The freedom of faith-based organizations to staff on a religious basis:
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Washington, DC
Center for Public Justice
[2004]
Wynnewood, PA Distributed by Evangelicals for Social Action © 2004 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Beschreibung: | 171 Seiten 23 cm |
| ISBN: | 9780936456041 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV049605237 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 240311s2004 b||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780936456041 |9 978-0-936456-04-1 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1427321208 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV049605237 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-188 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 340 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Esbeck, Carl H. |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1203069782 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The freedom of faith-based organizations to staff on a religious basis |c Carl H. Esbeck, Stanley W. Carlson-Thies, Ronald J. Sider |
| 264 | 1 | |a Washington, DC |b Center for Public Justice |c [2004] | |
| 264 | 1 | |a Wynnewood, PA |b Distributed by Evangelicals for Social Action |c © 2004 | |
| 300 | |a 171 Seiten |c 23 cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a 1. The faith-based initiative and the controversy over religious staffing -- The charge of violating the separation of church and state -- The charge of government-funded discrimination -- 2. Religious staffing: Legislation and the Constitution -- A. Religious staffing and the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 -- The constitutionality of the Section 702(a) freedom -- The relevance of religious staffing to the provision of social services -- B. Religious staffing where federal funds are involved -- Is 702(a) forfeited when a faith-based organization receives government funds? -- Doesn't acceptance of government funds turn faith-based providers into "public" social-service agencies? -- Isn't the religious staffing freedom a religious "preference" in violation of the establishment clause? -- Doesn't the Dodge case prove that religious staffing is illegal for government-funded faith-based providers? -- Don't taxpayers have a right not to be forced to support faith-based organizations they consider objectionable? -- Doesn't religious staffing open the floodgates to employment discrimination more generally? -- Pregnancy and discrimination on the basis of sex or religion -- Homosexuality and discrimination on the basis of religion | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 3. Religious staffing where a nondiscrimination clause is embedded in the federal program legislation -- Program-specific nondiscrimination clauses in federal legislations -- The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 -- 4. The religious staffing freedom where federal funds pass through state and local governments -- A. State and local "police power" legislation -- B. State and local procurement legislation -- Federal social-service funds subject to the safeguards of charitable choice -- Federal funds not subject to charitable choice safeguards | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 5. Religious staffing: The policy justifications -- A.A faith-based organization's decision to employ staff who share its religious beliefs is not an act of shameful intolerance but a laudable and positive act of freedom -- B. The ability to choose staff who share a religious organization's beliefs is essential to that organization's retention of its core identity -- C. The religious staffing freedom undergirds, rather than undermines, a diverse and pluralistic society -- D. Just because a private-sector organization, including one that is faith-based, accepts some federal funds, it does not cease to exist as a separate entity and become a mere arm of the government -- E. Permitting faith-based organizations that receive social-service grants the freedom to staff on a religious basis is the only way to avoid viewpoint discrimination by the government -- F. Prohibiting government funding for faith-based social-service providers that staff on a religious basis will hurt the poor and needy -- G. Because government is now asking religious groups to provide more social services, it should reciprocate by respecting the integrity of these organizations -- H. Religious charities that staff on a religious basis are not trying to foist their religion on others, but ask only that others not impose alien values on them -- I. Denying the freedom of faith-based organizations to hire staff on the basis of religion would require drastic and widespread changes in current practice | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 6. Recommendations and precautions -- A. For faith-based organizations -- B. For government officials -- Appendix 1: Selected resources -- Appendix 2: Key congressional and executive actions -- Appendix 3: Charitable choice provisions for the TANF program -- Appendix 4: Charitable choice regulations for the TANF program (excerpts) -- Appendix 5: Charitable choice regulations for SAMHSA programs (excerpts) -- Appendix 6: Executive order 13279, Equal protection of the laws -- Appendix 7: Department of Justice equal treatment regulations (excerpts) -- Appendix 8: White House policy statement on religious staffing -- Appendix 9: Ten affirmations on religious staffing | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Discrimination in employment / Law and legislation / United States | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Religious institutions / Government policy / United States | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Church and state / United States | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Église et État / États-Unis | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Church and state | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Discrimination in employment / Law and legislation | |
| 653 | 2 | |a United States / https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Carlson-Thies, Stanley W. |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1323084576 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sider, Ronald J. |d 1939- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)174074816 |4 aut | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034949581 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804186487903748096 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Esbeck, Carl H. Carlson-Thies, Stanley W. Sider, Ronald J. 1939- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1203069782 (DE-588)1323084576 (DE-588)174074816 |
| author_facet | Esbeck, Carl H. Carlson-Thies, Stanley W. Sider, Ronald J. 1939- |
| author_role | aut aut aut |
| author_sort | Esbeck, Carl H. |
| author_variant | c h e ch che s w c t swc swct r j s rj rjs |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV049605237 |
| contents | 1. The faith-based initiative and the controversy over religious staffing -- The charge of violating the separation of church and state -- The charge of government-funded discrimination -- 2. Religious staffing: Legislation and the Constitution -- A. Religious staffing and the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 -- The constitutionality of the Section 702(a) freedom -- The relevance of religious staffing to the provision of social services -- B. Religious staffing where federal funds are involved -- Is 702(a) forfeited when a faith-based organization receives government funds? -- Doesn't acceptance of government funds turn faith-based providers into "public" social-service agencies? -- Isn't the religious staffing freedom a religious "preference" in violation of the establishment clause? -- Doesn't the Dodge case prove that religious staffing is illegal for government-funded faith-based providers? -- Don't taxpayers have a right not to be forced to support faith-based organizations they consider objectionable? -- Doesn't religious staffing open the floodgates to employment discrimination more generally? -- Pregnancy and discrimination on the basis of sex or religion -- Homosexuality and discrimination on the basis of religion 3. Religious staffing where a nondiscrimination clause is embedded in the federal program legislation -- Program-specific nondiscrimination clauses in federal legislations -- The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 -- 4. The religious staffing freedom where federal funds pass through state and local governments -- A. State and local "police power" legislation -- B. State and local procurement legislation -- Federal social-service funds subject to the safeguards of charitable choice -- Federal funds not subject to charitable choice safeguards 5. Religious staffing: The policy justifications -- A.A faith-based organization's decision to employ staff who share its religious beliefs is not an act of shameful intolerance but a laudable and positive act of freedom -- B. The ability to choose staff who share a religious organization's beliefs is essential to that organization's retention of its core identity -- C. The religious staffing freedom undergirds, rather than undermines, a diverse and pluralistic society -- D. Just because a private-sector organization, including one that is faith-based, accepts some federal funds, it does not cease to exist as a separate entity and become a mere arm of the government -- E. Permitting faith-based organizations that receive social-service grants the freedom to staff on a religious basis is the only way to avoid viewpoint discrimination by the government -- F. Prohibiting government funding for faith-based social-service providers that staff on a religious basis will hurt the poor and needy -- G. Because government is now asking religious groups to provide more social services, it should reciprocate by respecting the integrity of these organizations -- H. Religious charities that staff on a religious basis are not trying to foist their religion on others, but ask only that others not impose alien values on them -- I. Denying the freedom of faith-based organizations to hire staff on the basis of religion would require drastic and widespread changes in current practice 6. Recommendations and precautions -- A. For faith-based organizations -- B. For government officials -- Appendix 1: Selected resources -- Appendix 2: Key congressional and executive actions -- Appendix 3: Charitable choice provisions for the TANF program -- Appendix 4: Charitable choice regulations for the TANF program (excerpts) -- Appendix 5: Charitable choice regulations for SAMHSA programs (excerpts) -- Appendix 6: Executive order 13279, Equal protection of the laws -- Appendix 7: Department of Justice equal treatment regulations (excerpts) -- Appendix 8: White House policy statement on religious staffing -- Appendix 9: Ten affirmations on religious staffing |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1427321208 (DE-599)BVBBV049605237 |
| dewey-full | 340 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 340 - Law |
| dewey-raw | 340 |
| dewey-search | 340 |
| dewey-sort | 3340 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>05554nam a2200433 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049605237</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240311s2004 b||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780936456041</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-936456-04-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1427321208</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV049605237</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">340</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Esbeck, Carl H.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1203069782</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The freedom of faith-based organizations to staff on a religious basis</subfield><subfield code="c">Carl H. Esbeck, Stanley W. Carlson-Thies, Ronald J. Sider</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Washington, DC</subfield><subfield code="b">Center for Public Justice</subfield><subfield code="c">[2004]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Wynnewood, PA</subfield><subfield code="b">Distributed by Evangelicals for Social Action</subfield><subfield code="c">© 2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">171 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="c">23 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1. The faith-based initiative and the controversy over religious staffing -- The charge of violating the separation of church and state -- The charge of government-funded discrimination -- 2. Religious staffing: Legislation and the Constitution -- A. Religious staffing and the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 -- The constitutionality of the Section 702(a) freedom -- The relevance of religious staffing to the provision of social services -- B. Religious staffing where federal funds are involved -- Is 702(a) forfeited when a faith-based organization receives government funds? -- Doesn't acceptance of government funds turn faith-based providers into "public" social-service agencies? -- Isn't the religious staffing freedom a religious "preference" in violation of the establishment clause? -- Doesn't the Dodge case prove that religious staffing is illegal for government-funded faith-based providers? -- Don't taxpayers have a right not to be forced to support faith-based organizations they consider objectionable? -- Doesn't religious staffing open the floodgates to employment discrimination more generally? -- Pregnancy and discrimination on the basis of sex or religion -- Homosexuality and discrimination on the basis of religion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3. Religious staffing where a nondiscrimination clause is embedded in the federal program legislation -- Program-specific nondiscrimination clauses in federal legislations -- The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 -- 4. The religious staffing freedom where federal funds pass through state and local governments -- A. State and local "police power" legislation -- B. State and local procurement legislation -- Federal social-service funds subject to the safeguards of charitable choice -- Federal funds not subject to charitable choice safeguards</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5. Religious staffing: The policy justifications -- A.A faith-based organization's decision to employ staff who share its religious beliefs is not an act of shameful intolerance but a laudable and positive act of freedom -- B. The ability to choose staff who share a religious organization's beliefs is essential to that organization's retention of its core identity -- C. The religious staffing freedom undergirds, rather than undermines, a diverse and pluralistic society -- D. Just because a private-sector organization, including one that is faith-based, accepts some federal funds, it does not cease to exist as a separate entity and become a mere arm of the government -- E. Permitting faith-based organizations that receive social-service grants the freedom to staff on a religious basis is the only way to avoid viewpoint discrimination by the government -- F. Prohibiting government funding for faith-based social-service providers that staff on a religious basis will hurt the poor and needy -- G. Because government is now asking religious groups to provide more social services, it should reciprocate by respecting the integrity of these organizations -- H. Religious charities that staff on a religious basis are not trying to foist their religion on others, but ask only that others not impose alien values on them -- I. Denying the freedom of faith-based organizations to hire staff on the basis of religion would require drastic and widespread changes in current practice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">6. Recommendations and precautions -- A. For faith-based organizations -- B. For government officials -- Appendix 1: Selected resources -- Appendix 2: Key congressional and executive actions -- Appendix 3: Charitable choice provisions for the TANF program -- Appendix 4: Charitable choice regulations for the TANF program (excerpts) -- Appendix 5: Charitable choice regulations for SAMHSA programs (excerpts) -- Appendix 6: Executive order 13279, Equal protection of the laws -- Appendix 7: Department of Justice equal treatment regulations (excerpts) -- Appendix 8: White House policy statement on religious staffing -- Appendix 9: Ten affirmations on religious staffing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Discrimination in employment / Law and legislation / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Religious institutions / Government policy / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Church and state / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Église et État / États-Unis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Church and state</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Discrimination in employment / Law and legislation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">United States / https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Carlson-Thies, Stanley W.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1323084576</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sider, Ronald J.</subfield><subfield code="d">1939-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)174074816</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034949581</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV049605237 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T23:35:18Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T10:11:55Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780936456041 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034949581 |
| oclc_num | 1427321208 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-188 |
| owner_facet | DE-188 |
| physical | 171 Seiten 23 cm |
| publishDate | 2004 |
| publishDateSearch | 2004 |
| publishDateSort | 2004 |
| publisher | Center for Public Justice Distributed by Evangelicals for Social Action |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Esbeck, Carl H. Verfasser (DE-588)1203069782 aut The freedom of faith-based organizations to staff on a religious basis Carl H. Esbeck, Stanley W. Carlson-Thies, Ronald J. Sider Washington, DC Center for Public Justice [2004] Wynnewood, PA Distributed by Evangelicals for Social Action © 2004 171 Seiten 23 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier 1. The faith-based initiative and the controversy over religious staffing -- The charge of violating the separation of church and state -- The charge of government-funded discrimination -- 2. Religious staffing: Legislation and the Constitution -- A. Religious staffing and the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 -- The constitutionality of the Section 702(a) freedom -- The relevance of religious staffing to the provision of social services -- B. Religious staffing where federal funds are involved -- Is 702(a) forfeited when a faith-based organization receives government funds? -- Doesn't acceptance of government funds turn faith-based providers into "public" social-service agencies? -- Isn't the religious staffing freedom a religious "preference" in violation of the establishment clause? -- Doesn't the Dodge case prove that religious staffing is illegal for government-funded faith-based providers? -- Don't taxpayers have a right not to be forced to support faith-based organizations they consider objectionable? -- Doesn't religious staffing open the floodgates to employment discrimination more generally? -- Pregnancy and discrimination on the basis of sex or religion -- Homosexuality and discrimination on the basis of religion 3. Religious staffing where a nondiscrimination clause is embedded in the federal program legislation -- Program-specific nondiscrimination clauses in federal legislations -- The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 -- 4. The religious staffing freedom where federal funds pass through state and local governments -- A. State and local "police power" legislation -- B. State and local procurement legislation -- Federal social-service funds subject to the safeguards of charitable choice -- Federal funds not subject to charitable choice safeguards 5. Religious staffing: The policy justifications -- A.A faith-based organization's decision to employ staff who share its religious beliefs is not an act of shameful intolerance but a laudable and positive act of freedom -- B. The ability to choose staff who share a religious organization's beliefs is essential to that organization's retention of its core identity -- C. The religious staffing freedom undergirds, rather than undermines, a diverse and pluralistic society -- D. Just because a private-sector organization, including one that is faith-based, accepts some federal funds, it does not cease to exist as a separate entity and become a mere arm of the government -- E. Permitting faith-based organizations that receive social-service grants the freedom to staff on a religious basis is the only way to avoid viewpoint discrimination by the government -- F. Prohibiting government funding for faith-based social-service providers that staff on a religious basis will hurt the poor and needy -- G. Because government is now asking religious groups to provide more social services, it should reciprocate by respecting the integrity of these organizations -- H. Religious charities that staff on a religious basis are not trying to foist their religion on others, but ask only that others not impose alien values on them -- I. Denying the freedom of faith-based organizations to hire staff on the basis of religion would require drastic and widespread changes in current practice 6. Recommendations and precautions -- A. For faith-based organizations -- B. For government officials -- Appendix 1: Selected resources -- Appendix 2: Key congressional and executive actions -- Appendix 3: Charitable choice provisions for the TANF program -- Appendix 4: Charitable choice regulations for the TANF program (excerpts) -- Appendix 5: Charitable choice regulations for SAMHSA programs (excerpts) -- Appendix 6: Executive order 13279, Equal protection of the laws -- Appendix 7: Department of Justice equal treatment regulations (excerpts) -- Appendix 8: White House policy statement on religious staffing -- Appendix 9: Ten affirmations on religious staffing Discrimination in employment / Law and legislation / United States Religious institutions / Government policy / United States Church and state / United States Église et État / États-Unis Church and state Discrimination in employment / Law and legislation United States / https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq Carlson-Thies, Stanley W. Verfasser (DE-588)1323084576 aut Sider, Ronald J. 1939- Verfasser (DE-588)174074816 aut |
| spellingShingle | Esbeck, Carl H. Carlson-Thies, Stanley W. Sider, Ronald J. 1939- The freedom of faith-based organizations to staff on a religious basis 1. The faith-based initiative and the controversy over religious staffing -- The charge of violating the separation of church and state -- The charge of government-funded discrimination -- 2. Religious staffing: Legislation and the Constitution -- A. Religious staffing and the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 -- The constitutionality of the Section 702(a) freedom -- The relevance of religious staffing to the provision of social services -- B. Religious staffing where federal funds are involved -- Is 702(a) forfeited when a faith-based organization receives government funds? -- Doesn't acceptance of government funds turn faith-based providers into "public" social-service agencies? -- Isn't the religious staffing freedom a religious "preference" in violation of the establishment clause? -- Doesn't the Dodge case prove that religious staffing is illegal for government-funded faith-based providers? -- Don't taxpayers have a right not to be forced to support faith-based organizations they consider objectionable? -- Doesn't religious staffing open the floodgates to employment discrimination more generally? -- Pregnancy and discrimination on the basis of sex or religion -- Homosexuality and discrimination on the basis of religion 3. Religious staffing where a nondiscrimination clause is embedded in the federal program legislation -- Program-specific nondiscrimination clauses in federal legislations -- The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 -- 4. The religious staffing freedom where federal funds pass through state and local governments -- A. State and local "police power" legislation -- B. State and local procurement legislation -- Federal social-service funds subject to the safeguards of charitable choice -- Federal funds not subject to charitable choice safeguards 5. Religious staffing: The policy justifications -- A.A faith-based organization's decision to employ staff who share its religious beliefs is not an act of shameful intolerance but a laudable and positive act of freedom -- B. The ability to choose staff who share a religious organization's beliefs is essential to that organization's retention of its core identity -- C. The religious staffing freedom undergirds, rather than undermines, a diverse and pluralistic society -- D. Just because a private-sector organization, including one that is faith-based, accepts some federal funds, it does not cease to exist as a separate entity and become a mere arm of the government -- E. Permitting faith-based organizations that receive social-service grants the freedom to staff on a religious basis is the only way to avoid viewpoint discrimination by the government -- F. Prohibiting government funding for faith-based social-service providers that staff on a religious basis will hurt the poor and needy -- G. Because government is now asking religious groups to provide more social services, it should reciprocate by respecting the integrity of these organizations -- H. Religious charities that staff on a religious basis are not trying to foist their religion on others, but ask only that others not impose alien values on them -- I. Denying the freedom of faith-based organizations to hire staff on the basis of religion would require drastic and widespread changes in current practice 6. Recommendations and precautions -- A. For faith-based organizations -- B. For government officials -- Appendix 1: Selected resources -- Appendix 2: Key congressional and executive actions -- Appendix 3: Charitable choice provisions for the TANF program -- Appendix 4: Charitable choice regulations for the TANF program (excerpts) -- Appendix 5: Charitable choice regulations for SAMHSA programs (excerpts) -- Appendix 6: Executive order 13279, Equal protection of the laws -- Appendix 7: Department of Justice equal treatment regulations (excerpts) -- Appendix 8: White House policy statement on religious staffing -- Appendix 9: Ten affirmations on religious staffing |
| title | The freedom of faith-based organizations to staff on a religious basis |
| title_auth | The freedom of faith-based organizations to staff on a religious basis |
| title_exact_search | The freedom of faith-based organizations to staff on a religious basis |
| title_exact_search_txtP | The freedom of faith-based organizations to staff on a religious basis |
| title_full | The freedom of faith-based organizations to staff on a religious basis Carl H. Esbeck, Stanley W. Carlson-Thies, Ronald J. Sider |
| title_fullStr | The freedom of faith-based organizations to staff on a religious basis Carl H. Esbeck, Stanley W. Carlson-Thies, Ronald J. Sider |
| title_full_unstemmed | The freedom of faith-based organizations to staff on a religious basis Carl H. Esbeck, Stanley W. Carlson-Thies, Ronald J. Sider |
| title_short | The freedom of faith-based organizations to staff on a religious basis |
| title_sort | the freedom of faith based organizations to staff on a religious basis |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT esbeckcarlh thefreedomoffaithbasedorganizationstostaffonareligiousbasis AT carlsonthiesstanleyw thefreedomoffaithbasedorganizationstostaffonareligiousbasis AT siderronaldj thefreedomoffaithbasedorganizationstostaffonareligiousbasis |