway and may also question the capacity of the present system to respond to unexpected challenges. For instance, crucial issues include the screening of FDI in strategic sectors, states' room to maneuver in adopting public policy measures, and the conduct of arbitral proceedings, including the use of experts and scientific knowledge. In this regard, the book embraces two different but interrelated perspectives. Firstly, it questions current reforms, concerning both arbitral proceedings and investment treaties, in light of the needs exposed by the pandemic. It also aims to understand whether such needs influenced the screening mechanisms. Secondly, it investigates the resilience of the present regime focusing on the challenges posed by the pandemic. Indeed, it is submitted that, regardless of the ongoing reforms, the current regime may already feature legal tools that allow for appropriate reaction capacity. |
| Beschreibung: | XI, 271 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9789004711198 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a22000008c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV050126523 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20250128 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 250117s2025 xx |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9789004711198 |c hbk |9 978-90-04-71119-8 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV050126523 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a International investment law and the pandemic |c edited by Antonino Alì, Sondra Faccio, and Marco Pertile |
| 264 | 1 | |a Leiden ; Boston |b Brill |c [2025] | |
| 264 | 4 | |c © 2025 | |
| 300 | |a XI, 271 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Nijhoff international investment law series | |
| 520 | 3 | |a "At the dawn of the most serious and challenging global health emergency of contemporary times, the investment regime, with its Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) mechanism, was already facing its own 'crisis'. In 2019, the number of treaty terminations were exceeding the number of new treaties entering into force, with the Energy Charter Treaty experiencing a veritable exodus. The ISDS was undergoing a reform, which aimed to dismantle the system based on ad hoc arbitration in favour of a multilateral court. States began to enact laws to review FDI in strategic sectors, concerned that foreign investors could undermine national security. Some commentators argued that the investment regime, and ISDS in particular, was 'shrinking', or even 'dead'. | |
| 520 | 3 | |a Despite this, three years after the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) a public health emergency of international concern, the number of ISDS claims has continued to rise, even though only a few of them relate to measures taken by states during the pandemic. States have continued to negotiate a new generation of investment treaties, including provisions aimed at limiting the discretion of arbitral tribunals' and avoiding excessive restrictions on states' regulatory powers for health purposes. Overall, screening measures have not deterred FDI flows. However, it is undeniable that the pandemic may influence the changes already underway and may also question the capacity of the present system to respond to unexpected challenges. | |
| 520 | 3 | |a For instance, crucial issues include the screening of FDI in strategic sectors, states' room to maneuver in adopting public policy measures, and the conduct of arbitral proceedings, including the use of experts and scientific knowledge. In this regard, the book embraces two different but interrelated perspectives. Firstly, it questions current reforms, concerning both arbitral proceedings and investment treaties, in light of the needs exposed by the pandemic. It also aims to understand whether such needs influenced the screening mechanisms. Secondly, it investigates the resilience of the present regime focusing on the challenges posed by the pandemic. Indeed, it is submitted that, regardless of the ongoing reforms, the current regime may already feature legal tools that allow for appropriate reaction capacity. | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Pandemie |0 (DE-588)4737034-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a COVID-19 |0 (DE-588)1206347392 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Investor-Staat-Streitbeilegung |0 (DE-588)1353330990 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 653 | 0 | |a Investments, Foreign (International law) | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Investments, Foreign / Law and legislation | |
| 653 | 0 | |a COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020- | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Investissements étrangers (Droit international) | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Pandémie de COVID-19, 2020- | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a COVID-19 |0 (DE-588)1206347392 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Pandemie |0 (DE-588)4737034-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Investor-Staat-Streitbeilegung |0 (DE-588)1353330990 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Alì, Antonino |0 (DE-588)143082698 |4 edt |4 win |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Faccio, Sondra |d 1982- |0 (DE-588)1171998961 |4 edt |4 win |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pertile, Marco |0 (DE-588)1250212731 |4 edt |4 win | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |z 978-90-04-71120-4 |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_NED_20250128 | |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 090513 |g 181 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 610.9 |e 22/bsb |f 090513 |g 181 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 330.09 |e 22/bsb |f 090513 |g 181 |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035463313 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1822497758936825856 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Alì, Antonino Faccio, Sondra 1982- |
| author2 | Alì, Antonino Faccio, Sondra 1982- Pertile, Marco |
| author2_role | edt edt edt |
| author2_variant | a a aa s f sf m p mp |
| author_GND | (DE-588)143082698 (DE-588)1171998961 (DE-588)1250212731 |
| author_facet | Alì, Antonino Faccio, Sondra 1982- Alì, Antonino Faccio, Sondra 1982- Pertile, Marco |
| author_role | aut aut |
| author_sort | Alì, Antonino |
| author_variant | a a aa s f sf |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV050126523 |
| ctrlnum | (DE-599)BVBBV050126523 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a22000008c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV050126523</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20250128</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">250117s2025 xx |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789004711198</subfield><subfield code="c">hbk</subfield><subfield code="9">978-90-04-71119-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV050126523</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">International investment law and the pandemic</subfield><subfield code="c">edited by Antonino Alì, Sondra Faccio, and Marco Pertile</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Leiden ; Boston</subfield><subfield code="b">Brill</subfield><subfield code="c">[2025]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XI, 271 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nijhoff international investment law series</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"At the dawn of the most serious and challenging global health emergency of contemporary times, the investment regime, with its Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) mechanism, was already facing its own 'crisis'. In 2019, the number of treaty terminations were exceeding the number of new treaties entering into force, with the Energy Charter Treaty experiencing a veritable exodus. The ISDS was undergoing a reform, which aimed to dismantle the system based on ad hoc arbitration in favour of a multilateral court. States began to enact laws to review FDI in strategic sectors, concerned that foreign investors could undermine national security. Some commentators argued that the investment regime, and ISDS in particular, was 'shrinking', or even 'dead'.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Despite this, three years after the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) a public health emergency of international concern, the number of ISDS claims has continued to rise, even though only a few of them relate to measures taken by states during the pandemic. States have continued to negotiate a new generation of investment treaties, including provisions aimed at limiting the discretion of arbitral tribunals' and avoiding excessive restrictions on states' regulatory powers for health purposes. Overall, screening measures have not deterred FDI flows. However, it is undeniable that the pandemic may influence the changes already underway and may also question the capacity of the present system to respond to unexpected challenges.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">For instance, crucial issues include the screening of FDI in strategic sectors, states' room to maneuver in adopting public policy measures, and the conduct of arbitral proceedings, including the use of experts and scientific knowledge. In this regard, the book embraces two different but interrelated perspectives. Firstly, it questions current reforms, concerning both arbitral proceedings and investment treaties, in light of the needs exposed by the pandemic. It also aims to understand whether such needs influenced the screening mechanisms. Secondly, it investigates the resilience of the present regime focusing on the challenges posed by the pandemic. Indeed, it is submitted that, regardless of the ongoing reforms, the current regime may already feature legal tools that allow for appropriate reaction capacity.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Pandemie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4737034-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">COVID-19</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1206347392</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Investor-Staat-Streitbeilegung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1353330990</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Investments, Foreign (International law)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Investments, Foreign / Law and legislation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Investissements étrangers (Droit international)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Pandémie de COVID-19, 2020-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">COVID-19</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1206347392</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Pandemie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4737034-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Investor-Staat-Streitbeilegung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1353330990</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alì, Antonino</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)143082698</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield><subfield code="4">win</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Faccio, Sondra</subfield><subfield code="d">1982-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1171998961</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield><subfield code="4">win</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pertile, Marco</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1250212731</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield><subfield code="4">win</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-90-04-71120-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_NED_20250128</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090513</subfield><subfield code="g">181</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">610.9</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090513</subfield><subfield code="g">181</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">330.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090513</subfield><subfield code="g">181</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035463313</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV050126523 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2025-01-28T13:01:44Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9789004711198 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035463313 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | XI, 271 Seiten |
| psigel | BSB_NED_20250128 |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publishDateSearch | 2025 |
| publishDateSort | 2025 |
| publisher | Brill |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Nijhoff international investment law series |
| spelling | International investment law and the pandemic edited by Antonino Alì, Sondra Faccio, and Marco Pertile Leiden ; Boston Brill [2025] © 2025 XI, 271 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Nijhoff international investment law series "At the dawn of the most serious and challenging global health emergency of contemporary times, the investment regime, with its Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) mechanism, was already facing its own 'crisis'. In 2019, the number of treaty terminations were exceeding the number of new treaties entering into force, with the Energy Charter Treaty experiencing a veritable exodus. The ISDS was undergoing a reform, which aimed to dismantle the system based on ad hoc arbitration in favour of a multilateral court. States began to enact laws to review FDI in strategic sectors, concerned that foreign investors could undermine national security. Some commentators argued that the investment regime, and ISDS in particular, was 'shrinking', or even 'dead'. Despite this, three years after the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) a public health emergency of international concern, the number of ISDS claims has continued to rise, even though only a few of them relate to measures taken by states during the pandemic. States have continued to negotiate a new generation of investment treaties, including provisions aimed at limiting the discretion of arbitral tribunals' and avoiding excessive restrictions on states' regulatory powers for health purposes. Overall, screening measures have not deterred FDI flows. However, it is undeniable that the pandemic may influence the changes already underway and may also question the capacity of the present system to respond to unexpected challenges. For instance, crucial issues include the screening of FDI in strategic sectors, states' room to maneuver in adopting public policy measures, and the conduct of arbitral proceedings, including the use of experts and scientific knowledge. In this regard, the book embraces two different but interrelated perspectives. Firstly, it questions current reforms, concerning both arbitral proceedings and investment treaties, in light of the needs exposed by the pandemic. It also aims to understand whether such needs influenced the screening mechanisms. Secondly, it investigates the resilience of the present regime focusing on the challenges posed by the pandemic. Indeed, it is submitted that, regardless of the ongoing reforms, the current regime may already feature legal tools that allow for appropriate reaction capacity. Pandemie (DE-588)4737034-8 gnd rswk-swf COVID-19 (DE-588)1206347392 gnd rswk-swf Investor-Staat-Streitbeilegung (DE-588)1353330990 gnd rswk-swf Investments, Foreign (International law) Investments, Foreign / Law and legislation COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020- Investissements étrangers (Droit international) Pandémie de COVID-19, 2020- COVID-19 (DE-588)1206347392 s Pandemie (DE-588)4737034-8 s Investor-Staat-Streitbeilegung (DE-588)1353330990 s DE-604 Alì, Antonino (DE-588)143082698 edt win aut Faccio, Sondra 1982- (DE-588)1171998961 edt win aut Pertile, Marco (DE-588)1250212731 edt win Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe 978-90-04-71120-4 |
| spellingShingle | Alì, Antonino Faccio, Sondra 1982- International investment law and the pandemic Pandemie (DE-588)4737034-8 gnd COVID-19 (DE-588)1206347392 gnd Investor-Staat-Streitbeilegung (DE-588)1353330990 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4737034-8 (DE-588)1206347392 (DE-588)1353330990 |
| title | International investment law and the pandemic |
| title_auth | International investment law and the pandemic |
| title_exact_search | International investment law and the pandemic |
| title_full | International investment law and the pandemic edited by Antonino Alì, Sondra Faccio, and Marco Pertile |
| title_fullStr | International investment law and the pandemic edited by Antonino Alì, Sondra Faccio, and Marco Pertile |
| title_full_unstemmed | International investment law and the pandemic edited by Antonino Alì, Sondra Faccio, and Marco Pertile |
| title_short | International investment law and the pandemic |
| title_sort | international investment law and the pandemic |
| topic | Pandemie (DE-588)4737034-8 gnd COVID-19 (DE-588)1206347392 gnd Investor-Staat-Streitbeilegung (DE-588)1353330990 gnd |
| topic_facet | Pandemie COVID-19 Investor-Staat-Streitbeilegung |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT aliantonino internationalinvestmentlawandthepandemic AT facciosondra internationalinvestmentlawandthepandemic AT pertilemarco internationalinvestmentlawandthepandemic |