The Queen's three bodies: representations of female sovereignty in early modern women's writing, 1588-1688
Sovereignty, a mechanism of power around which a state is organized, has emerged as a way to understand the twenty-first-century biopolitical moment. Thinkers including Michel Foucault, Michael Hardt, Antonio Negri, and Roberto Esposito find sovereignty essential to understanding modern regimes of b...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Abschlussarbeit Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
[Albany, NY]
University of Albany, College of Arts and Sciences
2015
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | Sovereignty, a mechanism of power around which a state is organized, has emerged as a way to understand the twenty-first-century biopolitical moment. Thinkers including Michel Foucault, Michael Hardt, Antonio Negri, and Roberto Esposito find sovereignty essential to understanding modern regimes of bodily domination and control. These thinkers look back to early modern England as an originary moment when older theories of sovereign power became attached to emerging modern political systems. Despite the sophistication of these arguments, however, no recent biopolitical theory accounts for the situation of women in historical or current system of power, nor do they discuss the role gender has played in the development of sovereignty. My project addresses this ideological and historical gap by examining how sovereignty was being discussed, challenged, and appropriated by literary figures from 1588-1688. In the years leading up to and spanning the Interregnum, sovereignty splintered and became available to formerly disenfranchised individuals, especially women writers. Such women not only appropriated and challenged traditional sovereignty in their texts, but also influenced contemporary and future understandings of power, politics, and gender. Each of my four chapters serves as a test cases of a woman writer engaging with and transforming sovereignty. I first examine Elizabeth Cary’s closet drama The Tragedy of Mariam, Faire Queen of Jewry (1612); I then move on to Mary Wroth’s epic romance The Countess of Montgomery’s Urania, Part 1 (1621) and Part 2 (completed and circulated in manuscript 1629). In the third chapter, I examine Katherine Philips’ Poems, circulated in manuscript during the Interregnum, and published posthumously in 1667; my final chapter then moves to Margaret Cavendish’s utopian fiction and work of natural philosophy, The Blazing World. |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (viii, 349 pages) illustrations |
ISBN: | 9781339289304 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV047077368 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20221124 | ||
006 | a m||| 00||| | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 210105s2015 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
020 | |a 9781339289304 |9 978-1-339-28930-4 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1237597667 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047077368 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-B220 |a DE-384 |a DE-473 |a DE-703 |a DE-1051 |a DE-824 |a DE-29 |a DE-12 |a DE-91 |a DE-19 |a DE-1049 |a DE-92 |a DE-739 |a DE-898 |a DE-355 |a DE-706 |a DE-20 |a DE-1102 |a DE-860 |a DE-2174 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Casey-Williams, Erin V. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a The Queen's three bodies |b representations of female sovereignty in early modern women's writing, 1588-1688 |c by Erin V. Casey-Williams |
264 | 1 | |a [Albany, NY] |b University of Albany, College of Arts and Sciences |c 2015 | |
264 | 0 | |a Ann Arbor, MI |b ProQuest, UMI Dissertations Publishing |c 2015 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (viii, 349 pages) |b illustrations | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
502 | |b Dissertation |c University of Albany, College of Arts and Sciences, Dept. of English |d 2015 | ||
520 | 3 | |a Sovereignty, a mechanism of power around which a state is organized, has emerged as a way to understand the twenty-first-century biopolitical moment. Thinkers including Michel Foucault, Michael Hardt, Antonio Negri, and Roberto Esposito find sovereignty essential to understanding modern regimes of bodily domination and control. These thinkers look back to early modern England as an originary moment when older theories of sovereign power became attached to emerging modern political systems. Despite the sophistication of these arguments, however, no recent biopolitical theory accounts for the situation of women in historical or current system of power, nor do they discuss the role gender has played in the development of sovereignty. My project addresses this ideological and historical gap by examining how sovereignty was being discussed, challenged, and appropriated by literary figures from 1588-1688. In the years leading up to and spanning the Interregnum, sovereignty splintered and became available to formerly disenfranchised individuals, especially women writers. Such women not only appropriated and challenged traditional sovereignty in their texts, but also influenced contemporary and future understandings of power, politics, and gender. Each of my four chapters serves as a test cases of a woman writer engaging with and transforming sovereignty. I first examine Elizabeth Cary’s closet drama The Tragedy of Mariam, Faire Queen of Jewry (1612); I then move on to Mary Wroth’s epic romance The Countess of Montgomery’s Urania, Part 1 (1621) and Part 2 (completed and circulated in manuscript 1629). In the third chapter, I examine Katherine Philips’ Poems, circulated in manuscript during the Interregnum, and published posthumously in 1667; my final chapter then moves to Margaret Cavendish’s utopian fiction and work of natural philosophy, The Blazing World. | |
655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/1747438221 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ebook | ||
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032484284 | ||
347 | |a text file |b PDF |c 1.97 MB |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804182085002330112 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Casey-Williams, Erin V. |
author_facet | Casey-Williams, Erin V. |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Casey-Williams, Erin V. |
author_variant | e v c w evc evcw |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV047077368 |
collection | ebook |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1237597667 (DE-599)BVBBV047077368 |
format | Thesis Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03354nmm a2200349 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047077368</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20221124 </controlfield><controlfield tag="006">a m||| 00||| </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210105s2015 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781339289304</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-339-28930-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1237597667</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047077368</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-B220</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1051</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1049</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-92</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-898</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-706</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1102</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-860</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-2174</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Casey-Williams, Erin V.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The Queen's three bodies</subfield><subfield code="b">representations of female sovereignty in early modern women's writing, 1588-1688</subfield><subfield code="c">by Erin V. Casey-Williams</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">[Albany, NY]</subfield><subfield code="b">University of Albany, College of Arts and Sciences</subfield><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ann Arbor, MI</subfield><subfield code="b">ProQuest, UMI Dissertations Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (viii, 349 pages)</subfield><subfield code="b">illustrations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">Dissertation</subfield><subfield code="c">University of Albany, College of Arts and Sciences, Dept. of English</subfield><subfield code="d">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sovereignty, a mechanism of power around which a state is organized, has emerged as a way to understand the twenty-first-century biopolitical moment. Thinkers including Michel Foucault, Michael Hardt, Antonio Negri, and Roberto Esposito find sovereignty essential to understanding modern regimes of bodily domination and control. These thinkers look back to early modern England as an originary moment when older theories of sovereign power became attached to emerging modern political systems. Despite the sophistication of these arguments, however, no recent biopolitical theory accounts for the situation of women in historical or current system of power, nor do they discuss the role gender has played in the development of sovereignty. My project addresses this ideological and historical gap by examining how sovereignty was being discussed, challenged, and appropriated by literary figures from 1588-1688. In the years leading up to and spanning the Interregnum, sovereignty splintered and became available to formerly disenfranchised individuals, especially women writers. Such women not only appropriated and challenged traditional sovereignty in their texts, but also influenced contemporary and future understandings of power, politics, and gender. Each of my four chapters serves as a test cases of a woman writer engaging with and transforming sovereignty. I first examine Elizabeth Cary’s closet drama The Tragedy of Mariam, Faire Queen of Jewry (1612); I then move on to Mary Wroth’s epic romance The Countess of Montgomery’s Urania, Part 1 (1621) and Part 2 (completed and circulated in manuscript 1629). In the third chapter, I examine Katherine Philips’ Poems, circulated in manuscript during the Interregnum, and published posthumously in 1667; my final chapter then moves to Margaret Cavendish’s utopian fiction and work of natural philosophy, The Blazing World.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.proquest.com/docview/1747438221</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ebook</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032484284</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="347" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text file</subfield><subfield code="b">PDF</subfield><subfield code="c">1.97 MB</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
genre | (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content |
genre_facet | Hochschulschrift |
id | DE-604.BV047077368 |
illustrated | Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T16:15:13Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:01:56Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9781339289304 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032484284 |
oclc_num | 1237597667 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-B220 DE-384 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-703 DE-1051 DE-824 DE-29 DE-12 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-1049 DE-92 DE-739 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-706 DE-20 DE-1102 DE-860 DE-2174 |
owner_facet | DE-B220 DE-384 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-703 DE-1051 DE-824 DE-29 DE-12 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-1049 DE-92 DE-739 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-706 DE-20 DE-1102 DE-860 DE-2174 |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (viii, 349 pages) illustrations |
psigel | ebook |
publishDate | 2015 |
publishDateSearch | 2015 |
publishDateSort | 2015 |
publisher | University of Albany, College of Arts and Sciences |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Casey-Williams, Erin V. Verfasser aut The Queen's three bodies representations of female sovereignty in early modern women's writing, 1588-1688 by Erin V. Casey-Williams [Albany, NY] University of Albany, College of Arts and Sciences 2015 Ann Arbor, MI ProQuest, UMI Dissertations Publishing 2015 1 Online-Ressource (viii, 349 pages) illustrations txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Dissertation University of Albany, College of Arts and Sciences, Dept. of English 2015 Sovereignty, a mechanism of power around which a state is organized, has emerged as a way to understand the twenty-first-century biopolitical moment. Thinkers including Michel Foucault, Michael Hardt, Antonio Negri, and Roberto Esposito find sovereignty essential to understanding modern regimes of bodily domination and control. These thinkers look back to early modern England as an originary moment when older theories of sovereign power became attached to emerging modern political systems. Despite the sophistication of these arguments, however, no recent biopolitical theory accounts for the situation of women in historical or current system of power, nor do they discuss the role gender has played in the development of sovereignty. My project addresses this ideological and historical gap by examining how sovereignty was being discussed, challenged, and appropriated by literary figures from 1588-1688. In the years leading up to and spanning the Interregnum, sovereignty splintered and became available to formerly disenfranchised individuals, especially women writers. Such women not only appropriated and challenged traditional sovereignty in their texts, but also influenced contemporary and future understandings of power, politics, and gender. Each of my four chapters serves as a test cases of a woman writer engaging with and transforming sovereignty. I first examine Elizabeth Cary’s closet drama The Tragedy of Mariam, Faire Queen of Jewry (1612); I then move on to Mary Wroth’s epic romance The Countess of Montgomery’s Urania, Part 1 (1621) and Part 2 (completed and circulated in manuscript 1629). In the third chapter, I examine Katherine Philips’ Poems, circulated in manuscript during the Interregnum, and published posthumously in 1667; my final chapter then moves to Margaret Cavendish’s utopian fiction and work of natural philosophy, The Blazing World. (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content https://www.proquest.com/docview/1747438221 Volltext text file PDF 1.97 MB |
spellingShingle | Casey-Williams, Erin V. The Queen's three bodies representations of female sovereignty in early modern women's writing, 1588-1688 |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4113937-9 |
title | The Queen's three bodies representations of female sovereignty in early modern women's writing, 1588-1688 |
title_auth | The Queen's three bodies representations of female sovereignty in early modern women's writing, 1588-1688 |
title_exact_search | The Queen's three bodies representations of female sovereignty in early modern women's writing, 1588-1688 |
title_exact_search_txtP | The Queen's three bodies representations of female sovereignty in early modern women's writing, 1588-1688 |
title_full | The Queen's three bodies representations of female sovereignty in early modern women's writing, 1588-1688 by Erin V. Casey-Williams |
title_fullStr | The Queen's three bodies representations of female sovereignty in early modern women's writing, 1588-1688 by Erin V. Casey-Williams |
title_full_unstemmed | The Queen's three bodies representations of female sovereignty in early modern women's writing, 1588-1688 by Erin V. Casey-Williams |
title_short | The Queen's three bodies |
title_sort | the queen s three bodies representations of female sovereignty in early modern women s writing 1588 1688 |
title_sub | representations of female sovereignty in early modern women's writing, 1588-1688 |
topic_facet | Hochschulschrift |
url | https://www.proquest.com/docview/1747438221 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caseywilliamserinv thequeensthreebodiesrepresentationsoffemalesovereigntyinearlymodernwomenswriting15881688 |